The City of Los Angeles and The Los Angeles River

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Management Plan: An Overview
Advertisements

Ecological and Recreational Flows Workgroup Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study Next Steps Urban Water Institute August 14, 2014 San Diego,
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Presented to the Environment Committee November 9, 2010 Information Item Master Water.
Bill Orme, Senior Environmental Scientist, State Water Board Liz Haven, Asst. Deputy Director, Surface Water Regulatory Branch, State Water Board Dyan.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Capitol Hill Oceans Week Wetlands Restoration Panel June 8, 2005 JOHN H. DUNNIGAN Ecosystem Goal Lead Capitol Hill Oceans Week June 8, 2005.
Naples Bay Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Plan
L-THIA Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment Model ….provides relative estimates of change of runoff and non point source pollutants caused due to land.
California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program SWAMP Today Emilie L. Reyes November 29, 2007.
Problem Definition Exercise. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service General Summary Responses from ½ of those surveyed (n=14/31) Broad and narrow in scope Narrow.
Bay Area IRWMP Public Workshop #1 July 23, OBJECTIVES I BAIRWMP-Goals and Objectives II. DWR Guidance- “Measures” III Process IV. Proposed.
1 Recycled Water Program for the City of Los Angeles.
Marin County Watershed Stewardship Plan
Water Quality Associated with Urban Runoff: Sources, Emerging Issues and Management Approaches Martha Sutula and Eric Stein Biogeochemistry and Biology.
Puget Sound Initiative 2007 At A Glance Jay Manning, Director Washington Department of Ecology April 26,
Jan 2005 Kissimmee Basin Projects Jan Kissimmee Basin Projects Kissimmee River Restoration Project (KRR) Kissimmee Chain of Lakes Long Term Management.
SB 1070 Overview California Water Quality Monitoring Council –MOU CalEPA and Resources (Dec 2007) –Monitoring Inventory (April 2008) –Monitoring Recommendations.
1 A Regional Approach to Research/Monitoring in Southern California Chris Crompton County of Orange National Monitoring Conference May 10, 2006.
Regional Grant Funding Coordination for Implementation of Watershed Management Plans Project Clean Water Summit July 15, 2004 David W. Gibson SDRWQCB
EPA and Flood Risk – Programs and Perspectives Rob Wood Acting Deputy Office Director Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds U.S. Environmental Protection.
CoastalZone.com The Use of Ecological Risk Assessments in a Watershed Level Context Thorne E. Abbott CoastalZone.com.
Managing Western Water as Climate Changes Denver, CO February 20-21, 2008.
PP 4.1: IWRM Planning Framework. 2 Module Objective and Scope Participants acquire knowledge of the Principles of Good Basin Planning and can apply the.
Laguna Creek Watershed Council Development of the Laguna Creek Watershed Management Action Plan & It’s Relevance to the Elk Grove Drainage Master Planning.
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
Wetland Wetland San Francisco Bay & Delta San Francisco Bay & Delta Wetland Wetland Steven Ortiz Per.1.
Sierra Water Workgroup Water Summit Kings Beach, California June 11, 2013 Barry Hill, Hydrologist Pacific Southwest Region USDA Forest Service.
HYDROELECTRIC POWER AND FERC. HYDRO 101A ”Water Runs Down Hill”
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Cooperating Partners Presentation October 12, 2006 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan (IRWMP) B S Strategies and Objectives C ANTA ARBARA OUNTY.
January 27, 2011 Examples of Recovery Evaluation Objectives in the Western U.S. Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
A Pivotal Moment for Leaders Across the Gulf Coast States and Connected Communities Throughout the Country.
“The minimum flow for a given watercourse shall be the limit at which further withdrawals would be significantly harmful to the water resources or ecology.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
September 23, 2010 Overview of DWR’s Flood Management Activities Related to the Delta A Briefing to the Delta Stewardship Council 1.
1 December 19, 2007 North-of-the-Delta Offstream Storage Project Overview State of California Department of Water Resources U.S. Department of the Interior.
Marin County Watershed Stewardship Program Marin County Department of Public Works.
Watershed Stewardship Program Status of Marin County Public Works Watershed Program 11/7/08 11/7/08.
Setting Goals for Stream “Health:” The Next Generation of Watershed Plans? The Waterlands Group San Francisco Estuary Institute Aquatic Science Center.
STRATEGIES FOR FRESHWATER. CONTEXT FOR STRATEGIES.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
Visual Decision Frameworks –Habitat GIT Adaptive Management based on annual review. Share progress and address challenges and opportunities Adjust management.
One Water LA is a collaborative approach to develop an integrated framework for managing the City’s watersheds, water resources, and water facilities in.
California Water Plan Old and New Steve Macaulay, Executive Director.
Noelle Patterson and Charlow Arzadon State Water Resources Control Board.
picture Renee Purdy, Environmental Program Manager Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board Renee Purdy, Environmental Program Manager Los Angeles.
Available Funding North/South Lahontan Colorado River Basin Sacramento River Mountain Counties Tulare/Kern San Diego Santa Ana Los Angeles Central Coast.
Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Management Planning Update Fall 2013.
Draft example: Indicators for water supply reliability and storage projects Presented by Steve Roberts (Department of Water Resources, Storage Investigations)
Watershed Monitoring *Background Watershed Stewardship Plan-2004 Gap Projects IRWMP-Dec Policies SFEI study-2007 Joint TC/WC meeting-June 2010 *Proposed.
Investing in Ocean Health Presentation to Ocean Protection Council (February 2016) Sara Aminzadeh, Executive Director, California Coastkeeper Alliance.
Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Report Information Presentation to YBFEPT July.
2035 General Plan Update Joint Study Session on Draft Conservation Element Planning Commission and Parks & Recreation Commission December 1, 2015.
Integrated Regional Water Management Grant Program Implemented Jointly by Department of Water Resources and State Water Resources Control Board.
Source: Stream Corridor Restoration Manual WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.
What is OneWater? “One Water is an integrated planning and implementation approach to managing finite water resources for long-term resiliency and reliability,
Assemblymember Adrin Nazarian
Puget Sound Watershed Characterization Project
Assessing the Los Angeles River Watershed
Liana Prudencio and Sarah E. Null
Regional Restoration Planning for the Delaware Estuary
York River Wild and Scenic Study
Los Angeles Greater IRWM:
Agriculture and Land Stewardship Planning
Anne Arundel County Maryland
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
Southern California Stormwater Monitoring Coalition
GCF business model.
Chino Basin Water Bank Development
Presentation transcript:

The City of Los Angeles and The Los Angeles River Urban Water Institute Spring Water Conference February 28, 2019 Evelyn Cortez-Davis, P.E., BCEE Assistant Director of Water Resources

History of the Los Angeles River EARLY HISTORY OF THE LA RIVER The Los Angeles River has since evolved into many looks/incarnations The River is the original source of life for the City of Los Angeles. Once plentiful with wetlands and marshes, filled with willows, alder, sycamore, steelhead trout, and grizzly bears, it was home to the Tongva people for thousands of years. In the 19th and 20th centuries, the River powered the City’s industry and served as an important transportation corridor, creating economic value and growth. A series of devastating floods caused the River to be channelized beginning in the 1930s-1940s Flood events 1914: $165 million in property damage; 1934: $75 million in damage and 49 deaths; 1938: $900 million in damage and 87 deaths The picture on the right shows the current state of the River, with most of the 51-miles channelized. Source: The Los Angeles River Revitalization Master Plan

The Los Angeles River Watershed 32-mile reach of the LA River within the City of Los Angeles LAR Watershed ~ 830 mi^2 The Los Angeles River begins in the west San Fernando Valley (Simi Hills), and ends at the Pacific Ocean 15 cities in the River Corridor 900,000+ people within 1 mile buffer of River 400,000 of which live within the City of LA 32 miles of the 51-mile river are located with the City’s boundaries. Source: The Los Angeles River Revitalization Master Plan

Los Angeles River Water Sources Tillman WRP Burbank WRP LA -Glendale WRP The City’s Water Reclamation Plants (WRP) are operated by LASAN

Diverse Interests for the Los Angeles River Water supply Recycled water projects 1211 petitions Stormwater runoff reductions Water rights allocations Beneficial uses Habitat restoration Recreational activities Community engagement www.larivermasterplan.org lariver.org

SWRCB Los Angeles River Flow Study River Beneficial Uses Local Water Supply Southern California Coastal Water Research Project

Los Angeles River Flow Study Project Goals Technical tools Relationship between flows and aquatic/non-aquatic beneficial uses Flow management scenarios Consensus on appropriate flow needs and optimal flow management scenarios Develop technical tools that quantify the relationship between various alternative flow regimes and the extent to which aquatic life and non-aquatic life beneficial uses are achieved. Evaluate various flow management scenarios in terms of their effect on uses in the LA River. Engage multiple affected parties to reach consensus about appropriate flow needs and optimal allocation of flow reduction allowances from multiple WRPs in consideration of other proposed flow management actions. Source: Establishing Environmental Flow for the Los Angeles River presentation by SCCWRP, SWRCB, Colorado School of Mines and Council for Watershed Health

Los Angeles River Flow Study Project Tasks Stakeholder Coordination Non-aquatic Life Use Assessment Aquatic Life Beneficial Use Assessment Apply Environmental Flows/Evaluate Scenarios Monitoring and Adaptive Management Plan Activity 1 Goal - Coordinate with stakeholders on technical approach and desired outcomes Activity 2 Goal – Identify key non-aquatic life uses and determine hydrologic needs for those uses Minimum depths and flow needs for fishing, bird watching, recreation, etc. Activity 3 Goal – Develop flow-ecology relationships for key aquatic species or habitats in the LA River Task 3A – Assess hydrologic baseline Task 3B – Identify and categorize ecological endpoints of management concern Task 3C – Determine flow-ecology relationships for stream endpoint Task 3D – Determine flow-ecology relationships for marsh and estuary habitats Activity 4 Goal – Evaluate effect of flow management/alteration on both aquatic life and non-aquatic life uses in the LA River Task 4A – Determine appropriate hydrologic tools and update modeling analysis Task 4B – Analyze tolerances of system to flow modification Task 4C – Analyze water use scenarios Task 4D – Evaluate stormwater capture scenarios Task 4E – Evaluate groundwater interactions Task 4F – Evaluate habitat management offsets for flow reductions Task 4G – Evaluate effects of flow alteration on tidal portions of the river Task 4H – Establish recommended flow targets w/stakeholder coordination Activity 5 Goal – Develop a recommended monitoring strategy with potential triggers for adaptive management Permanent flow monitoring stations and monitor biological responses to flow changes Source: Establishing Environmental Flow for the Los Angeles River presentation by SCCWRP, SWRCB, Colorado School of Mines and Council for Watershed Health

Los Angeles River Flow Study Schedule and Cost Schedule: completed by December 2020 Total Cost $2.86M State/Regional Boards’ contribution - $1.7M Funding partners - $1.16M For technical elements of study City of Los Angeles, LACDPW and LACSD

Los Angeles River Case Study Benefits Develop tools and approaches for assessing effects and optimizing water use management scenarios Support decision making under water code section 1211 –wastewater change petitions Prototype for consideration of establishing environmental flows in urban (effluent dominated) systems Case study for implementation of Tier 2 of statewide environmental flows framework California Environmental Flows Framework In 2016, a group of experts self-organized to pool knowledge and data, evaluate methods, and ultimately develop a statewide framework for determining environmental flow criteria for California. The strategy is organized into a two-tiered approach that varies in scale and detail. The two-tiered framework will provide a set of functional flow criteria for all streams in California (Tier 1) and a technical guidance document for estimating refined flow criteria at regional to site-specific scales (Tier 2). Tier 1: Use the California natural stream classes and the functional flows method to set flow criteria statewide Statewide applicable approach to set flow criteria protective of river-dependent ecosystems Tier 2: Provide guidelines for estimating refined flow criteria depending on the regional, local or site-specific context A tailored approach that incorporates specific environmental and water management factors and priorities Source: Establishing Environmental Flow for the Los Angeles River presentation by SCCWRP, SWRCB, Colorado School of Mines and Council for Watershed Health

Thank You Questions? Evelyn Cortez-Davis, P.E., BCEE Assistant Director, Water Resources Division Los Angeles Department of Water and Power evelyn.cortez-davis@ladwp.com