Bicycle Wrench Analysis

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

FEA Reference Guide See additional material herehere.

Advertisements

Fin Design for Maximum Thermal Dissipation ME 450: Computer Aided Engineering Analysis Instructor: Dr. Nema Group Members: Wei-Yuan Chu, Brad Holtsclaw,

FEA of Wind Turbine Tower Martin Knecht. The Problem FEA modeling of a wind turbine tower. Analysis: –Stress –Deflection Want to prevent –Yielding –Excessive.

ME 450 Group Adrian Conrad Chris Cook Thomas Hylton Nathan Wagers High Pressure Water Fixture Conceptual Design Analysis December 10, 2007.

Moonbuggy Rear Suspension Analysis ME450: Computer-Aided Engineering Analysis Department of Mechanical Engineering, IUPUI Instructor: Dr. Koshrow Nematollahi.

Failures Due to Static Loading

The Effect of T-Stiffener Web and Flange Tilt on Frame Stress Evaluated using Finite Element Analysis by Dean Pasquerella MASTER OF ENGINEERING Major Subject:

M.E. 462 Capstone Design I.U.P.U.I. Spring 2007 Bishop Steering: 1970 Lotus Europa Front Axle Re-design Aaron Emmons Phil Palmer Brad Holtsclaw Adam Spindler.

Chapter 17 Design Analysis using Inventor Stress Analysis Module

Lecture 2 – Finite Element Method

Copyright 2001, J.E. Akin. All rights reserved. CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis.

Feasibility MSA P Base Plate Feasibility 3 plastics were looked at for MSA mounting board material: ABS, Acrylic, and polypropylene. Due to cost.

Structure Analysis of 6061-T651 Aluminum Bridge Team Blackboard Mechanical Engineering University of Rochester Team Blackboard Department of Mechanical.

CTC / MTC 222 Strength of Materials

Identified Company (CompositeX) to manufacture Custom Composite Pressure Vessel ● Working pressure 1000psi ● Holds 8 kg Nitrous Oxide ● 700 cubic inch.

ME 501 Corey Roberts Leo Montgomery Motor Plate Analysis.

ME104Q PAPER RIVER CHASM BRIDGE Team Boomerang Mechanical Engineering University of Rochester Executive Summary The premise of this experiment is built.

Introduction to Finite Element Analysis for Structure Design Dr. A. Sherif El-Gizawy.

MCE 561 Computational Methods in Solid Mechanics

PIPE FEA USING ANSYS.

Introduction to virtual engineering László Horváth Budapest Tech John von Neumann Faculty of Informatics Institute of Intelligent Engineering.

Finite Element Analysis of Mini Baja Frame Ariana L. Gonzalez April 29, 2003 MECE.

Mechanical Engineering Analysis. Material Selection Process WoodStainless Steel HDPEAluminumPTFE Cost Machinability Strength Durability

Msc. eng. Magdalena German Faculty of Civil Engineering Cracow University of Technology Budapest, Simulation of damage due to corrosion in RC.

Engineering 309: Machine Design I Instructor: Dr. Min Lu Presented by: Mike Kraft Thanh Nguyen.

LOGO Soil slope stability analysis combining shear strength reduction and slip line method Supervisor: Yongchang Cai Ph.D. candidate: Jie Wu School of.

Accuracy of Fully Elastic vs. Elastic-Plastic Finite Element Analysis Masters of Engineering Rensselear Polytechnic Institute By Nicholas Szwaja May 17,

1. Introduction to Design 2. Materials and Processes 3. Load Determination 4. Stress, Strain, and Deflection 5. Static Failure Theories 6.

1 ME383 Modern Manufacturing Practices Lecture Note #3 Stress-Strain & Yield Criteria Dr. Y.B. Guo Mechanical Engineering The University of Alabama.

Overview of Mechanical Engineering for Non-MEs Part 2: Mechanics of Materials 6 Introduction – Concept of Stress.

The City College of New York Department of Mechanical Engineering Assembly and Analysis of Collectors Edition Chevy Impala Group Members: Dave Maharaj.

Imran Ahmed Tony Martinelli Rob Ramer Pete Rogers.

Forging new generations of engineers. Factors of Design and Safety.

ME 272 Final Problem 3 By Valerie Lease

MAE 322 Machine Design Lecture 2

1 CHAP 8 STRUCTURAL DESIGN USING FINITE ELEMENTS FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Nam-Ho Kim Edited and audio Raphael Haftka.

Ansys Workbench 10 Case Study with Introduction to Fluid Analysis ME 520 Fundamentals of Finite Element Analysis.

ME450 Project. Gearbox Analysis  ME450 Finite Element Analysis  Fall Semester, 2007  Prof: Dr. K. Nematollahi  Team Members  Aaron Huesman  Jae.

Workshop 2 Steel Bracket Modified by (2008): Dr. Vijay K. Goyal Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Puerto Rico at.

CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis –Thermal Analysis –Structural Dynamics –Computational.

Analysis of a Nulling Yaw Probe ME 450: Computer Aided Engineering Analysis Instructor: Dr. Nema Group members: Billy Holland, Alan Koers, Allison Heying.

Chapter 1 Introduction Concept of Stress. Road Map: Statics  Mechanics of Materials  Elasticity  Plasticity Fracture Mechanics Fatigue Creep Mechanics.

Ansys Workbench 11 Case Study with Design Optimization ME 520 Fundamentals of Finite Element Analysis.

ME 160 Introduction to Finite Element Method-Spring 2016 Topics for Term Projects by Teams of 2 Students Instructor: Tai-Ran Hsu, Professor, Dept. of Mechanical.

Gravity load on SAS – comparison between real and mock-up April 13 th, 2016.

Bicycle Wrench Analysis

Snag Boat Final Presentation

11 Energy Methods.

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS K SIVA RAMA KRISHNA Y LOKESWARA RAO R MANI KANTA

Introduction to Mechanical Engineering Design

UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING DESIGN II FME 461 PART 5 GO NYANGASI November 2008.

11 Energy Methods.

Stress Analysis Using ANSYS

Introduction – Concept of Stress

WORKSHOP 10 ANNULAR PLATE

Fredrik Fors Mechanical Engineering, JLab 09/29/2016

Mechanics of Solids I Energy Method.

CAD and Finite Element Analysis

Chapter 1 Introduction Concept of Stress.

Tensile Testing of Aluminum Alloy

Workshop 2.1 ANSYS Mechanical Basics.

Stress Analysis on SunSiphon Rack Design

Structure I Course Code: ARCH 208 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg

Introduction – Concept of Stress

DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING

Structure I Course Code: ARCH 208 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg.

EML 2023 – Stress Analysis Lecture 1 – Stress State.

PDT 153 Materials Structure And Properties

MECH 3550 : Simulation & Visualization

Presentation transcript:

Bicycle Wrench Analysis ME450: Computer-Aided Engineering Analysis Department of Mechanical Engineering, IUPUI Instructor: Dr. Koshrow Nematollahi Bicycle Wrench Analysis Danny Compton Adam Douglas Phil Palmer

OBJECTIVES Perform finite element analysis of a Bicycle Wrench using ANSYS Workbench. Evaluate stress and deformation resulting from applied loads and constraints. Evaluate that this design is satisfactory and will not fail during use.

The Bicycle Wrench design blueprint INTRODUCTION The Bicycle Wrench design blueprint

INTRODUCTION CONTINUED… The Bicycle Wrench design intent is to simplify the model orientation of the wrench using FEA Analysis. To know what the best material for production of wrenches should be used. Example + Pro E Model = FEA Analysis

INTRODUCTION CONTINUED… Normal loading conditions were chosen to be 10N and 100N being applied to the wrench. Analyzing these forces on the wrench is very beneficial when determining what material to use, and how much force that material will with stand.

Theoretical Background 10-node tetrahedral elements were used to mesh the model. Well suited for modeling models with curved boundaries and are very accurate.

BOUNDARIES Use of ANSYS Workbench Maximum number of nodes = 550 nodes Total number of elements = 54 Use of properties of Aluminum Use of properties of Steel

BOUNDARIES Properties of Aluminum / Steel Steel Aluminum 6061

ANALYSIS (Pre-Processing) The part was modeled in Pro/Engineer and imported into ANSYS Workbench All parts were assigned properties of Aluminum 6061 / Steel alloy construction Factor of safety of 3 was applied on the part, telling us our tensile strengths, from which we could determine if the wrench would fail. Fixed support was assigned at the left edge of the wrench Design was statically analyzed

ANALYSIS (Pre-Processing) Meshing The imported model was meshed and 550 nodes were obtained Using ANSYS Workbench, parts were suppressed 550 nodes

ANALYSIS - Final Model LOADING MESH 10N & 100N force applied on right edge of wrench Fixed support applied at left edge 550 Nodes 54 Elements

ANALYSIS (Solution Phase) Principal Stresses Shear Stresses Maximum Deformation

ANALYSIS (Solution Phase) Principal Stresses Steel – Loading (10N) Maximum Principal stress of 1.189e6 Pa Yield stress for Steel alloy is 2.5e8 Pa Maximum stresses occur where the part potentially failed

ANALYSIS (Solution Phase) Shear Stresses Steel – Loading (10N) Maximum shear stress of 6.180e5 Pa Passed

ANALYSIS (Solution Phase) Maximum Deflection Steel – Loading (10N) Max. Deflection of 7.296×10-6 m

ANALYSIS (Solution Phase) Principal Stresses Steel – Loading (100N) Maximum Principal stress of 1.189e7 Pa Yield stress for Steel alloy is 2.5e8 Pa Maximum stresses occur where the part potentially failed

ANALYSIS (Solution Phase) Shear Stresses Steel – Loading (100N) Maximum shear stress of 6.180e6 Pa Passed

ANALYSIS (Solution Phase) Maximum Deflection Steel – Loading (100N) Max. Deflection of 7.296×10-5 m

ANALYSIS (Solution Phase) Principal Stresses Aluminum 6061 – Loading (10N) Maximum Principal stress of 1.187e6 Pa Yield stress for Aluminum alloy is 1.15e8 Pa Maximum stresses occur where the part potential failed

ANALYSIS (Solution Phase) Shear Stresses Aluminum 6061 – Loading (10N) Maximum shear stress of 6.199e5 Pa Passed

ANALYSIS (Solution Phase) Maximum Deflection Aluminum 6061 – Loading (10N) Max. Deflection of 2.083×10-5 m

ANALYSIS (Solution Phase) Principal Stresses Aluminum 6061 – Loading (100N) Maximum Principal stress of 1.187e7 Pa Yield stress for Aluminum alloy is 1.15e8 Pa Maximum stresses occur where the part potential failed

ANALYSIS (Solution Phase) Shear Stresses Aluminum 6061 – Loading (100N) Maximum shear stress of 6.199e6 Pa Passed

ANALYSIS (Solution Phase) Maximum Deflection Aluminum 6061 – Loading (100N) Max. Deflection of 2.083×10-4 m

Impact Statement Through the use of finite element analysis on the bicycle wrench, we determined that both the 6061 Aluminum and structural steel propose no risk of structural failure in normal operating conditions.

Conclusion - Advantages of Final Iteration Using the same properties for density and the volume given in ANSYS, we calculated the mass of the wrench for both steel and 6061 aluminum: Volume 9.22E-05 m3 Mass (steel) 0.723927 kg Mass (aluminum) 0.000249 kg

Conclusion - Advantages of Final Iteration The cost difference of 6061 aluminum and structural steel can be seen below, which was used to calculate the cost per cubic foot of the material. $ per ft3 6061 Aluminum 1223.16 Structural Steel 1101.60

Conclusion - Advantages of Final Iteration Our final analysis for this wrench is that if the consumer is looking for a lighter weight tool, the aluminum would be the best choice. If strength and cost are more important to the consumer than the structural steel would be the best choice.

Bibliography ME 450 Course Text ANSYS Website www.ansys.com www.metalsdepot.com