Metop-C AMSU & MHS Radiometric Quality Status Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UPDATE ON BIAS TRENDS, DIRECT SUN CORRECTION, AND ROUGHNESS CORRECTION Joe Tenerelli May 10, 2011.
Advertisements

Preparing for JPSS-1/ATMS Direct Readout Readiness Acknowledgments: This work was performed under contract NAS , sponsored by NASA Nikisa S. George.
ECMWF – 1© European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Developments in the use of AMSU-A, ATMS and HIRS data at ECMWF Heather Lawrence, first-year.
A STUDY OF THE NOAA NEAR-NADIR MICROWAVE HUMIDITY SOUNDER BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURES OVER ANTARCTICA Tsan Mo, Yong Han, and Fuzhong Weng NOAA/NESDIS Center.
Slide 1 EUMETSAT Fellow Day, 9 March 2015 Observation Errors for AMSU-A and a first look at the FY-3C MWHS-2 instrument Heather Lawrence, second-year EUMETSAT.
Slide: 1 Quality indicators in an operational precipitation product IPWG meeting 4 Beijing, October 2008 Presented by: Thomas Heinemann Meteorological.
© Crown copyright 2007 Optimal distribution of polar-orbiting sounding missions John EyreMet Office, UK CGMS-40; Lugano, Switzerland;5-9 Nov 2012.
Slide 1 Second GPS/RO Users Workshop, August , The EUMETSAT Polar System GRAS SAF and Data Products Martin B. Sorensen GRAS SAF Project Atmosphere.
Slide 1 VAISALA Award Lecture Characterising the FY-3A Microwave Temperature Sounder Using the ECMWF Model Qifeng Lu, William Bell, Peter Bauer, Niels.
ROSA GRAS Meeting February 2009 Matera, Italy GRAS Monitoring and Validation GRAS EUMETSAT (contact:
Comparison of updated SSU temperatures with chemistry climate model simulations Nathan Gillett Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Victoria,
Slide 1 Initial results from the assessment of ATMS data at ECMWF Niels Bormann, Bill Bell, Anne Fouilloux, Ioannis Mallas, Nigel Atkinson, Stephen English.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: Initial trade-off: Height-resolved.
© 2014 RAL Space Study for the joint use of IASI, AMSU and MHS for OEM retrievals of temperature, humidity and ozone D. Gerber 1, R. Siddans 1, T. Hultberg.
NCEP Assessment of ATMS Radiances Andrew Collard 1, John Derber 2 and Russ Treadon 2 1 IMSG at NOAA/NCEP/EMC 2 NOAA/NCEP/EMC 1NPP ATMS SDR Product Review13th.
Indirect impact of ozone assimilation using Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (GSI) data assimilation system for regional applications Kathryn Newman1,2,
Satellite data monitoring
Monitoring weather and climate from space
Joint GRWG and GDWG Meeting February 2010, Toulouse, France
ACC and GPS summary Christian Siemes, QWG and Cal/Val team Copenhagen, Denmark 18/06/2014.
Validation status overivew
Validation status overivew
VIS/NIR reference instrument requirements
Report to 8th GSICS Exec Panel
met.no – SMHI experiences with ALARO
ECMWF/EUMETSAT NWP-SAF Satellite data assimilation Training Course
In-orbit Microwave Reference Records
Radiometric and spectral inter-comparison of IASI
Concept study GOME-2/AVHRR radiance inter-comparison
GSICS Microwave Sub-Group Summary Tim Hewison and Cheng-Zhi Zou
Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC Height-resolved aerosol R.Siddans.
Calibration Status for the GOME Instrument
NOAA Report on Satellite Data Calibration and Validation – Satellite Anomalies Presented to CGMS-43 Working Group 2 session, agenda item 3 Author: Weng.
Calibration Activities of GCOM-W/AMSR2
Fangfang Yu and Fred Wu 22 March 2011
M. Goldberg NOAA/NESDIS Z. Cheng (QSS)
NOAA-20 and Suomi NPP ATMS On-orbit Performance
GOME-2 hyper-spectral reflectance measurements: Inter-comparison with AVHRR and Seviri Rűdiger Lang, Rose Munro, Antoine Lacan, Christian Retscher, Gabriele.
Cristina Lupu, Niels Bormann, Reima Eresmaa
Manik Bali Jonathan Mittaz
PATMOS-x AVHRR Calibration Update
Comparison between Sentinel-3A SLSTR and IASI aboard Metop-A and –B
Assimilation of MWHS on FY-3B over Land
Imke Hans1, Martin Burgdorf1, Viju O
Intercomparison of IASI and CrIS spectra
Annual GSICS Calibration Report for {Agency}
Masaya Takahashi (JMA), Dohyeong Kim (KMA),
GSICS MW products and a path forward.?
- Change title to more general one.
Recent update on EUMETSAT
Dorothee Coppens.
Assessing passband errors
Early calibration results of FY-4A/GIIRS during in-orbit testing
NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research
Radiometric inter-comparison of IASI
Intercalibration of AMSU-A,MHS and Update on mitigating loss of AATSR
FY-3 Microwave Sensor Status and Calibration
SRF Retrieval Using VIIRS/AIRS/IASI radiances
Use of GSICS to Improve Operational Radiometric Calibration
Status after 3 months of L1 Cal/Val
Proposed best practices for Simultaneous Nadir Overpass (A Discussion)
GSICS Product Development Plan for Microwave Instruments
goes-16/17 abi lunar calibration
Update on EUMETSAT CEOS Plenary 2018 Agenda Item # 4.3
G16 vs. G17 IR Inter-comparison: Some Experiences and Lessons from validation toward GEO-GEO Inter-calibration Fangfang Yu, Xiangqian Wu, Hyelim Yoo and.
Why use NWP for GSICS? It is crucial for climate and very desirable for NWP that we understand the characteristics of satellite radiance biases Simultaneous.
Variogram Stability Analysis
NOAA-20 ATMS STATUS ATMS SDR Team
Assimilation of MW data in The C3S ERA5 Reanalysis
How good is IASI-A as an in-orbit reference in GSICS in LWIR and IR
Presentation transcript:

Metop-C AMSU & MHS Radiometric Quality Status Update Tim Hewison Slides from Jörg Ackermann Status for PVRB on 13. Feb. 2019

Metop-C AMSU and MHS Status Metop-C launched 7 Nov 2018 In 9:30 orbit (same as Metop-A & -B), but with different phasing: SIOV & Commissioning in Tristar configuration During commissioning, based on early user feedback, decision made to remain in a Tristar phasing configuration or to shift Metop-C 180 degrees opposite Metop-B (original A/B configuration) with Metop-A in-between (“trident” configuration – see Figure 1, right). Recommend to start Level 1 dissemination as ‘Pre-Operational’

Results: AMSU/MHS Radiometric Performance (NeΔT BOL) NE∆T < Red line = Requirement

AMSU

Results: AMSU channels 3, 7, 8, 9, 10 Radiometric Performance Evolution (NeΔT) Variations related to both, gain changes and NE∆T instabilities. Cause is still unknown.

Result: AMSU channels 3, 7, 8, 9, 10 Gain Evolution (Counts/K)

Results: AMSU Ch.7 Instability on 17. Nov. 2018 Higher Noise is visible in the L1B product:

Results: AMSU Ch.7 Monitoring in ECMWF System Courtesy: Niels Bormann

Results: M03 AMSU Mean Bias (Obs-B) Courtesy: Niels Bormann

Results: M03 AMSU Stdev (Obs-FG) Courtesy: Christina Koepken, DWD

Results: M03 AMSU vs. N-19 AMSU AMSU channel 1, 2, and 15 brightness temperatures are about 1 K warmer, when compared with NOAA-19 AMSU (this observation is very similar to an earlier M02 vs. N-19 comparison) The cause for the channel 8 discrepancy (2 SNO’s over Antarctica) is not understood yet The remaining channels fit very well within a corridor of 0.8 K

MHS

Results: MHS Geolocation Assessment left mid right Ascending: Descending: right mid left

Results: MHS Channels 3 and 4 Striping First Orbits (L1B): Early Orbit (L0): Striping Indices for all MHS instruments: It’s always there and nearly independent of NeDT. Root cause unknown

Result: MHS Channels 3 and 4 Radiometric Performance Evolution (NeΔT)

Results: M03 MHS Mean Bias and Stdev (Obs-B) Courtesy: Niels Bormann noise on MHS-C really higher than MHS-A & -B for channels 3 and 4, it is significantly higher

Results: M03 MHS Stdev (Obs-FG) Courtesy: Christina Koepken, DWD

Results: M03 MHS vs. N-19 MHS Results: Large scatter of Ch.3 due to high noise (NeDT~ 2.5 K) of NOAA-19 MHS channel 3 Cause for the channel 2 scatter (SNO over Antarctica) is due to a large surface terrain inhomogeneity Remaining channels fit very well within 1 K

Result: AMSU and MHS Mean Bias (Obs-B) Courtesy: Brett Candy and Nigel Atkinson

Conclusions The L0 and L1B products are complete and processed in NRT without gaps The feedback from the user community (ECMWF, DWD, UKMO) is positive AMSU channels 7 and 8 exhibit occasionally sudden noise increase that can last for more than one orbit AMSU channel 3 radiometric instabilities are superimposed by a performance degradation MHS channels 3 and 4 are unstable (NeΔT between 0.7 K and 1.2 K) and show a significant striping Continuous monitoring of product quality is highly demanded Trial dissemination for Metop-C AVHRR/AMSU, and MHS Level 1 data will start on 28 Feb via EUMETCast Europe with “pre-operational” status