Rail – The Intermodal Connection

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KEVIN B. PAGE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION VIRGINIAS RAILROADS A STAKEHOLDER IN TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT.
Advertisements

Regional Routing Model Review: C) Model Formulation and Scenario Analysis Frank Southworth Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN NETS Program.
©2009 ViTAL Economy, Inc. ViTAL Economy Alliance Initial Market Assessment Transportation Distribution and Logistics Cluster.
2010 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan February 2010 presented by: Minnesota Department of Transportation and Cambridge.
FPSC Ten Year Plan Workshop Nuclear Panel Steven Scroggs Senior Director, Project Development Florida Power & Light Company August 15, 2007.
Watco Companies Overview January 25, 2013 Southwestern Rail Conference
Bringing the Powerful Application of Outsourced Manufacturing… …to the Solar Industry.
Annual Conference, Toronto Ontario NOVEMBER 17, 2008 Canadian Association of Movers TONY BIANCO National Account Manager.
TRANSPLEX 2007 Freight Demand and Planning in Florida July 12, 2007.
SINGLE SOURCE INTERMODAL DEDICATED FINAL MILE TRUCKLOAD LESS THAN TRUCKLOAD REFRIGERATED FLATBED EXPEDITED Multimodal Transport J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.
Manitoba International Gateway Strategy Manitoba Infrastructure & Transportation.
© 2008 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice Better business outcomes equal better.
EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS IN MINNESOTA A JOINT PRESENTATION TO THE Transportation Funding Advisory Committee September 14, 2012.
Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study -- Benefit Assessment Presented by: Jack Lettiere, Commissioner New Jersey Department of Transportation Presented to:
D R A F T 1 Coal Comparisons Third Quarter 2012 vs F REIGHT R AIL S YSTEM 1 Dates back to late 1820’s Today, more than 560 freight railroads operate.
Valleyfield Intermodal Canada-United States Transportation Border Working Group October 2013.
Returning to Our National Waterways Dabney Hegg U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.
Department of Industrial Engineering1 Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Waterways on the Port of Cincinnati-Tristate Heather Nachtmann, Ph.D. River.
1 CSX & Florida Presentation to ABC of Central Florida November 15, 2011.
Metroplan Orlando Freight Advisory Council July 23, 2012 Stephanie Lane CSX Regional Development.
Dan O’Neal, Chairman Washington State Transportation Commission.
U.S. Mexico Chamber of Commerce – Mid America Chapter October 18th - Southfield, MI U.S. MEXICO RAIL TRANSBORDER TRAFFIC OVERVIEW.
1 Passenger Rail Solutions – Balanced Approach 2009 Ark-La-Tex Rail Summit May 9, 2009 – Marshall, TX Joe Adams, Vice President – Public Affairs.
URBAN FREIGHT Getting kicked to the curb?. How will we live?
Moving the World: The Future of Freight Transportation Environment/Fuel Efficiency Panel Randy Mullett Vice President - Government Relations & Public Affairs,
Railroads & Economic Development: On Parallel Tracks? Page Siplon Executive Director Georgia’s Center of Innovation for Logistics.
Expanding the Twin Ports Energy Cluster to include LNG and CNG Production and Distribution Dr. Richard Stewart, Co-Director-GLMRI May 21, 2014.
Talking Freight Growth of Intermodal Terminal Facilities Overall Economic and Transportation Perspective Marty Lipinski / Dan Pallme Intermodal Freight.
Industry Challenges: 2015 January 22 nd, Fiscal Pressures across all service offerings  Driver shortage and retention  Regulations and hours.
Mike Elliott, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen (BLET), Washington State Legislative Board (WSLB) February 2014.
U.S. Railroad Industry Federal Railroad Administration U.S. Railroad Industry Federal Railroad Administration.
Future of Freight Rail National Association of Counties 2011 Rail Conference Commissioner Francis P. Mulvey April 28, 2011.
Motor Carrier Industry Overview April 2007 Tavio Headley Economist American Trucking Associations.
Los Angeles Transportation Club May 14, 2013 Scott Satterlee C.H. Robinson Senior Vice President.
1 1 CRTPA Board Meeting 09/20/2010. CSX Corporation (NYSE: CSX) CSX Transportation – serves every major population and industrial center east of the Mississippi;
TRANSPORTE INTERNACIONAL & SUPPLY CHAIN INTEGRATION 2008 U.S.-Mexico Chamber of Commerce Irving, Texas September 22-24, 2008.
Transportation—Managing the Flow of the Supply Chain Lecture 8.
1 THE FREIGHT RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE CHALLENGE 2009 AASHTO SCORT Conference – Oklahoma City, OK September 20 – 23, 2009.
6 th largest LTL (Less than truckload) -Founded Service Centers – 11,000 FT Employees –OD Domestic - Multi-regional, inter-regional, 48 state.
1 Florida Trade Flow Study presented to Florida Transportation Commission November 5, 2010 presented by Carrie Blanchard, Ph.D., Florida Chamber Foundation.
Talking Freight Promoting Economic Revitalization through Enhanced Freight Transportation Eric G. Madden Deputy Secretary for Aviation and Rail Freight.
VICS Empty Miles Time Is UP! Production growth will eventually stop and production will peak. Production is already past its peak in 54 of the 65 largest.
How Tomorrow Moves Brian Hammock Resident Vice President (410)
1 Transportation Infrastructure Programs Past, Present & Future Transportation Association of Canada Fall Conference September 2011 Edmonton, Alberta.
NCDOT Rail Division Managing Multi-modal Projects within a Corridor Freight in the Southeast February 10, 2011.
CSXT Intermodal SCORT September 2010 CSXT Intermodal SCORT September 2010.
Network Appalachia Access to Opportunity in the Global Economy of the 21 st Century.
1 Houston Economic Club May 18, 2009 Matthew K. Rose Chairman, President and CEO Transportation for Tomorrow.
1 Les Passa CSX VP – Strategic Planning. 2 Transportation marketplace supports long term rail growth Global market opportunities are increasing CSX’s.
DRIVERS OF INTERMODAL RAIL FREIGHT GROWTH IN NORTH AMERICA European Transport Conference 2007 Noordwijkerhout, Netherlands Session I International Rail.
U.S. Freight Railroad Infrastructure: Current and Future Issues Craig F. Rockey Vice President - Policy and Economics Association of American Railroads.
Nate Asplund Director – Public Private Partnerships September 20, 2009 SCORT 2009 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII.
2015 Emerald Coast Transportation Symposium Stephanie Lane, Director CSX Industrial Development November 13, 2015.
Maritime Saudi Arabia 2010 Agility Logistics.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues for aviation, highways and transit Uncertain.
1 Tampa Bay Transportation Management Leadership Group September 4, 2015.
PAUL HIRSCH | VICE PRESIDENT MEXICO OPERATIONS US-MEXICO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE NOVEMBER 7, 2013 “NAFTA – 20 YEARS AND BEYOND”
The Role of Industry for Smart Freight in Latin America: Opportunities and Challenges Edgar E Blanco MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics
APLL Automotive Intermodal Overview September 2015.
I’ve Been Working on the Railroad... Marketing Opportunities.
SmartWay & Sustainability Erik Herzog US Environmental Protection Agency 4 th Annual Government Transportation Forum April 24, 2014 SmartWay & Sustainability.
Freight Railway Integration Strategy For Inter-American Development Bank Transport Week 2009 by Transportation Technology Center, Inc. (TTCI) Subsidiary.
Industry Update for: FEI – St. Louis Chapter February 2012.
Objective Transportation Assets Strategic Intermodal/International Points Next Steps & Discussion Critical Issues for Ohio.
The Transportation Logistics Company Indiana Logistics Summit Infrastructure Needs and Opportunities September 26, 2007.
Economic Dynamics of Freight & Modes. The Trucking Industry.
Transportation of sporting goods Trevor Herrick and James Brown IV.
University of Wisconsin – Madison Memphis Overview Dan Pallme, Acting Director Intermodal Freight Transportation Institute University of Memphis 10/26/2012.
Introduction First established as Federal Express, today’s FedEx Corporation is one of the most recognized brands for their express delivery system, FedEx.
Access to Opportunity in the Global Economy of the 21st Century
Presentation transcript:

Rail – The Intermodal Connection Drew Glassman, AVP Intermodal Marketing CSX Transportation

Holistic focus on controlling supply chain costs Near-sourcing of manufacturing sites due to rising costs in Asia Simplification and rebalancing of supply chain network design Optimization software to improve efficiencies and streamline processes Use of alternate transportation modes, including intermodal Journal of Commerce industry reports 2012 + Gartner Supply Chain Top 25 for 2012

Truck capacity is imminent concern for future Surplus/(Shortage) Capacity Utilization Truck Capacity Utilization to Increase, Resulting in a Shortage Driver shortages are a threat with economic recovery U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports driver supply is 185,000 below 2007 levels Turnover for Q1 2012 was 90%, the highest since 2008 Driver supply impacted by many macro-factors CSA, HOS and other proposed regulations Aging driver base Recovery of housing market Key regulations include CSA and HOS; one FTR study indicated that is all proposed regulations are passed, the driver supply would be reduced by 500,000 drivers in 2016 (includes HOS, CSA, Drug & Alcohol regulations, Training, etc.). U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (JOC Article “Can Trucking Solve Its Driver Problem?” 8/17/2012) The number of heavy-truck or tractor-trailer drivers employed in the U.S. fell 13.4 percent, or by 226,850, between 2007 and 2010, according to the latest data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. About 42,000 truck drivers joined the payrolls last year, a 2.9 percent increase. However, that means almost 185,000 CDL-carrying truckers who earned a living on the road in 2007 have yet to return to the driver’s seat — more than twice the number of truckers in Perry’s estimated 90,000-driver shortage. Driver turnover at large truckload carriers — which exacerbates any shortage — surged to 90 percent on average in the first quarter, its highest point since 2008, according to the American Trucking Associations. 2012 Source: FTR

Intermodal provides scalable capacity Coast-to-coast intermodal network with global reach 14 million loads moved in 2011 Access to key markets, population centers Connectivity to major U.S. ports Access to a large, growing container fleet Rail and carrier-owned assets Intermodal scales to meet supply chain needs efficiently One train can move the load of 280 trucks You Can Go Here with Intermodal Animation

Intermodal industry volume has steadily grown Volume has increased more than four-fold 3.1M Source: Intermodal Association of North America

Intermodal offers sustainable savings Fuel efficiency and freight density drive cost savings Railroads are three times more fuel efficient than trucks One train can move the load of 280 trucks Higher fuel efficiency means lower greenhouse emissions Intermodal reduces carbon footprint Moving freight by rail, instead of truck, reduces emissions by 75% If 10% of long haul highway freight converted to rail… Annual fuel consumption would decrease by 12 billion gallons, and Annual greenhouse emissions would decrease by 12 million tons Source AAR http://www.aar.org/Environment.aspx Source: AAR

Intermodal conversion opportunity is substantial Highway-to-rail conversion still in early stages Over 9 million loads in east have conversion potential Intermodal conversion results in additional capacity and cost savings for shippers Union Pacific stated there are over 11M potential truckload opportunities in Western Market (550 miles+) – Wolfe Trahan “Double Stacked” Report 2012 Intermodal loads reflect year end 2011 (CSX 2.3 NS 3.2) based on 10-k Freight length of haul > 550 miles Sources: AAR CS-54 and Global Insight’s Transearch data

Shippers achieve the value of intermodal with CSX Company Overview Intermodal at CSX America’s first railroad Founded 1827, headquartered in Jacksonville, FL Largest rail network in east 21,000 route miles in 23 states, serving 70 ports Significant resources Over 4,000 locomotives, 80,000 freight cars, 30,000 employees Ranked 226 on Fortune 500 $11.7 billion of revenue in 2011 Far-reaching, dynamic network Hub and spoke design provides unique service capabilities Aggressive capital investment Terminal and infrastructure development, public-private projects Customer and service focus Minimizing variability in service, while meeting customer needs Highway-to-rail “H2R” strategy Conversion of over-the-road loads Together ,businesses and state/local agencies invested over $1.3B in rail-served facilities on the CSX network during 2011 $1.3B figure as reported by customers to CSX

The National Gateway is evolving the rail network Public-private investment of $850 million State, Federal, and CSX funded Support of 300+ public and private organizations and individuals Increases efficiency and reach of U.S. rail network Links Mid-Atlantic ports with Midwestern markets 61 clearance projects and 6 intermodal terminals, including Northwest Ohio Clearance projects are ~50% complete to date The National Gateway is $842M public-private partnership aimed at completing 61 clearance projects and 6 terminals. The clearance work as part of the Gateway is a key part of our broader strategy to double-stack clear key portions of our network and increase intermodal terminal capacity. CSX - $395M – 47% States - $189M – 23% Feds - $258 – 30% (1) The estimated cost of the National Gateway is now $842M – up $68M from previous estimates. (2) The cost estimates of the NG for CSX’s share has risen by $8M. CSX’s cost increases were driven by scope and cost increases in Northwest Ohio Intermodal Terminal, but largely offset deferred investments in Columbus and Charlotte. (3) The state share has declined by $4M – which was driven by our decision to defer further investments in Charlotte. (4) The federal share has increased by $64M – which was drive by updated cost estimates for the Virginia ave tunnel. (3) As you can see, the states’ share is $189 (or 23%); and the federal share is $258 (or 30%); and CSX’s share is $395 (or 47%) of which $225 million has already been spent. Keeping the cost share at about 50% has been a powerful sales tool as we have discussed this project with the public sector. It was important to us to maintain that attribute of the project. 9 9

Northwest Ohio Hub creates a more efficient network Bypass high traffic areas resulting in faster transit times Non-stop service to east and west coasts for more reliable service New lanes increase access to major population centers Effective connector, with 99% scheduled connectivity at NWOH Chicago run-through for Western interchange Hub and spoke network is a strategic differentiator

CSX focused on highway-to-rail (H2R) strategy Network Design NWOH – Hub & Spoke New England Florida Service Reliability Meeting customer commitments Minimizing variability in the service product Channel Strategy IMC Brokers Ocean carriers Truck BCO Education Dedicated National Accounts Team H2R Optimizer Animation

Highway-to-rail continues to drive industry growth Intermodal offers a transportation alternative with scalable capacity and sustainable savings advantages The value of intermodal rail only beginning to be realized; great potential remains CSX dedicated to understanding transportation needs and developing intermodal solutions

Appendix

Public-private investments continue to grow network Investment in the Rail Network In 2011, businesses and state and local agencies invested over $1.3B CSX also investing in new terminals and infrastructure throughout network Clearance projects enable double-stack capable network New England National Gateway $ 67M $ 3M $ 94M $ 10M $ 35M $ 70M $250M $ 44M $ 44M $ 1M $ 2M $ 37M $ 4M $ 46M $ 73M $ 53M $ 1M $ 74M $515M *D.C. $ 10M $117M $ 71M $ 2M $ 50M $ 1M $ 66M $385M $ 84M $ 70M $ 1M $ 90M $ 8M $ 70M $ 30M Private-Public Investment Rail –Served Facilities (2011) = Business/State & Local Agency Investment in New or Expanded rail-served facilities on CSX or its connecting regional and short lines ($M) as reported to CSX by customers. CSX does not disclose the break-down by customers due to confidentiality. $ 5M Terminal Expansions $105M $165M New Terminals CSX Investment in Rail Network (2011) Private-Public Investment Rail –Served Facilities (2011)