Line of Reasoning was developed by Linda Denstaedt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GRADE 5, MODULE 2A: UNIT 1, LESSON 5
Advertisements

OP-EDS ARGUMENT MINI-UNIT Sugar as a Social Issue Linda Denstaedt Oakland Writing Project (MI) i3 Career and College Ready Writing Leadership Team Linda.
Taking a Stand: Equal Rights for Women
Taking a Stand: Equal Rights for Women
Reality TV A mini-unit designed to introduce text-based argument drafting i3 College Ready Writers Program National Writing Project 2014.
Teen Brains Adapted from Teen Brains mini-unit by Beth Rimer, Ohio Writing Project by Perry Public Schools teachers Beth Rimer, Ohio Writing Project for.
Activity 5a Systems of Professional Learning Module 3 Grades 6–12: Supporting all Students in Writing and Research.
Reading for Effective Arguments LINDA DENSTAEDT CRWP LEADERSHIP TEAM OAKLAND WRITING PROJECT (MI)
Academic Conversations
Reading and Writing multi-digit numbers using
Academic Conversations
Academic Conversations
Academic Conversations
Building Academic Language
Should We Have Zoos? Opinion Mini-Unit
Learning Targets I can identify and know the meaning of the inflected endings –s, -es in verbs. I can use strategies to help identify the meanings of words.
Delete this box when you are done!
Rights to the Streets of Memphis
What the text is MOSTLY about.
Meeting the Reading Standards in Secondary Classrooms
Lesson 9 Analyzing Details in “Prometheus” for Elements of Mythology and Theme.
Bring a Text to Class ERWC Module 3.
PPT QUESTIONS Is Survival Selfish?.
Academic Vocabulary Opener
Connecting Evidence to a Claim was developed by Jean Wolph.
Tuesday, 4/19 Lesson 1: Research on Driverless Cars
What Gives Stories Their Power?
Percy Jackson Unit 2 Lesson 2.
9th Grade Lesson 1 Fall.
Module 1 Unit 1 lesson 3.
Segment 1: Economic Reasoning & Content Standards
Get you thinking I didn’t like school, I didn’t learn nothin’ useful and teachers didn’t like me ‘cos I didn’t talk like them! If my kids don’t want to.
Inferring about Character: Close Reading of “Inside Out”
Close Reading: Paragraph 1 of “Refugee and Immigrant Children: A Comparison” (from “Refugee Children in Canada: Searching for Identity”)
Gather your materials! Let’s Prepare!.
Gather your materials! Let’s Prepare!.
Quick review of quiz Refer to page 90 on PDF. Review of Results from Mid-Unit 1 Assessment and Review Learning Targets.
Water is my life: Rachel’s Story
“Refugees: Who, Where, Why”
Gather your materials! Let’s Prepare!.
Expeditionary Learning Grade 8 Module 1 Unit 2 Case Study:
A Long Walk to Water ELA Module 7.1.1L5 Agenda Opening
Expeditionary Learning Grade 8 Module 1 Unit 2 Case Study:
Lesson 35: Compare different forms of a text
Expeditionary Learning Grade 8 Module 1 Unit 2 Case Study:
How to have a conversation with a text
Module 1: Unit 2: Lesson 8 Exploring Allusions to Myths in
Expeditionary Learning Grade 8 Module 1 Unit 2 Case Study:
Unit 2/ lesson 10 End-of-unit 2 Assessment
Turn and Talk 5 minutes Timeline Discussion.
Gather your materials! Let’s Prepare!.
Module 3 Unit 1: Lesson 4 Mid-Unit assessment:
Lesson 21: Timed writing About this lesson
Gather your materials! Let’s Prepare!.
Lesson 2: Studying Room for Debate Op-Eds
Critical Reading with AVID
Building Background Knowledge and Summarizing:
Opener: Insert Image Here
Today’s objective I can select the strongest evidence in an informational text about who the refugees were, where they fled from, and why they had to flee.”
Close Reading: Paragraphs 2 and 3 of “Refugee and Immigrant Children: A Comparison” and Introducing the NYS Expository Writing Rubric.
Building Background Knowledge:
1. Write your current claim on a notecard.
Lesson 33: Culminating writing task: revising a claim and gathering evidence About this lesson Students begin the writing process to answer the prompt.
Wednesday, April 20 QW – 5 minutes – ½ page Driverless Cars-
Mini-Unit: Focus on Evidence This Mini-Unit supports students use of evidence by focusing how students use nonfiction sources.   The unit includes lessons.
Gather your materials! Let’s Prepare! Chromebo ok 2 partners.
Active Reading Series: Using critical annotating to solve a mystery…
Four Corners “Two Kinds”.
Lesson 8: Analyze an Argument
Let’s Prepare BYOT 3 COLORS 4 corners handout.
Presentation transcript:

Line of Reasoning was developed by Linda Denstaedt. 4/18 Write #1 What do you think of driverless or robot cars? Write ½ page – 5 minutes Write #1: 3 minutes Line of Reasoning was developed by Linda Denstaedt.

Line of Reasoning was developed by Linda Denstaedt. Goals Explore an issue to make a claim   Identify and rank evidence Write/draft based on evidence Line of Reasoning was developed by Linda Denstaedt.

Line of Reasoning was developed by Linda Denstaedt. Reading #1 Gather Evidence [images and words] as you read. Images Words Poster of Conference Title: International CES “took my breath away” Ford CEO: Expect Driverless Cars Within Five Years Total Reading Time—approximately 4 minutes with commercial and teacher modeling. Focus for Reading #1: Multi-draft reading—1] Read for gist or basic points in the interview; 2] read to collect key evidence. Teacher Model: how to collect evidence with a t-chart [images and words] Line of Reasoning was developed by Linda Denstaedt.

Line of Reasoning was developed by Linda Denstaedt. Write #2 – ½ page – 5 minutes Now what do you think of driverless or robot cars? Use evidence from the text to support and explain your thinking. Form a claim to state your current view. Write #2: 4 minutes Push to explore the evidence and arrive at a claim that expresses your current view of autonomous or robot cars. Line of Reasoning was developed by Linda Denstaedt.

Line of Reasoning was developed by Linda Denstaedt. Reading #2 Read, annotate, and rank evidence in the text. Read & code important evidence. Focus for Reading #2: Total Writing Time 4-5 minutes Additional time for with teacher model if students do not already code texts. Read: Gather evidence being open to new information and/or thinking. Code: Circle key evidence that seems most relevant and grabs your interest. In the margin, write a word or phrase that states the key point in the evidence. Line of Reasoning was developed by Linda Denstaedt.

Line of Reasoning was developed by Linda Denstaedt. Write #3 – ½ page – 5 mins Now what do you think of driverless or robot cars? Use evidence from the text to support and explain your thinking. Form a claim to state your current view. Write #3: 4 minutes Push to explore the evidence and arrive at a claim that expresses your current view of autonomous or robot cars. Line of Reasoning was developed by Linda Denstaedt.

Line of Reasoning was developed by Linda Denstaedt. Reading #3 Gather Evidence [images and words] as you read. Images Words Driverless cars could let you sleep Total Reading Time—approximately 6 minutes with commercial Focus for Reading #3: Multi-draft reading—1] Read for gist or basic points in the interview; 2] read to collect key evidence. Line of Reasoning was developed by Linda Denstaedt.

Line of Reasoning was developed by Linda Denstaedt. Write #4 – ½ page – 5 mins Now what do you think of driverless or robot cars? Use evidence from the text to support and explain your thinking. Form a claim to state your current view. Write #2: 4 minutes Push to explore the new and conflicting evidence and arrive at a claim that expresses your current view of autonomous or robot cars. Line of Reasoning was developed by Linda Denstaedt.

Prepare to Talk with a Partner Sharing and Comparing Prepare to Talk with a Partner Partner Conversation Reread your writing. How has your thinking changed? What evidence seems to be the most relevant to support your thinking and claim now. What evidence do you question and/or disagree with? What is your current claim? What is your current claim? What evidence seems most relevant? What evidence seems limited? Explain why. How did the reading and writing series impact your view of the issue? Paired Conversation Time: 11 minutes Preparation for 3 minute statement of claim and evidence: 3 minutes Paired conversation: 8 minutes total—3 minutes for each partner to state and support their claim; 2 minutes to compare thinking Other options. Pairs read the final write to each other and discuss their different views Whole class report out on the range of current claims and thinking on robot cars Whole class report out on how their views on robot cars changed during the lesson and what evidence cause the changes. Line of Reasoning was developed by Linda Denstaedt.