9. Axial Capacity of Pile Groups

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mechanical response of shallow foundations - Some experimental/theoretical and numerical issues: monotonic loading Introduction Prof. ing. Claudio di Prisco.
Advertisements

Solve this equation to find x
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Mechanical response of shallow foundations - Some experimental/theoretical and numerical issues: monotonic and cyclic loading Introduction Prof. ing. Claudio.
Finite Element Method CHAPTER 4: FEM FOR TRUSSES
Pile foundations.
Mechanics of Composite Materials
Stress and Strain TUTORIAL 6 to answer just click on the button or image related to the answer.
Shallow Foundations Bearing Capacity
PILE FOUNDATION.
Copyright 2011 – Magnum Piering, Inc. Reliability and Theory of Helical Pile Sizing Howard A. Perko, Ph.D., P.E. Magnum Geo-Solutions, LLC Copyright 2011.
Before Between After.
Prepared by J. P. Singh & Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., PE West Virginia University Tech and Gary Norris Ph.D., PE University of.
Subtraction: Adding UP
Analysis of Tri-axial Stress-strain Conditions of Pre-stressed Masonry Corner VSB-TU, Faculty of Civil Engineering Radim Cajka Pavlina Mateckova Lucie.
JP Singh and Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., P.E. Gary Norris, Ph.D., P.E. March 2004 COMPUTER PROGRAM S-SHAFT FOR LATERALLY LOADED.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
SUB-STRUCTURE foundations.
BTECH Mechanical principles and applications
5. Bearing Capacity of Shallow Footings
Calculation of Heave of Deep Pier Foundations By John D. Nelson, Ph.D., P.E., Hon. M. SEAGS, F. ASCE, Kuo-Chieh (Geoff) Chao, Ph.D., P.E., M. SEAGS, M.
O UT LINE 1) Determine the own weight of building 2) Design of mat foundation 3) Design of pile foundation.
8. Axial Capacity of Single Piles
ECGD 4122 – Foundation Engineering
Wave Equation Applications 2011 PDCA Professor Pile Institute Patrick Hannigan GRL Engineers, Inc.
6. Settlement of Shallow Footings
4.3 STONE OR SAND COLUMNS IN SOFT CLAYEY MATERIALS :
INTRODUCTION Session 1 – 2
Negative Skin Friction
Session 25 – 26 DRILLED SHAFT And CAISSON FOUNDATION
Prepared by J. P. Singh & Associates in association with
Leaning objectives Axial Stress
Analysis of Basic Load Cases Axial Stress
Bearing Capacity Theory
Pile Foundations پي هاي شمعي.
Session 17 – 18 PILE FOUNDATIONS
BRACED EXCAVATIONS  for deep, narrow excavations  pipelines  service cuts.
Footings.
EXTERNAL STABILITY The MSE wall system consists of three zones. They are: 1. The reinforced earth zone. 2. The backfill zone. 3. The foundation soil zone.
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations
Liquefaction Analysis For a Single Piled Foundation By Dr. Lu Chihwei Moh and Associates, Inc. Date: 11/3/2003.
Reference Manual Chapter 9
Abstract *Our project is about ( Foundation Design of Al- Maslamani Mall) which is located in the village of Beit Eba – Nablus governorate. *The total.
Session 7 – 8 SETTLEMENT OF SHALLOW FOUNDATION
Session 15 – 16 SHEET PILE STRUCTURES
PILE FOUNDATION Session 17 – 26
OMAE 2009 Honolulu, HI - May 31 to June
IWM2003 in Seattle Kinya Miura: GeoMechanics Group,
Wave Equation Applications 2009 PDCA Professor Pile Institute Patrick Hannigan GRL Engineers, Inc.
CE 482 Examples.
Session 19 – 20 PILE FOUNDATIONS
1 Pile Groups Most pile foundations contain group of piles instead of single pileThe supporting capacity of a group of ‘n’similar piles in many cases (not.
Course : S0484/Foundation Engineering Year : 2007 Version : 1/0
Credit Valley Hospital Pre-loaded Micropiles for Vertical Expansion of Parking Garage SMART Contractometer Results Nadir Ansari, Isherwood Associates Jim.
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
Bearing capacity of Piles in group By: Alka Shah Assistant professor Civil Department Nirma University.
SEMBODAI RUKMANI VARATHARAJAN ENGINEERING COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING SHALLOW FOUNDATION BY KARTHIVELU.
PILE FOUNDATIONS UNIT IV.
1 MISCELLANEOUS Pile driving formulae To develop the desired load carrying capacity, a point bearing driven pile must penetrate sufficiently into a dense.
GLE/CEE 330: Soil Mechanics Bearing Capacity of Shallow Footings
Chapter 15 Soil-Bearing Capacity for Shallow Foundations
GLE/CEE 330: Soil Mechanics Settlement of Shallow Footings
Pile Foundation Reason for Piles Types of Piles
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-III (CE 434)
Clemson Hydro Deformation of Solids. Clemson Hydro Tensile test.
Deep Replacement Presented by: M. Taromi
Prepared by:- Barham Jalal
An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering
Pile Group
DEEP FOUNDATIONS PILES.
Presentation transcript:

9. Axial Capacity of Pile Groups CIV4249: Foundation Engineering Monash University

Axial Capacity Fu + W = Pbase + Pshaft W Pshaft Fu Shear failure at pile shaft Pbase Bearing failure at the pile base

Tu - W = Pshaft,t < Pshaft,c Tension Capacity Tu - W = Pshaft,t < Pshaft,c Pshaft,t Shear failure at pile shaft

Very Large Concentrated Applications Very Large Concentrated Weight Large Distributed Weight Low Weight Soft to Firm Clay Dense Sand Strong Rock

Group Capacity Pug ¹ n.Pup Pug = e.n.Pup Pile Cap Pug Overlapping stress fields Progressive densification Progressive loosening Case-by-case basis Pug ¹ n.Pup Pug = e.n.Pup

Efficiency, e Clay Sand Rock Pile Cap n = 5 x 5 = 25 Soil Type Number of Piles, n Spacing/Diameter s d s/d typically > 2 to 3

Capped Groups Types of Groups Flexible Cap Free-standing Groups Rigid Cap Capped Groups Types of Groups

Feld Rule for free-standing piles in clay û Feld Rule for free-standing piles in clay 13/16 11/16 A B B B A 8/16 reduce capacity of each pile by 1/16 for each adjoing pile B C C C B e = 1/15 * (4 * 13/16 + 8 * 11/16 + 3 * 8/16) = 0.683 A B B B A

Converse-Labarre Formula for free-standing piles in clay n = # cols = 5 m = # rows = 3 e = 1 - q (n-1)m + (m-1)n 90 mn s = 0.75 d=0.3 q = tan-1(d/s) e = 0.645

Block Failure PBL = BLcbNc + 2(B+L)Dcs D cs cb L,B Flexible Cap D PBL = BLcbNc + 2(B+L)Dcs cs Nc incl shape & depth factors cb L,B Pug = min (nPup,PBL)

Empirical Modification PBL = BLcbNc + 2(B+L)Dcs Pug = min (nPup,PBL) 1 1 1 P2ug = n2P2up + P2BL 1 = 1 + n2P2 up e2 P2BL nPup n

Block Failure D = 20m cs = cb = 50 kPa d = 0.3m Flexible Cap L = B = 5m

Capped Groups Ptotal = Pgroup + Pcap Bc x Lc Rigid Cap for single pile failure, Pcap = ccapNc [BcLc - nAp ] for group block failure, Pcap = ccapNc [BcLc - BL] B x L

Efficiency increases s/d 1 2 3 4 72 capped 72 free-standing 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 72 free-standing 0.6 0.5 0.4 s/d 0.3 1 2 3 4

Piles in Granular Soils End bearing - little interaction, e = 1 Shaft - driven For loose to medium sands, e > 1 Vesic driven : 1.3 to 2 for s/d = 3 to 2 Dense/V dense - loosening? Shaft - bored Generally minor component, e = 1

Pile Settlement

Elastic Analysis Methods based on Mindlin’s equations for shear loading within an elastic halfspace Poulos and Davis (1980) assumes elasticity - i.e. immediate and reversible OK for settlement at working loads if reasonable FOS use small strain modulus

Definitions Ep Es Area Ratio, Ap Pile Stiffness Factor, K K = RA.Ep/Es RA = Ap / As K = RA.Ep/Es Ap As Ep Es

Floating Pile Ep Es,n L d h % load at the base b = boCKCn Pile top settlement d h r = P.IoRKRLRn / Esd Solutions are independent of soil strength and pile capacity. Why? Rigid Stratum

Floating pile example b = boCKCn r = P.IoRKRLRn / Esd P = 1800 kN Ep = 35,000 MPa bo = 0.038 CK = 0.74 Cn = 0.79 b = .022 Pb = 40 kN Io = 0.043 RK = 1.4 RL = 0.78 Rn = 0.93 r = 4.5mm 25 32 0.5 Effect of : L = 15m db/d = 2 h = 100m Es = 35 MPa n = 0.3 Rigid Stratum

Pile on a stiffer stratum % load at the base Ep b = boCKCbCn Es,n L Pile top settlement d r = P.IoRKRbRn / Esd Stiffer Stratum Eb > Es

Layered Soils Es = 1 S Ei hi L Ep E1,n1 L E2,n2 d Stiffer Stratum Eb > Es d

Stiffer base layer example P = 1800 kN b = boCKCbCn r = P.IoRKRbRn / Esd Ep = 35,000 MPa n = 0.3 bo = 0.038 CK = 0.74 Cn = 0.79 Cb = 2.1 b = .0467 Pb = 84 kN Io = 0.043 RK = 1.4 Rb = 0.99 Rn = 0.93 r = 4.5 mm 25 Es = 35 MPa 0.5 Eb = 70 MPa Effect of: Es = 15 MPa to 15m

Movement Ratios MR is ratio of settlement to PL/AE Focht (1967) - suggested in general : 0.5 < MR < 2 See Poulos and Davis Figs 5.23 and 5.24

Single pile settlement is computed for average working load per pile Pile group settlment Floating Piles End bearing piles Single pile settlement is computed for average working load per pile