Program Review Committee

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR and Linked Institutional Planning and Budgeting Lisa Marie McCauley, Kings College, VP/CFO.
Advertisements

What is Assessment? The university, with the support and encouragement of President Hitt and the Vice President team, engages in the institutional effectiveness.
Writing Assessment Plans for Secondary Education / Foundations of Educations Department 9 th Annual Assessment Presentation December 3, 2013 Junko Yamamoto.
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
Accreditation: Alignment and Assessment of Outcomes for a Learning College OPCOM PRESENTATION October ACCREDITATION ALIGNMENT ASSESSMENT.
October 2, 2013 PaRC E. Kuo M. Casey. Propose a new structure for the Student Equity Committee Provide rationale for recommendation Open to feedback,
April 30, 2013 Leticia Barajas, VP Academic Affairs and Workforce Development Academic Affairs and Workforce Divisional Resource Prioritization.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Learning Outcomes Assessment RESULTS AND ACTION PLAN Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director, University Planning.
Proposed EA Assessment Framework 2.0 Chief Architect’s Forum (CAF) Dick Burk Chief Architect and Director of Federal Enterprise Architecture Program, OMB.
TaskStream Training Presented by the Committee on Learning Assessment 2015.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Foundation of the Future Town Hall Meetings Sharon L. Vasquez, Provost Arosha Jayawickrema, VP of Finance and Administration Katherine Black, R.J. McGivney,Harry.
COD Institutional Effectiveness Process (IEP) Planning, Assessment, Allocation Learn More.
Overview Changes in the re-accreditation process since 2007 Assessment Resources.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
Audit of predetermined objectives Presentation: Portfolio Committee on Economic Development March 2013.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee.
Revisiting Foothill’s Vision, Values and Institutional Goals Wednesday, February 5, 2014 PaRC Meeting E. Kuo.
Foothill College Instructional Program Review Training Craig Gawlick Elaine Kuo Andrew LaManque Kimberlee Messina Fall /29/2014Program Review Training.
Foothill College Student Services Program Review Training Craig Gawlick Elaine Kuo Andrew LaManque Kimberlee Messina Fall /17/2014Program Review.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
Fall 2015 Professional Development Days C. Cruz-Johnson & R. Gamez August 28, Walking with Integrity Towards Student Success.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Learn More, Earn More, Live More with CT. ATC’s QEP An Update from the Topic Focus and Development Plan Team College-wide Meeting, January 25 th, 2010.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
Accreditation Institute, 3/20/10 Newport Beach, CA Dr. Dan Walden, Dean of Academic Affairs & ALO, LASC Mr. Glenn Yoshida, Department Chair (Natural Sciences/Health/PE),
Program Review: The Sequel Institutional Briefing on the Process and Outcomes of the Process.
The Quality Enhancement Plan from a SACSCOC Perspective 1 Leadership Orientation for 2016-A Institutions January 27, 2014 Michael S. Johnson Senior Vice.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
Select Slides… Spring 2013 Training Strengthening Teaching and Learning through the Results of Your Student Assessment of Instruction (SAI) For Faculty.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
Armstrong’s QEP Quality Enhancement Plan. QEP Steering Committee Nancy Remler, Chair – John Kraft, Andy Clark, Marilyn O’Mallon, Bob LeFavi, Mario Incorvaia,
College of Education and Behavioral Sciences Empowering Individuals to Lead and Serve Our Dynamic World Overview Video Welcome – Dr. Evans New Literacy.
Strategic Directions: Taking Stock Report to College Council AIQ & Strategic Directions December 4, 2015.
Foundation of the Future A Process of Program Review and Prioritization Update provided by Sharon L. Vasquez, Provost Arosha Jayawickrema, VP of Finance.
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
Conversation with the SLOA&C March 20, 2015 Professional Development Day SJCC Presenters: C. Cruz-Johnson, S. Datta, and R. Gamez Paving the Way for Student.
August 08 Montgomery College 1 Institutional Effectiveness Facilities Master Plan Middle States Review College Area Review Outcomes Assessment Academic.
1 Foothill College, El Monte Road, Los Altos Hills, CA | foothill.edu El Monte Road Los Altos Hills, CA foothill.edu 2016 Governance.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Program Review Committee Spring 2016
Mission fulfillment: How do we know?
Orientation Overview April 14, 2017
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
How an Assessment Framework helped revitalize Program Review at JCCC
LMU’s WASC Special Visit:
Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Institutional Effectiveness USF System Office of Decision Support
HARNESSING VOICES OF SUPPORT FOR PROGRAM REVIEW
What does OPC do? Tri-chairs: Bret Watson (Administrative)
Bakersfield College Annual Program Review Work Session 2013
Program Review and Accreditation
Still Lovin’ those Outcomes
Program Review Committee 2017/2018 Final Ranking Recommendations
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Foothill College Governance Redesign Update
Foothill College Governance Redesign Update
Completing your Program Review
Overview of Program Review Categories
Fort Valley State University
Start with PROGRAM REVIEW
Program Review Committee 2017/2018 Ranking Recommendations
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

Program Review Committee Foothill College Program Review Committee

Program Review Overview Comprehensives Done Every Three Years Submitted to Deans at the End of Fall Quarter Submitted to VPs In Early Winter Quarter Submitted to PRC February All programs including administrative, student services, and instructional programs submit a comprehensive program review every three years.

Program Review Committee Follows Tri-Chair Model Reviews all Comprehensives (including out of cycle) Makes Recommendations to PaRC & the President

Criteria Data Trends & Analysis Institutional Standards Student Equity Program Goals Outcomes Assessment Outcomes Reflection Overall

Red Yellow Green Green Response is clear and addresses the question, AND Results document improvements in program practices, AND Any trends in the data are steady or increasing

Red Yellow Green Yellow Response is incomplete or unclear or Issues are identified along with ideas for improvement Trends show a decline

Red Yellow Green Red Response is missing or Response identifies issues but does not demonstrate a viable plan for improvement Trends show an abrupt change or persistent decline

Overall Rating Green signifies the program is recommended to continue in the regular program review cycle. Yellow signifies that trend analysis indicates the program is not meeting targets and/or indicators identified within the program review document, or that the program review document is incomplete. Red signifies that trend analysis indicates a notable and persistent decline in viability, an abrupt change to one or more of the targets and/or indicators, or that a program previously categorized as yellow has not successfully implemented its remediation plan.

PRC Timeline Fall—Produce Program Reviews Winter—Evaluate Them Spring—Share Results (with programs and PaRC)

Questions?