Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Advertisements

Structural Basis for NHERF Recognition by ERM Proteins
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (May 2018)
Structure and Protein Design of a Human Platelet Function Inhibitor
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages (June 1996)
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages (October 1999)
Frank J. Smith, Victor P.T. Pau, Gino Cingolani, Brad S. Rothberg 
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Allosteric Effects of the Oncogenic RasQ61L Mutant on Raf-RBD
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Molecular Basis of Lysosomal Enzyme Recognition: Three-Dimensional Structure of the Cation-Dependent Mannose 6-Phosphate Receptor  David L Roberts, Daniel.
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
Rong Shi, Laura McDonald, Miroslaw Cygler, Irena Ekiel  Structure 
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Structure of the UBA Domain of Dsk2p in Complex with Ubiquitin
Splice Form Dependence of β-Neurexin/Neuroligin Binding Interactions
Structural Basis for the EBA-175 Erythrocyte Invasion Pathway of the Malaria Parasite Plasmodium falciparum  Niraj H. Tolia, Eric J. Enemark, B. Kim Lee.
Structure and Site-Specific Recognition of Histone H3 by the PHD Finger of Human Autoimmune Regulator  Suvobrata Chakravarty, Lei Zeng, Ming-Ming Zhou 
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman,
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
A Self-Sequestered Calmodulin-like Ca2+ Sensor of Mitochondrial SCaMC Carrier and Its Implication to Ca2+-Dependent ATP-Mg/Pi Transport  Qin Yang, Sven.
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Structural Insight into AMPK Regulation: ADP Comes into Play
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Ying Huang, Michael P. Myers, Rui-Ming Xu  Structure 
Structural Basis for NHERF Recognition by ERM Proteins
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
NMR Polypeptide Backbone Conformation of the E
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Structure of a HoxB1–Pbx1 Heterodimer Bound to DNA
Luc Bousset, Hassan Belrhali, Joël Janin, Ronald Melki, Solange Morera 
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Rachelle Gaudet, Andrew Bohm, Paul B Sigler  Cell 
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural Basis for Ligand Recognition and Activation of RAGE
K-Ras Populates Conformational States Differently from Its Isoform H-Ras and Oncogenic Mutant K-RasG12D  Jillian A. Parker, Alicia Y. Volmar, Spiro Pavlopoulos,
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 410-421 (March 2008) Crystal Structures of β-Neurexin 1 and β-Neurexin 2 Ectodomains and Dynamics of Splice Insertion Sequence 4  Jesko Koehnke, Xiangshu Jin, Nikola Trbovic, Phinikoula S. Katsamba, Julia Brasch, Goran Ahlsen, Peter Scheiffele, Barry Honig, Arthur G. Palmer, Lawrence Shapiro  Structure  Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 410-421 (March 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2007.12.024 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The α- and β-Neurexins Are Transcribed from Alternative Promoters of the Same Genes α-Neurexins contain an N-terminal signal peptide, which is removed from the mature protein followed by neurexin repeats, consisting of LNS (green) and EGF-like domains (blue). α- and β-NRX share a common transmembrane segment and short cytoplasmic region. The β-neurexins contain a different signal peptide and a short β-neurexin-specific sequence and share membrane proximal regions, including the final LNS domain, LNS6, with their α counterparts. Positions of the five alternative splice sites of α-neurexins are numbered and indicated by arrows. Structure 2008 16, 410-421DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.12.024) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Binding Analysis of β-NRX1Δ and 1+4 with NL1A and NL2A (A–C) Sedimentation velocity analysis of β-NRX1+4, NL1A, and their complex. SPR sensograms of the interactions of β-NRX1Δ and β-NRX1+4 with immobilized NL1A (B) and NL2A (C). Binding was tested at the concentration range indicated in each panel. (D) Binding isotherms for β-NRX1Δ (shown in red) and 1+4 (shown in blue) interacting NL1A and 2A. The responses versus concentration plots were fit using a 1:1 interaction model. The KD for each interaction is listed in Table 1. The two plots are drawn to scale. Structure 2008 16, 410-421DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.12.024) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 FHSQC Spectra of β-NRX1Δ and β-NRX1+4 Dashed boxes indicate aliased resonances from arginine Nɛ-Hɛ groups. (A and B) Resonances common to the spectra of (A) β-NRX1Δ and (B) β-NRX1+4 are shown in black, and resonances new to either spectrum are shown in red. Resonances that could not be clearly assigned to either of these categories are shown in green. (C and D) Resonances of (C) β-NRX1Δ and (D) β-NRX1+4 spectra with a heteronuclear {1H}-15N NOE value <0.5 are shown in red; values >0.5 are shown in black. Structure 2008 16, 410-421DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.12.024) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Overlay of the FHSQC Spectrum of [U-99% 15N]-β-NRX1+4 in Complex with Unlabeled NL1A (green) with the FHSQC Spectrum of [U-99% 15N]-β-NRX1+4 Alone (A) In the FHSQC spectrum of the uncomplexed β-NRX1+4, resonances not observed for β-NRX1Δ are shown in red; all remaining resonances are shown in black. Dashed boxes (black for the spectrum of the uncomplexed β-NRX1+4, green for the spectrum of the complex) indicate aliased resonances from arginine Nɛ-Hɛ groups. (B) Magnification of the region between 126.2 ppm and 132.4 ppm (F1) and 9.77 ppm and 10.51 ppm (F2), which is characteristic of Trp indole Nɛ1-Hɛ1 resonances. (C) Magnification of the region between 117.8 ppm and 123.7 ppm (F1) and 7.78 ppm and 8.51 ppm (F2), which is characteristic of disordered backbone amide resonances. Structure 2008 16, 410-421DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.12.024) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Structure of Δ-Isoform LNS Domains from β-NRX1 and β-NRX2 Rainbow ribbon diagrams from blue to red representing the N to C terminus. β Strands are numbered, and the bound Ca2+ ion in the NRX1 structure is shown as a green sphere. The α-carbon of residue 200, the position of splice insertion 4, is shown as a magenta sphere. An eight-residue stretch in the β9-β10 loop of NRX2 is disordered and is indicated by a dashed yellow line. Structure 2008 16, 410-421DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.12.024) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Structure of the Ca2+ Binding Region from β-NRX1, and Comparison with LNS2 from α-NRX1 (A) Image of 1.7 Å 2Fo-Fc electron density contoured at 1.0 σ in the region of the Ca2+ binding site. (B) The Ca2+ ion is ligated by four ligands in the Ca2+ binding site, one water molecule, and a glutamic acid side chain from a symmetry mate. (C) Superposition of LNS2 from α-NRX1 (blue) on the β-NRX1 structure (green and yellow) shows that the Ca2+ binding sites are positioned identically in each LNS domain. Ligation by the N208 side chain appears to be common to all the β-NRX but absent from many other LNS domains of α-NRX. Structure 2008 16, 410-421DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.12.024) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Comparison of Electrostatic Surface Potential in β-NRX1 and β-NRX2 Surface potentials calculated using the program GRASP2 (Petrey and Honig, 2003) are displayed in blue (positive) and red (negative) for the potential range +5 to −5 kT. The “top” surface is not shown for β-NRX2, because eight residues in the β9-β10 loop that contribute to the top surface are disordered. Structure 2008 16, 410-421DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.12.024) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Sequence Alignment of the LNS Domains from Rat β-NRX1, 2, and 3 and the Ectodomains from Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans Neurexins The secondary structure of β-NRX1 is shown above the alignment. Residues that ligate Ca2+ are denoted as blue stars (side chain ligation) or circles (main chain carbonyl ligation). The position of splice site 4 is indicated. The loop regions that contribute to the Ca2+ binding face of the β-NRX are highlighted in blue. The disordered region of the β-NRX2 structure is highlighted in gray. Structure 2008 16, 410-421DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.12.024) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions