River groups with extension

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intercalibration of assessment systems for the WFD: Aims, achievements and further challenges Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute.
Advertisements

Lake Intercalibration: status of ongoing work Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Intercalibration Guidance: update Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
WG 2A ECOSTAT 7-8 July 2004 Task on Harmonisation of Freshwater Biological Methods Status Report AC Cardoso and A Solimini Harmonisation Task Team: JRC.
ECOSTAT 8-9 October 2007 River GIGs: Future intercalibration needs/plans Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
River Intercalibration Phase 2: Milestone 4 reports Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
ECOSTAT 8-9 October 2007 Comparability of the results of the intercalibration exercise – MS sharing the same method Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint.
River Intercalibration Phase 2: Milestone 2 reports Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
River Intercalibration Phase 2: Milestone 3 reports Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
GIG plan updates GIG leads were requested to update their work plans
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Intercalibration Results 2006
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive Working Group A ECOSTAT Ecological Status 7th Meeting Stresa, Lago Maggiore, Italy
IC network selection process
WG 2A Ecological Status First results of the metadata collection for the draft intercalibration register: RIVERS.
CIS guidance document on E-Flows
Working Group A ECOSTAT October 2006 Summary/Conclusions
Synthesis of the intercalibration process Working group 2.5.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Objectives & Agenda of the meeting March 2005
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
GEP vs. GES.
River GIGs: Future intercalibration needs/plans Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Task 1 - Intercalibration WG 2A ECOSTAT - Intercalibration
Progress report Working Group D - Reporting SCG meeting May 2008 Unit D.2 Water and the Marine - WFD Team.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Summary progress report River GIGs Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Central-Baltic Rivers GIG progress
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT WFD CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting, October 2005 Progress in the intercalibration exercise.
Progress report Working Group D - Reporting SCG meeting May 2008 Unit D.2 Water and the Marine - WFD Team.
Common Implementation Strategy for the
Activity on environmental objectives and exemptions
Nutrient Standards: Proposals for further work
Update on progress since last WG meeting (13-14 June 2002)
Working Group A ECOSTAT Update on intercalibration Prepared by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT State of play in the intercalibration exercise Water Directors Meeting, November 2005.
Progress Report Working Group A Ecological Status Intercalibration (1) & Harmonisation (3) Activities Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen EC Joint Research.
Intercalibration Decision and Technical Report
WFD – CIS Working group A ECOSTAT
Activities of WG A Ecological Status
ECOSTAT, JRC April 2007 MEDiterranean RIVers GIG Report
WG A Ecological Status Progress report April-October 2009
EU Water Framework Directive
Working Group A ECOSTAT progress report on Intercalibration Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
ECOSTAT, Stresa, Italy, October 2005
Water Directors meeting Warsaw, 8-9 December 2011
IC remaining gaps: overview and way forward
Water Directors meeting Spa, 2-3 December 2010
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Guidance for the intercalibration process Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
WG A ECOSTAT Intercalibration guidance : Annexes III, V, VI
Status of the Nutrient Best Practice Guide
Lake Intercalibration – IC Decision Annexes + what to do in future
Standardisation/Harmonisation
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT WFD CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting, 22 Febraury 2006 Progress Report.
Lake Intercalibration
Common Implementation Strategy for the
WG A Ecological Status Progress report April-October 2010
Reporting template for milestone reports
Common Implementation Strategy for the
WFD CIS WG ECOSTAT meeting on 8-9 October 2007 Objectives What do we need to achieve during this meeting?
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
NEA GIG COORDINATION.
2nd phase intercalibration
Intercalibration round 2: finalisation and open technical issues – RIVERS ECOSTAT October 2012.
EU Water Framework Directive
Fish intercalibration – rivers Progress and expected outcome
WG A Ecological Status Intercalibration: Where do we go from here ?
WG A Ecological Status Progress report October 2010 – May 2011
Baltic Sea GIG Status Ecostat 23 April 2013
Why are we reviewing reference conditions in intercalibration?
Presentation transcript:

WG A Ecological Status Rivers intercalibration – update on progress of groups with 6-month extension

River groups with extension Mediterranean GIG – all BQEs (except Fish) EC GIG – Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Large Rivers – Phytobenthos and Invertebrates Additional issue: macrophytes for NO GIG

MED GIG Progress with the work done by the Portuguese coordination theme No new Milestone delivered because the outcomes have not yet been discussed with the participating Member States – no new info to present to ECOSTAT Full results and draft final milestone report expected soon Final meeting 10-11 October to endorse final results

EC GIG Updated Milestone reports available on CIRCA Macrophytes: Methods available, data set in place Problems with RC – solution: ‘continuous benchmarking EC GIG can take advantage of the now finalized work in the CB GIG Phytobenthos: Analysis under way No major problems expected (?) Detailed Milestone reports expected with final resuts expected for next ECOSTAT

Large rivers Progress with the work done by the DE coordination theme Phytobenthos, Benthic Invertebrates No new Milestone delivered – no new info to report Full results and draft final milestone report expected in time to be included in the current IC

Macrophytes in NO GIG Macrophytes work never started in NO GIG JRC has asked the MS for clarifications UK: macrophyte method intercalibrated in CB GIG, considers that they have fulfilled their IC obligations SE, FI, NO have put together a (draft) document explaining the situation: SE, FI, NO have no final methods at the moment All three countries foresee such methods in the future: NO already late 2012 SE has recently started a research project FI sees this as something for future development

Macrophytes in NO GIG - Conclusions No macrophyte methods in the NO countries at the moment No NO macrophytes in the 2011 intercalibration Methods are in development – up to NO MS to intercalibrate them when ready Propose to distribute the note prepared by the NO countries to ECOSTAT

Method checking for the intercalibration exercise: what methods can be included in the exercise? ECOSTAT paper summarizing the situation and proposing solutions for problems encountered by the GIGs when applying the existing guidance (it is not a new guidance document) General issues (e.g. not all aspects of a BQE covered; no response to pressure demonstrated) and specific issues for the BQEs General recommendation: IC groups and/or MS should provide justifications that are strong enough to pass scientific peer review

Status of the paper… SCG 11-12 May: No need to have it endorsed by SCG/Water Directors as it is not a guidance document Paper updated after last ECOSTAT meeting  version 2.0 of 16 May 2011 taking into account the comments received Propose not to have another discussion/revision of the paper, but to bring up relevant issues with the intercalibration results