GAINESVILLE HALL COUNTY Comprehensive Plan Update Land Demand & Development Capacity May 28, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Click here to add text Click here to add text. Joint Informational Meeting Cornelius Road Area Presented by Iredell County and the Town of Mooresville.
Advertisements

July 19, Horizon West Area 28,000 Gross Acres Six (6) Planned Villages / Communities Includes one (1) Town Center ~41,000 Planned Households.
Pinellas by Design: A Blueprint for Updating the Countywide Plan Pinellas Planning Council May 18, 2011.
Purpose of TDR Market Analysis To determine whether and where there is demand for development over and above whats permitted by baseline zoning How that.
Missoula Planning Summit Milestone 14 August, 2008 Missoula, Montana.
1 Site Capacity and Natural Resource Protection Relationships in Subdivision Design.
Kirkland 2035 Plan Update Summary of EIS Alternatives Transportation Commission – September 25, 2014.
General Plan Amendment 2008 (960) General Plan Advisory Committee January 20, 2009.
“Old Approach to Needs Analysis” The standard practice in Oregon has been to extrapolate forward the past 5 or more years in housing production as the.
Smith County - Public Hearing TRZ Description & Boundary Based initially from 1-mile off centerline for Toll 49 alignment Included all GIS parcels for.
3680 Avalon Park Blvd E Orlando, FL Phone: Fax: Future Land Use Allocation Model (FLUAM)
CITY OF TIGARD Respect and Care | Do the Right Thing | Get it Done City of Tigard Economic Opportunities Analysis May 10, 2011City Council Public Hearing.
 Matt Gates.  Forecast sprawl  Guide long-range population and employment forecasts o For the region o For individual counties  Allocate growth to.
Proposed Modification of Policies for Rural Employment Centers Policy 6.3 of the Future Land Use Element of the Alachua County Comprehensive plan CPA
Community Planning Land Use Education Project Charlotte P. Burckhardt, AICP, PCP Principal Planner.
Presented by: ECONorthwest December 15, Agenda Introductions (10 minutes) Overview of the project (30 minutes) Presentation by ECONorthwest Role.
High Growth Counties: Opportunities for Pinal County Pinal County Comprehensive Plan Curt Dunham AICP Partners for Strategic Action, Inc. Comprehensive.
Lec 15 LU, Part 1: Basics and simple LU models (ch6.1 & 2 (A), ch (C1) Get a general idea of urban planning theories (from rading p (A)
Multi-Family Development Trends in Delaware David L. Edgell, AICP Principal Planner.
Land-Use and Transportation
The Effects of Different Land Uses in Missouri on Local Fiscal Conditions – Cost of Community Services Project Update – 4/12/02.
PUBLIC HEARING: Development (Impact) Fees - Land Use Assumptions & Infrastructure Improvement Plan Reports June 30, 2014.
TRANSECT ZONING IN DUBUQUE COUNTY Prepared by: Barrett Voigt Jamie Sanchagrin Evgeny Chavanin Special thanks to: Dr. Anthony Andrea Uhl.
Candidate Briefing and Update. 45 minutes. Not a lot of time for most, for me IMPOSSIBLE ! ◦ Personal background ◦ Vision ◦ Development of a comprehensive.
R IDGEFIELD P IONEER & 45 TH S UB -A REA P LAN E. D. Hovee & Company, LLC BergerABAM Stakeholder Meeting #1 June 1, 2015.
Public Workshops July 12, 2011 | Napa July 14, 2011 | St. Helena WELCOME!
What is Legacy? Current Comprehensive Plan for Forsyth County and Winston-Salem. Adopted in 2001 by Forsyth County and its 8 municipalities. Focuses on.
Housing Element Update Workshop The City of Fillmore is Currently Updating its Housing Element  State law mandates the Housing Element be included.
CorPlan: Place Based Scenario Planning Tool
Chittenden County Land Use - Transportation Decision Support System November 19, 2003 Chittenden County Metropolitan.
June 30, 2015 Land Use Meeting Heather Gutherless Jefferson County Planning & Zoning
FLORIDA 2060 A Research Project of 1000 Friends of Florida.
Flintstone-Oldtown Planning Region Comprehensive Plan Kick-Off Meeting June 23, 2010 Insert pictures.
UPlan: How It Works and How to Get Started A description for the rest of us Nathaniel Roth Information Center for the Environment University of California,
Estimating Residential Infill Capacity: A Bay Area Application John D. Landis Department of City & Regional Planning UC Berkeley for Caltrans Horizons.
Wisconsin’s Forests and the Comprehensive Planning Law Preserving forests in the wilderness of Smart Growth.
Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) June, 2007 Kirby Date, Countryside Program Coordinator.
Avalon Park Retail Market Analysis Fishkind and Associates, Inc Corporate Blvd. Orlando, FL December 12, 2008.
“Connecting People and Places” REGIONAL MOBILITY PLAN Future Scenarios October 19, 2009.
Review of Data Model.  Major Office  Employment occurring in office buildings of 1,860 square metres (20,000 sq. ft.) or larger  Population Related.
Impact Fee Updates Board of County Commissioners Public Hearings October 30, 2012.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP DECEMBER 14, Sec Review requirements. (a) The City Manager shall each fiscal year prepare a preliminary capital improvement.
The Capacity of Hope: Developing a Regional Build-Out Model with GIS Martin Kim, Tom Harner, Kathryn Youra Polk The Capacity of Hope: Developing a Regional.
Alternative Growth Futures Studio University of Colorado at Denver Sponsors: Custer Heritage Committee San Isabel Foundation Sonoran Institute.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 4: How to Develop SCEA Land Use Information How to Develop Land Use Information.
 Kevin Behm – Addison County Regional Planning Commission  Kevin Behm – Addison County Regional Planning Commission Community Build-Out.
Jefferson County Agricultural Preservation and Land Use Plan Jefferson County’s Comprehensive Plan: Process and Strategies Presented to: Dane County Officials.
RVCOG Advisory Committee Meeting Discussion on Draft Interpretation of The Urban Reserve Rule Location Factors And Analysis of RPS Growth Areas February.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP DECEMBER 21, Sec Review requirements. (a) The City Manager shall each fiscal year prepare a preliminary capital improvement.
September 2005Urban Planning Carleton University 1 Land Use-Transportation Interaction, Urban Activity System Analysis Concepts & Methods.
Presentation to the Water and Environmental Planning Committee September 22, 2006 Ad Hoc Committee on UGB/A Policy: Progress Report.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion June 19, 2012 Growth Management Legislative Discussion June 19, 2012.
Housing Element Update Workshop #2 January 28, 2009.
“ Grand Landings North” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing March 3, 2015.
Steve Horenstein CASE STUDIES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSES AND RESULTS : Comprehensive planning as an economic development tool; Striking the right.
DUVALL 2015 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE and SURVEY RESULTS 9:00 – 10:30 AM Survey Results 30 minutes (Lara) Comprehensive Plan, Density and Capacity, and.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 1 – ANNEXATION, PLANNING AREA, AND DENSITIES 11/07/2013.
Fiscal Impact Analysis – City of Norwalk, Connecticut October 5, 2006 Prepared by:RKG Associates, Inc. Economic, Planning and Real Estate Consultants 277.
1 PSRC and Comprehensive Plan Updates City of Duvall Joint Planning Commission / City Council Duvall, WA March 5, 2014.
Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item.
BUILDABLE LANDS ANALYSIS City of Snoqualmie Planning & Buildable Sno-lutions Chris Sungjin Im Ian Garnier Nick Nielson Geography 469.
ULI Symposium: Central City Commercial Development 1988.
Island County Comprehensive Plan 2016 Review and Update Buildable Lands Analysis Results 1.
Land Use Urban Service Boundary is the framework for managing growth.
Updates to the Traffic Reduction and Transportation Improvements Fee (TR/TIF) City Council July 24, 2017.
Land Use Assumptions Public Hearing - 5/31/18
Comprehensive Plan Update
Davie County Comprehensive Land Development Plan
Southwest Urban Growth Area Boundary Planning Study
Presentation transcript:

GAINESVILLE HALL COUNTY Comprehensive Plan Update Land Demand & Development Capacity May 28, 2003

Tonight we will Discuss: Where we are in the Planning Process Why we do a Demand and Capacity Analysis The method and results of the Demand Analysis The method and results of the Capacity Analysis Comparison of the Demand to Capacity What this means for the City/County

Where are we in this process? Land Demand Analysis Land Capacity Analysis Vision and Policy Development Plan Development Implementation Strategy Project Initiation Inventories Public Outreach

Why do a Demand & Capacity Analysis Identify potential future growth pressures Identify the current capacity of the City/County to deal with potential growth To create a baseline for what if scenarios To establish a foundation for the discussion of policy questions How should we prepare for the future?

Caution: These analyses and forecasts represent what could happen if current trends continue and current policies are implemented. They do not reflect a value judgment as to whether they are desirable or not.

What Have We Heard? Five Consensus Planning Themes: Quality Growth Efficient Growth Fiscally Sound Growth Urban and Rural Growth Coordinated Growth

Five Attributes of Growth Location of Growth Amount of Growth Rate and Timing of Growth Fiscal Impact of Growth Quality and Environmental Impact of Growth

The Demand Analysis Bill Ross

Demand Analysis Methodology 1. Population and employment forecasts 2. Translate population into dwelling units in different categories 3. Translate employment into land use categories 4. Translate employment into square footage and acreage

Forecasts Past trends – we looked back: Thirty years ( ) Recent past (the 1990s) Natural growth process affected by: Market response to land availability Infrastructure constraints Redevelopment, communication diversity Technological innovation

Forecasts Assumptions Past trends represent a valid anticipation of future change in Hall County and its cities. Those past trends will continue with few changes in the market forces that created them. Factors that would otherwise limit growth naturally will not begin to affect growth until the latter portion of the 2030 forecast horizon.

Forecasts Hall County Population 162,372489,366 Employment 95,605280,792

Forecasts Gainesville Population 29,66287,309 Employment 51,92492,088

Comparison to Other Counties

Residential Demand

Nonresidential Demand

Questions about Demand?

The Capacity Analysis Greg Dale

Capacity Analysis Methodology 1. Identify available land (Gross Land) 2. Identify constraints to land (Net Land) 3. Identify Potential Development Areas (PDAs) 4. Assign Development Density 5. Calculate Residential Unit and Nonresidential Building Area Capacity

How much land is available? Assumptions Vacant Parcels in City Most land zoned for agriculture in the County Conservation land, in floodplains or stream buffers is not available Certain small fragments of land are not included Only includes land in Gainesville and unincorporated Hall County

Net Land Assumptions The way steep slope reduces the capacity of land varies 15 % of Gross Land is needed for infrastructure

Residential Capacity Assumptions Calculated for areas currently designated for residential development Guided by existing Comprehensive Plan, adopted land use density and Zoning Regulations Different between City and County High and low scenario 108,109 Net Acres for Residential

Net Residential Acreage Hall County –104,760 acres Gainesville- 3,079 acres

Residential Capacity Density Assumptions

Residential Unit Capacity (Adjusted) 72, ,707 Total Units

Nonresidential Capacity Assumptions Density based on established floor area ratios Capacity calculated for Office Commercial/Retail Industrial 13,322 net acres of nonresidential land

Net Nonresidential Acreage Commercial/Retail-918 acres Office- 3,281 acres Industrial-9,122 acres

Nonresidential Density Assumptions

Nonresidential Building Area Capacity (Adjusted) million SF total nonresidential

Capacity Questions ?

Residential Demand vs. Capacity

Single Family New Units

Nonresidential Demand vs. Capacity

Implications of Demand and Capacity There is potential market pressure to build out most of Hall County under the current planning policies within the planning horizon This means that we need to be thinking about the end state for the City and County In some ways, this makes the planning simpler – we are not planning for a portion of the county, only to be revisited again and again

Implications of Demand and Capacity We should assume that the future pattern of land uses, intensities, densities, and character proposed in this plan is the final pattern We can identify this final pattern relative to the final level of infrastructure needed to support it Once we establish the final state, then we address how to get there in the most orderly and efficient way, which includes rate of growth issues, the relationship of land use to infrastructure, the allocation of costs of the infrastructure

Next Month: Examine the demand and capacity further Where do we have capacity? Is it in the right places, both from a market perspective, and from a land use perspective? How does the capacity of different types of residential land use compare to demand?

Next Month: Is the end state suggested by current policies what the community wants to be in years? What are the policy implications for the Comprehensive Plan?

Questions and Comments