How does the data relate to reality?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Loftus and Palmer Leading Questions.
Advertisements

PYA1: Critical Issue Eye Witness Testimony EWT. Eye Witness Testimony EWT The statements provided by witnesses of a crime or situation which help to establish.
The Social Approach  Altruism has been defined as behaviour intended to help others having NO benefit to ourselves.
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Loftus & Palmer (1974) - Aim: - To see the effect of leading questions on Eye Witness Testimony.
Eye-witness testimony
Baron Cohen et al (1997) Reading Minds The eye task.
The psychology of human relationships Social responsibility © Hodder & Stoughton 2013.
Evaluation of bandura.
Reliability and Validity. * How consistent the test is within itself - this might be affected by different people collecting the data differently in an.
Memory and the power of suggestion
Social Influence Research Is it ethical? Is it valid? Campbell Russell.
Introduction to Research Methods Psychologists try to explain human behaviour. They do this by conducting research.
VALIDITY IS THE RESEARCH MEASURING WHAT IT AIMED TO MEASURE?
Lecture 10: Issues with Laboratory Studies. When to Use Lab Studies? First define the question as a universalistic or particularistic research question.
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. Social Psychology Assumptions: That other people influence our behaviour. 1. Individuals and groups affect behavior (you act differently.
Reliability of one cognitive process
Memorise these words, you have until I have finished reading them out. sournicecandy honeysugarsoda bitterchocolategood hearttastecake toothtartpie.
Loftus And Palmer The Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction.
AICE.Milgram.
AS Level Psychology The core studies
Evaluate, including the relative strengths and weaknesses, of Field experiments including their use in criminological psychology with regard to : Evaluate,
The task The task: You need to create a set of slides to use as your evaluation tools Once created please print them out and bring to your lesson. Use.
INTRODUCTION TO METHODS Higher Psychology. What do Psychologists do?  Discuss in groups  5MINS.
Witness Appeal: Effect of shields and videotape on children giving evidence.
Loftus & Palmer Cognitive Psychology The Core Studies.
Lesson 4. In a laboratory experiment involving a medical consultation role-play, participants were randomly allocated to one of two conditions. In Condition.
Eyewitness Testimony Violence and Recall Loftus & Burns: showed participants a filmed bank robbery. One version shots were fired but no one was hurt.
Research methods Designing an experiment Lesson 5.
Designing psychological investigations
Memory Bingo! HypothesisIndependent variable Dependent variable Weapon focusDecaySensory store CapacityEncodingPeterson and Peterson LoftusCentral ExecutivePhonological.
1.3 Research in Psychology: Experimental Methods Pgs
Observation.
Ethics in Psychology.
Solomon Asch’s 1951 conformity experiment
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY APPROACH
Discussion Loftus and Palmer suggest 2 explanations for the results of Experiment 1: Response Bias: The different speed estimates occurred because the.
Loftus and Palmer Study one Study two Aim Reconstructive memory is….
Multiple choice questions
AS Psychology The Core studies
Psychology and Research Methods
Piliavin et al. (1969) Good Samaritanism: An underground phenomenon?
Loftus and Palmer (1974) (A2) Reconstruction of automobile destruction and example of the interaction between language and memory.
Research methods Lesson 3.
Results (1) Children from the aggressive model group showed significantly more imitation of the model’s physical & verbal aggression and non-aggressive.
Problems with Kohlberg’s method
Reliability of Memory Ms. Carmelitano.
Research Methods in Psychology
Methodology of the Behaviourist Approach
IS THE RESEARCH MEASURING WHAT IT AIMED TO MEASURE?
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Observation.
Piliavin.
G r a v e AO3 EVALUATE GENERALISABILITY VALIDITY
what have we learned from past two lessons?
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Types of Experiments Lab Field Natural Quasi.
IS THE RESEARCH MEASURING WHAT IT AIMED TO MEASURE?
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
L.O: Misleading information leading questions post-event discussion.
VI. Analysis of Results 6. Why then would the Placebo Ps show both greater self report and behavioral emotional responses than the Epi Inf group. a.
The cognitive area.
What is the social area? Conformity Environment Obedience
EXPERIMENTAL METHOD.
Research Method Sample Ethics Data Validity Reliability
The effect of Anxiety on Eyewitness Testimony
 Piliavin et al. developed a model to explain their results called the Arousal: Cost vs. Reward model. They argue that firstly, observation of an emergency.
Levine et al continued.
Similarities between the studies: Differences between the studies:
AS Psychology Research Methods
Presentation transcript:

How does the data relate to reality? Ecological Validity How does the data relate to reality?

“to what extent does the research reflect real-life situations” Ecological Validity “to what extent does the research reflect real-life situations” It can either mean how realistic is an experiment eg. Plane crash simulation Mock trial Or it can mean is that how we really behave? Eg. Eyes test Yuki’s emoticons

Ecological Validity A piece of research can be described as having either, HIGH ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY OR LOW ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY And the distinction isn’t always clear cut…

HIGH ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY OR LOW ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY Research into passenger behaviour during emergencies in planes. Simulations can never capture the fear

HIGH ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY OR LOW ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY Loftus and Palmer 1974 used videos of car crashes to test if differently phrased questions led to different approximations if speed. A video will never capture the full sensation of witnessing a car crash. How fast were the cars going when they contacted each each other? 31.8 mph How fast were the cars going when they collided with each other? 40.08 mph

HIGH ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY OR LOW ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY Mock trials are often used in Forensic Psychology A mock trial cannot be considered equal to real trial as the verdict does hold the same significance. However sometimes if the participants genuinely participate in the trial then surely their verdict would not differ in a real- life case?

HIGH ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY OR LOW ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY Baron – Cohen et al. 1997 used the eyes test to demonstrate how adults with autism or Asperger’s Syndrome performed less well reading the emotions in people’s eyes as shown here. However, is looking only a picture of the eyes how we really gauge people’s emotions in everyday life?

HIGH ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY OR LOW ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY Piliavin et al. 1969 conducted research into bystander behaviour (whether or not people would help an actor pretending to collapse). This was a field study and can be said to be high in ecological validity as the participants (the passengers) though it was real

Advanced discussion Often ecological validity is improved at the expense of experimental control Mundane realism can lead to demand characteristics In harmful situations high ecological validity (realistic) may entail ethical considerations