2007 Intermodal Operations Planning Workshop Bus Stop & Bus Lane Capacity: Planning Bus Routes in Downtown Seattle Owen Kehoe, PE, PTOE Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A34 Corridor Strategy Strategic Route Improvements 25 th November 2004 working together with.
Advertisements

SR Lititz Pike Bridge Replacement Note: Dates indicated in this presentation are estimated based on the contractors current schedule and does.
Bus Lane with Intermittent Priority Graham Carey PE., AICP BRT Project Engineer, Lane Transit District, Eugene, Oregon QUALITY TRANSIT -- NOW.
The Downtown Seattle Bus Monitoring System Collecting and Analyzing Transit Travel Time Data Owen Kehoe, PE, PTOE King County Metro Transit : Seattle,
Third Avenue Skip-Stop Operations Now a Rainbow of Frequent, Efficient Service Owen Kehoe, PE, PTOE King County Metro Transit, Transportation Engineer.
Directions to Jackson Federal Building and parking.
Urban Partnership Agreement Summary Metropolitan Council Meeting September 12, 2007.
D2 Roadway Discussion Sound Transit Board September 22, 2011.
MUNI Operations Overview and Recent Innovations Julie Kirschbaum San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, Operations Planning and Scheduling Manager.
Breaking the Static Barrier: Building Regional Support for Implementation of Dynamic Traffic Assignment in Long-Range Planning Processes TRB Planning Applications.
Comparative Traffic Study Morrisville-Carpenter Road versus Crabtree Crossing Extension Presentation to: Morrisville Town Council Prepared by: Parsons.
The State Route 246 Central Avenue Ext. and Purisima Road Traffic Study May 2008.
The TRANSIMS Model: Combining Travel Demand and Microsimulation Operating Paradigms Presented to 2012 ITE District 6 Annual Meeting by John Kerenyi, P.E.,
38 th Street to Kessler Boulevard Traffic Engineering Review Summary For Historic Midtown Initiative (HARMONI) By HNTB Corporation June, 2010.
Route 17 Corridor Study Public Workshop II – November 29, 2012 Orange / Sullivan County 1.
Transit Improvements on East-West Routes in Downtown Minneapolis Michael Mechtenberg Planner Metro Transit Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN.
Board of County Commissioners November 8, Recommendation Project Background and Location Traffic Analysis Comparison of Alternatives Public Meeting.
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
Planning and Polishing Service for High Schools Kristin Thompson Supervisor, Service Analysis Metro Transit Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN.
ICM Minnesota – Interstate 394 Brian Kary, Minnesota Department of Transportation.
1 Presentation to TAC June 17, 2009 Overview of Rapid Bus Measures and Effectiveness And Case Studies.
South/West Corridor Improvements Service and Facility Alternatives September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee March 3, 2015.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
ITS for BRT Systems: How Does Boston’s Silver Line Compare With Other BRT Systems? Carol Schweiger, Assistant Vice President ITS Georgia Annual Meeting.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 20: Transit System Design.
Metrobus 30s Line Study Improving Your Customer’s Transit Experience Virginia Transit Association May 20,
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
Urban Partnership Agreement Summary August 27, 2007.
I-35W and 46 th Street Final Service Restructuring Plan.
May 1, 2014 East Gude Drive Pedestrian Road Safety Audit Stakeholder Pedestrian Safety Meeting.
Roosevelt Road: State to Columbus Public Meeting September 22, 2015.
The Transit “T” Craig Lamothe UPA Transit Project Manager City of Minneapolis City of Lakes Innovative Choices for Congestion Relief.
FORTIFY……… ……………..I-40 / I-440 NC DOT Project. August 2012 New I-40/440 rebuild project dubbed 'Crawleigh' by NC DOT October 2013 New I-40/440 rebuild.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
Challenges in Using Paramics in a Secondary Plan Study – Case Study of Downsview, Toronto Paramics Users Group Meeting October 5, 2009.
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
Company LOGO Ramp Meters. Company LOGO What are Ramp Meters? Part of NaviGAtor, Georgia DOT’s Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Also includes electronic.
WWS527a: Transportation Strategies to 2030 for a Climate Responsible New York City: Maximizing Capacity, Minimizing Impact Wendy W Fok Putting “Service.
May 10, 2007 Presented by: Bill Ball, AICP and Joel Rey, P.E., AICP BRT To Maximize Person Capacity Within Limited ROW Using.
ITS PCB T3 Webinar October 21, 2008 Montgomery County, Maryland Advanced Transportation Management System Automated Parking Information System Operational.
Line 22 BRT: Summary Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority May 2003.
Leveraging GIS to Implement an Automated Bus Announcement Program GIS in Transit Conference Metro Transit, Minneapolis/St. Paul.
Village of Palmetto Bay
Rainier Avenue South Pilot Project Update Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board Project Manager Jim Curtin September 2, 2015.
Express/Rapid Bus Opportunities for Priority Bus Transit in the Washington Region Sponsored by National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Chun.
Travel Reliability – Reliable traffic flow is more important than reducing congestion – traffic congestion is often a sign of an area’s economic vitality.
Integrated Corridor Management Initiative ITS JPO Lead: Mike Freitas Technical Lead: John Harding, Office of Transportation Management.
Overview of King County Transit Signal Priority Program T3 Webinar January 22, 2008.
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data David T. Crout Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) Presented at Transportation.
Real-time Bus Information on Mobile Devices Stuart D. Maclean, Daniel J. Dailey ITS Research Program University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Fairview Avenue North Bridge Replacement Project Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board MariLyn J. Yim, P.E. October 7, 2015.
Pavement Replacement Priority in Seattle Ali Boyum, Kayla Dantzler, John Mayfield, Derek Van De Wege.
Metro’s Use of Data URBDP 422 An exploration of data integration to better plan and analyze transit service.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Photos by Susie Fitzhugh Bell Times Analysis Task Force Getting students to and from school safely January 22 nd 2015.
ATDM Analytical Methods for Urban Streets Urban Streets Subcommittee Meeting January 10, 2016 David Hale.
University Drive Road Diet September 8, Goals and Objectives A. Reduce vehicular speed in the corridor. B. Provide an attractive bicycle accommodation.
MODULE 4, LESSON 5 Developing Service: Calculating Capacity.
The Downtown Seattle Bus Monitoring System A New Way of Collecting and Analyzing Transit Travel Time Data Owen Kehoe, PE, PTOE King County Metro Transit.
Evaluation of Hard Shoulder vs
City Council Meeting November 7, 2016
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ACEC Presentation May 25, 2017
TRB Planning Applications Conference 2017
Grey County Transportation Master Plan
Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data
M14A/D Select Bus Service
Transportation Engineering Calculating Signal Delay February 23, 2011
Presentation transcript:

2007 Intermodal Operations Planning Workshop Bus Stop & Bus Lane Capacity: Planning Bus Routes in Downtown Seattle Owen Kehoe, PE, PTOE Transportation Engineer Speed & Reliability Group King County Metro Transit Seattle, WA

Background Speed & Reliability Group Special projects, improve existing service Special projects, improve existing service Traffic Engineering background Traffic Engineering background Work with local DOTs Work with local DOTs Transit in Downtown Seattle: daily buses on 5 Avenues daily buses on 5 Avenues Bus Tunnel Bus Tunnel

Background 2-year Bus Tunnel Closure 2-year Bus Tunnel Closure – Buses diverted to surface streets 3 rd Avenue: Two way, Four Lanes 3 rd Avenue: Two way, Four Lanes Skip Stop operation: Blue & Yellow Zones Skip Stop operation: Blue & Yellow Zones General Traffic Restricted: Right-Turn Only AM/PM Peak General Traffic Restricted: Right-Turn Only AM/PM Peak 2 nd & 4 th Avenues: One way with transit lane 2 nd & 4 th Avenues: One way with transit lane Tunnel opening September 2007 Tunnel opening September 2007 – Traffic restrictions remain on 3 rd Avenue – Shift additional routes to 3 rd Avenue How many buses can we load onto 3 rd Avenue?

Too Many!

How Many Buses? Methodology presented in TCRP TCQS Manual Methodology presented in TCRP TCQS Manual – Bus Stop Capacity – Bus Lane Capacity Developed custom worksheet Developed custom worksheet – Need to automate, user-friendly – Uses available input data – Dialog with transit planning staff Focus on PM peak condition Focus on PM peak condition – 3 rd Avenue, NB & SB – 2 nd Avenue, SB only

Bus Stop Capacity # of Loading Areas Dwell Time Clearance Time Signal Timing Failure Rate Main InputsCalculationsOutput Capacity buses/hr 25% Right-Turn traffic

83 bus/hr 81 bus/hr 114 bus/hr 139 bus/hr 90 bus/hr 107 bus/hr 136 bus/hr 3 rd Ave Pine St Pike St Union St University St Seneca St Spring St Madison St Marion St Columbia St Cherry St James St Identify Critical Bus Stops NB Bus stop capacity Refine Dwell Time & Clearance Time measurements Blue Zone Capacity: 75 buses/hr Yellow Zone Capacity: 80 buses/hr

Bus Lane Capacity Adjacent Lane traffic Main InputsCalculationsOutput Bus Lane Capacity buses/hr Yellow Zone Capacity Blue Zone Capacity

3 rd Ave Pine St Pike St Union St University St Seneca St Spring St Madison St Marion St Columbia St Cherry St James St Blue Zone Capacity: 75 buses/hr Yellow Zone Capacity: 75 buses/hr SB Third Avenue Capacity: 140 buses/hr Blue Zone Capacity: 75 buses/hr Yellow Zone Capacity: 80 buses/hr NB Third Avenue Capacity: 140 buses/hr

End Results Compared bus volume to capacity Compared bus volume to capacity Assigned routes to 3 rd Avenue Assigned routes to 3 rd Avenue – Just enough buses/hr added – Skip-stops well-balanced Future Planning Future Planning – Identify improvements to increase capacity – BRT service integration Triple skip stop pattern? Triple skip stop pattern?

Key Lessons Learned Planning bus stop capacity for reliability Planning bus stop capacity for reliability – Maximize use of transit priority streets – Tool for planning/scheduling routes Balance: bus volume vs. reliability Balance: bus volume vs. reliability – Capacity = limit for acceptable reliability – Failure Rate sets reliability level Critical bus stops are key Critical bus stops are key – Analysis/data collection efforts – Capacity improvements

2007 Intermodal Operations Planning Workshop Owen Kehoe, PE, PTOE Speed & Reliability Group King County Metro Transit Seattle, WA Bus Stop & Bus Lane Capacity: Planning Bus Routes in Downtown Seattle