How glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase selects glutamine

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Advertisements

Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Luke D Sherlin, John J Perona  Structure 
Structure of β2-bungarotoxin: potassium channel binding by Kunitz modules and targeted phospholipase action  Peter D Kwong, Neil Q McDonald, Paul B Sigler,
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2000)
by Andrew D. Ferguson, Eckhard Hofmann, James W
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Structure and Protein Design of a Human Platelet Function Inhibitor
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2000)
Yu Luo, Su-Chen Li, Min-Yuan Chou, Yu-Teh Li, Ming Luo  Structure 
Solution Structure of a Cyanovirin-N:Manα1-2Manα Complex
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (August 2007)
Beyond the “Recognition Code”
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages (September 1995)
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (June 1995)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages (June 1996)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Mark Ultsch, Nathalie A Lokker, Paul J Godowski, Abraham M de Vos 
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Xiao Tao, Zhiru Yang, Liang Tong  Structure 
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2001)
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Chi-Hon Lee, Kalle Saksela, Urooj A Mirza, Brian T Chait, John Kuriyan 
A biosynthetic thiolase in complex with a reaction intermediate: the crystal structure provides new insights into the catalytic mechanism  Yorgo Modis,
Kevin G. Hoff, José L. Avalos, Kristin Sens, Cynthia Wolberger 
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
The structural basis for pyrophosphatase catalysis
Sebastiano Pasqualato, Jacqueline Cherfils  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages (October 1998)
Peter Trickey, Mary Ann Wagner, Marilyn Schuman Jorns, F Scott Mathews 
The 1.9 Å Structure of α-N-Acetylgalactosaminidase
Volume 2, Issue 7, Pages (July 1994)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Alison Burgess Hickman, M.A.A. Namboodiri, David C. Klein, Fred Dyda 
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
Qun Liu, Qingqiu Huang, Xin Gen Lei, Quan Hao  Structure 
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages (September 2003)
Crystal Structure of 4-Amino-5-Hydroxymethyl-2- Methylpyrimidine Phosphate Kinase from Salmonella typhimurium at 2.3 Å Resolution  Gong Cheng, Eric M.
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Carl C. Correll, Betty Freeborn, Peter B. Moore, Thomas A. Steitz  Cell 
The Structure of the Mammalian 20S Proteasome at 2.75 Å Resolution
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1998)
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 1995)
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 1997)
Annia Rodríguez-Hernández, John J. Perona  Structure 
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2000)
Stanley J Watowich, John J Skehel, Don C Wiley  Structure 
Luhua Lai, Hisao Yokota, Li-Wei Hung, Rosalind Kim, Sung-Hou Kim 
Presentation transcript:

How glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase selects glutamine Virginia L Rath, Laura F Silvian, Barbro Beijer, Brian S Sproat, Thomas A Steitz  Structure  Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages 439-449 (April 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00046-X

Figure 1 The chemical structures of (a) glutaminyl-adenylate and (b) QSI, showing the difference between the analog inhibitor and the substrate intermediate. Structure 1998 6, 439-449DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00046-X)

Figure 2 Stereoview omit map showing electron density for QSI. A simulated-annealing omit map was calculated using all data from 50 å to 2.3 å resolution from a model without QSI. The refined model of QSI is superimposed on the electron density of a σA weighted 2Fo–Fc map contoured at 1.0 σ above the mean [44,45]. Structure 1998 6, 439-449DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00046-X)

Figure 3 The interactions between QSI and GlnRS. (a) Stereoview showing the principal interactions between QSI and the synthetase. The two halves of the Rossmann fold (residues 25–100 and 210–264) are colored turquoise and purple, respectively. The KMSK sequence is shown in dark blue. QSI bonds are colored gold, with carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and sulfur atoms in green, blue, red and yellow, respectively. A76 is gray; water molecules are shown in turquoise. Sidechains are colored according to their properties: hydrophobic gray; positively charged, blue; negatively charged, red; polar, green. For reasons of clarity, Phe233 is omitted from the image. (b) Schematic diagram of the principal hydrogen-bonding and electrostatic interactions made by QSI in the ternary complex with GlnRS and tRNAGln. Dashed lines indicate hydrogen-bonding or electrostatic interactions within 2.8–3.2 å. Distances between the two electronegative atoms are given in å. Structure 1998 6, 439-449DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00046-X)

Figure 4 Comparison of the QSI- and ATP-binding sites. The ternary complex of GlnRS, tRNAGln and ATP [4] and the ternary complex of GlnRS, tRNAGln and QSI were superimposed using the strands of the Rossmann fold. After superposition, the adenine rings and ribose sugars of the ATP (bonds in gray) and QSI (bonds in gold) are nearly coincident. Carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and sulfur atoms of ATP and QSI are shown in green, blue, red and yellow, respectively. Water molecules found in the complex with QSI are colored gold; those found in the complex with ATP are colored gray. The glutamine moiety of QSI replaces three water molecules found in the ATP complex. Water molecule 1050, which is responsible for glutamine specificity, appears in both complexes. Structure 1998 6, 439-449DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00046-X)

Figure 5 Interactions between the glutamine sidechain and GlnRS. (a) Schematic diagram of the principal hydrogen-bonding and electrostatic interactions made by the glutamine moiety of QSI (GLN) in the ternary complex with GlnRS and tRNAGln. Dashed lines indicate hydrogen-bonding or electrostatic interactions; wavy lines indicate van der Waals interactions. Distances between the two electronegative atoms are given in å. (b) Stereoview showing all the conserved residues in the glutamine-binding pocket of the QSI complex. Only the glutamine portion of QSI (GLN) is shown; bonds are colored gold, with carbon, nitrogen and oxygen atoms in green, blue and red, respectively. Mainchain atoms of GlnRS are shown in gray. Sidechains are colored according to their properties: hydrophobic, gold; positively charged, blue; negatively charged, red; polar, green. Water molecules are shown as turquoise spheres. Structure 1998 6, 439-449DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00046-X)

Figure 6 The role of water in specifying glutamine. Schematic diagram showing the interactions with water in the ternary complex of GlnRS and tRNAGln. Dashed lines indicate hydrogen-bonding or electrostatic interactions within 2.8–3.2 å; directionality of the hydrogen bonds is indicated by arrows. Distances are given in å between the two electronegative atoms. Only the glutamine moiety (GLN) of QSI is shown (in bold). Water molecule 1050 (Wat 1050) is positioned to accept a hydrogen from glutamine, because both of its hydrogens form bonds with obligate hydrogen-bond acceptors: one to Ser227 Oγ and one to Gln255 Oϵ1. The acceptor status of Ser227 and Gln255 are due to interactions with Asp219 and Glu257, respectively. Asp219 accepts a hydrogen bond from the hydroxyl group of Ser227. Glu257 forms a hydrogen bond to Gln255 Nϵ2 and, in doing so, correctly positions Gln255 Oϵ1 to interact with Wat1050. The second hydrogen on the amino group of glutamine is also an obligate donor to the hydroxyl of Tyr211. Wat1052 is a hydrogen-bond acceptor because its hydrogens are involved in bonds with Wat1136 and the sidechain of Gln255. Wat1136 is able to accept the hydrogen bond from Tyr211 due to interactions with residues Asp212 and Asn236. Structure 1998 6, 439-449DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00046-X)

Figure 7 Multiple amino acid sequence alignment of GlnRS from several organisms showing the binding-pocket residues described in the text. The numbers in the boxes refer to the residues in E. coli GlnRS while the numbers to the left of the sequences indicate the first residue of each sequence. The dashes indicate data missing from the deposited sequence. The sequences of GlnRS from six organisms are aligned: E. coli (Ec), S. cerevisiae (Sc), H. sapiens, cytoplasmic (Hs), D. discoideum (Dd), L. luteus (LI) and T. vaginalis (Tv). Structure 1998 6, 439-449DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00046-X)

Figure 8 Stereoview of the stacking interactions of Tyr211 (green), Phe233 (green), QSI (gold) and adenosine 76 (Ade 76; gray). The van der Waals surface of each atom is shown as a dotted sphere colored according to sidechain or nucleic acid residue. Structure 1998 6, 439-449DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00046-X)

Figure 9 Mechanism of transfer. (a) Schematic view of a modeled ground state for the transfer of glutaminyl-adenylate to the 2′-hydroxyl group of A76 of the tRNA, based on the structure of the ternary complex of GlnRS–tRNAGln–QSI. The ribose 2′-hydroxyl hydrogen may be polarized by a water-mediated interaction (Wat1086 or Wat1139) with the sidechain of Glu34, facilitating the nucleophilic attack on the carbonyl carbon of the adenylate. (b) Proposed model for the transition state of the aminoacyl transfer step. The developing negative charge on the oxygen is compensated by long range electrostatic effects from Arg260, possibly mediated by water molecules. Although not a general acid, the polarized partial positive charge on the mainchain NH of Glu34 will help to stabilize the developing negative charge on the phosphate oxygen. Lys270 is also likely to be involved as previously suggested [6]. Structure 1998 6, 439-449DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00046-X)