Map by Glenda baker, 2016 Tutorial overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Teacher Work Sample
Advertisements

Fieldwork assessment The difference between AS and A2 David Redfern
Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Collaborative Conversations Doug Fisher, PhD San Diego State University.
Designing ePortfolios to Promote & Assess Adaptive Expertise Evelyn Reed, Serra De Arment, Angela Wetzel Virginia Commonwealth University TED Conference.
WARNING: Making, carrying, or using overhead transparencies for every item in this training packet poses a significant physical and mental health hazard.
Implementing RtI 2 Douglas Fisher
© E. Kowch iD Instructional Design Evaluation, Assessment & Design: A Discussion (EDER 673 L.91 ) From Calgary With Asst. Professor Eugene G. Kowch.
Customer Focus Module Preview
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
Essential Components of a Program of Instruction for Every Student with ASDVI.
Models of Online Learning – Identifying Components Week 3 Introduction to Web-Based Mentoring and Distance Education.
Bibliographic Referencing QUILT Seminar Series 4 th April 2008.
Session 3 / Adolescent Literacy January Teaching Inductively.
ATL’s in the Personal Project
Technology in Special Education Classrooms Ivette Veiga EDU623: Designing Learning Environments Instructor: Dr. Steven Moskowitz.
Fourth session of the NEPBE II in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 25th, 2013 Assessment Instruments.
Annotation a critical or explanatory note from the Latin! How do you feel about annotation?? Why do we annotate in Art? Why is it important that we get.
1 Connecting Classroom & Online Experiences: Building in Accountability Tuesday, 9:00 – 10:30 AM Patricia McGee, PhD Veronica Diaz, PhD This work is licensed.
Teaching & Learning Center, Temple University CITL Professional Development Fox School of Business 12/11/08.
The Presentation of Self: Performance Distinction between LinkedIn & an E-portfolio Folayemi Akinbolaji Writing with New Media.
Universal Design for Learning Creating Curb Cuts Creating Curb Cuts.
Creative Intervention Planning through Universal Design for Learning MariBeth Plankers, M.S. CCC-SLP Page 127.
Talk about the assignment! April 27th 2015 #TOOC15 Webinar.
STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE SYLLABUS DESIGN Mr. Philip Montgomery.
UOP PSYCH 610 W EEK 1 I NDIVIDUAL A SSIGNMENT R ESEARCH S TUDIES Q UESTIONNAIRE Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
CJA 474 Week 1 Individual Values Reflection Paper NEW Check this A+ tutorial guideline at 474-Week-1-Individual-Values-Reflection-Paper-NEW.
PSYCH 570 Week 2 Individual Applying Organizational Psychology Paper Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
COMM 400 Week 1 Individual Communications Evaluation and Analysis Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
COMM 400 Week 4 Individual Communication Channel and Context Matrices Check this A+ tutorial guideline at 400/COMM-400-Week-4-Individual-
EDU 620 Week 2 Assignment Evaluation of Assistive Technology Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
EDU 620 Week 4 Assignment Assistive Technology Plan Check this A+ tutorial guideline at assignment-assistive-technology-plan.
BUS 352 Week 2 Assignment Social Business Networking and E- Commerce Select one of the social networking sites for business professionals listed in Insights.
Online Quality Course Design vs. Quality Teaching:
PowerPoint Presentation Guide
Data Collection with Forms For Special Education
1. Question & Research Task
COM 486 Course Experience Tradition / snaptutorial.com
“Embracing the Future”
blended Approach to academic literacy in so100 self & society
Explaining Performance Assessment Exhibitions
Learning and Teaching –
Group Assignment: Application and Update of existing ECB-Check quality criteria Uranchimeg Tudevdagva, Kerynn Dahl, Angela Falkensteiner and Eleonora Deschamps.
EDU 654 Innovative Education- -snaptutorial.com
IFSM 461Competitive Success/tutorialrank.com
IFSM 461 Education for Service-- tutorialrank.com.
IST 732 Education for Service/tutorialrank.com
EDU 654 Education for Service-- tutorialrank.com
Strategic Marketing Process Week-2 Dr. Ananda Sabil Hussein
Seminar Four Quality Academic feedback: oral and written
Peer Observation & Review of Teaching (P.O.R.T.)
Experiential Education and Academic Literacies
Method Separate subheadings for participants, materials, and procedure (3 marks in total) Participants (1 mark) Include all info provided in the assignment.
Inclusive Pedagogy School of Rehabilitation Therapy
How do you get assessed? Assessment Criteria
PowerPoint Presentation Guide
LCN600 – Online tutorial (Week 2) What is connected learning?
Creating a Community of Inquiry
HEA Fellowship Workshop
Week 4 Introduction to CL environment mapping project
Increasing self-determination through involvement in the IEP process
Assessing educational/training competencies of trainers of trainers
Univ. Prof Dr Viktor Jakupec
Approaches to Learning (ATL)
Introducing the Core Competencies
How do current core learning goals integrate into courses?
Wiki, Wiki Sanden, S., & Darragh, J. (2011). Wiki use in the 21st-century literacy classroom: A framework for evaluation. Contemporary Issues in Technology.
Nevada Educator Performance Teacher Framework
Back to School Night Integrated Math 1
Presentation transcript:

Connected Learning Week 5 CL environment map feedback & Part B critical discussion Map by Glenda baker, 2016 Tutorial overview Reminder: Assignment 1 requirements CL environment map feedback Assignment 1 – Part B - Critical Discussion Practice discussion Q & A

Map the CL environment of a particular community of CL learners, ie: Reminder: Assignment 2 2 parts: Map the CL environment of a particular community of CL learners, ie: visually represent this CL community’s network and its various elements [2 A4 sheets or equivalent – approx 200 words] Critical discussion of the CL environment that you have mapped [Approx 2300 words]

Your CL environment map ideas

Yasmin Relja

Liz Mellon

Angela Bowen

Part B: Critical discussion of the connected learning environment Critically discuss the connected learning environment that you mapped (in Part A). Consider the strengths and limitations of the connected learning environment and indicate opportunities for further development. The discussion should: Refer to Ito et al.’s connected learning principles, core properties and design principles (2013, p. 74-81) Explain and justify the distinctive characteristics of the connected learning environment that you mapped in Part A. In particular, address: (i) how peer-supported, interest-driven learning occurs within this environment (ii) how digital technologies and social media support learning and interactions of this CL learning community (iii) further expansion or learning opportunities, and/or risks, for the connected learning community Draw on 3-5 select scholarly references (in addition to Ito et al., 2013) that support your discussion Scholarly: academic written style with clear structure and expression; discussion meaningfully supported with references; full, accurate & consistent referencing (APA preferred)

For some ideas and questions to prompt your discussion, see Tables 3,4 & 6 in Ito et al. report (this is Table 6) - You don’t have to address particular dot points

Practice discussion □CL design principles ? □ CL principles ? - interest powered - peer supported - academically oriented □ CL core properties ? -Production-centred -Shared purpose -Openly networked  □CL design principles ? -everyone can participate -learning happens by doing -challenge is constant -everything is interconnected □ Opportunities for further development? □ Potential risks?

Next week (Week 6) tutorial is optional - Assign 1 Q & A drop-in Be sure to complete Week 7 activities by 9 am Thursday 13 April