New TGSRR Standard for receiver tests Document for discussions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VDL Mode 3 Cosite Interference Testing Summary WP-WGB1701A Attachment A International Civil Aviation Organization 17th Meeting of Aeronautical Communications.
Advertisements

HGS Coordination Methodology: Initial Concepts 400 MHz Project.
November 2013 doc.: IEEE /1449r2 Tevfik Yucek, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 1Submission Authors: Date: Proposal for UNII-4 band coexistence.
AUTOMOTIVE RADAR APPLICATIONS
F ACULTY OF C OMPUTER S CIENCE & E NGINEERING Chapter 03. Spread Spectrum Technologies.
Doc.: IEEE /0806r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Authors: aj (45 GHz) Channelization and Channel Operation Jul 2014 Bo Sun, ZTE Corp.
Bands A & B update Andy Gowans Private Business Systems Unit UK Radiocommunications Agency.
Which telecommunication service is better for you?
Doc.:IEEE /1159r1 Submission Laurent Cariou Sept, 2010 Slide 1 Non contiguous additional bandwidth mode Date:
Joint Industry Canada/RABC Stakeholder Discussion - Ottawa, ON
Doc.: IEEE /1210r1 Submission Nov 2009 Tuncer Baykas, NICT.Slide 1 Energy Detection vs Common Mode Signaling Detection for Coexistence Authors:
Doc.: IEEE Submission August 2011 Anuj Batra (TI) and Mark Dawkins (Toumaz)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
A new challenge – creating a regulatory environment for implementing geo-location databases for White Space Devices (WSD) Andy Gowans Date (26 th January.
©Ofcom IEEE 802 Plenary, Dallas, Tx RRTAG( ) meeting Consultation on Safety Related ITS 12 th November 2008 Andrew Gowans, Head of Exempt Technology.
Submission L. Li, Vinno;Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Tamed Spread Spectrum.
Doc.: IEEE /214r1 Submission July 2000 Grant B. Carlson, Eastman Kodak Co. Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /0799r2 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Modifications to Simulation Scenarios and Calibration Process Date:
SPECTRUM EFFICIENCY GAINS RESULTING FROM THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ADAPTIVE TRANSMIT POWER CONTROL IN FIXED TERRESTRIAL LINKS AT 38 GHZ S.A. Callaghan (1),
DO Rev B & SVDO Arnab Chakrabarti, Vikram Gupta, Tao Chen 1/12/2016QUALCOMM Confidential and Proprietary1.
0 Slide 0 Evolving Methods of Controlling Interference National Spectrum Managers Association May 19, 2004 Mitchell Lazarus | |
RADAR. Main uses of radar Collision avoidance i.e. look-out, plotting, finding course & speed, finding closest point of approach, determining risk of.
Coexistence Studies in IEEE Meeting #3 San Francisco, July 2003 Reza Arefi IEEE C /72.
Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt XPD measurement & Alignment.
Spectrum Planning Work Program Tune-up Spectrum Engineering and Space Section Mark Arkell Section Manager.
Thomas Weilacher WG FM Chairman
Technology as a Policy Enabler
Operation of Radar Services in 76 – 81 GHz band
False Radar Pulse Detection on WUR Signal
Classical blocking test (e.g. EN )
Adjacent Channel results for Four Channels
A methodology for establishing national frameworks for spectrum sharing between MFCNs and FSS/FS in the GHz band 20 April 2015.
Introduction to SEAMCAT
Critics of IEEE P response to FCC NPRM
平成30年6月 March 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Technical requirements of Japanese.
VDL Mode 3 Cosite Interference Testing Summary
ACSF CAT C Radar Sensor Range
Which telecommunication service is better for you?
平成30年6月 November 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Technical requirements for 950MHz.
Spectrum Mask in IEEE802.11p Date: Authors: March 2008
平成30年6月 November 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Revised technical requirements.
Thailand, Bangkok, 18 – 21 October 2016
Status On Current DFS CEPT/ECC Civil/Military Meeting, November 2016, Prague Thomas Weber, ECO, Spectrum Management
Proposed Evaluation Methodology Additions
Wi-Fi Alliance meeting
Submission Title: [Kodak - High Rate PHY Proposal]
Adjacent Channel results for Four Channels
Spectrum Mask in IEEE802.11p Date: Authors: March 2008
November 18 March 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Multi-Rate PHY Proposal for the.
Presented by Mohamad Haidar, Ph.D. May 13, 2009 Moncton, NB, Canada
120MHz channelization solution
Non contiguous additional bandwidth mode
平成30年12月 November 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Technical requirements for 950MHz.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Spectral Control Issues for TGg
GSC: Standardization Advancing Global Communications
Submission Title: [Regulatory Update]
April 24, Study Group 1 A Regulatory Framework for Use of TV Channels by Part 15 Devices John Notor, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Orchestrator pilot signal
AEB IWG 02 ISO Standard: FVCMS
Orchestrator pilot signal
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [LECIM Coexistence Considerations] Date Submitted:
GSC: Standardization Advancing Global Communications
Enterprise Simulation Scenario
Enterprise Simulation Scenario
Channelization for China’s Spectrum
TGah Coexistence Assurance
ECC actions on interference from 5 GHz RLAN into meteorological radars
INMARSAT > CTO> RMA
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 August 2019
Month Year doc.: IEEE y18/r0 March 2018
Presentation transcript:

New TGSRR Standard for receiver tests Document for discussions

RE-D Whereas in the case of a receiver, it has a level of performance that allows it to operate as intended and protects it against the risk of harmful interference, in particular from shared or adjacent channels, and, in so doing, supports improvements in the efficient use of shared or adjacent channels

Receiver New Tests The radar shall be able to detect a specific target in spite of interference occurring Target not specified yet (Distance ?, RCS ?) Interferer not specified yet (Power ? Distance ? Modulation ?) Test set-up not specified yet Interferer operating frequencies : 3 tests are foreseen Co-channel signal -> within the radar operating frequency band In-band signal -> within the regulated frequency band (i.e. 76-77 GHz) but not overlapping the radar operating band (for example 50 MHz apart) Out-of-band signals -> for example 3 GHz apart

Assumptions The level of performance for each radar depends on the type of radars (SRR, MRR, LRR) the expected function The test should be performed with regard to the intended performance E.g.: if a SRR operating as a BSD sensor needs to detects targets at [60m], then the test set-up should not allow to put the target at more than this distance even if the radar is capable of detecting it. Should the interferer be representative to existing systems in term of modulation and power ? Test set-up should be relatively simple and repeatable among different test laboratories.

Proposition Target Corner reflector, 10dBsm at 77 GHz Can represent a car, most relevant target. Interferer CW as modulation is proposed for repeatable tests and simplicity of implementation Power around [23dBm] – mean current radar power

Test set-up Example SRR MRR LRR D 40 m 120 m 200 m Equipement Under Test Target Interferer Example SRR MRR LRR D 40 m 120 m 200 m D Manufacturers would have to declare the maximum intended distance for their operation