Cross-cutting WG TFMM-TFEIP

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COPERT 4 Training 2. General Methodology.
Advertisements

Gas/Particle Partitioning. Why is gas/particle partitioning important? Dispersion of Pollutants Introduced into the Atmosphere as Determined by Residence.
1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
A high resolution emission inventory of particulate EC and OC for Europe Hugo Denier van der Gon, Antoon Visschedijk, Rianne Dröge, Maarten Mulder, Jeroen.
The semi-volatile nature of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area November 2, 2007 EAS Graduate Student Symposium Christopher.
Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosols in Atlanta
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
Air Quality Impacts from Prescribed Burning Karsten Baumann, PhD. Polly Gustafson.
Developing Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) Code for the MCM David Johnson (Mike Jenkin and Steve Utembe) Department of Environmental Science and Technology,
VII. How might current analysis methods be enhanced or combined to obtain more information about the nature of OC, EC, and other carbon fractions in filter.
WHAT IS MISSING IN THE SOURCE APPORTIONMENT OF PM? Dick Derwent rdscientific, Newbury APRIL Workshop, Imperial College London April 23 rd 2010 This work.
From Ammonia to PM 2.5 Brent Auvermann Texas Cooperative Extension Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Amarillo, TX.
Improving regional air quality model results at the city scale : results from the EC4MACS project INERIS : Bertrand Bessagnet, Etienne Terrenoire, Augustin.
C&I feedback to TFEIP Expert Panel meeting 14 May 2013 Jeroen Kuenen, Carlo Trozzi.
SOURCE APPORTIONMENT of PARTICULATE MATTER Imperial College 23 rd April 2010 APRIL:Air Pollution Research in London.
BC, EC and OC Metrics, emissions and trends Jeroen Kuenen, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Bas Henzing, Antoon Visschedijk EC emissions from diesel-fuelled vehicles,
Air Quality Impact Analysis 1.Establish a relationship between emissions and air quality. AQ past = a EM past + b 2.A change in emissions results in an.
1 Influence of dilution and particle fractal dimension of diesel exhaust on measured SOA formation in a smog chamber Shunsuke Nakao (1,
Preparation of Fine Particulate Emissions Inventories Lesson 1 Introduction to Fine Particles (PM 2.5 )
Title Progress in the development and results of the UNIFIED EMEP model Presented by Leonor Tarrason EMEP/MSC-W 29 th TFIAM meeting, Amiens, France,
25/05/20071 About comparability of measured and modeled metrics Jean-Philippe Putaud Fabrizia Cavalli DG JRC Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Properties of Particulate Matter Physical, Chemical and Optical Properties Size Range of Particulate Matter Mass Distribution of PM vs. Size: PM10, PM2.5.
Wish-list to the Emission community.  TFMM annual meeting held in Zagreb on the 6-8 May 2013  Main issues :  Review of the implementation of the EMEP.
Online measurements of chemical composition and size distribution of submicron aerosol particles in east Baltic region Inga Rimšelytė Institute of Physics.
Emission Inventory in Georgia December, 2013 Tbilisi, Georgia Ambient Air Protection Service MoENRP of Georgia.
Charmex workshop Trieste 1/Total Working sesssion « chemical processes » overview Relevant questions : -VOC reactivity, oxidized.
Karl Ceulemans– Steven Compernolle – Jean-François Müller
1.
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
Secondary Organic Aerosols
UNECE-CLRTAP and EMEP Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling 26th session, Brussels, May 2001 Integrating the environmental effects of Particulate.
11 September 2015 On the role of measurements and modelling in Dutch air quality policies Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)
PARTICULATE MATTER EMISSIONS FROM RESIDENTIAL WOOD COMBUSTION Revised estimates and an evaluation | Hugo Denier van der Gon CO-AUTHORS: Antoon Visschedijk,
Yunseok Im and Myoseon Jang
2. Earth System Research Laboratory, Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA
2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016 Cross-cutting WG TFMM-TFEIP on SVOC emissions Working document for the workshop on condensables & Semi-Volatiles.
Ambient air sampling and monitoring Topic 5 Ms. Sherina Kamal.
Properties of Particulate Matter
Task Force on Emission Inventories and Projections Emissions of condensable and semi-volatile organic particulate matter Summary of TFEIP background paper.
Joint thematic session on B(a)P pollution: main activities and results
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
Air Pollution and Stratospheric Ozone Depletion
Sunil Kumar TAC, COG July 9, 2007
COPERT 4 Training 3. General Methodology.
Cross-cutting WG TFMM-TFEIP on SVOC emissions
Contributions of Condensable Particulate Matter
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Review of Important PM2.5 Source Categories
Organic Aerosol is Ubiquitous in the Atmosphere
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
vkm in transport modelling
Yongtao Hu, Jaemeen Baek, M. Talat Odman and Armistead G. Russell
Continuous measurement of airborne particles and gases
16th Task Force on Measurement and Modelling Meeting:
On-going developments of SinG: particles
Major Air Pollutants.
MSC-E: Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya, Nadejda Vulykh
Multi-model and Observed PM Trends
Statistical analysis of the secondary inorganic aerosol in Hungary using background measurements and model calculations Zita Ferenczi   Hungarian Meteorological.
About comparability of measured and modeled metrics
PM modelling assessment in Northern Italy
9th TFMM, Bordeaux, France, April 2008
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
Z.Klimont, J.Cofala EMEP Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) Variability in emission parameters of ozone precursors’ emissions in the GAINS.
Robert Griffin Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space
TFMM Work plan for 2010 Build-up the appropriate framework for the implementation of the revised monitoring strategy Technical support to the Parties.
Summary: TFMM trends analysis
Task Force on Emission Inventories and Projections
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Air Quality Management in Mumbai
Presentation transcript:

Cross-cutting WG TFMM-TFEIP Martin Adams EEA Sebnem Aksoyoglu PSI Michel André IFSTTAR Bertrand Bessagnet INERIS Augustin Colette Florian Couvidat Neil Donahue CMU Chris Dore Aether Ltd Hugo Denier Van Der Gon TNO Hilde Fagerli MET.NO Isaline Fraboulet Christian Gaegauf Oekozentrum Marta Garcia Vivanco CIEMAT Alma Hodzic NCAR Jeroen Kuenen Yao Liu Rob Maas RIVM Mihaela Mircea ENEA Ole-Kenneth Nielsen AU Spyros Pandis Guido Pirovano RSE André Prevôst Stewart Robert AEAT Allen Robinson Laurence Rouïl Kristina Saarinen SYKE Karine Sartelet CEREA David Simpson CHALMERS Carlo Trozzi Techne Consulting Cross-cutting WG TFMM-TFEIP on SVOC emissions - Outcome of the workshop in TFEIP Bertrand Bessagnet (www.ineris.fr)

Why this working group? Organic matter (OM) represents 20 to 30% of the particulate matter in Europe, this fraction is dominated by the secondary organic fraction produced by chemical reactions of organic precursors (Freutel et al., 2013, Crippa et al., 2013) Official primary PM emissions decrease (e. g. use of filtering techniques for the case of diesel vehicles, improvement of efficiency of wood stoves, etc…) Air quality models usually underestimate PM, and the lack of some emissions is considered as one of the explanations (particularly in winter due to wood burning) The secondary fraction and/or the organic fraction are underestimated by models In smog chambers, the aging of diesel vs gasoline exhausts show the importance of SOA formation. In some experiments, gasoline vehicles produce more aerosols than diesel vehicles after several hours in the chambers → role of VOC and S/IVOC WG on emissions decided during the 2015 TFMM in Krakow Semi volatile Organic Compounds (SVOC) are partly included in emission inventories How to complement these emissions inventories?

Concept of SVOC - I All organic species are more or less volatile and can be considered as semi-volatile, their vapour pressure is the key parameter to define the volatility. The temperature and the organic aerosol loading (the total mass of organic species into which semi-volatile species can condense) influence the partitioning between the gas and particle phases. VOCs represent the most volatile fraction of organic species. The heaviest organic molecules (in term of molecular weight) can be considered to be entirely in the particulate phase, they constitute what is commonly called organic matter. In between, there is a large spectrum of molecules that are partitioned between the gas and particle phases, they are called in a broad sense SVOC (semi-volatile organic compounds).

Concept of SVOC - II Organic species can be split in: ELVOC (Extremely low Volatile Organic Compounds) LVOC (Low Volatile Organic Compounds) SVOC (Semi Volatile Organic Compounds) IVOC (Intermediate Volatility Organic Compounds) VOC (Volatile Organic Compounds) These categories can be delimited by vapour pressure thresholds This delimitation is arbitrary, the Gas/Particle partitioning can change with the temperature and the level of concentrations Chemistry transport models host secondary organic aerosol modules able to produce secondary organic aerosol from gas phase organic species POA (Primary Organic Aerosol) in gas and particle phases SVOC in a broad sense

Evolution of SVOCs Air quality models have chemistry modules to account for the VOC and SVOC chemistry Some simple considerations: Dilution of SVOC leads to evaporation Decrease of T° leads to condensation/absorption of SVOC Oxidation reactions lead to the formation of bigger molecules

Until now, how do modellers manage SVOC emissions? So far, emission inventories are targeted on VOC, NOx, SOx, NH3, CO and PM broken down into PM2.5 and PM10 A speciation is often proposed to identify the organic matter in each PM fraction EC / OM / Other OM is organic matter supposed as particulate matter at the emission “other” means non carbonaceous species (dust, inorganics, etc…) Modellers do their own calculation of total primary organic matter (gas + particles) emitted by a given sector with coefficients based on dilution curves reported in the literature. TPOM= 2 * OA (as an example) IVOC can be considered as not included in TPOM then IVOC is estimated from TPOM or VOC emission factors (Ots et al., 2016)

Dilution curves - a tool to estimate total POA At Coa=10 µg/m3 and 25°C, about 55% is in the particle phase If you measure solid POA, you have to multiply 1/0.55~2 to get the total organic fraction (Gas+Particles) If we could measure higher Coa we could take into account missing SVOC (the so called IVOC) Dilution curve from 51 light-duty American gasoline vehicles (from May et al. 2013a) at 47°C and 25°C. 55%

PM EF measurements – focus on the organic fraction 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Emission Factor in mg km-1 Ambient POA Molecule Carbon number VOC Adapted from Robinson et al. (2010) IVOC SVOC LVOC ELVOC POA in dilution samplers + IVOC Not adsorbed on filters Total SVOC without IVOC + Adsorbed vapors on filters Elemental Carbon Metals-dust Inorganics

How much organics in EF? For a good assessment we need to identify + + + The coefficients used for this estimation are based on very few publications (dilution curves) and sometimes old coefficients We don’t have any clues about the operating conditions (T° and PM load) of the EF measurements In the dilution sampler ? SVOC PM Inorganics Dust Elemental Carbon

How to proceed to identify SVOC/IVOC in emissions for a better air pollution assessment ?

Two options for the future (10 years) OPTION I An updated (=increased) PM emission estimate including SVOC will be determined with (by activity sector), integrated with: A split by components : OM, EC, other (minimum requirement) A split by volatility for OM (including SVOC), for each of volatility classes a split by species will be provided An updated (=increased) total VOC estimate including IVOC will be determined, integrated with Improvement of the VOC split including also IVOC Impact: Automatically, increase the total emissions by country

Two options for the future (10 years) OPTION II PM without OM should be known OM including SVOC will be determined separately A split by volatility for OM (including SVOC), for each of volatility class a split by species will be provided VOC Improvement of the VOC split IVOC will be determined separately with a split by species

Some outcomes of the workshop I TFEIP knows better our needs in terms of semi volatile compounds and why, and the community is evolving to methods including “condensables” “Condensable” vs “Semi Volatile Organic Compounds” Condensables include inorganic species too : Comparable orders of magnitude for nitrate /ammonium and organic compounds For high fuel contents (shipping) sulfate can dominate the “condensable” fraction We wonder if “condensable” is the right word perhaps “condensed “ is more appropriated, then we would miss the gas fraction that modellers need. The guidebook of EF has been reviewed with an information on the type of particles taken into account : filterable PM or total (means including condensables)

Some outcomes of the workshop II Presentation by Jeroen (TNO) of the impact of the new approach to account for condensable (+ an update of activities) in Emission Inventories (Denier van der Gon, 2015) David (EMEP) presented some basics of SOA modelling with EMEP and how they handle POA emissions (No adjustment coefficient for modelling in the frame of the Convention)

Some outcomes of the workshop III A suggestion for EI was made to get all the organic matter from VOC to ELVOC in one species OM (+ volatility split and screening by species) We (modellers) suspect the “condensable” fraction of organics is not exactly what we need in models: IVOC are not included Gas phase fraction of SVOC molecules could be also not included INERIS has proposed for France a pilot study for the road traffic sector consisting in: Calculating total PM emissions by subsectors for FR (ex. EURO5 diesel emission PC , etc…) Identify corresponding EF for each subsector (COPERT used in FR) Interactions with COPERT team (AUTH) to understand how the EF are determined and under which operating conditions and if they account for all organics species Develop a method based on AUTH expertise or dilution curves to complete our needs for modelling If relevant, we could repeat this exercise in other countries

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

Dilution curves – application with french data for vehicle emissions What are the level of PM concentrations and temperatures in the CVS sampling system: Diesel vehicle (without Particulate filter) : 1.102 - 6.103 µg/m3 Petrol or Diesel vehicle (with Particulate filter) : 4.101 - 1.5.103 µg/m3 Temperature : 36°C Determination of Xp: Diesel vehicle (without Particulate filter) : 70-95% Petrol or Diesel vehicle (with Particulate filter) : 50-90% Total POA (including all SVOC) could be 2 times that is measured May et al, 2013