Fernando P. Secin, Fernando J. Bianco, Nicholas T

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Steven Joniau Filip Ameye
Advertisements

Postsurgical Risk Factors for Prostate Cancer Mortality Slideset on: Freedland SJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA, et al. Risk of prostate cancer–specific mortality.
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 155, Issue 3, Pages (March 1996)
Fig. 3. Kaplan-Meier analyses of biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival rates according to ADCmeanvalues among the total subjects (A) and among the.
The PSA Era is not Over for Prostate Cancer
Oncological outcomes of high risk prostate cancer patients between robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
New perioperative risk factors for biochemical recurrence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: A single surgeon experience in high volume Canadian.
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Post Op Positive Seminal Vesicle Case 4: Prostate_4
Prostate Cancer: Highlights from 2006
Claude C. Schulman, Jacques Irani, Juan Morote, Jack A
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Apollo Gleneagles Hospitals,
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Pitfalls of Pathologic Staging in Prostate Cancer
Volume 61, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
What is New in Hormone Therapy for Prostate Cancer in 2007?
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Intermittent Hormone Therapy: What Is Its Place in Clinical Practice?
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Ongoing Gleason Grade Migration in Localized Prostate Cancer and Implications for Use of Active Surveillance  Adam B. Weiner, Ruth Etzioni, Scott E. Eggener 
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Retrograde Nerve-Sparing (NS) Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP): Technical Aspects and Early Results  Jens J. Rassweiler, Marto Sugiono, Marcel.
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Counselling the Prostate Cancer Patient
Volume 185, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Luis Martínez-Piñeiro  European Urology Supplements 
The PSA Era is not Over for Prostate Cancer
Cytoreductive Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Prostate Cancer and Skeletal Metastases  Axel Heidenreich, Nicola Fossati, David Pfister, Nazareno Suardi,
External Beam Radiotherapy as Curative Treatment of Prostate Cancer
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages 1-7 (July 2010)
Richard C. Harkaway  European Urology Supplements 
Is It Necessary to Detect All Prostate Cancers in Men with Serum PSA Levels
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Selma Masic, Janet E. Cowan, Samuel L. Washington, Hao G
Risk Factors for the Development of Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer
Optimising Hormone Therapy in Advanced Disease
Development and External Validation of Nomograms To Predict Adverse Pathological Characteristics After Robotic Prostatectomy: Results of a Prospective,
Prostate Cancer Nomograms: An Update
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Antonio Alcaraz, Pierre Teillac  European Urology Supplements 
What's New in Prostate Cancer: Highlights from Urologic and Oncologic Congresses in 2006  Michel Soulié, Nicolas Mottet, Laurent Salomon, Jacques Irani,
Intermittent Hormone Therapy: What Is Its Place in Clinical Practice?
Learning Curve of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a University Teaching Hospital: Experience after the First 600 Cases  Luis Martínez-Piñeiro, Felipe.
Long-Term Hormonal Therapy: Who Would Benefit?
Trend of Adverse Stage Migration in Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer  Felix Preisser, Michele Marchioni, Sebastiano.
Jonathan S. Brajtbord, Michael S. Leapman, Matthew R. Cooperberg 
Improving Outcomes in Prostate Cancer: Time to Tackle Bone Disorders
Volume 74, Issue 6, Pages (December 2018)
A Multidisciplinary Team Approach for the Optimal Clinical Management of Metastatic Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer—Case Study  John Fitzpatrick  European.
Axel Heidenreich  European Urology Supplements 
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Prognostic Factors in Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Tumors
Management of Prostate Cancer: Global Strategies
Early Single-Instillation Chemotherapy Has No Real Benefit and Should Be Abandoned in Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer  Sten Holmäng  European Urology.
Clinical Management of Patients Receiving Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma  Jan Roigas  European Urology Supplements  Volume.
Oncoforum Urology: Prostate Cancer 2008 at a Glance
Axel Heidenreich  European Urology Supplements 
European Urology Oncology
Presentation transcript:

Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Intermediate-Term Follow- up  Fernando P. Secin, Fernando J. Bianco, Nicholas T. Karanikolas, Karim Touijer, Bertrand Guillonneau  European Urology Supplements  Volume 5, Issue 19, Pages 934-941 (November 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.eursup.2006.08.001 Copyright © 2006 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 The cumulative 5-yr biochemical recurrence-free rate for 1001 patients. European Urology Supplements 2006 5, 934-941DOI: (10.1016/j.eursup.2006.08.001) Copyright © 2006 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Scatter plots of preoperative (A) and postoperative nomograms over time (B), showing that there has not been a clear stage migration or selection of patients over time. European Urology Supplements 2006 5, 934-941DOI: (10.1016/j.eursup.2006.08.001) Copyright © 2006 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Bar chart shows the proportion of patients with pT3 or pT4 disease in comparison to pT2 grouped in 100s of cases. European Urology Supplements 2006 5, 934-941DOI: (10.1016/j.eursup.2006.08.001) Copyright © 2006 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 Univariate association between (A) pathologic Gleason, (B) serum prostate-specific antigen level, (C) positive surgical margin status, (D) seminal vesicle invasion, (E) lymph node status, and (F) pathologic stage and time to biochemical recurrence. The log-rank test is used to compare the Kaplan-Meier curves. European Urology Supplements 2006 5, 934-941DOI: (10.1016/j.eursup.2006.08.001) Copyright © 2006 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 (A) Comparison of biochemical recurrence-free Kaplan-Meier curves between N0 and Nx disease among patients with low-risk disease, defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level<10ng/ml and clinical stage T1c/T2a and biopsy Gleason score<7. (B) Comparison of the same features for patients with intermediate risk, defined by the presence of PSA level of 10–20ng/ml or clinical stage T2b or biopsy Gleason score 7. European Urology Supplements 2006 5, 934-941DOI: (10.1016/j.eursup.2006.08.001) Copyright © 2006 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 6 Cumulative biochemical recurrence free rates of patients with extracapsular extension [ECE] (A) and/or seminal vesicle invasion [SVI] (B) with or without positive surgical margins [PSM]. European Urology Supplements 2006 5, 934-941DOI: (10.1016/j.eursup.2006.08.001) Copyright © 2006 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions