Session 2: Designing M&E for Climate Actions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Advertisements

RBM in the context of Operations and Programme and Project Management Material of the Technical Assistance Unit (TAU)
An initiative of the ACP Group of States funded by the European Union Global Climate Change Alliance: Intra-ACP Programme Training Module Mainstreaming.
Results-Based Management
May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.
Session 0. Introduction: Why and key concepts Benedetta Magri, Bangkok, 2-5 September 2013.
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
UNDP-GEF Adaptation 0 0 Impact of National Communications on Process of Integrating Climate Change into National Development Policies UNFCCC Workshop on.
Module 9 Mainstreaming in country monitoring systems Country-led environmental and climate change mainstreaming (specialist course) Training materials.
USAID’s Approach to Monitoring Capacity Building Activities Experiences, lessons learned, and best practices Duane Muller, USAID November 5, 2007 UNFCCC.
Key Components of a successful Proposal OAS / IACML Workshop on Technical Assistance. San José, Costa Rica May 8, 2007 By: José Luis Alvarez R. Consultant.
Tools for Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction: Guidance Notes for Development Organisations Charlotte Benson and John Twigg Presented by Margaret Arnold.
P3 Business Analysis. 2 Section F: Project Management F1.The nature of projects F2. Building the Business Case F4. Planning,monitoring and controlling.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Phase-1: Prepare for the Change Why stepping back and preparing for the change is so important to successful adoption: Uniform and effective change adoption.
Working with Logic Models
Gender-Responsive NAP Processes
Article by Caroline Moser
Reporting, Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
Template Contents of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS)
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 9. Periodic data collection methods.
Workshop to develop theories of change
Project Cycle Management
Fundamentals of Monitoring and Evaluation
Project Integration Management
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF PROJECT MONITORING AND EVALUATION M&E.
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
Introduction to Program Evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 7. Managers’ and stakeholders’ information needs.
Business Environment Dr. Aravind Banakar –
Business Environment Dr. Aravind Banakar –
Business Environment
Business Environment
Business Environment
Business Environment
Developing & Refining a Theory of Action
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)
EXECUTIVE – LEGISLATIVE AGENDA FORMULATION
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
UNDP-UNEP POVERTY & ENVIRONMENT INITIATIVE (PEI): MID-TERM REVIEW
منهج الإطار المنطقي وإطار الرصد والتقييم وإطار النتائج
Integrated DRR and CCA Mainstreaming TOOL OUTLINE
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Case Study Work Session 2 From Concept to Reality
4.2 Identify intervention outputs
Project Management Process Groups
United Nations Development Programme
Gender mainstreaming in environmental
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
CATHCA National Conference 2018
Integrating Climate Change into Development Programming – Tracking, Measuring & Learning for Adaptive Management Issues and an analytical framework for.
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Albania 2021 Population and Housing Census - Plans
WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?
Implementing Budget Reforms
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Results Based Management for Monitoring & Evaluation
Changing the Game The Logic Model
Group work on challenges Learning oriented M&E System
Session 2: Designing M&E for Climate Actions
Environment and Development Policy Section
Appraising result framework
Mainstreaming Climate Change Adaptation
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
City Adaptation Strategy and UPD Policy Framework
LOCALIZING AGENDA 2030 AND THE SDGS: UNDG’S “MAPS” APPROACH IN CAMBODIA.
Appraising result framework
M & E Plans and Frameworks
Presentation transcript:

Monitoring and Evaluating Climate Change Actions: Designing CCA M&E System Session 2: Designing M&E for Climate Actions Training for CCC on Monitoring and Evaluation 3-4 April 2019

Session Objectives Share concepts on Designing Adaptation M&E and Learning from key researches/literature Steps/Process Details on key elements of M&E System Design Purpose/Context Indicators and Baseline Resources for M&E M&E implementation Interactive discussions/exercise

What are the steps and processes? Some references…

(Spearman and McGray, 2011)

Adaptation M&E Discussion Papers UNFCCC Adaptation M&E Discussion Papers

Summary and Key Points M&E: BASIC COMPONENTS Results Framework Indicators Monitoring Reporting Evaluation Context Purpose Resources Framework Plan M&E: BASIC COMPONENTS Operationalization

Context and Purpose of M&E Why oh why???

Context and Purpose for CCA M&E What is the Policy Framework? Existing M&E Framework? What does the ToC emphasize? What are the assumptions? Does it remain valid? Why are we doing the M&E? What will be the use of monitoring report/results? What must be measured given the ToC and assumptions? Are the targets and indicators “clear”? Have we identified interlinkages with other development indicators? Proxy indicators?

Results-Based Management (RBM) Results-based management (RBM) is a broad management approach whose core focus is achieving results RBM is about selecting a destination first, then deciding on the route, checking against a map and making adjustments as required, in order to achieve the desired results. The UN Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) defines RBM as a “management strategy by which processes, outputs and services contribute to the achievement of clearly stated expected accomplishments and objectives. It is focused on achieving results, improving performance, integrating lessons learned into management decisions and monitoring and reporting on performance.”

Theory of Change is at the Center of RBM ToC is a process designed to depict how a complex change initiative will unfold over time. ToC is a method that organizations and groups use to think critically about what is required to bring about a desired social change. Results should be based on a sound Theory of Change (ToC) that will guide the different phases of programme/ project implementation.

CCA Indicators For reals???

CCA M&E Indicators Indicators must fit and be consistent the context and purpose of the M&E Typical logic model: Baseline > (intervention) > Output > Outcome >> IMPACT <-------------------------------Indicator-----------------------------> Since CCA is complex – requires causal pathway from a good ToC

Results (outputs & outcomes), Further Requirements CCA M&E Indicators Indicators must fit the context and purpose of the M&E Progress Effectiveness Learning Process, Results (outputs & outcomes), Further Requirements Context and Purpose

Results (outputs & outcomes), Further Requirements The monitoring of adaptation can examine, on an on-going basis, one or several of the following aspects: progress made in implementing planned initiatives that directly or indirectly affect the level of climate resilience or the capacities to develop and implement adaptation policies, plans and strategies, known as adaptive capacity changes in the enabling environment in place for adaptation actions and adaptive capacity, trends in exposure and vulnerability to climate-related hazards,2 or realised impacts of climate events, tracking financial or non-financial resources spent on adaptation initiatives. The evaluation of adaptation is a periodic assessment to answer one or several of the following questions: Are adaptation action(s) on track to meet pre-defined objective(s) and why/why not? Are resources spent efficiently allocated? Are these actions effectively reducing climate risks and how are they doing so? Progress Effectiveness Learning Process, Results (outputs & outcomes), Further Requirements Context and Purpose INDICATORS? Source: Lola Vallejo, OECD/IEA (2017)

CCA M&E Indicators Process versus outcome indicators. ETCACC, as cited by Spearman and McGray 2011: 33 Do keep in mind though that there are some gray areas in their difference “Hybrid” suite of Indicators in necessary! “Do bear in mind that the difference between an outcome and a process indicator is not always hard and fast, and can depend on what the programme objective is. For example, ‘number of people trained’ might be an outcome indicator if the programme objective itself is to conduct trainings. However, if the programme objective is wider in scope (e.g. capacity building), then ‘number of people trained’ could be a process indicator”.

Think about this: # of VG assisted? # and Info on Scalable results? # of New technology/innovation adopted or used? Amount of resources used? (External and internal budget) Reduced risks of men and women and other vulnerable groups (children, elderly and persons with disability) from climate disasters How effective and efficient were the practice to lead to the larger outcome/goal ? CCA & DRRM practiced by communities and sectors at all levels % of LGUs and communities practicing CCA and DRRM Conduct provincial-level vulnerability and risk assessment Mainstream & implement CCA-DRRM in the local plans based on information from vulnerability and risk assessment Number of LGUs with VRA Number of LGUs with CLUP and CDP with mainstreamed VRA Number of LGU personnel trained on conducting VRA Existence of a Policy guide to mainstream VRA in local plans Number of Institutions available to support LGU VRA process Number of CCA projects identified Number or Existence of methodological tools and guide for VRA Existence of Climate Information/Parameters developed for use of LGUs Number of CCA projects budgeted and implemented

CCA M&E Indicators Timing and Frequency of monitoring is important for progress tracking; Evaluation cant be one-off because of the “learning” agenda “No one set of adaptation indicators or single type of M&E system will work for all adaptation interventions. Indicators must be chosen based on the relationship between planned adaptation activities and the socioeconomic, environmental and climatic context in which they will be implemented” (Spearman and McGray, 2011) M&E Indicators should be owned and understood by “all actors” – source, coordinator, users/learners

CCA M&E Indicators https://www.adaptationcommunity.net/?wpfb_dl=221

Operationalizing/Implementing the M&E Plan Here we go… let’s go!

Resources for CCA M&E

CCA M&E Framework and Plan Written and accepted M&E Framework for CC Adaptation and Mitigation Assist in understanding and analyzing a programme Help to develop sound monitoring and evaluation plans and implementation of monitoring and evaluation activities Articulate programme goals and measurable short, medium and long-term objectives Define relationships among inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes and impacts Clarify the relationship between programme activities and external factors. Demonstrate how activities will lead to desired outcomes and impacts, especially when resources are not available to conduct rigorous impact evaluations. They often display relationships graphically. (PATH Monitoring and Evaluation Initiative)

CCA M&E Framework and Plan M&E (and Learning) Plan the tool to perform the M&E tasks and actions contains and presents conceptual measures and definitions, along with baseline data; the monitoring schedule; lists the data sources to be used; cost estimates for the monitoring and evaluation activities; a list of the partnerships and collaborations; and a knowledge capture and dissemination of the information and learnings gained

Thank you for your attention! “Practitioners should recognize that not all development is adaptation and not all adaptation leads to development”. “There is a possibility that development activities may inadvertently exacerbate the effects of climate change more than taking no action”. (Spearman and McGray, 2011) M&E plays a key and important role in learning and sustainably linking CC actions to development End of Presentation Thank you for your attention!