Case 1 Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
H AZELWOOD V. K UHLMEIER The Supreme Court Decision on School Censorship.
Advertisements

(school district v. student editor).  In 1988, the case Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier was taken to the US Supreme Court. Journalism students at Missouri’s Hazelwood.
Supreme Court Cases Notes in p. 89 (Right Side)
The 9 th Amendment: F 9th amendment case: -Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) -The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed.
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) Summary of Case: Pennsylvania's schools were giving public school money to private schools in the surrounding area. Most of which.
The First Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom.
FREEDOM of the student press. CHAPTER 14
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier A First Amendment Case © Constitutional Rights Foundation, Los Angeles, 2002 All rights reserved.
2/11/11 B- Day Do Now: 1.Write down your homework Chapter 7 quiz review due on Tuesday Chapter 7Quiz on Wednesday Bring headphones to class on Monday 2.
THE SPECTRUM HAZELWOOD V. KUHLMEIER HAZELWOOD EAST HIGH SCHOOL
AP GOVERNMENT. CIVIL LIBERTIES  Civil Liberties are individual’s legal and constitutional protections against the government.  Although our civil liberties.
+ School newspapers and censorship Student Press Rights.
Katelyn Strawhand David Chen Chelsea Hedrick. Hazelwood East High School newspaper published viewpoints of three girls who were pregnant (1983) Second.
Chapter 39 Expressions in Special Places. Schools, Military Bases, & Prisons present special 1 st Amendment problems Schools, Military Bases, & Prisons.
Tyranikkquia Oliver. Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), [1] was a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that.
By Josh Barringer.  Became known as “Pentagon Papers Case”  decided together with United States v. Washington Post Co.
OBJECTIVES:  COMPARE and CONTRAST federal and state court systems  LIST and EXPLAIN the differences between criminal and civil cases  DESCRIBE the basic.
Griswold v. Connecticut Christianne Derwinski. Case Overview Estelle Griswold and Lee Buxton gave medical advice and birth control to married couples.
Homework: 14 th questions for Wednesday; test Friday FrontPage: Where are the following “rights” mentioned in the Constitution? Privacy? Abortion? Physician-assisted.
Student rights / School Newspaper Rights
Hazelwood vs. Kuhlmeier Katelyn Strawhand David Chen Chelsea Hedrick.
Chapter 19: Civil Liberties. Civil Liberties Protections against government Guarantees of the safety of persons, opinions, and property from arbitrary.
The Importance of Rights Kurt Van Deren What have we learned?
Due Process, including no forced testimony Unwritten power is reserved to the people or the state.
The privacy of citizens A right to privacy? – Griswold v Connecticut (1965) The right to choose? – Roe v Wade (1973), Casey v Planned Parenthood of Pennsylvania.
History of Journalism: How Do Students’ Rights Differ From Those of the Press? By Amy and Suzan.
Haley Jurbala Derek Hegna Ashley Hitchcock Andrew Howard COURT CASES- GROUP 2.
BAILEY BARTESCHI, RYAN CAVIOLA, ANDRE COLANDONE AND MIRANDA MCDONALD P4 Gitlow v. New York (1925) Argued: April 11, 1923 Re-argued: November 22, 1923 Decided:
Privacy? Abortion? Physician-assisted suicide?
Chapter 4 – The Amendments to the US Constitution
Arguments Presented in Lower Courts
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier A First Amendment Case
Chapter 4 – The Amendments to the US Constitution
First Amendment in Schools
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier A First Amendment Case
First Amendment in Schools
The Amendments to the US Constitution
Discrimination Against Women
Chapter 6 – The Amendments to the US Constitution
By Michael Cleary Period 8 10/3/13 College Business Law Mr. Como
1st Amendment & School (8 cases = 7 revolving around school and 1 NOT)
1st Amendment Freedom of Speech Freedom of Religion
Arguments Presented in Lower Courts
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier A First Amendment Case
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Citlalli Caltzontzin & Luz Garcia 10.3 Forensics 10/12/16
Supreme Court Cases Impacting School Policy in the United States
Unit 1: Introduction & Orientation
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Chapter 4 – The Amendments to the US Constitution
Limiting the 1st Amendment in Schools
The ninth amendment By: Arturo C..
Jefferson.
Hazelwood vs kuhlmeier
First Amendment in Schools
U.S. Constitution: States, Amending, Federalism, and Ratification
Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier 1987.
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier 484 U. S
Student Speech in Schools
Chapter 6 – The Amendments to the US Constitution
Chapter 6 – The Amendments to the US Constitution
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier 1988
Warm Up – February 13 Read the article on Engel v. Vitale that is on my website under today’s date and answer the following questions: 1. Who was Steven.
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier A First Amendment Case
Griswold v. Connecticut 1965
Limits on Scholastic Journalism
Constitutional Rights: Protections and Limitations
1st Amendment Rights Student Journalists.
Arguments Presented in Lower Courts
Student Speech in Schools
Presentation transcript:

Case 1 Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988) School Principal of Hazelwood school Editor Cathy Kuhlmeier and 2 other students The school “Spectrum” newspaper, written a edited by students, was not allowed to publish several pages because two articles were deemed inappropriate by the school principal.

This case came to the USSC to decide whether a school newspaper was a “public forum” protected by the full reach of the 1st Amendment.   Question - Does the school have the right to exercise control over what is published in a school newspaper? This case is important because it decides the right of students speech as control by the school principal. The Supreme Court decides in favor of the school saying that the principal had the right to “Reasonable Restrictions” on students’ speech in a school setting. School is not a “public forum.”

Case 2 GRISWOLD v. CONNECTICUT(1965) Griswold was the Executive Director of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut. Both she and the Medical Director for the League gave information, instruction, and other medical advice to married couples concerning birth control. Griswold and her colleague were convicted under a Connecticut law which criminalized the provision of counselling, and other medical treatment, to married persons for purposes of preventing conception.

Question - Does the Constitution protect the right of married people to use birth control when it is against the law in their home state? Concerns Amendment 9: Implied Rights beyond the Constitution Implications: Freedom to decides whether or not you have a baby or whether the state limits your access to birth control.