Bioreactance is not reliable for estimating cardiac output and the effects of passive leg raising in critically ill patients E. Kupersztych-Hagege, J.-L. Teboul, A. Artigas, A. Talbot, C. Sabatier, C. Richard, X. Monnet British Journal of Anaesthesia Volume 111, Issue 6, Pages 961-966 (December 2013) DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet282 Copyright © 2013 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 Bland–Altman plot for the absolute values of CI values measured by transpulmonary thermodilution (CItd) and by the NICOM® device (CINicom). n=144; straight line: bias, dashed line: +2sd/−2sd limits of agreement. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2013 111, 961-966DOI: (10.1093/bja/aet282) Copyright © 2013 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 Four-quadrant concordance analysis between the percentage changes in CI measured by transpulmonary thermodilution (CItd) and by the NICOM® device (CINicom) induced by volume expansion. The zero-centred square corresponds to the 15% exclusion zone. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2013 111, 961-966DOI: (10.1093/bja/aet282) Copyright © 2013 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions
Fig 3 ROC curves testing the ability of the percentage changes in CI measured by transpulmonary thermodilution (CItd) and by the NICOM® device (CINicom) induced by the PLR test to predict fluid responsiveness. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2013 111, 961-966DOI: (10.1093/bja/aet282) Copyright © 2013 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions