The Cell Adhesion Molecule Echinoid Functions as a Tumor Suppressor and Upstream Regulator of the Hippo Signaling Pathway  Tao Yue, Aiguo Tian, Jin Jiang 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Advertisements

A Hedgehog-Responsive Region in the Drosophila Wing Disc Is Defined by Debra- Mediated Ubiquitination and Lysosomal Degradation of Ci  Ping Dai, Hiroshi.
The Salvador-Warts-Hippo Pathway Is Required for Epithelial Proliferation and Axis Specification in Drosophila  Carine Meignin, Ines Alvarez-Garcia, Ilan.
The Sterile 20-like Kinase Tao-1 Controls Tissue Growth by Regulating the Salvador- Warts-Hippo Pathway  Carole L.C. Poon, Jane I. Lin, Xiaomeng Zhang,
Volume 16, Issue 21, Pages (November 2006)
The DHHC Palmitoyltransferase Approximated Regulates Fat Signaling and Dachs Localization and Activity  Hitoshi Matakatsu, Seth S. Blair  Current Biology 
Brian S. Robinson, Juang Huang, Yang Hong, Kenneth H. Moberg 
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Distinct Mechanisms of Apoptosis-Induced Compensatory Proliferation in Proliferating and Differentiating Tissues in the Drosophila Eye  Yun Fan, Andreas.
Drosophila Melted Modulates FOXO and TOR Activity
Kibra Is a Regulator of the Salvador/Warts/Hippo Signaling Network
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Mutual Repression by Bantam miRNA and Capicua Links the EGFR/MAPK and Hippo Pathways in Growth Control  Héctor Herranz, Xin Hong, Stephen M. Cohen  Current.
Dpp Gradient Formation in the Drosophila Wing Imaginal Disc
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 17, Pages (September 2012)
Opposing Transcriptional Outputs of Hedgehog Signaling and Engrailed Control Compartmental Cell Sorting at the Drosophila A/P Boundary  Christian Dahmann,
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Act up Controls Actin Polymerization to Alter Cell Shape and Restrict Hedgehog Signaling in the Drosophila Eye Disc  Aude Benlali, Irena Draskovic, Dennis.
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Sightless has homology to transmembrane acyltransferases and is required to generate active Hedgehog protein  Jeffrey D. Lee, Jessica E. Treisman  Current.
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Fat2 and Lar Define a Basally Localized Planar Signaling System Controlling Collective Cell Migration  Kari Barlan, Maureen Cetera, Sally Horne-Badovinac 
The Intracellular Domain of the Frazzled/DCC Receptor Is a Transcription Factor Required for Commissural Axon Guidance  Alexandra Neuhaus-Follini, Greg J.
Proteolysis of the Hedgehog Signaling Effector Cubitus interruptus Requires Phosphorylation by Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 and Casein Kinase 1  Mary Ann.
Integrin Signaling Regulates Spindle Orientation in Drosophila to Preserve the Follicular- Epithelium Monolayer  Ana Fernández-Miñán, María D. Martín-Bermudo,
Helen Strutt, Mary Ann Price, David Strutt  Current Biology 
Jianjun Sun, Wu-Min Deng  Developmental Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 16, Issue 21, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (April 2008)
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Joanna Chen, Esther M. Verheyen  Current Biology 
The LRR Proteins Capricious and Tartan Mediate Cell Interactions during DV Boundary Formation in the Drosophila Wing  Marco Milán, Ulrich Weihe, Lidia.
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Propagation of Dachsous-Fat Planar Cell Polarity
Julian C. Boggiano, Pamela J. Vanderzalm, Richard G. Fehon 
Julien Colombani, Cédric Polesello, Filipe Josué, Nicolas Tapon 
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
A Role of Receptor Notch in Ligand cis-Inhibition in Drosophila
Drosophila ASPP Regulates C-Terminal Src Kinase Activity
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
The Hippo Pathway Regulates the bantam microRNA to Control Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis in Drosophila  Barry J. Thompson, Stephen M. Cohen  Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
The Master Switch Gene Sex-lethal Promotes Female Development by Negatively Regulating the N-Signaling Pathway  Jill K.M. Penn, Paul Schedl  Developmental.
Sandra Claret, Matthieu Sanial, Anne Plessis  Current Biology 
STIL Microcephaly Mutations Interfere with APC/C-Mediated Degradation and Cause Centriole Amplification  Christian Arquint, Erich A. Nigg  Current Biology 
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Aeri Cho, Masato Kato, Tess Whitwam, Ji Hoon Kim, Denise J. Montell 
The LRR Proteins Capricious and Tartan Mediate Cell Interactions during DV Boundary Formation in the Drosophila Wing  Marco Milán, Ulrich Weihe, Lidia.
The sterol-sensing domain of Patched protein seems to control Smoothened activity through Patched vesicular trafficking  Verónica Martı́n, Graciela Carrillo,
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
F. Christian Bennett, Kieran F. Harvey  Current Biology 
Oocyte polarity is disrupted in the presence of FP41 mutant PFCs
Ubiquitin mediates the interaction between Smo and Vps36.
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (August 1996)
Salvador-Warts-Hippo Signaling Promotes Drosophila Posterior Follicle Cell Maturation Downstream of Notch  Cédric Polesello, Nicolas Tapon  Current Biology 
A B C D E F Supplementary Figure S1 Deng et al. MS1096
Hernán López-Schier, Daniel St Johnston  Developmental Cell 
Drosophila Schip1 Links Expanded and Tao-1 to Regulate Hippo Signaling
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
Evidence for a Growth-Stabilizing Regulatory Feedback Mechanism between Myc and Yorkie, the Drosophila Homolog of Yap  Ricardo M. Neto-Silva, Simon de.
Presentation transcript:

The Cell Adhesion Molecule Echinoid Functions as a Tumor Suppressor and Upstream Regulator of the Hippo Signaling Pathway  Tao Yue, Aiguo Tian, Jin Jiang  Developmental Cell  Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 255-267 (February 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.12.011 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Developmental Cell 2012 22, 255-267DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.12.011) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Inactivation of Ed Induces Tissue Overgrowth and Enhances Yki Gain-of-Function Phenotype (A–D′) Side (A–D) and dorsal (A′–D′) views of a control adult fly eye (A and A′) or eyes expressing UAS-Yki (B and B′) or UAS-Yki + UAS-Ed-RNAi3087 (C and C′) with GMR-Gal4, or expressing UAS-Ed-RNAi3087 with ey-Gal4 (D and D′). (E–F′) Side (E and F) and dorsal (E′ and F′) views of mosaic eyes containing control clones (E and E′) or ed clones (F and F′) induced by ey-FLP. (G–J) A control adult fly wing (G) and wings expressing UAS-Ed-RNAi937 (H), UAS-Sav-RNAi (I), or UAS-Ed-RNAi937 + UAS-Ed (J) with hh-Gal4 at 29°C. Red dashed lines indicate the A/P compartment boundary. Developmental Cell 2012 22, 255-267DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.12.011) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Inactivation of Ed Increases the Expression of Multiple Hpo Pathway Target Genes (A and A′) A wing disc expressing UAS-GFP + UAS-Ed-RNAi104279 with hh-Gal4 and immunostained with anti-GFP (A) and anti-Ed (A′) antibodies. GFP marked the posterior compartment (arrows) where hh-Gal4 is expressed. (B–E′) Wild-type wing discs (B, C, D, and E) or wing discs expressing UAS-Ed-RNAi104279 (B′, C′, D′, and E′) or UAS-Ed-RNAi104279 + UAS-Ed (C″) with hh-Gal4 and immunostained to show the expression of diap1-GFP (B and B′), ex-lacZ (C–C″), Wg (green in D and D′), Ci (red in D and D′), and bantam sensor (BS; E and E′). Arrows in (B–C″), (E), and (E′) indicate posterior compartments. Arrows and asterisks in (D and D′) indicate Wg expression at the periphery of the wing pouch region and along the D/V compartment boundary, respectively. Ci expression (red in D and D′) marks the A compartment. (F and F′) A large magnification view of an eye disc containing ed mutant clones and immunostained to show the expression of LacZ (green; F′) and DIAP1 (red; F and F′). ed mutant clones are marked by the lack of LacZ expression and exhibit elevated DIAP1 expression (arrows; F and F′). (G and G′) A wing disc carrying ed mutant clones was immunostained to show the expression of LacZ (green; G′) and Wg (red; G and G′). ed mutant cells are marked by the lack of LacZ expression. ed mutant cells exhibit elevated Wg expression at the periphery of the wing pouch region (arrows) but normal Wg expression along the D/V boundary (asterisks). Developmental Cell 2012 22, 255-267DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.12.011) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Loss of Ed Phenocopies Loss of Hpo Signaling in Ovary (A–F′) Stage 8 wild-type (A–A″′, C–C″′, and E–E′) and mosaic egg chambers carrying ed mutant clones (B–B″′, D–D″′, and F–F′) were immunostained with antibodies against Cut (green in A and B), GFP (green in C and D), and LacZ (red) and the nuclear dye, DRAQ5 (blue). In all panels, the posterior is to the right. The dashed lines outline the mutant follicle cell clones that are marked by the lack of LacZ expression, and the solid lines indicate the posterior follicle cells. Cut expression is downregulated in follicle cells at stage 8, and its expression remains in the anteriorly and posteriorly localized polar cells (A). Cut expression is prolonged in posterior ed mutant follicle cell clones (arrow in B). There is a singer layer of follicle cells surrounding the wild-type oocyte (A″ and C″), but multiple layers of follicle cells are found in posterior ed mutant follicle cell clones (B″ and D″). The expression of Hpo pathway target gene diap1-GFP is weak in posterior follicle cells (C) but is upregulated in posterior ed mutant follicle cells (arrow in D). The oocyte nucleus is localized at the anterior-dorsal corner (arrows in E and E′) but is mislocalized at the posterior pole of the oocyte with large ed follicle cell clones (arrows in F and F′). (G–H′) Stage 9 wild-type (G and G′) and mosaic egg chambers carrying ed mutant clones (H and H′) were immunostained with antibodies against Grk (red) and LacZ (green) and the nuclear dye, DRAQ5 (blue). Grk is localized at the anterior-dorsal corner of wild-type oocytes (arrows in G and G′) but is mislocalized at the posterior pole of oocytes associated with large posterior ed follicle cell clones marked by the lack of LacZ staining (arrows in H and H′). Developmental Cell 2012 22, 255-267DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.12.011) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Ed Acts Upstream of Sav to Regulate Yki Phosphorylation and Nuclear Localization (A) Western blot analysis of Yki and phospho-Yki for wild-type wing discs or wing discs expressing UAS-Ed-RNAi104279 with the MS1096 Gal4 driver. The bottom panel is western blot for α-tubulin as a loading control. (B–B″) A wing disc expressing ex-lacZ and UAS-Ed-RNAi104279 with hh-Gal4 was immunostained with Yki (green; B′ and B″) and LacZ (red; B′ and B″) antibodies. The A/P boundary is demarcated by white lines based on Ci staining (not shown). Of note, Yki colocalized with LacZ in the nucleus of posterior compartment cells (arrows). (C–E) Adult fly wings expressing UAS-Ed-RNAi973 (C), UAS-Ed-RNAi973 + UAS-Yki-RNAi (D), or UAS-Ed-RNAi973 + UAS-Sav (E) with hh-Gal4 at 29°C. Red dashed lines demarcate the A/P compartment boundary. (F–I) A wild-type wing disc (F) or wing discs expressing UAS-Ed-RNAi104279 (G), UAS-Ds-RNAi (H), or UAS-Ed-RNAi104279 + UAS-Ds-RNAi (I) with MS1096. The discs also expressed UAS- dicer2 to enhance the RNAi efficiency. Developmental Cell 2012 22, 255-267DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.12.011) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Ed Interacts with Multiple Hpo Pathway Components (A) A schematic drawing of full-length Ed (EdFL) and its deletion constructs. Black boxes denote the transmembrane domain of Ed. (B–H) S2 cells were transfected with DNA constructs expressing epitope-tagged full-length or indicated truncated Ed and tagged Hpo pathway components including Sav (B–C, H), Hpo (C), Ex (D), Mer (E), Kibra (F), or Yki (G). Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated, followed by western blot analysis with the indicated antibodies (top panels), or directly subjected to western blot analysis with the indicated antibodies (bottom panels). Asterisks in H and J indicate weak bands. Arrows in B indicate the cleaved Ed. (I) A schematic drawing of full-length Sav and its deletion mutants. The WW and CC domains are indicated by shaded and black boxes, respectively. The ability of individual Sav constructs to interact with Ed is indicated by a plus or minus symbol. (J) S2 cells were transfected with DNA constructs expressing Myc-tagged EdFL and indicated HA-tagged Sav deletion constructs. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibody, followed by western blot analysis with anti-Myc antibody (top panel), or directly subjected to western blot analysis with anti-Myc or anti-HA antibody (middle and bottom panels). Asterisks indicate weak bands. (K–N′) Wing discs expressing UAS-Ed-RNAi3087 (K and K′), UAS-Ed-RNAi3087 + UAS-EdTMC-Myc (L and L′), UAS-Ed-RNAi3087 + UAS -EdTMCΔ1-Myc (M and M′), or UAS-Ed-RNAi3087 + UAS-EdTMCΔ2-Myc (N and N′) with hh-Gal4 and immunostained to show the expression of Ci (red), ex-lacZ (green) and Myc (blue). Ed transgenes with comparable Myc expression levels were used for the rescue experiments. Developmental Cell 2012 22, 255-267DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.12.011) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Ed Regulates the Stability and Apical Localization of Sav (A) Western blot analysis of cell lysates from S2 cells transfected with the indicated constructs. Myc-CFP (arrow) was cotransfected as an internal control. Samples were boiled and loaded immediately after 2× SDS loading buffer was added into cell lysates. (B) S2 cells were transfected with HA-Sav in the absence or presence of EdFL-Myc and treated with cycloheximide for the indicated time. Cell lysates were subjected to western blot analysis using anti-Myc antibody. Myc-CFP (arrow) was cotransfected as an internal control. (C) Quantification of HA-Sav in the absence or presence of EdFL-Myc by western blot analysis performed in B. (D) Western blot analysis of cell lysates from S2 cells transfected with HA-Sav and Myc-CFP and treated with MG132 for 4 hr before harvesting. Myc-CFP (lower panel) served as a transfection and loading control. (E–F′) Wing discs expressing UAS-Sav-RNAi with hh-Gal4 were immunostained with an anti-Sav antibody (green) and the nuclear dye, DRAQ5 (red in E′), or an anti-Ed antibody (red in F′). Sav exhibited cytoplasmic staining, which was abolished by Sav-RNAi. (G–G″) Transverse section view of wild-type wing discs immunostained with Ed (red) and Sav antibodies (green). Sav was enriched at the apical plasma membrane where it colocalized with Ed at adherens junctions. (H–I″′) Transverse section view of a wing disc expressing UAS-Ed-RNAi104279 with hh-Gal4 and immunostained to show the expression of Sav (green in H′ and H″), Ed (red in H and H″) or E-cadherin (E-cad; red in I′ and I″′) and En (blue in I″ and I″′) that marks the P compartment. Loss of Ed resulted in reduced Sav accumulation at the apical surface. (J–K″′) Wild-type (J–J″′) and mosaic egg chambers carrying ed mutant clones (K–K″′) were immunostained to show the expression of Sav (green), LacZ (red), and phalloidin (blue). ed mutant follicle cells are marked by the lack of LacZ expression (arrows in K–K′). Posterior ed mutant follicle cells showed reduced Sav signals at the apical surface marked by phalloidin. Developmental Cell 2012 22, 255-267DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.12.011) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Regulation of Ed/Sav Interaction by Dimerization and Cell-Cell Contact (A) Schematic drawings of full-length Ed and Ed variants. Black bars indicate the Ed transmembrane domain. Triangle and gray box represent a myristoylation (Myr) signal and a CC dimerization domain, respectively. (B and C) S2 cells were transfected with the indicated constructs. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-HA or anti-Myc antibody, followed by western blot analysis with the indicated antibodies (top two panels) or directly subjected to western blot analysis with anti-Myc or anti-HA antibody (bottom two panels). Asterisks in (B) indicate weak bands. Arrows indicate IgG. (D) FRET efficiency of indicated pairs of CFP/YFP constructs transfected into S2 cells (mean ± SD, n ≥ 10). (E–G″) S2 cells were transfected with tub-Sav-GFP (green) and tub-EdFL-Myc or tub-EdTMCΔ1-Myc (red). Immunostaining was carried out after cell aggregation was induced. (H) A model for Ed in the Hpo signaling pathway. Dashed lines indicate less characterized interactions. See text for details. Developmental Cell 2012 22, 255-267DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.12.011) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions