International Policy Update & Producer Opportunities

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doing Business in Korea October 22, 2008 Ken Nye, Commodity Specialist Michigan Farm Bureau.
Advertisements

Free Trade of The Americas: Issues and Prospects The Andean Group Jaime Malaga Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics Texas Tech University Free.
International Trade Policy A Major Influence On The Economic Viability Of The U.S. Cotton Industry A Major Influence On The Economic Viability Of The U.S.
Global Marketing Chapter 3
The Political Economy of Integration Agreements and the Crisis: Coping Strategies for Small States Carol Wise University of Southern California.
Ch.6: International Environment: Regional Political & Economic Integration.
Trade in Mediterranean Products: The Effects of United States Regional and Bilateral Trade Agreements Cal Med Consortium Workshop Mediterranean Products.
Does the U.S. Feed the World?
The U.S. and World Sugar Industries under the EU and DOHA Trade Liberalization Won W. Koo   Chamber of Commerce Distinguished Professor and Director  
Multilateralism and Regionalism: Trade Agreement Effects on Southern Agricultural Products Lynn Kennedy, Brian Hilbun, and Elizabeth Dufour LSU AgCenter.
Free Trade Agreements: Helping U.S. Businesses Export.
Shrinking the Gap: Potential Roles of the WTO & Trade Agreements Parr Rosson, Professor & Director Center for North American Studies Department of Agricultural.
September 28, 2012 Expanding Market Opportunities Through Trade Policy: Office of the U.S. Trade Representative Sushan Demirjian Deputy Assistant U.S.
International Trade Issues & Texas Agriculture Parr Rosson Professor & Director Center for North American Studies Department of Agricultural Economics.
Trade Programs, Policies, and Outlook 2014 Farm Bill Education Conference Luis A. Ribera Associate Professor and Extension Economist.
Overview and Current Status of the Doha Work Program and Negotiations Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meetings Orlando, FL, February.
© Copyright AAFA. All rights reserved Trade Agenda in 2006 and Beyond: A View from Washington ISC/SCLC Spring 2006 Meeting Stephen Lamar Sr. Vice.
Why Trade? The WTO and Trading Blocs 5 th March 2010.
Trade Effects of the Free Trade Area of the Americas Won Koo Professor and Director Jeremy Mattson Research Assistant Center for Agricultural Policy and.
© The McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 Ch.6: International Environment: Regional Political & Economic Integration.
The Impact of the World Trade Organization on Food Aid Policies USDA and USAID EXPORT FOOD AID CONFERENCE Kansas, City, Missouri April 25, 2006 Floyd Gaibler,
The Doha Development Agenda: Issues of Process and Substance Parr Rosson Texas Cooperative Extension Texas A&M University System American Agricultural.
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics Risk Environment for Agriculture Ag. Credit School Ames, Iowa June 4, 2013 Chad Hart Associate Professor/Crop.
The Doha Development Agenda: Progress Or Process? Parr Rosson Professor & Director Center for North American Studies Department of Agricultural Economics.
By Ntando Ndlovu - ZIMCODD1 Removal of subsidies on cotton trade and growth of the cotton industry in Africa SARPN/EJN Regional Strategy Meeting on Hong.
© Copyright AAFA. All rights reserved SCLC/ECC Spring 2007 Meeting International Trade Update Stephen Lamar Exec. Vice President American Apparel.
Does the U.S. Feed the World? Economic Research Service U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Texas Agricultural Forum Waco, Texas January 21, 2004 New Trade Negotiations: What’s at Stake For Texas Agriculture? Parr Rosson Center for North American.
REGIONAL INTEGRATION IN LATIN AMERICA Luis Ángel Madrid April 2010.
Economic Impacts of CAFTA- DR on US & Texas Agriculture Parr Rosson Professor & Director Center for North American Studies Department of Agricultural Economics.
The DR/Central American Free Trade Agreement: What’s at Stake for U.S. Agriculture? Mechel S. Paggi Director Center for Agricultural Business CSU, Fresno.
Texas Plant Protection Conference ‘Climate of Change’ International Trade Relations Parr Rosson Professor & Director Center for North American Studies.
Economic and Policy Analysis Directorate 1 Canada’s Agricultural Trade with FTAA Countries Organized Symposium at the Meeting of the American Agricultural.
Impact of Potential Free Trade Agreements on Sugar Prices P. Lynn Kennedy.
W T O : O v e r v I e w. ABOUT: WTO Binding institution Consensus-based 151 members (as of Aug 07) Established 1995 Negotiating forum to reduce barriers.
Does the U.S. Feed the World? Economic Research Service U.S. Department of Agriculture.
AAEA Annual Meetings Denver, CO August 1-4, 2004 DR-CAFTA & Australia Trade Agreement: Issues & Implications for U.S. Agriculture C NAS Parr Rosson Professor.
Texas Trade Issues Parr Rosson Center for North American Studies Department of Agricultural Economics Texas Cooperative Extension.
Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meetings Orlando, FL, February 7, 2006 The Economic Impacts of CAFTA-DR on the Southern U.S. Beef, Rice.
24 March 2010Exporting 101 Building International Sales Assessing Risk & Opportunity Craig A Harvey Chair, MSDEC.
The Importance of Increased Market Access to Southern Agriculture Presentation at SAEA Organized Symposium: The Doha Development Agenda: Where are We and.
THE ROLE OF TRADE: SOUTH-SOUTH AND GLOBAL Ing. MARCELO REGUNAGA New Delhi, November 2003.
United States Horticultural Imports and Exports. Objectives I can compare and contrast imports and exports. I can identify top U.S. horticultural imports.
Levels of Economic Integration
WTO Status of Negotiation, July 2004 Framework... and Beyond Debra Henke USDA/ Foreign Agricultural Service.
SAFTA: FTAA Southern Exposure South American Perspective of Agricultural Free Trade Jaime Malaga Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics Texas.
Wednesday, April 18, 2012 Pittsburg State University Pittsburg, Kansas Southeast Kansas International Trade Symposium Presented by: Dr. Raffaele DeVito.
World Grain Situation Trends, Conditions and Outlook Parr Rosson Professor & Director Center for North American Studies Department of Agricultural Economics.
1 U.S. Trade Agreements with Chile and Andean Countries: Implications for FTAA? Jaime Malaga, Texas Tech University Flynn Adcock, Texas A&M University.
U.S. Trade Agenda Juliet Bender, Director Office of the Pacific Basin September 2007 ~ Bangkok, Thailand.
Lecture 0 Introduction: Overview of the International Economy by Alan V. Deardorff University of Michigan 2016 PubPol/Econ 541.
NS4540 Winter Term 2017 Central America: Trade Opportunities
ALMA Business Plan Overview
Associate Professor/Crop Marketing Specialist
Mexico, NAFTA, and Expansion Toward the European Union
Honors International Marketing Ms. Osteen
Texas Vegetable Assn. Mid-Year Meeting McAllen, Texas June 17, 2004
Risk Environment for Agriculture
Washington Trade Overview 18th Annual International Legislators Forum (ILF) June 26, 2018 Hanna Abou-El-Seoud.
Preferential Trade Agreements Or Trade blocs Ch. 12
Class 1 Introduction to Trade and Trade Policy
Ch.6: International Environment: Regional Political & Economic Integration © The McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000.
5 The United States and the Global Economy.
Associate Professor/Crop Marketing Specialist
5 The United States and the Global Economy.
Economic Turmoil & Trade Liberalization
The Doha Development Agenda: Issues of Process and Substance
Trade, Tariffs, & the Ag Economy
Globalization and Global Poverty
U.S. Pork Exports Update for January 2019
Presentation transcript:

International Policy Update & Producer Opportunities Parr Rosson Professor & Director Center for North American Studies Department of Agricultural Economics Texas A&M University

Overview Trade Trends International Institutions Trade Agreements Conclusions & Implications

Trade Trends & International Setting

World Population Billions 7,570 6,310 Ind. + 8%, Dev. + 31% 8 ME AFR US Census Bureau Billions 8 ME AFR LA TOTAL 7,570 8 NA WE I. ASIA EE/FSU D. ASIA 6,310 Ind. + 8%, Dev. + 31% 6 6 4 4 2 2 1990 2000 2001 F2005 F2010 F2015 F2020

World Economic Output GDP, Trillion 1997 Dollars NA WE I. ASIA EE/FSU Global Insight, Inc., World Economic Outlook, 2002. GDP, Trillion 1997 Dollars 1990 2000 2001 F2005 F2010 F2015 F2020 $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 NA WE I. ASIA EE/FSU D. ASIA ME AFR CSA Ind. + 64%, Developing + 140%

U.S. Tariffs, 1789-2004 Percent WTO, 1995 GATT, 1947 70 70 Tariff of Abominations, 1828 Smoot-Hawley Tariff, 1930 60 60 Morrill Act, 1861 50 50 Generalized System of Preferences, 1968 40 40 30 30 WTO, 1995 20 20 Fordney-McCumber Tariff, 1922 10 10 GATT, 1947 1789 1816 1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 Statistical Abstract of the United States

World Average Agricultural Tariffs, 2002 Percent 140 Region Average 115 120 World Average 100 85 62% 80 55 60 40 30 40 25 10 20 Asia Central America South America United States Caribbean Islands European Union North America Source: WTO & ERS/USDA

Top 10 U.S. Ag Export Markets

Trade Surplus Vanishes Since 2000: Exports + 25% Imports + 50%

Observations Disparity in Population & Income Growth Disparity in Use of Trade Barriers Disparity in Agricultural Trade Growth Finally Seeing China Emerge as Market, Cuba Growing Questions About Role & Future Importance of Trade

International Institutions & Trade Strategies

Concurrent Initiatives U.S. Trade Strategy Unilateral Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) CBI/CBERA African Growth Opportunities Act (AGOA) Regional/Bilateral NAFTA, CAFTA-DR, Others Multilateral World Trade Organization Only Forum Where All 150 Member Countries Are Present & Farm Policy Is Negotiated Concurrent Initiatives

Doha Development Agenda in the World Trade Organization (2001-6?) The Hong Kong Ministerial December 13-18, 2005 Agreement on Reductions by April 30, 2006 Draft Schedules Due July 31, 2006 Conclude Negotiations December 31, 2006

Three Pillars for Negotiations in Agriculture Market Access Export Competition Domestic Support Negotiations Under Tight Timeline Due to Expiration of TPA July 2007

Hong Kong, December 2005 Little Progress Made in Hong Kong EU Trade Commissioner said state of negotiations was “serious but not desperate.” Agreement to Eliminate Export Subsidies by 2013 Greater “Quota-Free, Duty-Free” Access Granted LDCs, Up to 97% of Products LDC’s want it above 99% and Prepared to Veto While Many Fundamental Issues Remain Unresolved, Deadlines Have Been Set

Hong Kong, December 2005 (continued) Agreement on Degree of Tariff Cuts by April 30, 2006 EU Wants to Reduce by 39% (They Claim 46%) while U.S. and Others Think EU Needs to Reduce by about 60% Each Country to Submit Tariff Schedules by July 30 While Export Subsidies Addressed, More work on STE’s and Export Credit Guarantees Needed Agreement Still Needed on Cuts in Trade Distorting Domestic Support (Amber/Blue) U.S. Wants about 53%, Pushing EU and Japan Towards 80% This Does Not Address Green Box Programs U.S. wants “New” Blue Box for CCPs

Other Negotiating/Related Issues NAMA (Non-Ag Market Access) The Cotton Case (DS 267) U.S. Budget Situation Dissension within EU (France vs. Everyone Else)

Observations WTO Could Result in No Substantial Agreement Future of WTO May Be On the Line Agreement Important to U.S. Open Markets Get Rid of Export Subsidy Distortions Minimize Litigation Over Farm Policy

Role of Trade Agreements

Why Regional Agreements? 2d Best After MTN WTO Has Been Slower than Desired Outcome is Uncertain Economic Incentives Open Markets Increase Business Efficiency Keep Pressure on MTN to Perform

Strategic Considerations Secure Strategic Materials Oil, Fertilizer, Natural Gas Stem Illegal Immigration by Creating Economic Opportunity in Other Countries Create ‘Buffer Zone’ Against Terrorism (9/11 Commission Report)

Southern African Customs Union ‘06 CUSTA, ‘89 Jordan ‘01 Bahrain ‘05 CAFTA-DR ‘05 NAFTA ‘94 Israel ‘85 Morocco ‘04 Thailand ‘06 Panama ‘06 S. Korea Andean FTA ‘06 MEFTA ‘06 FTAA ‘06 Singapore ‘03 Chile ‘04 Southern African Customs Union ‘06 Australia ‘05 U.S. Trade Agreements

Trade Agreements In-Place (7) Israel-1985-1994 Canada-US (CUSTA)-1989-1998 North America (NAFTA)-1994-2008 US-Mexico US-Canada Canada-Mexico Jordan-December 17, 2001-2010 Chile-January 1, 2004-2015 Singapore-May 6 2003-2012 Australia-January 1, 2005-2022

Trade Agreements-Pending (10) Morocco-President Signed 8/17/04, Pending Signature, King of Morocco CAFTA-DR-Signed by President, (20 Years to Full Implementation) Bahrain-Pending Submission to Congress Panama-Nine Negotiating Sessions Held, Panama Delays Colombia, Ecuador, Peru (ANDEAN)-Nine Rounds, Negotiations Continue Thailand-Three Rounds Held S. Korea - 2007

Trade Agreements-Pending (10) Southern African Customs Union (SACU): Botswana, Namibia, Lesotho, Swaziland, South Africa-Six Rounds Held MEFTA: Oman & United Arab Emirates Under Negotiation: Egypt, Others??

Mexico Houston, 1,300 Miles NW Dominican Republic, 800 Miles NE North

CAFTA-DR Demographic Overview Country Pop. (mil) GDP/ Person Poverty % Lit. Ag. Pop. Costa Rica 3.9 $8,300 20.6 96 20 El Salvador 6.5 $4,600 48 80.2 30 Guatemala 13.9 $3,900 75 70.6 50 Honduras 6.7 $2,500 53 76.1 34 Nicaragua 5.1 $2,200 67.5 42 Dom. Rep. 8.7 $6,300 25 84.7 17

CAFTA-DR Prospects U.S. Ag. Export Gains of $1.5 Billion Annually Near Term: HQ Beef, Cotton, Wheat & Soybeans Long Term: Rice, Dairy, Pork, Poultry & Corn Challenges: Sugar, Cantaloupe, Honeydew Limitations: Infrastructure, Income Growth/Distribution, Plant & Animal Health Other Opportunities: Investment

CAFTA-DR Ag. Trade, 2003 US Exports: $1,339 million US Imports: $2,654 million Meats Sugar Coffee 15.2% 7.1% Veg/Fruit Other 17.3% Oilseeds 8.7% 12.4% 19.4% Cotton 3.5% Other Fish 9.6% 18.0% Bananas 25.4% Grains & Feeds Fruit/Veg 43.5% 19.9% USDA, FATUS.

Observations Agreements May Be Necessary Condition for Opening New Markets for Agriculture Time is Crucial Due to Expiration of TPA Some Agreements Easier than Others Future of Free Trade of the Americas in Serious Doubt

Conclusions and Implications

Conclusions & Implications U.S. Market Is Open, Rest of World Is Not U.S. Export Growth Lags Import Growth If Trade Growth is Important, Disparities Must Be Addressed Progress in WTO Important to U.S. & Texas for at Least 2 Reasons: Markets Farm Policy

Conclusions & Implications Reductions in Trade Distorting Domestic Support Likely Substantial Some Adjustment for U.S. Producers Absent WTO Progress, Expect More Litigation in WTO Aimed at Farm U.S. Policy Trade Reform is at a Crossroads: Protection or Progress? If Export Markets Are Important, Trade Agreements & WTO Progress Are Necessary, But Not Sufficient

Thank You! Questions? Parr Rosson Department of Agricultural Economics Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843-2124 E-mail: prosson@tamu.edu Telephone: 979-845-3070