Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A non-endoscopic device to sample the oesophageal microbiota: a case-control study  Daffolyn R Fels Elliott, MD, Alan W Walker, PhD, Maria O'Donovan, MD,
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Systematic Characterization and Analysis of the Taxonomic Drivers of Functional Shifts in the Human Microbiome  Ohad Manor, Elhanan Borenstein  Cell Host.
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2017)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (May 2017)
Community Behavior and Spatial Regulation within a Bacterial Microcolony in Deep Tissue Sites Serves to Protect against Host Attack  Kimberly M. Davis,
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Associations between infant fungal and bacterial dysbiosis and childhood atopic wheeze in a nonindustrialized setting  Marie-Claire Arrieta, PhD, Andrea.
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Ahyeon Son, Jong-Eun Park, V. Narry Kim  Cell Reports 
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Prevotella as a Hub for Vaginal Microbiota under the Influence of Host Genetics and Their Association with Obesity  Jiyeon Si, Hyun Ju You, Junsun Yu,
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Alterations in the Gut Microbiota Associated with HIV-1 Infection
Genetic Determinants of the Gut Microbiome in UK Twins
Microbiota and Host Nutrition across Plant and Animal Kingdoms
Host Genetic Control of the Oral Microbiome in Health and Disease
Antibiotics, Pediatric Dysbiosis, and Disease
SIV-Induced Instability of the Chimpanzee Gut Microbiome
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
A Subset of Polysaccharide Capsules in the Human Symbiont Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron Promote Increased Competitive Fitness in the Mouse Gut  Nathan.
Cristina Márquez, Scott M. Rennie, Diana F. Costa, Marta A. Moita 
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Skin Microbiome Surveys Are Strongly Influenced by Experimental Design
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Collateral damage from oral ciprofloxacin versus nitrofurantoin in outpatients with urinary tract infections: a culture-free analysis of gut microbiota 
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
The NLR Protein NLRP6 Does Not Impact Gut Microbiota Composition
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Ruth E. Ley, Daniel A. Peterson, Jeffrey I. Gordon  Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (November 2015)
Pairing beyond the Seed Supports MicroRNA Targeting Specificity
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages e3 (June 2017)
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages e4 (September 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)
A Major Role for Capsule-Independent Phagocytosis-Inhibitory Mechanisms in Mammalian Infection by Cryptococcus neoformans  Cheryl D. Chun, Jessica C.S.
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Brandon Ho, Anastasia Baryshnikova, Grant W. Brown  Cell Systems 
Global Analysis of Palmitoylated Proteins in Toxoplasma gondii
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages e5 (October 2017)
Kevin R. Foster, Thomas Bell  Current Biology 
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
by Peter J. Turnbaugh, Vanessa K. Ridaura, Jeremiah J
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages e5 (September 2019)
Variations in beta and alpha diversity of gut microbiome bacterial communities in relation to presence of Blastocystis. Variations in beta and alpha diversity.
Northern shovelers may have unique microbiome differences with respect to IAV infection, relative to the other duck species. Northern shovelers may have.
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2018)
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages e5 (June 2019)
Fig. 4 The abundance of Bifidobacterium in breast-fed infant guts is associated with FL transporter genes. The abundance of Bifidobacterium in breast-fed.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 515-526 (October 2016) Stable Engraftment of Bifidobacterium longum AH1206 in the Human Gut Depends on Individualized Features of the Resident Microbiome  María X. Maldonado-Gómez, Inés Martínez, Francesca Bottacini, Amy O’Callaghan, Marco Ventura, Douwe van Sinderen, Benjamin Hillmann, Pajau Vangay, Dan Knights, Robert W. Hutkins, Jens Walter  Cell Host & Microbe  Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 515-526 (October 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.001 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 515-526DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.001) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Experimental Design and Survival and Persistence of B. longum Subsp. longum AH1206 in the Human Gut (A) Experimental design of the human trial. The arrows indicate the collection of fecal samples, completion of Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) forms, and samples that were sequenced and used for typing of isolates. (B) Proportions of strain AH1206 among the total cultured bifidobacteria during the two baseline periods, treatment, and placebo as determined by colony PCR with strain-specific primers. The groups labeled with different letters are significantly different (repeated-measures two-way ANOVA; α = 0.05, p < 0.0001). (C) Quantification of B. longum AH1206 in fecal samples by strain-specific qPCR. The data are represented as mean and SE. Baseline: BL. The significant difference between time points and baseline are indicated by asterisks. Repeated-measures two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; ∗∗p ≤ 0.01; and ∗p ≤ 0.05. (D) Cell numbers of B. longum AH1206 in fecal samples determined by qPCR throughout the entire trial with subjects categorized as persisters (closed symbols) and non-persisters (open symbols). Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 515-526DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.001) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 WMS Analysis Confirms Establishment and Persistence of AH1206 (A) Quantification of genes unique to B. longum AH1206 in fecal samples taken during pre-treatment baseline, consumption of the strain (14 days), and around 200 days after consumption. Mean coverage for each AH1206-specific gene was obtained by mapping metagenomics sequence reads against AH1206 specific genes absent in the combined pre-treatment metagenome. The bars represent the relative abundance (y axis) of each of the 26 genes (x axis). (B) Administration of AH1206 caused enrichment of a set of genes belonging to the species B. longum into the gut ecosystem. The relative abundances (mean coverage) before and during consumption are shown. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 515-526DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.001) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Influence of Ecological Factors on AH1206 Invasibility of Baseline Fecal Microbial Communities (A) Overall comparison of community profiles between persisters and non-persisters revealed no significant differences (p = 0.2488; Adonis PERMANOVA). The data are shown by NMDS. (B–D) α-diversity (B), evenness (C), and stability (D) of the fecal microbiota of persisters and non-persisters. Data in boxplots show the median, first, and third quartiles (hinges); whiskers are extended to the highest value within the 1.5 × IQR of the upper and lower hinges. (E and F) Barplots of the average abundance ratio of highly discriminant taxonomic groups (E) and B. longum genes (F) in pre-treatment samples in persisters and non-persisters. OTUs for which percentages of identity are not indicated have >99% identity to the type strain of the indicated bacterial species. Mean importance and p values were determined by random forest analysis and Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test, respectively. Persister: P, Non-Persister: NP. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 515-526DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.001) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Abundance of Representative Discriminatory Genes in Individual Subjects (A) Absolute abundance of representative genes that predict colonization as quantified by qPCR of persisters with high levels and non-persisters with low levels of B. longum. The average and SE of the absolute abundance of genes in all subjects is also shown. (B) Relative abundance represented as the mean coverage of the WMS reads within representative genomic regions containing genes that predict persistence. The shaded areas display the genes of interest. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 515-526DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.001) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Differences in Gene Distribution in Persisters and Non-persisters Disappear after Engraftment of B. longum AH1206 NMDS plots based on Bray-Curtis distance calculated with the abundance of 70 genes that differ in persisters and non-persisters. Baseline (A), probiotic treatment (B), and around 200 days TOP (C). Boxplots showing average gene abundance for genes g 2015, Lacl-type response repressor (D); g 1077, Lacl-family transcriptional regulator (E); g 1467, (F), and g 1830, permeases of the major facilitator superfamily (COG0477) (G); g 1136, ABC-type sugar transport system permease component (H); and g 0877, β-galactosidase (I). Means and SEM are shown. Wilcoxon test; ∗∗p ≤ 0.01; ∗p ≤ 0.05; and not significant: n.s. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 515-526DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.001) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions