PUBLIC MEETING May 12, 2011 P U B L I C I N V O L V E M E N T Project Status PHASE III Construction PHASE II Contract Plan Preparation & Land Acquisition.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Route 30 Environmental Impact Statement & Phase I Design Report Community Advisory Group Meeting Thursday May 8, 2008.
Advertisements

The presentation will follow this format:
Oregon 62: I-5 to Dutton Rd. (Medford) Oregon 62: I-5 to Dutton Rd. (Medford) for Jackson County Planning Commission May 9, 2013.
Oregon 62: I-5 to Dutton Rd. (Medford) for Jackson County Planning Commission May 9, 2013.
Project Description and Needs Lincoln Way Widening Addition of a center-turn lane and safety improvements to the grade and horizontal alignment. Needs.
Presented by Nazir Lalani P.E TRAFFIC SAFETY EVALUATIONS (Pedestrians and Bicyclists)
Great Western Corridor Feasibility Study
Hot Springs Public Meeting Reconstruction of US 18 & US 385
What is the S-48 Corridor? Study Area What’s Happened So Far? Previous Tasks  Project InitiationJune 2005  Existing ConditionsOct  Planning.
NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Environmental Impact Statement and Preliminary Engineering Public Scoping Meeting Tuesday, November 15, 2011,
January 8, 2014 FMATS College Road Corridor Study FMATS Technical Committee Update.
Proposed S.R. 26 Pavement Replacement Project Thursday, December 13, :00 p.m. Presentation East Jay Middle School 225 East Water Street in Portland.
US 52 Corridor Study Public Meeting November 15, 2010.
New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road Welcome!.
U.S. 33 Northern Connector Alternative
JANUARY 9, 2002 SCAJAQUADA CORRIDOR STUDY Grant Street to Parkside Avenue City of Buffalo Fisher Associates Joseph Passonneau & Partners In Association.
Environmental Assessment Public Meeting
TBG MKE West Waukesha Bypass Study Community Sensitive Solutions Advisory Group Meeting No. 5 January 31, 2011 Community Sensitive Solutions.
Public Open House February 6, Study Overview - Study Area South North.
S.R. 3 / South State Street Added Auxiliary Lanes Project in North Vernon Wednesday, June 29, :30pm Presentation Jennings County High School.
Public Location/Design Hearings November 17, 2010 Laughlin, Nevada November 18, 2010 Bullhead City, Arizona.
State Highway 6 Corridor Access Plan. SH 6 Project Description Project Initiated and funded by –City of Houston –Missouri City –City of Sugar Land –Harris.
In association with: THOMAS ROAD STREETSCAPE 73 RD STREET TO HAYDEN ROAD PROJECT NO. T0606 City of Scottsdale.
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
U.S. 231 Intersection Improvement in North Spencer County Heritage Hills High School Thursday, April 30, 2015.
TYPES OF INTERSECTIONS OF ROAD AND DESIGN PARAMETERS OF INTERSECTION
S.R. 144 Intersection Improvement and Road Reconstruction Project Tuesday, October 11, :30pm Presentation Neil A. Armstrong Elementary School 1000.
Schools Jobs Revenues Services Recreation Environment Transportation Transportation Connectivity Housing Public Safety Pontiac’s.
Barrington Road at Jane Addams Memorial Tollway (Interstate 90) Interchange Improvement Study Hoffman Estates Village Hall June 27, 2012.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Richmond Highway Transit Center Feasibility Study Briefing with the Fairfax County Transportation.
1 Item 11: Review of Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
Capital Improvement Program. During the Annual Strategic Action Plan (SAP) evaluation, long-term needs and priorities are identified by City Council Capital.
US 101 Corridor Plan Prepared by: Oregon Department of Transportation May 2013.
Alachua County Future Traffic Circulation Corridors Map Project July 10 th, 2007.
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT MAJOR COMMUNITY ISSUES RELATED TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Board of County Commissioners/ Local Planning Agency Joint Meeting.
New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road April 11, 2013 Welcome!
WELCOME! July 31, 2012 ODOT District July 31, 2012 PURPOSE OF TONIGHT’S MEETING Introduce the project –Reconstruct I-75.
U.S. 31 at C.R. 400 South Intersection Improvement Clifty Creek Elementary School May 22, 2014, 6:00 p.m.
Transportation and Transit Committee 4 December 2002 Albion Road Corridor Study.
9 TH STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN Corvallis Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) Ali Bonakdar.
1 INTERCHANGE SELECTION CE 550 SPRING OBJECTIVE Identify types of interchange by function and geometry Learn process for optimizing the type of.
S.R. 930 and Green Street Intersection Improvement Project Tuesday, May 22, :00 p.m. Presentation Park Hill Learning Center Auditorium New Haven,
Route 55: Lauer Rd –TSP & Access Management. Agenda  Welcome and Introductions  Workshop Purpose  Project Introduction & Background  Citizen Advisory.
U.S. 33 Road Reconstruction Goshen High School Auditorium 6 p.m. Wednesday, August 20, 2014.
Phase I Engineering and Environmental Studies Project Development Flowchart US Route 45; IL Route 132 to IL Route 173 and Millburn Bypass CSS
I-95 Access Study Fredericksburg Area Project Status Update February 12, 2010.
The Fargo/Moorhead Area Interstate Operations Study Opportunities and Planned Activities Presentation for the Mn/DOT Travel Demand Modeling Coordinating.
US 25 Corbin to London Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting December 2011.
State Route 109 (Portland Bypass) Robertson & Sumner County, TN NEPA Public Hearing November 12, 2015.
COUNTY ROAD 517 Improvements from State Highway 172 to Howe Drive DECEMBER 16, 2015 At Tribal Multipurpose Facility.
Context Sensitive Solutions Focus Group Session Lynn Purnell Parsons Brinckerhoff Prosperity Church Road Corridor December 8, 2005.
Urban Bicycle Networks Throughout Virginia I. Introduction This multimodal investment network is the incorporation of four urban bicycle studies and plans.
U.S. 20 Intersection Improvement Project at Waverly Road Porter Town Hall Thursday, August 13, 2015.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 6 October 6, 2015.
South/West Corridor Transit Improvements ZARZAMORA AND MILITARY PRIMO BRT PROJECTS ENVIRONMENTAL AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE September 9, 2014 VIA Community.
East-West Corridor Connectivity Study – Study Recommendations November 17, 2009.
Virginia Street Bus RAPID Transit Extension City of Reno Council Meeting April 29, 2015.
District VI, Florida Department of Transportation SE 2 nd Avenue and SE 4 th Street/Biscayne Boulevard Way March 25 th, 2014 Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.
EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH PECUE LANE/I-10 INTERCHANGE EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH CITY/PARISH PROJECT NO. 09-CS-US-0041 STATE PROJECT NO. H FEDERAL AID.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
County Road 19(Manning Road) & County Road 22 Improvements Environmental Study/ Preliminary Design Report November 2008.
The I-465 West Leg Reconstruction Project
PROJECT LOCATION Project begins at Garden Lane (East of I-4)
Technical and Public Advisory Committee Meeting #3
I-85 Widening Project MM Cherokee County Public Hearing March 14, 2017.
I-85 Widening Project MM Cherokee County Public Hearing March 14, 2017.
Technical Committee on Geometric Design
S.R. 26 Road Rehabilitation in Clinton County
Presentation transcript:

PUBLIC MEETING May 12, 2011

P U B L I C I N V O L V E M E N T Project Status PHASE III Construction PHASE II Contract Plan Preparation & Land Acquisition PHASE I Preliminary Engineering & Environmental Studies START

Project Status P U B L I C I N V O L V E M E N T DEVELOP PURPOSE AND NEED IDENTIFY DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFY POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVES PUBLIC MEETING STUDY MILESTONE START PUBLIC HEARING Public Meeting #1(April 7, 2010) Project Schedule Project Development Context Sensitive Solutions Initial Data Findings Project Study Group (PSG) Technical Advisory Group (TAG) Technical Advisory Group (TAG) Community Advisory Group (CAG) Community Advisory Group (CAG) Clark Dietz, Inc. & Sub-Consultants

Project Status Public Meeting (May 12, 2011) Project Status Problem Statement Present Purpose and Need Present Range of Alternatives Evaluation & Screening Criteria Next Steps P U B L I C I N V O L V E M E N T DEVELOP PURPOSE AND NEED IDENTIFY DEFICIENCIES FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI) PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE & ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) DETAILED ENVIRONMENTAL AND TECHNICAL STUDIES EVALUATE ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFY POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVES PUBLIC MEETING STUDY MILESTONE START PUBLIC HEARING

Define Problem Alternative Development Process Identify Context Considerations Stakeholder Considerations / Community Assets Environmental Considerations / Compatibility with the Environment Engineering Considerations / Transportation Needs Identify Stakeholders Interest Groups Local Businesses Regional Agencies Elected Officials Public/ Stakeholders Public/ Stakeholders City/County Staff Transportation Providers

Alternative Development Process Considerations Stakeholder Considerations / Community Assets Environmental Considerations / Compatibility with the Environment Engineering Considerations / Transportation Needs Define Problem Identify Context Identify Stakeholders PURPOSE AND NEED REPORT

Purpose and Need Development STAKEHOLDER INPUT CONTEXT SURVEY PROBLEM STATEMENT TECHNICAL ANALYSIS CRASH DATA ANALYSIS TRAFFIC DATA ANALYSIS PUBLIC AND AGENCY COORDINATION PURPOSE AND NEED REPORT

Project Purpose The purpose of the proposed action is to provide an improved transportation facility in the Interstate 55 and Weber Road Interchange project study area. The specific needs to be addressed include safety, operational, and capacity deficiencies.

Purpose and Need Prevents efficient access Lack of pedestrian, ADA, and bike facilities Improve pedestrian access and bike path continuity Traffic Safety Handicap accessibility Sidewalks and pedestrian crossings Bike lanes/recreation facilities High number of crashes Multi-modal conflicts High number of rear- end and sideswipe collisions Crashes data consistent with congestion No crosswalks or continuous bike paths Need: Improve Safety Technical Analysis Community Advisory GroupCommunity Context Survey

Purpose and Need Inadequate lane marking Merging issues Poor signage Traffic signal delay Signals (traffic/ pedestrian) Street lighting/ pedestrian lighting Roadways compatible to existing businesses Roadways compatible to existing commuting patterns Traffic signal spacing Substandard geometrics (travel lanes, intersections) Need: Address Operational Deficiencies Technical Analysis Community Advisory Group Community Context Survey

Purpose and Need High volume of trucks No alternate north- south routes Inadequate access to I- 55 Congestion High volume turn movements Industrial centers and commercial areas Commuter corridor Congestion and delay Unacceptable level of service on Weber Road and I-55 ramps Projected increase in traffic volumes Need: Improve Capacity Technical Analysis Community Advisory Group Community Context Survey

Alternative Development Process Brainstorm alternatives with stakeholders Solicit alternatives from agencies Develop alternatives with project team Brainstorm alternatives with stakeholders Solicit alternatives from agencies Develop alternatives with project team Preferred Alternative Evaluate Alternatives Range of Alternatives Define Problem Identify Context Identify Stakeholders

Preliminary Alternatives Interchange Improvements Weber Road Improvements Other mode accommodations

Preliminary Alternatives Interchange Improvements Weber Road Improvements Other mode accommodations

Interchange Improvements CLOVERLEAF Free-flowing traffic Large footprint Weaving sections Not pedestrian friendly

Interchange Improvements Partial Cloverleaf No weaving Some free-flowing movements Some signal control Smaller footprint in some quadrants

Interchange Improvements Diamond Signal controlled intersections Smaller footprint

Interchange Improvements Split Diamond Signal controlled intersections Access distributed at two locations Frontage road system

Interchange Improvements Single Point Urban Diamond (SPUDI) Small footprint One signalized intersection Large structure

Interchange Improvements Diverging Diamond Small footprint Accommodates heavy left turn traffic Free flow Interstate entrances Driver unfamiliarity

Interchange Improvements Veterans Parkway IL Route 126

Preliminary Alternatives Interchange Improvements Weber Road Improvements Other mode accommodations

Weber Road Improvements Existing Lanes Added Lane Additional Capacity

Weber Road Improvements Lighting

Weber Road Improvements Raised Median and Physically Separated Turn Lanes Access Management

Weber Road Improvements Additional turn lanes Improved traffic signal coordination Turn prohibitions Improved signage/striping Pedestrian/Bicyclist accommodations

Preliminary Alternatives Interchange Improvements Weber Road Improvements Other mode accommodations

Other Mode Accommodations Pedestrian/Bicycle access over I-55 Connect existing bike path network PACE Park-N-Ride

Alternative Development Process Confirm alternatives meet Purpose and Need and transportation performance measures Compare impacts to natural and built environment Confirm alternatives meet Purpose and Need and transportation performance measures Compare impacts to natural and built environment Preferred Alternative Evaluate Alternatives Range of Alternatives Define Problem Identify Context Identify Stakeholders

Transportation Evaluation Criteria Assess existing conditions Evaluate safety performance of each alternative Performance metrics may include: Adherence to safety standards Projected change in crashes from 2040 baseline ADA Compliance Pedestrian/bicycle compatible Address Operational Deficiencies Address Operational Deficiencies Improve Capacity Improve Safety NEED

Transportation Evaluation Criteria Assess existing conditions Evaluate alternatives on addressing design issues Performance metrics may include: Design deficiencies Right-of-Way Construction Costs Address Operational Deficiencies Address Operational Deficiencies Improve Capacity Improve Safety NEED

Transportation Evaluation Criteria Baseline condition will be 2040 (no improvements) Evaluate alternatives on projected changes in travel conditions Performance metrics may include: Level of Service (LOS) Right-of-Way Construction Costs Address Operational Deficiencies Address Operational Deficiencies Improve Capacity Improve Safety NEED

ResourceEvaluation Criteria Wetlands Number of wetlands impacted Acres of wetland Impacts FloodplainsAcres of floodplain impacted Threatened and Endangered Species Number of species encountered T&E species habitat loss Parks and RecreationNumber of parks impacted Agricultural Lands Acres acquired Prime farmland impacted GroundwaterNumber of setback zones encroached Special WasteNumber of special waste sites impacted Economic and Business Number of business relocations Acres of business property acquisition Loss of direct access to Weber Road Loss of parking area Public facilities, schools and places of worshipNumber of facilities impacted Environmental Evaluation Criteria

Alternative Evaluation Fatal Flaw Screening Purpose & Need Screening Round 1 Analysis Level of Service (LOS) Right of Way Stakeholder Input Round 1 Analysis Level of Service (LOS) Right of Way Stakeholder Input Initial Alternatives Preferred Alternative Eliminate Alternative(s) Round 2 Analysis Environmental Impacts Level of Service (LOS) Right of Way Costs Stakeholder Input Round 2 Analysis Environmental Impacts Level of Service (LOS) Right of Way Costs Stakeholder Input Eliminate Alternative(s)

Alternative Development Process Detailed engineering and environmental analysis of remaining alternatives Evaluate performance, impacts, and costs Recommend preferred alternative Detailed engineering and environmental analysis of remaining alternatives Evaluate performance, impacts, and costs Recommend preferred alternative Preferred Alternative Evaluate Alternatives Range of Alternatives Define Problem Identify Context Identify Stakeholders

Next Steps P U B L I C I N V O L V E M E N T PUBLIC MEETING STUDY MILESTONE START Public Meeting (Fall 2011) Present the results of technical screening Identify alternatives to carry forward PUBLIC HEARING DEVELOP PURPOSE AND NEED IDENTIFY DEFICIENCIES FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI) PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE & ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) DETAILED ENVIRONMENTAL AND TECHNICAL STUDIES EVALUATE ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFY POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVES

Thank You! Please browse the exhibits Direct questions to the study team Please fill out a comment form Comment period ends May 26, 2011 Visit the website: Thank you for attending!