Nadine M. P. Daan, Annemieke Hoek, Eva Corpeleijn, Marinus J. C

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Miscarriage risk for IVF pregnancies in poor responders to ovarian hyperstimulation Maaike L Haadsma, Henk Groen, Thea M Mooij, Curt W Burger, Frank JM.

Advertisements

E.H. Duran, D. Dowling-Lacey, S. Bocca, L. Stadtmauer, S. Oehninger

Mostafa Metwally, Cynthia M. Farquhar, Tin Chiu Li

T. Murto, A. Skoog Svanberg, A. Yngve, T. K. Nilsson, S. Altmäe, K

Effect of androgen supplementation or modulation on ovarian stimulation outcome in poor responders: a meta-analysis Sesh Kamal Sunkara, Jyotsna Pundir,

Programmes and prospects for ovotechnology

Cancer and fertility: strategies to preserve fertility

Miscarriage risk for IVF pregnancies in poor responders to ovarian hyperstimulation Maaike L Haadsma, Henk Groen, Thea M Mooij, Curt W Burger, Frank JM.

J.C. Sadeu, A.M.C.M. Doedée, M.S. Neal, E.G. Hughes, W.G. Foster

Norbert Gleicher, Andrea Weghofer, David H. Barad

Socio-economic disparities in access to assisted reproductive technologies in Australia Katie Harris, Hugh Burley, Robert McLachlan, Mark Bowman, Alan.

E. Jauniaux, I. Ben-Ami, R. Maymon Reproductive BioMedicine Online

A. Osman, J. Pundir, M. Elsherbini, S. Dave, T. El-Toukhy, Y. Khalaf

Ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination in women aged 40years or more Amir Wiser, Einat Shalom-Paz, Shauna Leigh Reinblatt, Weon-Young Son,

Pharmacokinetics and follicular dynamics of corifollitropin alfa versus recombinant FSH during ovarian stimulation for IVF Bart C.J.M. Fauser, Michael.

Preovulatory progesterone concentration associates significantly to follicle number and LH concentration but not to pregnancy rate Claus Yding Andersen,

E. Jauniaux, I. Ben-Ami, R. Maymon Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Management of ovarian stimulation for IVF: narrative review of evidence provided for World Health Organization guidance Cindy Farquhar, Jane Marjoribanks,

Fresh transfer outcome predicts the success of a subsequent frozen transfer utilizing blastocysts of the same cohort L.F. Doherty, J.R. Martin, U. Kayisli,

Factors affecting embryo viability and uterine receptivity: insights from an analysis of the UK registry data Stephen A. Roberts, Mark Hann, Daniel R.

Short follicular phase of stimulation following corifollitropin alfa or daily recombinant FSH treatment does not compromise clinical outcome: a retrospective.

Gillian M. Lockwood Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Female gender pre-selection by maternal diet in combination with timing of sexual intercourse – a prospective study A.M. Noorlander, J.P.M. Geraedts,

Asymptomatic adenomyosis and embryo implantation in IVF cycles

Why are reproductive cancers more common in nulliparous women?

Semen cryopreservation and usage rate for assisted reproductive technology in 898 men with cancer Iris Muller, Ralph J.A. Oude Ophuis, Frank J.M. Broekmans,

K. Gersak, A. Veble Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Moniek van der Zanden, Annemiek W. Nap Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Hillary B. Alberta, Roberta M. Berry, Aaron D. Levine

S Munné, E Fragouli, P Colls, MG Katz-Jaffe, WB Schoolcraft, D Wells

Working to eliminate multiple pregnancies: a success story in Québec

Sarah McCredie, William Ledger, Christos A. Venetis

Effect of N-acetyl-cysteine after ovarian drilling in clomiphene citrate-resistant PCOS women: a pilot study A. Nasr Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Altered first-trimester screening markers after IVF/ICSI: no relationship with small-for- gestational-age and number of embryos transferred F. Bender,

Cumulative live-birth delivery after IVF/ICSI since the progressive introduction of single- embryo transfer D. De Neubourg, C. Daels, M. Elseviers, K.

Chief editor's 2017 annual report

Ovarian reserve determinations suggest new function of FMR1 (fragile X gene) in regulating ovarian ageing Norbert Gleicher, Andrea Weghofer, David H.

M. Dieterich, M. Bolz, T. Reimer, S. Costagliola, B. Gerber

Implications of the 2014 Androgen Excess and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Society guidelines on polycystic ovarian morphology for polycystic ovary syndrome.

Computer-automated time-lapse analysis results correlate with embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy: A blinded, multi-centre study Matthew D. VerMilyea,

The impact of maternal lifestyle factors on periconception outcomes: a systematic review of observational studies Elsje C. Oostingh, Jennifer Hall, Maria.

Mostafa Metwally, Cynthia M. Farquhar, Tin Chiu Li

Spontaneous ovulation versus HCG triggering for timing natural-cycle frozen–thawed embryo transfer: a randomized study Ariel Weissman, Eran Horowitz,

Follicular flushing in natural cycle IVF does not affect the luteal phase – a prospective controlled study M. von Wolff, A. Kohl Schwartz, P. Stute,

Male age negatively influences clinical pregnancy rate in women younger than 40 years undergoing donor insemination cycles Su-Ann Koh, Katherine Sanders,

Donor information considered important to donors, recipients and offspring: an Australian perspective I.S. Rodino, P.J. Burton, K.A. Sanders Reproductive.

Impact of vitamin D levels on ovarian reserve and ovarian response to ovarian stimulation in oocyte donors Alberta Maria Fabris, Maria Cruz, Carlos Iglesias,

V Isachenko, E Isachenko, R Kreienberg, M Woriedh, JM Weiss

Swapna S. Desai, Swati K. Achrekar, Smita R. Paranjape, Sadhana K

LH concentrations do not correlate with pregnancy in rFSH/GnRH antagonist cycles Kevin Doody, Paul Devroey, Keith Gordon, Han Witjes, Bernadette Mannaerts

S. Seshadri, S.K. Sunkara, Y. Khalaf, T. El-Toukhy, H. Hamoda

Should we be promoting embryo transfer at blastocyst stage?

Stephen C. Collins, Esther Chan Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Pietro Gambadauro, Ramesan Navaratnarajah

Genome-wide analysis shows no genomic predictors of ovarian response to stimulation by exogenous FSH for IVF Jeroen van Disseldorp, Lude Franke, Rene.

Jeff G. Wang, Nataki C. Douglas, Gary S. Nakhuda, Janet M

Response: time-lapse systems for ART

Norbert Gleicher, Andrea Weghofer, David H. Barad

Ovarian reserve screening before contraception?

Cryobanking of human ovarian tissue: do women still want their tissue stored beyond 5 years? Kirsten Tryde Macklon, Erik Ernst, Anders Nyboe Andersen,

The significance of the number of CGG repeats and autoantibodies in premature ovarian failure Cem Fıçıcıoglu, Gazi Yildirim, Rukset Attar, Banu Kumbak,

Implantation of fresh and thawed–warmed embryos in single embryo transfer cycles: interpreting the initial beta-HCG Cynthia K. Sites, Peter St Marie,

Programmes and prospects for ovotechnology

Randomized controlled trial of benzocaine versus placebo spray for pain relief at hysterosalpingogram E.A. Bachman, S. Senapati, M.D. Sammel, S.K. Kalra

Women with regular menstrual cycles and a poor response to ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization exhibit follicular phase characteristics.

Cardiovascular and metabolic profiles amongst different polycystic ovary syndrome phenotypes: who is really at risk? Nadine M.P. Daan, M.D., Yvonne V.

M. Franz, J. Ott, A. Watrelot, L. Küssel, H. Husslein

Fertility in cancer patients after cryopreservation of one ovary

Use of progestins to inhibit spontaneous ovulation during ovarian stimulation: the beginning of a new era? Antonio La Marca, Martina Capuzzo Reproductive.

High oestradiol concentration after ovarian stimulation is associated with lower maternal serum beta-HCG concentration and neonatal birth weight Suying.

Presentation transcript:

Reproductive characteristics of women diagnosed with premature ovarian insufficiency Nadine M.P. Daan, Annemieke Hoek, Eva Corpeleijn, Marinus J.C. Eijkemans, Frank J. Broekmans, Bart C.J.M. Fauser, Maria P.H. Koster Reproductive BioMedicine Online Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 225-232 (February 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.11.009 Copyright © 2015 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Inclusion criteria. POI, premature ovarian insufficiency. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2016 32, 225-232DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.11.009) Copyright © 2015 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 (a) Time to pregnancy of spontaneous pregnancies resulting in live births per maternal age category in women with premature ovarian insufficiency compared with population-based controls. Bars represent medians of time to pregnancies; whiskers represent interquartile ranges; numbers within bars represent number of pregnancies per age category. Pregnancies established during the use of contraceptives were excluded. A two-way analysis of variance on ranks of time to pregnancy showed for age (P < 0.001); for premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) versus controls, no statistically significant difference was found; (b) percentage of spontaneous pregnancies resulting in live births per maternal age category in women with POI versus population based controls. Bars represent percentage of pregnancies; numbers within bars represent number of pregnancies per age category. Pregnancies established during the use of contraceptives were excluded. A chi-squared test showed a difference between distributions of POI and controls (P < 0.001). Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2016 32, 225-232DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.11.009) Copyright © 2015 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions