ENS Alicia A. Washkevich, USN

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An analysis of transport and water masses in the Straits of Florida and the Bahamas Moulin Aurélie Moulin Department of Marine and Environmental Systems.
Advertisements

Introduction to Oceanography Dynamic Oceanography: Waves.
This is.
Internal Tidal Currents in the Gaoping Submarine Canyon I-Huan Lee National Museum of Marine Biology and Aquarium,Pingtung, Taiwan, , R.O.C.
9.2 Ocean Waves, Tides and Currents
SBI /13 Vagarities of Velocity Variations Andreas Muenchow Graduate College of Marine Studies University of Delaware
Lien, R.-C., and M. C. Gregg (2001), Observations of turbulence in a tidal beam and across a coastal ridge, J. Geophys. Res., 106,
Natural Hazards and Disasters Chapter 5 Tsunami. Tsunami is a “harbor wave” Waves rise highest where focused in bays or harbors.
Oceanography Jeopardy! -Review for Unit Test
Ocean Motions Information to help you along in Earth science.
2.1 Exploring the Ocean. The water in Earth’s oceans varies in salinity, temperature, and depth The water in Earth’s oceans varies in salinity, temperature,
Physical and Chemical Oceanography
Hurricane Ike. Natural Hazards and Disasters Chapter 5 Tsunami.
Oceanography Test Review
Baroclinicity, Forcing Mechanism and Prediction of Chemical Propagation of San Diego Bay and Their Chemical Propagation of San Diego Bay and Their Effects.
Ship-based observations: CTD, Nansen and Niskin bottles, inverting thermometer and Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler Ben Lee December 2, 2005 EPS 131.
The oceans are a connected system.
Waves in the Ocean. Waves are the undulatory motion of a water surface. Parts of a wave are, Wave crest,Wave trough, Wave height (H), Wave Amplitude,
Oceanography Sarah Hall. Marine Biology vs. Oceanography Marine Biology is the study of life in the ocean. Oceanography is the study of the physical characteristics.
LEO PAN PHYSICS 420 OUTREACH PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY UNIVERSITY OF B.C. An Introduction to Tsunami.
Waves Chapter 9.
Waves. Wave: A periodic disturbance in a solid, liquid, or gas as energy is transmitted through a medium (such as air, water, or rock).
Thermocline & Pycnocline
Chapter 3 Chemical and Physical Features of the Oceans Why study this?
Estuarine Variability
CHAPTER 9 Tides Dr. C. Dong, ECC
Wave Parameters (Figure 7-1a)
Observations of Deep Flow along the Central California Coast
Subsurface Topography & Waves, currents, and tides… ROLL TIDE!
WAVE.
11.2 Ocean Currents.
Waves in the Ocean.
Inshore Frontal Features of the California Current
LCDR John Hendrickson 17SEP2008
presented by LCDR Allon Turek, USN 14 March 2008
San Francisco Bay Properties
UNDERWATER CURRENTS OF THE COAST OF SAN DIEGO, CA
OC3570 Project Winter 2007 A COMPARISON OF COASTAL CURRENTS USING LAND BASED HF RADAR AND SHIP BOARD ADCP OBSERVATIONS LCDR Steve Wall, RAN.
CTD SVP’s Compared to GDEM
Operational Oceanography
Combination of oceanographic data with wind data acquired during the cruise to try to draw conclusions on wind stress, Ekman transport and Ekman layer.
LCDR George Wright, USN OC 3570 – Winter 2008 Friday, March 14th 2008
Evidence of the California Undercurrent in CTD Data
LT John Marburger OC 3570 March 17, 2004
LT Erica A Museler OC September 2002
HYDROGRAPHY OF THE NAVO CENCAL REGION FOR DEC01
Comparison of CTD vs XBT data
Operational Oceanography and Meteorology
GEOSTROPHIC, EKMAN & ADCP VOLUME TRANSPORT
LT Ricardo Roman OC3570 March 7, 2006
A HEIGHT AND STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF THE MARINE BOUNDARY LAYER OFF THE CALIFORNIA COAST LCDR Matthew J. Moore   13 Sep 2004 OC3570 Cruise Project.
The California Current System: Comparison of Geostrophic Currents, ADCP Currents and Satellite Altimetry LCDR David Neander, NOAA OC3570, Summer 2001.
LEUT Kristen Watts, RAN OC 3570 Winter 2003
Turbidity in Monterey Bay: Operational Oceanography Winter 2009 Project Rip Coke 16MAR09.
LEUT Scott Peak, RAN OC 3570 Winter 2004
Comparison of Computed Geostropic Currents and ADCP
Operational Oceanography and Meteorolgy
EL NINO EFFECTS ON SOUND SPEED IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA BASIN
Comparison of observed SST Vs. Satellite AVHRR SST
LT Anna C. (Christy) Bryant
GVEL using Reid and Mantyla Method
An Analysis of San Clemente Basin: Crosshore vs. Alongshore
Ocean Movements 15.3.
COMPARISON OF COASTAL CURRENTS FROM HF RADAR AND ADCP DATA
Oceanography.
OC3570 Operational Oceanography
WAVES.
Physical and Chemical Oceanography
ADCP-Corrected Absolute Geostrophic Current and Transport
Presentation transcript:

ENS Alicia A. Washkevich, USN An Overview of the Internal Tidal Bore at the Head of the Submarine Canyon in Monterey Bay OC 3570 Cruise 21-28 JUL 2003 Project by: ENS Alicia A. Washkevich, USN

Introduction: OC3570 NPS student cruise 2 Legs: 21-24 JUL & 24-28 JUL Legs traveled from Monterey south to San Luis Obispo and back

Internal Tidal Bore Unsteady flow caused by tidal forcing Common to Monterey Bay Submarine Canyon Narrowing Rising sea floor / slope Long distance Characterized by: Lower temperature and salinity extending down in water column Increased wave height Greater current velocity at the bottom of the water column traveling toward shallow bathymetry

Bathymetry of Monterey Bay Time Series 2 Time Series 1

Instruments / Data Used 25 Hour CTD Time Series Data Shipboard ADCP data Mean Sea Level data from NOAA/NOS CO-OPS

CTD’s Time Series 1 Time Series 2 27 CTD casts 26 JUL 03 0302 – 27 JUL 03 0409 Average maximum depth 162m Time Series 2 27 JUL 03 0459 – 28 JUL 03 0610 Temperature and salinity measurements used and plotted with depth / pressure

Salinity from CTD Time Series 1 T-S Plot Pressure/100 Yearday

Temp from CTD Time Series 1 Pressure/100 Yearday

Salinity from CTD Time Series 2 Pressure/100 Yearday

Temp from CTD Time Series 2 Pressure/100 Yearday

CTD Data Shows: Lower temperature extending down at Yearday 207.7 and 208.1 for Series 1 Lower salinity extending down at approximately same time Lower temperature extending down at Yearday 208.5 and 209.1 for Series 2

ADCP (Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler Onboard Pt Sur Transmits 150 kHz Measures velocity of water from reflection off suspended particles

East/West Velocity cm/s PBOR1 Some Bottom Intensification Yearday -1

North/South Velocity cm/s PBOR1 Depth/100 Yearday -1

East/West Velocity cm/s PBOR2 Depth Yearday -1

North/South Velocity cm/s PBOR2 “sloshing” Depth “spilling” Yearday -1

PBOR2 U vs. V (Overlay) “E/W” “N/S”

PBOR2 Discussion: Not perfectly aligned E/W (slightly oblique) Exception to general trend (One would assume a NE/SW but overlay shows a NW/SE movement) Canyon wall deeper on Southern side, may spill over more to South Sloshing to North and South above canyon wall (freedom of movement) North may be possible reflection

ADCP Data shows: PBOR1 clearly defined Most notable E/W – deep water funneled “in and out” of canyon PBOR2 Slightly offset Less strength Different but possible

Propagating or Standing Wave? U and V components taken at depths of 71, 87, and 103 meters 6 Minute Mean Seal Level Data for Monterey Station # - 9413450 36 36.3’ N 121 53.3’ W

(PBOR1)

(PBOR2)

(PBOR1)

Propagating Internal Wave http://www.es.flinders.edu.au/~mattom/IntroOc/lecture10.html

Sea Level Shows: Bit of a lag Strong velocity at peaks Generally followed shape

CONCLUSIONS: Internal bore was present in the form of a propagating internal wave The bore displayed customary characteristics Lower salinity and temperature extending down into water column Bottom intensification (velocity) Mirrored mean sea level heights with strong velocity at peaks

Questions? Special Thanks to: LT Kristen Watts RAN, Chris Miller, Tarry Rago, Prof. Collins