The Master Switch Gene Sex-lethal Promotes Female Development by Negatively Regulating the N-Signaling Pathway  Jill K.M. Penn, Paul Schedl  Developmental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Advertisements

The Salvador-Warts-Hippo Pathway Is Required for Epithelial Proliferation and Axis Specification in Drosophila  Carine Meignin, Ines Alvarez-Garcia, Ilan.
The Sterile 20-like Kinase Tao-1 Controls Tissue Growth by Regulating the Salvador- Warts-Hippo Pathway  Carole L.C. Poon, Jane I. Lin, Xiaomeng Zhang,
Steroid Signaling Establishes a Female Metabolic State and Regulates SREBP to Control Oocyte Lipid Accumulation  Matthew H. Sieber, Allan C. Spradling 
Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 Expression is Coordinately Modulated by the KRE-M9 and 12-O-Tetradecanoyl-Phorbol-13-Acetate Responsive Elements  Takashi Kobayashi,
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 
Tony DeFalco, Nicole Camara, Stéphanie Le Bras, Mark Van Doren 
Volume 26, Issue 13, Pages (July 2016)
Kibra Is a Regulator of the Salvador/Warts/Hippo Signaling Network
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Lacy J. Barton, Belinda S. Pinto, Lori L. Wallrath, Pamela K. Geyer 
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Wnt/β-Catenin and Fgf Signaling Control Collective Cell Migration by Restricting Chemokine Receptor Expression  Andy Aman, Tatjana Piotrowski  Developmental.
Cynthia Vied, Amy Reilein, Natania S. Field, Daniel Kalderon 
Gáspár Jékely, Hsin-Ho Sung, Carlos M. Luque, Pernille Rørth 
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Vivek S. Chopra, Joung-Woo Hong, Michael Levine  Current Biology 
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999)
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 27, Issue 19, Pages e3 (October 2017)
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Nikhila S. Tanneti, Kathryn Landy, Eric F. Joyce, Kim S. McKim 
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Integrin Signaling Regulates Spindle Orientation in Drosophila to Preserve the Follicular- Epithelium Monolayer  Ana Fernández-Miñán, María D. Martín-Bermudo,
Jianjun Sun, Wu-Min Deng  Developmental Cell 
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (April 2004)
Decapentaplegic Is Essential for the Maintenance and Division of Germline Stem Cells in the Drosophila Ovary  Ting Xie, Allan C Spradling  Cell  Volume.
Vitaly Zimyanin, Nick Lowe, Daniel St Johnston  Current Biology 
From Stem Cell to Embryo without Centrioles
Andrew R. Bassett, Charlotte Tibbit, Chris P. Ponting, Ji-Long Liu 
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Boss/Sev Signaling from Germline to Soma Restricts Germline-Stem-Cell-Niche Formation in the Anterior Region of Drosophila Male Gonads  Yu Kitadate, Shuji.
Joanna Chen, Esther M. Verheyen  Current Biology 
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages e6 (August 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Rongwen Xi, Jennifer R. McGregor, Douglas A. Harrison 
Mara Schvarzstein, Andrew M. Spence  Developmental Cell 
Leah Vardy, Terry L. Orr-Weaver  Developmental Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
The Regulation of the Drosophila msl-2 Gene Reveals a Function for Sex-lethal in Translational Control  Greg J Bashaw, Bruce S Baker  Cell  Volume 89,
E2a Is Necessary for Smad2/3-Dependent Transcription and the Direct Repression of lefty during Gastrulation  Andrea E. Wills, Julie C. Baker  Developmental.
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
Nicola Iovino, Filippo Ciabrelli, Giacomo Cavalli  Developmental Cell 
Drosophila ASPP Regulates C-Terminal Src Kinase Activity
Drosophila Maelstrom Ensures Proper Germline Stem Cell Lineage Differentiation by Repressing microRNA-7  Jun Wei Pek, Ai Khim Lim, Toshie Kai  Developmental.
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
The Cell Adhesion Molecule Echinoid Functions as a Tumor Suppressor and Upstream Regulator of the Hippo Signaling Pathway  Tao Yue, Aiguo Tian, Jin Jiang 
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (October 2006)
The Drosophila Homolog of C
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Paracrine Signaling through the JAK/STAT Pathway Activates Invasive Behavior of Ovarian Epithelial Cells in Drosophila  Debra L. Silver, Denise J. Montell 
Interaxonal Interaction Defines Tiled Presynaptic Innervation in C
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
FGF9 Suppresses Meiosis and Promotes Male Germ Cell Fate in Mice
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Gene Amplification as a Developmental Strategy
Salvador-Warts-Hippo Signaling Promotes Drosophila Posterior Follicle Cell Maturation Downstream of Notch  Cédric Polesello, Nicolas Tapon  Current Biology 
A Splicing-Independent Function of SF2/ASF in MicroRNA Processing
Evidence for a Growth-Stabilizing Regulatory Feedback Mechanism between Myc and Yorkie, the Drosophila Homolog of Yap  Ricardo M. Neto-Silva, Simon de.
Presentation transcript:

The Master Switch Gene Sex-lethal Promotes Female Development by Negatively Regulating the N-Signaling Pathway  Jill K.M. Penn, Paul Schedl  Developmental Cell  Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 275-286 (February 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.01.009 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Loss of Sxl in Follicle Cells Results in Egg-Chamber Packaging Defects (A–B′) Whole-mount ovaries labeled for Sxl (red) and Hoechst (blue): (A) WT, (B and B′) Loss of Sxl protein in fl(2)d1/fl(2)d1 egg chamber. (C–J) Whole-mount ovaries labeled for Orb (red) and Hoechst (blue): (C) WT egg chamber. Egg-chamber packaging defects observed in ovaries compromised for Sxl: (D) fl(2)d1/fl(2)d1, (E) P{w+;otu::Sxl}, fl(2)d1/fl(2)d1, (F) snfJ210/ snfJ210; P{w+; otu::Sxl}/ P{w+; otu::Sxl}; P{w+; snf5-mer}/ P{w+; snf5-mer}, (G) Sxl7BO follicle cell clones, and (H) Sxl7BO follicle cell clones induced in hsp83-traF ovaries (clones marked by the absence of GFP [green] in [G] and [H]). (I) Partitioned chamber from Nts1/Nts1 ovary; the arrow indicates the intervening wall of follicle cells. (J) Nintra follicle cell clones produce packaging defects. Developmental Cell 2007 12, 275-286DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2007.01.009) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Loss of Sxl in Follicle Cells Results in Gain-of-Function N Phenotypes (A– H) Whole mount ovaries labeled for FasIII (red) and Hoechst (blue). Clones marked by the absence of GFP (green) in (D) and (F). (A) WT egg chamber containing two pairs of FasIII expressing follicle cells at the anterior and posterior poles. Ectopic FasIII is expressed in main body follicle cells in egg chambers compromised for Sxl: (B) fl(2)d1/fl(2)d1, (C) P{w+; otu::Sxl}, fl(2)d1/fl(2)d1, (D) Sxl7BO follicle cell clones. (E–E″) Whole-mount ovaries labeled for FasIII (red), Eya (green), Hoechst (blue): main body follicle cells ectopically expressing FasIII upon induction of Sxl follicle cell clones (E and E″) are likely ectopic polar cells as Eya is not expressed (E′ and E″). (F) Main body follicle cells ectopically express FasIII upon induction of Sxl follicle cell clones in hsp83-traF ovaries. (G) Larger interfollicular stalks form upon induction of Sxl follicle cell clones (Hoechst, blue). (H) Nintra random follicle cell clones result in ectopic FasIII expression. Developmental Cell 2007 12, 275-286DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2007.01.009) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 N Protein Increases in Sxl− Clones (A–F′) Whole-mount ovaries labeled for N (red) and GFP (green) (Sxl− clones marked by the absence of GFP in [B′], [D′], [E′], and [F′]). (A) WT stage 10 chamber. N is enriched in posterior follicle cells and cells along the anterior of the oocyte (o). (B and B′) Stage 10 chamber showing upregulation of N in a small Sxl− clone. (C) WT previtellogenic egg chamber. (D and D′) N is upregulated in Sxl− follicle cell clone relative to adjacent WT follicle cells. (E and E′) Germarium with Sxl− follicle cell clones and encapsulation defects. Higher levels of N protein are present in clones (arrowheads) compared to WT (arrow). (F and F′) Sxl− follicle cell clones in hsp83-traF show upregulation of N. Developmental Cell 2007 12, 275-286DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2007.01.009) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Sxl Is Downregulated and N Is Upregulated in WT Germaria High-resolution image of the posterior region of an Oregon R germarium labeled for N (green) and Sxl (red). High levels of N are observed in polar and stalk cell precursors (arrowhead). Sxl is cytoplasmically downregulated in these cells compared to main body follicle cells (arrows). (Punctuate Sxl protein expression pattern indicates nuclear localization.) Developmental Cell 2007 12, 275-286DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2007.01.009) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Sxl Binds N mRNA (A and B) Schematic of important sequences in N 5′ and 3′UTRs. Xs mark the location of putative Sxl binding sites, arrows indicate location of primers used for PCR in (B), while a and b correspond to 32P-labeled RNA probes containing either three or zero Sxl binding sites. (B) Sxl IP followed by RT-PCR for N mRNA indicate that Sxl can bind N mRNA. Lane 1: positive control RT-PCR for N from ovarian extract. Lane 2: Sxl IP followed by RT-PCR for N. Lane 3: negative control Scute IP followed by RT-PCR for N. Lane 4: Sxl IP, no reverse transcriptase negative control. Lane 5: Sxl IP, no primers negative control. (C) In vitro binding experiments with ovarian extract and 32P-labeled probes a and b. Ovarian extracts were incubated with probes, UV crosslinked, and then treated with RNase. The extracts were then split into three. One portion was saved as the input control, while the other portions were immunoprecipitated with either Sxl or Scute antibody. A 32P-labeled protein of the size expected for Sxl is observed in Sxl IPs from the extract incubated with probe a (three Sxl binding sites). This protein is not detected in the control Scute IP, nor is it detected in the IPs of extracts incubated with the probe b (no Sxl binding sites). Sxl can also be detected in the probe a input sample. It migrates just ahead of the heavily labeled ∼40 kd protein. Developmental Cell 2007 12, 275-286DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2007.01.009) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Sxl Interacts with N in the Developing Wing Wings from (A) WT, (B) N264-40/+, (C) N264-40/Sxl7BO, and (D) N264-40/SxlM4 adult females. (E) Sxl7BO suppresses N264-40 wing phenotype, while Sxldup and SxlM4 enhance. Developmental Cell 2007 12, 275-286DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2007.01.009) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Regulation of N by Sxl Contributes to Sexual Dimorphism (A) hsp83-traF progeny obtained by crossing hsp83-traF/w X w/BsY (N = 673). hsp83-traF males had fewer bristles (mean 17.6, SD 2.0) than hsp83-traF females (mean 19.6, SD 2.39; p < 0.00001). Not shown: tra−/tra− females had more bristles (mean 19.5, SD 1.7) than tra−/tra− males (mean 18.2, SD 2.0; p < 0.005). (B) Nts1/Nts1 and Nts1/Y shifted to 29°C for 6 hr, 21 hr APF. Nts1/Nts1 had an average of 30.2 sternite A5 bristles compared to 25.5 bristles observed for nonheat-shocked controls. Nts1/Y had an average of 31.0 sternite A5 bristles compared to 21.0 bristles observed for nonheat-shocked controls. (C) Progeny obtained by crossing Sxl7BO/Bin X N264-40/Y; Dp(1;2)72c21/+ (N = 299). N264-40/Sxl7BO females have fewer bristles (mean 20.8, SD 2.06) than N264-40/+ siblings (mean 22.0, SD 2.38; p < 0.005). Not shown: N264-40/Sxlf1 females also had fewer bristles (mean 22.0, SD 2.07) than their N264-40/+ siblings (mean 23.6, SD 1.69; p < 0.002). (D and E) Progeny obtained by crossing Sxldup/FM7 X N264-40/Y; Dp(1;2)72c21/+ (N = 189). (D) N264-40/Sxldup females had more bristles (mean 24.2, SD 2.25) than N264-40/+ siblings (mean 22.4, SD 2.33; p < 0.0002). Not shown: N264-40/+; Sx.FLΔ/+ females had more bristles (mean 23.2, SD 2.31) than their N264-40/+ siblings (mean 21.3, SD 2.52; p < 0.0025). (E) Sxldup/+ females had more bristles (mean 21.2, SD 2.01) than WT siblings (mean 19.6 SD 1.9; p < 0.0005). Not shown: Sx.FLΔ/+ females had more bristles (mean 21.4, SD 1.5) than their WT siblings (mean 19.4, SD 1.96; p < 0.002). (F) Effect of FM7 and Bin on bristle number. Although N264-40 increased the number of bristles of wild-type, FM7, and Bin females, there was no significant difference in bristle number between balancers and nonbalancers. Asterisk denotes progeny derived by crossing FM7/+ X N264-40/Y; Dp(1;2)72c21/+. Dagger denotes progeny derived by crossing Bin/+ X N264-40/Y; Dp(1;2)72c21/+. Developmental Cell 2007 12, 275-286DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2007.01.009) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions