Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Molecular Mechanism of Action of Plant DRM De Novo DNA Methyltransferases Xuehua Zhong, Jiamu Du, Christopher J. Hale, Javier Gallego-Bartolome, Suhua.
Advertisements

Volume 124, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Evolving Catalytic Properties of the MLL Family SET Domain
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Beyond the “Recognition Code”
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Evolving Catalytic Properties of the MLL Family SET Domain
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Structural Basis of Selective Ubiquitination of TRF1 by SCFFbx4
Crystal Structure of Tetrameric Arabidopsis MYC2 Reveals the Mechanism of Enhanced Interaction with DNA  Teng-fei Lian, Yong-ping Xu, Lan-fen Li, Xiao-Dong.
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Charlotte Hodson, Andrew Purkiss, Jennifer Anne Miles, Helen Walden 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Structure of DDB1 in Complex with a Paramyxovirus V Protein: Viral Hijack of a Propeller Cluster in Ubiquitin Ligase  Ti Li, Xiujuan Chen, Kenneth C.
Structural Basis for Protein Recognition by B30.2/SPRY Domains
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Shaun K. Olsen, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
A Potential Protein-RNA Recognition Event along the RISC-Loading Pathway from the Structure of A. aeolicus Argonaute with Externally Bound siRNA  Yu-Ren.
Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human DOT1L, a Non-SET Domain Nucleosomal Histone Methyltransferase  Jinrong Min, Qin Feng, Zhizhong Li, Yi Zhang,
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Scaffolding in the Spliceosome via Single α Helices
Volume 51, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Mirjana Lilic, Milos Vujanac, C. Erec Stebbins  Molecular Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Shiqian Qi, Do Jin Kim, Goran Stjepanovic, James H. Hurley  Structure 
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 157, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structure of the Siz/PIAS SUMO E3 Ligase Siz1 and Determinants Required for SUMO Modification of PCNA  Ali A. Yunus, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Jia-Wei Wu, Amy E. Cocina, Jijie Chai, Bruce A. Hay, Yigong Shi 
Structural Basis of 3′ End RNA Recognition and Exoribonucleolytic Cleavage by an Exosome RNase PH Core  Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Molecular Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (April 2005)
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
A Potential Protein-RNA Recognition Event along the RISC-Loading Pathway from the Structure of A. aeolicus Argonaute with Externally Bound siRNA  Yu-Ren.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages 495-504 (August 2014) Mechanism of DNA Methylation-Directed Histone Methylation by KRYPTONITE  Jiamu Du, Lianna M. Johnson, Martin Groth, Suhua Feng, Christopher J. Hale, Sisi Li, Ajay A. Vashisht, Javier Gallego-Bartolome, James A. Wohlschlegel, Dinshaw J. Patel, Steven E. Jacobsen  Molecular Cell  Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages 495-504 (August 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.009 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2014 55, 495-504DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.009) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Overall Structure of KYP in Complex with mCHH DNA, SAH, and H3(1–15) Peptides (A) Color-coded domain architecture of full-length KYP and KYP(93–624) construct used in this study. (B) Ribbon representation of the overall structure of KYP in complex with mCHH DNA, SAH, and H3(1–15) peptide. The N-terminal antiparallel two-helix alignment, SRA, pre-SET, SET, and post-SET domains of KYP are color-coded in yellow, green, blue, orange, and cyan, respectively. The mCHH DNA, the SAH cofactor, and the H3 peptide are shown in magenta ribbon, space filling, and stick model, respectively. Some disordered loops, which were not built in the final model, are shown as dashed lines. The Zn3Cys9 triangular zinc cluster in the pre-SET domain is highlighted with ball and stick model. (C) The hydrophobic interactions within the antiparallel two-helix alignment shown in two views by a 180° rotation. The interacting residues are highlighted in a stick representation. (D) The N-terminal part of the first helix forms extensive hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding interactions with the SRA domain. The interacting residues are shown in stick representation and hydrogen bonds are shown by dashed red line. (E) The middle part of the first helix forms hydrogen bonding as well as salt bridge interactions with the SET domain. (F) The C-terminal part of the first helix forms hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonding interaction with the pre-SET domain. (G) One side of the short helix has several hydrophobic residues that form extensive hydrophobic interactions with the SRA domain. (H) The SRA domain forms both hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding interactions with the pre-SET and SET domains. See also Figure S1. Molecular Cell 2014 55, 495-504DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.009) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Recognition of mCHH DNA by KYP (A) Schematic representation of the interactions between KYP and DNA. Hydrogen bonds are shown by red arrows and hydrophobic contacts by blue arrows. The SRA domain residues and the two-helix alignment residues are colored in green and yellow, respectively. (B) The SRA pocket accommodating the flipped-out 5mC and the two-helix alignment residues interacting with the DNA. The 5mC base is highlighted by a solid magenta hexagon. The thumb- and NKR finger-loops are colored in brown with the Leu176 and Leu227 highlighted in a stick representation. The hydrogen bonds between the two-helix alignment residues and mCHH DNA are shown in dashed red lines. (C) The detailed recognition of the flipped out 5mC base by residues lining the binding pocket within the SRA domain. (D) Electrophoretic mobility-shift assays using a mCHH double-stranded DNA and increasing levels (50, 100, and 200 ng) of the indicated protein. Similar results were observed using mCHG substrate (data not shown). (E) In vitro methylation of H3 by KYP SRA domain mutants. KYP protein (upper panel, silver-stained) was incubated with S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) and recombinant H3. Histone methyltransferase activity was tested by quantitative western blot using primary antibodies against H3K9me1 and H3 and infrared secondary antibodies (green, 800 nm; red, 680 nm). (F) Boxplots of CHG and CHH context DNA methylation at a subset of kyp CHG hypomethylated DMRs that show complementation upon transformation with a wild-type KYP construct. All the whiskers on the box plots represent plus/minus 1.5× interquartile range (iqr). (G) Western blot analysis of lines used in the complementation studies showing expression levels comparable to the Flag-KYP/kyp (WT). See also Figures S2, S3, and Table S1. Molecular Cell 2014 55, 495-504DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.009) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Recognition of the Substrate H3 Peptide by the SET Domains of KYP (A) An electrostatics surface representation of KYP. The bound H3 peptide, in a space filling representation, is inserted into a negatively charged binding channel. The mCHH DNA in magenta cartoon representation aligns along the opposite side of KYP. (B) The intermolecular interactions among SAH, peptide, and KYP in the complex. The peptide fits into a narrow channel between the SET (orange) and post-SET (cyan) domains, with the H3K9 inserting into a narrow deep pocket, where it is stabilized through formation of extensive intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions. The zinc-binding motif, which stabilizes the fold of the post-SET domain, is highlighted with ball and stick representation. (C) Methyltransferase activity of KYP WT and SET domain mutants. Radioactivity (CPM) of H3 peptides was measured after incubation of unmethylated (H3K9um), monomethylated (H3K9me1), or dimethylated (H3K9me2) substrate with KYP protein and tritiated SAM (n = 3, ±SD). (D) Differential in vitro methylation of H3 by KYP SET domain mutants. KYP protein (upper panels, silver-stained) was incubated with SAM and recombinant H3. Histone methyltransferase activity was tested by quantitative western blots using primary antibodies against H3 and H3K9me1, H3K9me2, or H3K9me3 and infrared secondary antibodies (green, 800 nm; red, 680 nm). (E) Boxplots of CHG and CHH context DNA methylation at a subset of kyp CHG hypomethylated DMRs that show complementation upon transformation with a wild-type KYP construct (see Supplemental Experimental Procedures). (F) Western blot analysis of lines used in the complementation studies showing expression levels comparable to the Flag-KYP/kyp (WT). Molecular Cell 2014 55, 495-504DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.009) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 A Working Model for the Epigenetics Mechanism Controlling H3K9me by KYP (A) Modeling of KYP on the nucleosomal DNA indicates that KYP can be bound to methylated nucleosomal DNA and further methylate the H3 tail of the same nucleosome. The KYP is colored as Figure 1B. The H3 is highlighted in red. The nucleosomal DNA and other histone proteins are colored in wheat and silver, respectively. The flipped out 5mC is highlighted in space filling model to indicate its position. A green circle marks a positively charged region within the pre-SET domain that is adjacent the nucleosomal DNA, indicating plausible interaction between them. (B) A schematic model of CMT3 and KYP controlled self-reinforcing feedback loop between mCHG and H3K9me. Molecular Cell 2014 55, 495-504DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.009) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions