VRU-Proxi Reversing Motion Regulation

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

37 TH APEC TRANSPORTATION WORKING GROUP MEETING HO CHI MINH CITY, VIETNAM 8-12 APRIL 2013 MOHAMMAD MALAWAT MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION INDONESIA.

Advertisements

Progress Report on Vehicle Safety Testing Regulations in Chinese Taipei 34 th APEC TPT-WG Jun

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Proposal for Amendment to UN Regulation No. 46 (Devices for indirect vision) Proposal for Amendment.

Torque. Torque ≡ the action of a leveraged force Torque is the ability of a force to cause rotation or a turning motion. Unbalanced torque provides a.

Control & Safety The concept of our project is to devise a warning system that providing some feedback, visual and sound, to catch the driver’s attention.

EXAMPLE 4 Use Pascal’s triangle School Clubs The 6 members of a Model UN club must choose 2 representatives to attend a state convention. Use Pascal’s.

Sub-group “UN R0” of the IWVTA Informal Group

General Safety Regulation ACEA discussion paper Renzo Cicilloni Director Safety Paris, June 2009 AEBS/LDWS

Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 1Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars Hans-Martin Gerhard Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG Quiet.

Proposal for amendments to UN R16: Mandatory fitting of safety-belt reminder Informal document GRSP (57th GRSP, May 2015 Agenda item 7) Submitted.

What do you do when…. when making a right turn on a red light after a stop? you stop where there is a stop sign or flashing red signal? making a left turn.

Final Presentation.  Software / hardware combination  Implement Microsoft Robotics Studio  Lego NXT Platform  Flexible Platform.

ECE 477 Design Review Group 11  Fall Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.

ISOFIX FRENCH PROPOSAL (DOCUMENTS TRANS/WP29/GRSP/2001/14Rev1; 2001/15Rev1 and 2001/16Rev1) GRSP 13-17/05/2002.

Statistics with TI-Nspire™ Technology Module E. Lesson 3: Exercises Statistics with TI-Nspire™ Technology Module E.

Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russian Federation June 2013 Deputy director of the Department of transport and special engineering industry V. Kaganov.

Area of a quadrilateral is when you calculate Length X Width length width Area = length x width.

Research on HMI Homework item 1 (ACSF-01-13)

Some alternatives for pause switch Pause switch prohibit (US) Pause switch mandatory (EU) Pause switch option (UN, Taiwan) No switch-off on reverse condition.

Practice with Inclined Planes

Dynamic Turn Indicator: Research/Investigation Findings Informal document GRE (70th GRE session (21-23 October 2013, agenda item 5(f))

Study of Pedestrian’s fatal accidents (vs. motor vehicles at low speed) in Japan 110 th GRSG MLIT, Japan Informal document GRSG (110th GRSG,

ПОРТФОЛИО профессиональной деятельности Белово 2015 Таюшовой Натальи Борисовны Преподавателя дисциплин «Химия», «Биология»

Module 3 Brianna James Percy Antoine. Entering the Roadway/Moving to the Curb/Backing  The seven steps to safely pull from a curb. Place foot firmly.

Annex 12 #2.6.4 Camera Monitor arrangement

Comments and Questions on Proposal for new Class VIII close-proximity and close rear-view devices UN R46 Devices for indirect vision GRSG (Japan)

IWVTA: UN-Regulation No.0 IWVTA Inf. G Technical Secretary

ACSF-C2 2-actions system

Report Task Force UNR46 5th Meeting OICA Paris, 26-27th September 2016

Transmitted by the IWVTA Informal Group

Status Report to GRB #68 Task Force on Reverse Warning issues

Next Step of TFRA Chair of TFRA.

The driver’s looking back ocular points

N.J.A.C. 6A:27 Student Transportation First Discussion 7/13/16

GRSG-113 Agenda point 5 – Awareness of Vulnerable Road Users proximity

Transmitted by Japan Doc.No.IWVTA-SGR rev.1, 7th IWVTA-SGR0

Reversing audible warning devices for M- and N- Vehicles

GRSG IWG VRU-Proxi 3c Direct vision - D standard on direct vision

Informal document GRSG

The driver’s looking back ocular points

Harmonization of Crash Regulations in Korea

Status report of “Reversing Motion”

Study about Audible Warning system effects for VRU safety

Physics Review Optical Power Topic Slides Minutes Displacement Vectors

UN QRTV GTR Informal Working Group 6th session – Baltimore, USA, May 2018 Regulation (EU) No 540/2014: commonalities and differences with UN R

Questions/Comments on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2019/10

AEB 07 – Euro NCAP Summary Overview

AEB IWG 02-XX Industry Position

Safety concept for automated driving systems

AEB IWG 02 ISO Standard: FVCMS

Task-force on reverse warning signal CURRENT STATUS in United nations C-WGN 16th – Wuhan – December 11, 2018.

Terms of Reference (AEBS Rev.1)

Status of discussion about “Reversing Motion”

TF Reversing Alarm Report to GRB 67th

2019 Governor’s Cup PRESHIFT CONTEST Roof Control Plan

Submitted by the expert

VRU-Proxi IWG Reversing Motion Task Force Discussion Points

Status of discussion about “Reversing Motion” in VRU-Proxi

Proposed Definition of the Pause Function

GRSG/VRU-Proxi Informal Working Group Japan Proposals for Technical Requirements on Sonars November 21th 2017 Tokyo.

“Class IX Front and Close-proximity Passenger-side”

Updates and discussion points for reversing motion

Proposed Definition of the Pause Function

6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016

Status of discussion after 7th meeting

Advantages and Disadvantages

Automated Lane Keeping Systems

AEBS-09 – Industry Input.

Status of discussion after 8th meeting

Presentation transcript:

VRU-Proxi Reversing Motion Regulation Regulation framework proposal Performance requirements (discussion) Main questions VRU-Proxi-08-10

VRU-Proxi Reversing motion regulation framework (compromise proposal) Part R46 Rxx (new regulation) Component Mirrors (Class I to VII) CMS (Class I to VII) Detection CMS Class VIII Mirror Class VIII Installation CMS (Class I and VIII) (reference to R46 and Rxx) Mirrors (Class I and VIII) (reference to R46 and Rxx) Direct vision

Performance Requirements (discussion) Parking Scenarios < 6 km/h Portion of Person is sufficient for recognition Audible Reaction time is shorter than Visual Reaction time Possible Recognition of 1 m Thorax depth Standing Small Child Fallen Person Translates into System Related Requirements Vision system: Detection system: Calculate in Audible Reaction Time of Driver Detection System Latency [0.2s] convert to Mirror: Calculate in Visual Reaction Time of Driver convert to CMS: Calculate in Visual Reaction Time of Driver CMS Latency 0.2 s convert to Horizontal Area above [Thorax depth] m above floor Vehicle width x [1.5 m] Floor Area Vehicle width x 3.5 m Floor Area Vehicle width x 3.5 m

Main questions Nr Main questions What / who? 1 Fallen person to be taken into account? Accidentology (ask CP’s for in-depth data) 2 Shall detection system give an audible and/or optical warning? 3 Do we allow direct vision (turning head)? 4 Do we allow a combination of devices with different type of HMI? 5 Shall each row of poles (perpendicular to the longitudinal direction of the vehicle) be seen/detected by one (single) device? CP’s to answer 6 Do we allow mirror-to-mirror solution (periscope)? 7 How to test, static or random position of poles? 8 Shall exemptions be implemented in the UN Regulation or not?