Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (November 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 86, Issue 5, Pages (June 2015)
Advertisements

Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (May 2017)
Linking Cholinergic Interneurons, Synaptic Plasticity, and Behavior during the Extinction of a Cocaine-Context Association  Junuk Lee, Joel Finkelstein,
Volume 88, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
Kurt C. Marsden, Michael Granato  Cell Reports 
Cortico-Accumbens Regulation of Approach-Avoidance Behavior Is Modified by Experience and Chronic Pain  Neil Schwartz, Catriona Miller, Howard L. Fields 
Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
Dense Inhibitory Connectivity in Neocortex
David H. Root, David J. Estrin, Marisela Morales
Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Activation of VTA GABA Neurons Disrupts Reward Consumption
Essential Role of Presynaptic NMDA Receptors in Activity-Dependent BDNF Secretion and Corticostriatal LTP  Hyungju Park, Andrei Popescu, Mu-ming Poo 
The Generation of Direction Selectivity in the Auditory System
Dynorphin Controls the Gain of an Amygdalar Anxiety Circuit
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages e8 (October 2017)
Linking Cholinergic Interneurons, Synaptic Plasticity, and Behavior during the Extinction of a Cocaine-Context Association  Junuk Lee, Joel Finkelstein,
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 17, Pages (September 2014)
Hai-Yan He, Wanhua Shen, Masaki Hiramoto, Hollis T. Cline  Neuron 
Volume 85, Issue 2, Pages (January 2015)
BLA to vHPC Inputs Modulate Anxiety-Related Behaviors
Hypothalamic Circuits for Predation and Evasion
Hippocampus and Entorhinal Cortex Recruit Cholinergic and NMDA Receptors Separately to Generate Hippocampal Theta Oscillations  Zhenglin Gu, Georgia M.
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 88, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 89, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (April 2018)
A Cooperative Mechanism Involving Ca2+-Permeable AMPA Receptors and Retrograde Activation of GABAB Receptors in Interpeduncular Nucleus Plasticity  Peter.
Cell-Specific Retrograde Signals Mediate Antiparallel Effects of Angiotensin II on Osmoreceptor Afferents to Vasopressin and Oxytocin Neurons  Tevye J.
Kurt C. Marsden, Michael Granato  Cell Reports 
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
In Vivo Direct Reprogramming of Reactive Glial Cells into Functional Neurons after Brain Injury and in an Alzheimer’s Disease Model  Ziyuan Guo, Lei Zhang,
A Central Amygdala CRF Circuit Facilitates Learning about Weak Threats
Ryan G. Natan, Winnie Rao, Maria N. Geffen  Cell Reports 
Volume 94, Issue 2, Pages e4 (April 2017)
Experience-Dependent Equilibration of AMPAR-Mediated Synaptic Transmission during the Critical Period  Kyung-Seok Han, Samuel F. Cooke, Weifeng Xu  Cell.
Distinct Translaminar Glutamatergic Circuits to GABAergic Interneurons in the Neonatal Auditory Cortex  Rongkang Deng, Joseph P.Y. Kao, Patrick O. Kanold 
GABA Neurons of the VTA Drive Conditioned Place Aversion
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages e8 (October 2017)
Essential Role of Presynaptic NMDA Receptors in Activity-Dependent BDNF Secretion and Corticostriatal LTP  Hyungju Park, Andrei Popescu, Mu-ming Poo 
Tiago Branco, Kevin Staras, Kevin J. Darcy, Yukiko Goda  Neuron 
Volume 97, Issue 6, Pages e5 (March 2018)
Organization of Functional Long-Range Circuits Controlling the Activity of Serotonergic Neurons in the Dorsal Raphe Nucleus  Li Zhou, Ming-Zhe Liu, Qing.
Target-Specific Glycinergic Transmission from VGluT3-Expressing Amacrine Cells Shapes Suppressive Contrast Responses in the Retina  Nai-Wen Tien, Tahnbee.
Differentiating Cerebellar Impact on Thalamic Nuclei
Serotonergic Modulation of Sensory Representation in a Central Multisensory Circuit Is Pathway Specific  Zheng-Quan Tang, Laurence O. Trussell  Cell Reports 
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2017)
Dopamine Neurons Control Striatal Cholinergic Neurons via Regionally Heterogeneous Dopamine and Glutamate Signaling  Nao Chuhma, Susana Mingote, Holly.
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages e4 (May 2019)
Corticostriatal Transmission Is Selectively Enhanced in Striatonigral Neurons with Postnatal Loss of Tsc1  Katelyn N. Benthall, Stacie L. Ong, Helen S.
Spontaneous Neurotransmitter Release Shapes Dendritic Arbors via Long-Range Activation of NMDA Receptors  Laura C. Andreae, Juan Burrone  Cell Reports 
Activation of VTA GABA Neurons Disrupts Reward Consumption
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Optogenetic analysis of mPFC neurons.
Matthew T. Rich, Yanhua H. Huang, Mary M. Torregrossa  Cell Reports 
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages e7 (January 2019)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 1757-1769 (November 2017) Lateral Preoptic Control of the Lateral Habenula through Convergent Glutamate and GABA Transmission  David J. Barker, Jorge Miranda-Barrientos, Shiliang Zhang, David H. Root, Hui-Ling Wang, Bing Liu, Erin S. Calipari, Marisela Morales  Cell Reports  Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 1757-1769 (November 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.066 Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2017 21, 1757-1769DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.066) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Major Input from the Lateral Preoptic Area to the Lateral Habenula Is from Glutamatergic Neurons (A) Iontophoretic delivery of the retrograde tract tracer Fluorogold (FG) into the LHb. (B and C) FG injection site in the LHb (B) and retrogradely labeled LPO→LHb neurons (C). (D and E) Phenotypic characterization of LPO→LHb neurons. FG is seen as white or brown after its immunodetection (FG-immunoreactivity [IR]). (D) LPO→LHb neuron expressing GADs mRNA (detection with non-radioactive probe; purple cell). (E) LPO→LHb neuron expressing VGluT2 mRNA (detection with radioactive probe; cell with green or silver grains). (F) Frequency of different phenotypes of LPO→LHb neurons (mean ± SEM; 10–15 sections from each of three rats). Most LPO→LHb neurons expressed VGluT2 mRNA (FG-VGluT2; 74.7% ± 3.2%), some expressed GADs (FG-GADs; 16.0% ± 3.2%), fewer lacked detectable levels of VGluT2 or GAD mRNA (FG: 5.9% ± 1.8%), and infrequently expressed both transcripts (FG-VGluT2-GADs; 3.5% ± 2.8%). (G) The frequency of FG-GADs neurons was confirmed with a radioactive probe for GAD 65/67 detection. Scale bars represent 40 μm in (C) and 10 μm in (D) and (E). Cell Reports 2017 21, 1757-1769DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.066) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 LPO Neurons Establish Functional Glutamate and GABA Synapses on LHb Neurons (A) Delivery of AAV-DIO-ChR2-mCherry (for electron microscopy) or AAV-DIO-ChR2-eYFP (for in vitro electrophysiology) into the LPO of VGluT2::Cre or VGAT::Cre mice. (B–G) LHb electron micrographs (B–D) and corresponding diagrams (E–G, respectively) showing LPO axon terminals (AT) expressing mCherry (dark, diffuse material; yellow arrow). (B and E) LPO-mCherry terminal in the LHb of a VGluT2-LPOChR2-mCherry mouse expressing VGluT2 (labeled using immunogold, which can be seen as dark black puncta; green arrowhead) establishing an asymmetric synapse (green arrow) on a dendrite (De) of an LHb neuron. (C, D, F, and G) LPO mCherry terminal in the LHb of a VGAT-LPOChR2-mCherry mouse expressing VGAT (labeled using immunogold, which can be seen as dark black puncta; dots; red arrowheads) establishing a symmetric synapse (red arrow) on a De (C and F) or soma (D and G) of LHb neurons. (H) EPSCs recorded in voltage-clamp mode in an LHb neuron after LHb photostimulation (blue line) of LPO-VGluT2 fibers were not affected by bicuculline (10 μM) but were abolished by the subsequent addition of CNQX (10 μM) (baseline: −138.18 ± 27.98 pA; bicuculline: −148.83 ± 29.67 pA; bicuculline plus CNQX: −2.84 ± 0.40 pA; [F2,29 = 23.56, ∗p < 0.0001, repeated-measures ANOVA, post hoc Dunnett’s test]; n = 10 cells from 6 mice). Error bars correspond to SEMs. (I) IPSCs recorded in voltage-clamp mode in an LHb neuron after LHb photostimulation (blue line) of LPO-VGAT fibers were not affected by CNQX (10 μM) but were abolished by the subsequent addition of bicuculline (10 μM), (baseline: 20.23 ± 3.60 pA; CNQX: 17.58 ± 3.58 pA; CNQX plus bicuculline: 1.38 ± 0.26 pA [F2,20 = 21.56, ∗p = 0.0001, repeated-measures ANOVA, post hoc Dunnett’s test]; n = 7 cells from 5 mice). Error bars correspond to SEMs. Scale bars represent 200 nm in (B)–(D). Cell Reports 2017 21, 1757-1769DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.066) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Axon Terminals from LPO-Glutamate and LPO-GABA Neurons Innervating the LHb Have Distinct Topographical Distributions within the LHb (A) Delivery of AAV-CaMKII-ChR2-mCherry into the LPO of wild-type mice (WT-LPOChR2-mCherry). (B) LHb at low magnification showing LPO-mCherry fibers in the LHb and axon terminals with either VGluT2 or VGAT labeling. (C and D) High magnification of the medial (C) and lateral (D) aspects of the LHb showing LPO terminals containing VgluT2 (blue arrows) or VGAT (yellow arrows). (E) LPO-mCherry fibers were more prevalent in the medial than in the lateral aspects of the LHb and more frequently contained VgluT2 than VGAT. Within the lateral aspects of the LHb, the LPO-mCherry-VGAT were more abundant than were LPO-mCherry-VGluT2 (n = 24,236 terminals; n = 3 mice with three replications each [F1,8 = 49.02, p = 0.0001, two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, Sidak adjusted post hoc, ∗p < 0.05]). Data are shown as mean ± SEM. (F and G) Diagrams showing a high concentration of LPO-mCherry-VGluT2 axon terminals in the medial aspect of the LHb (F) and a broad distribution of LPO-mCherry-VGAT axon terminals across the LHb (G). Scale bars represent 100 μm in (B) and 2 μm in (C) and (D). Cell Reports 2017 21, 1757-1769DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.066) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Converging LPO-Glutamatergic and LPO-GABAergic Inputs onto Single LHb Neurons (A) Delivery of AAV-CaMKII-ChR2-eYFP into the LPO of wild-type mice (WT-LPOChR2-eYFP). (B and C) LPO-glutamatergic input on an LHb neuron. EPSCs recorded in voltage-clamp mode in an LHb neuron at three holding potentials after LHb photostimulation (blue line) of LPO-fibers were all blocked by CNQX (10 μM) (B) indicating LPO-glutamatergic neurotransmission on LHb neurons (∼29%; 6 of 21 recorded LHb neurons) (C). (D and E) LPO-GABAergic input on an LHb neuron. IPSCs recorded in voltage-clamp mode at three holding potentials in an LHb neuron after LHb photostimulation (blue line) of LPO-fibers were not affected by CNQX (10 μM) but were all blocked by the subsequent addition of bicuculline (10 μM) (D) indicating LPO-GABAergic neurotransmission on LHb neurons (∼9%; 2 of 21 recorded LHb neurons) (E). (F and G) Convergent neurotransmission of LPO-glutamate and LPO-GABA inputs on a single LHb neuron. Both EPSCs and IPSCs were recorded in voltage-clamp mode on a single LHb neuron after LHb photostimulation. EPSCs were blocked by CNQX (10 μM), and the remaining IPSCs were blocked by the subsequent addition of bicuculline (10 μM) (F) indicating that LPO-glutamate and LPO-GABA neurons provide convergent neurotransmission onto single LHb neurons (∼62%; 13 of 21 recorded LHb neurons) (G). (B, D, and F) LHb neurons were recorded under voltage clamp at three holding potentials: 0 mV to record inhibitory currents; −60 mV to record excitatory currents, and −45 mV to simultaneously record both inhibitory and excitatory currents. Cell Reports 2017 21, 1757-1769DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.066) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Simultaneous Activation of LPO-VGluT2 and LPO-VGAT Fibers in the LHb by an Aversive Stimulus and Its Predictive Cue (A) Delivery of AAV-DIO-GCAMP6s into the LPO in VGAT-LPOGCaMP6s mice or VGluT2-LPOGCaMP6s mice and optic fiber placement over the LHb for recording Ca2+ activity in LPO-VGluT2 fibers and LPO-VGAT fibers. (B) Ca2+-imaging traces during an entire aversive conditioning task. (C and D) Heatmaps of Ca2+ activity over successive aversive conditioning trials (top) and peri-event histograms showing the average trace during aversive conditioning (bottom) in a VGAT-LPOGCaMP6s mouse (C) and VGluT2-LPOGCaMP6s mouse (D). (E) Average ± SEM Ca2+ activity for VGluT2-LPOGCaMP6s mice or VGAT-LPOGCaMP6s mice in a 25-s window encompassing the tone and footshock periods. (F) Area under the curve (ΔF/F) for Ca2+ activity in LPO-VGluT2 terminals or LPO-VGAT terminals during baseline (VGluT2-LPOGCaMP6s mice: −293.52 ± 155.47; VGAT-LPOGCaMP6s mice: −103.12 ± 91.13), tone (VGluT2-LPOGCaMP6s mice: 1183.86 ± 562.63; VGAT-LPOGCaMP6s mice: 590.88 ± 149.85), shock (VGluT2-LPOGCaMP6s mice: 940.03 ± 434.93; VGAT-LPOGCaMP6s mice: 365.13 ± 116.72), and post-shock epochs (VGluT2-LPOGCaMP6s mice: −121.05 ± 85.55; VGAT-LPOGCaMP6s mice: −147.96 ± 58.50) (n = 13 VGluT2-LPOGCaMP6 mice, and n = 14 VGAT-LPOGCaMP6 mice [mixed ANOVA, main effect of epoch: F3,75 = 24.61, p < 0.0001, general linear model [GLM], Sidak post hoc test,∗p < 0.001 versus baseline; epoch × group and group effects: not significant). Cell Reports 2017 21, 1757-1769DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.066) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 LHb Photostimulation of LPO-Glutamate Is Aversive, whereas LHb Photostimulation of LPO-GABA Fibers Is Rewarding (A) Diagram of virus injection in LPO and photostimulation of LPO-VGluT2 or LPO-VGAT fibers in the LHb. (B) Timeline for the place conditioning procedure. (C) VGluT2-LPOChR2-eYFP mice (n = 9) spent less time in the chamber paired with photostimulation on conditioning days (blue line) and exhibited place aversion during stimulation-free test sessions. VGluT2-LPOeYFP mice (n = 7) spent equal time in the photostimulation paired and unpaired chambers during conditioning (blue line) and test sessions (F20,280 = 3.78, p < 0.0001, mixed ANOVA, Sidak adjusted post hoc, ∗p < 0.05 for paired versus unpaired chambers). (D) VGAT-LPOChR2-eYFP mice (n = 7) spent more time in the photostimulation paired chamber during conditioning (blue line) sessions. Stimulation in VGAT-LPOChR2-eYFP mice did not produce a conditioned place preference for the photostimulation-paired chamber on test sessions, although there was a trend for animals to spend more time in the photostimulation paired chamber. VGAT-LPOeYFP mice (n = 7) did not show a preference for either the paired or unpaired chamber during conditioning sessions (blue line) or test sessions (F20,260 = 1.76, p = 0.26, mixed ANOVA, Sidak-adjusted post hoc, ∗p < 0.05 for paired versus unpaired chambers). Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Cell Reports 2017 21, 1757-1769DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.066) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Functional Neuroanatomy of the LPO→LHb Circuit (A) Electrophysiological and anatomical evidence indicate that LPO-glutamate and LPO-GABA neurons both synapse on single LHb neurons to provide convergent neurotransmission of glutamate and GABA or independently synapse on LHb neurons to release only glutamate or only GABA. (B) Recording LPO-VGluT2 or LPO-VGAT terminals by fiber photometry Ca2+ imaging demonstrated that noxious footshock induces the simultaneous and balanced activation of LPO-glutamatergic and LPO-GABAergic inputs to the LHb. (C and D) Independent optogenetic activation of LPO→LHb GABA produces reward (C) while independent optogenetic activation of LPO→LHb glutamate produces aversions (D). These results suggest that the balance of LPO-glutamate and LPO-GABA is critical for an organisms’ normal response to aversive stimuli and that shifts in this balance may produce a psychopathological state. Cell Reports 2017 21, 1757-1769DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.066) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions