VFLA 2017 Laurie Clarcq www.heartsforteaching.com www.embeddedreading.com lclarcq@yahoo.com.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Strategies Teaching students to use special thoughts or actions to Assist learning tasks Understand, remember, recall new information Practice skills efficiently.
Advertisements

Welcome Session Norms: All pagers and cell phones on vibrate Stay on topic being discussed Use professional courtesy.
The Basics of Language Acquisition
The Natural Approach Introduction. **The term NA was developed by Tracy Terrl and Stephen Krashen in 1977 **The term NA was developed by Tracy Terrl and.
ATTENTION LANGUAGE LEARNERS ! THE SENIORS’ GUIDE FOR SUCCESS.
in Learner –Centered Classrooms
Beyond the Basal: Reader’s Workshop February 17, 2011 …schools shouldn’t be about handing down a collection of static truths to the next generation but.
Welcome to Unit 5 Seminar: Stages of Languge Acquisition Learning The Language.
S TRATEGIES. ROUND TABLE REVIEW Activity: With the teachers at your table, discuss the information from our previous training. Use the following topics.
Teacher Candidates Practice Oral Language Functions Using Digital Video Recording Martha E. Castañeda Miami University Ohio Foreign Language Association.
Operational Definitions Dr. Elva Cerda Pérez University of Texas /TSC Brownsville.
March 30,  Objectives  Anticipatory Set  Questioning Strategy Video Clip  Questioning Strategy Reading  Data  Closure.
Applied Linguistics Written and Second Language Acquisition.
Krashen’s Hypotheses about Second language Acquisition YL-TESOL.
Aspire: Professional Development for Bilingual and ELL Paraprofessionals DAVID IRWIN LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES LLC.
SIOP: Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol Dr. Kelly Bikle Winter 2007.
Best Practices in ELL Instruction: Multimodal Presentation Professional Development by: Heather Thomson T3 845.
Piaget, Vygotsky, Bruner, Krashen, Chomsky
Piaget, Vygotsky, & Krashen laksmisuharyo.weebly.com.
Learning Through Failure. Reflect O Take a few moments to write down your answers to the following questions: O What was your reaction to the video? O.
Embedded Reading: An example and explanation for teachers who want to help students to discover the joy and the power of reading ! © Clarcq, Whaley 2012.
Overview of Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects The Common Core State Standards.
Lesson Planning. WHO determines what we teach? Put the following in order from the broadest to the most specific. Lesson plan State standard National.
Using Games in Teaching Vocabulary Evi Sofiawati.
Objectives We will explore preschool literacy.
Embedded Reading Laurie Clarcq and Michele Whaley
The Interpersonal Mode
Differentiated Instruction Using Language Objectives
Facilitating Early Language Learning
ESOL Best Strategies and Practices for Adult Learners
A Project LIFT Training Module
Learning Model for English 2-8 grades
Sheltered English Instruction
Homework questions How does ACTFL define an intermediate level learner? (p.90) In terms of syllabus design, how can teachers help intermediate learners?
Bilingual/ESL Department
CHAPTER 3 : LEARNING THE SPOKEN LANGUAGE
Embedded Reading Laurie Clarcq and Michele Whaley
How to Learn English Mark Brierley.
Second Language Acquisition
Teaching Oral Communication
Today’s class Listening, Speaking, TEE Review Learning theories
Michele Whaley and Laurie Clarcq
Second Language Theory Put Into Practice
The SIOP® Model PRACTICE & APPLICATION
A Applying the New Curriculum in Classroom
Literacy in the Language Classroom ETPRS16 Amersfoort
Performance Indicator I:
Adult Literacy Council Coastal Bend Community Foundation Accelerating Your ESL Students’ Learning Through Brain Compatible Strategies Facilitator:
A Applying the New Curriculum in Classroom
Six Trait Writing Voice!
CATCH Early Childhood Classroom Curriculum
The Natural Approach in Linguistics
Create An Embedded Reading From The Bottom Up!.
Curriculum Updates Spanish and French
Tasks & Grades for MET1.
Tasks & Grades for MET2.
Tasks & Grades for MET3.
Tasks & Grades for MET5.
“Charles” p. 9 Purple Book
IFLT 2013 EMBEDDED READING IN ACTION
©Joan Sedita, Kinds of PD Follow Up ©Joan Sedita,
Tasks & Grades for MET4.
Chapter 4.
How do you plan your lessons?
“Charles” p. 9 Purple Book
Concept: Reading Short Stories and Understanding Elements of Plot
“Charles” p. 9 Purple Book
CUTM 4012: Methods of Teaching English
A conversational lesson with a video
CLASS Expectations MATERIALS
Presentation transcript:

VFLA 2017 Laurie Clarcq www.heartsforteaching.com www.embeddedreading.com lclarcq@yahoo.com

The purpose of language As used in communication Is to put a picture From one heart, and/or mind, Into another. L. Clarcq Picks from kids????

Focus the picture...or see a part/whole of the picture

Define TPRS® Teaching Proficiency through Reading and Story”telling”.

TPRS® Approach? Method? Technique? Tool? Trick question?

TPRS®

TPRS® “Definition”

Focus the picture...or see a part/whole of the picture

“Definition”: A way to approach interaction in the language classroom. Goal: Increase students’ ability to COMMUNICATE Using: Interactive Input-based Activities Based on: Dr. Krashen’s Hypotheses

www.sdkrashen.com the Acquisition-Learning hypothesis the Monitor hypothesis the Natural Order hypothesis the Input hypothesis the Affective Filter hypothesis the Reading Hypothesis

provides a better base for communication than Language Acquisition provides a better base for communication than Language Learning. Subconscious Brain at Work Less affected by the Affective Filter © L.Clarcq 2017

creates and grows language in the brain.. Comprehended Input creates and grows language in the brain.. Layers of Comprehended Input provide a language base for the brain. © L.Clarcq 2017

TPRS® Three __________ © L.Clarcq 2017

Ways to Provide Comprehensible Input Three Steps of TPRS®

Ways to Provide Comprehensible Input Three of TPRS® © L.Clarcq 2017

Ways to Provide Comprehensible Input Three Elements of TPRS® © L.Clarcq 2017

Three Elements of TPRS® Identify meaning. Interact via a Storyline. Read. © L.Clarcq 2017 Three Elements of TPRS®

Ways to Provide Comprehensible Input Use the Elements in an interactive activity: Discussions about an interesting topic Story-asking Storytelling/Storylistening Picture Talk/Movie Talk Discussing any kind of reading Etc.!! © L.Clarcq 2017

TPRS® Student Success © L.Clarcq 2017

Student Success=Increased Proficiency Who are the students? What is their present proficiency level? What kind of input are they successful with? Where are their strengths? How are they going to interact with the input? How and How often do I need to check for comprehension? © L.Clarcq 2017

Questions to ask about the instruction: 1. Is the goal to increase students’ ability to COMMUNICATE? 2. Does it incorporate interactive Input-based activities? 3. Is it based on Krashen’s Hypotheses? 4. Does the teacher check for comprehension? 5. Does it include the three Elements of TPRS®? Is it created for students’ success? © L.Clarcq 2017

TPRS® Storyline © L.Clarcq 2017

Is the student focus on the storyline? 7. Is the student focus on the storyline? © L.Clarcq 2017

What a Demo is and is not….

A Demo is NOT an example of a lesson. It is more like a scrapbook of things that can happen as part of instruction over the course of days, or even weeks. It is condensed so that participants can become familiar with, in a short period of time, what a student in a TPRS® classroom experiences over a longer period of time.

A Demo is NOT a training. I do not participants expect to be able to plan, construct, or deliver a TPRS® lesson after participating in a demo.

Demo+Training Student brain+Teacher brain (Clarcq’s) Stages of Comprehension Interact in Vietnamese (Focus: Create a Base Using Input)

Visualize this:

What kinds of “stories” have we seen so far? Stories of people meeting people. Stories of people and what they like to drink (including Justin T.!!) Stories of people and where they get their coffee. Stories about Si. Coming up: Stories about videos Stories connected to stories about videos. Personal conversations stories read Mini real stories stories written Mini co- created stories stories from a picture

TPRS® © L.Clarcq 2017

1. Is the goal to increase students’ ability to COMMUNICATE? 2. Does it incorporate interactive Input-based activities? Is it based on Krashen’s Hypotheses? 4. Is the teacher checking for comprehension? 5. Does it include the three Elements of TPRS®? 6. Is it created for students’ success? Are the students focused on the storyline? © L.Clarcq 2017

If you have questions like these: What about classes above Novice-Low? What about using a textbook? What about finding materials? What other kinds of “stories” are there? What does a class look like?

Or these: How do I bridge students to/from a program that uses TPRS®? How do I talk to administrators about it? How do I prepare students for it? How do I prepare myself for it? How do I know if I am doing it right? How do I get started?

You can find a schedule for numerous training opportunities here: © L.Clarcq 2017