Polarization at the Super-B Factory

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SuperB Damping Rings M. Biagini, LNF-INFN P. Raimondi, SLAC/INFN A. Wolski, Cockroft Institute, UK SuperB III Workshop, SLAC, June 2006.
Advertisements

July 24, 2008Super-B Mini-MAC MeetingPage 1 Super-B Overview John Seeman Accelerator Systems Division SLAC.
Super-B Accelerator R&D J. Seeman With contributions from the Super-B Staff September 17, 2009.
1 Super-B Factory Scenarios John Seeman Assistant Director PPA Directorate SLAC SLUO Meeting September 11, 2006.
Linear Super-B Factory Progress John T. Seeman FPCP Workshop Vancouver BC April 9, 2006.
Issues for Optimization of a Super-B Factory John T. Seeman SBF Workshop SLAC June 14, 2006.
SLAC Accelerator Department The PEP-II Accelerator John T. Seeman Assistant Director of the Technical Division Head of the Accelerator Department SLUO.
2 February 2005Ken Moffeit Spin Rotation scheme for two IRs Ken Moffeit SLAC.
Ion Polarization Control in MEIC Rings Using Small Magnetic Fields Integrals. PSTP 13 V.S. Morozov et al., Ion Polarization Control in MEIC Rings Using.
SuperB Accelerator & ILC SuperB Accelerator & ILC M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN for the SuperB Team ILC GDE visit, LNF, Jan. 22 th 2008 D. Alesini, M. E. Biagini,
1 Options for low energy spin manipulation Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October 2009 K. Moffeit, D.
Polarization issues in SuperB-Factories I.A.Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia Frascati Workshop, March 16-18, 2006.
Control of Beam Polarization at the NICA Collider A.M. Kondratenko 2, A.D. Kovalenko 1, M.A. Kondratenko 2, Yu.N. Filatov 1,3 and V.A. Mikhaylov 1 1 Join.
New Ideas for Super B Factories for Flavour Physics Steve Playfer University of Edinburgh, Future Directions, BEACH 2006 Lancaster, July 2006.
EIC Users Meeting, SBU, 6/27/14 Polarized Electron Beams in the MEIC at JLab Fanglei Lin for MEIC Study Group EIC Users Meeting, Stony Brook University,
Polarization in ELIC Yaroslav Derbenev Center for Advanced Study of Accelerators Jefferson Laboratory EIC Collaboiration Meeting, January 10-12, 2010 Stony.
Ken Moffeit SLAC LCWA09 1 Polarization Considerations for CLIC Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October.
SLAC Accelerator Development Program: SuperB Mike Sullivan OHEP Accelerator Development Review January 24-26, 2011.
For Layout of ILC , revised K.Kubo Based on following choices. Positron source: Prepare both conventional and undulator based. Place the.
Polarized Proton at RHIC: Status and Future Plan Mei Bai Collider Accelerator Dept. BNL A Special Beam Physics Symposium in Honor of Yaroslav Derbenev's.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Main Technical Issues of theSuper B Injector Main Technical Issues of the Super B Injector SuperB Meeting, Isola d’Elba, May 31st – June 3rd, 2008 D. Alesini,
SuperB Accelerator Overview & Status M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN for the SuperB Accelerator Team SuperB Meeting Elba, May 31 th, 2008.
November 12-13, 2007 Super-B Factory: Accelerator Costing, PEP-II Hardware and Schedule J. Seeman SLAC International Review Committee meeting November.
SuperB Injector (2) R. Boni, INFN-LNF - on behalf of the “Injector Study Group” SuperB Mini-MAC, Frascati July, 2008 D. Alesini, R. Boni, F. Marcellini,
WP9-SuperB in TIARA M. Biagini, INFN-LNF.
Polarization in SuperB
P. Chevtsov for the ELIC Design Team
Design and Parameters for a linearly colliding Super B-FACTORY
Injector and positron source scheme. A first evaluation Thanks to O
Deuteron Polarization in MEIC
Accelerator R&D for the Super-B Factory
SuperB Injection, RF stations, Vibration and Operations
Linac possibilities for a Super-B
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Beam polarization in eRHIC
The SuperB Accelerator Lattice M. E
Report on ILC and SuperB work at LNF
Michael Sullivan and John Seeman SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Accelerating and injecting polarized beams into FCC-ee I
Preservation and Control of Ion Polarization in MEIC
Electron Polarization In MEIC
Injection facility for Novosibirsk Super Charm Tau Factory
SuperB project. Injection scheme design status
eRHIC with Self-Polarizing Electron Ring
Super-B Overview John Seeman Accelerator Systems Division
Other issues and concepts under study Conclusions References
SuperB Accelerator Overview and Status
SuperB Workshop Frascati March 16, 2006
AC Power for a Super-B Factory
Summary of Washington DOE Review
Super-B Accelerator Overview
Super-B Factory in a “4400m” Tunnel
JLEIC Collaboration meeting Spring 2016 Ion Polarization with Figure-8
Spin Transparency Study and Test
Cost Algorithm for a Super-B Factory
M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov , 2007
J. Seeman Perugia Super-B Meeting June 2009
Polarization Section in SuperB DR2
SuperB Accelerator Overview
JLEIC Collider Rings’ Geometry Options
Update on MEIC Ion Polarization Work
CDR2 – Injection System Injection system overview (Seeman) (2 pages)
Yu.N. Filatov, A.M. Kondratenko, M.A. Kondratenko
Progress Update on the Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
Beam-beam simulations
ELIC: An Electron – Light Ion Collider based at CEBAF
Status of Proton & Deuteron Spin Tracking in Racetrack Booster
Current Status of Ion Polarization Studies
Report on Electron Polarization Study
Presentation transcript:

Polarization at the Super-B Factory J. Seeman SLAC IRC Meeting November 13, 2007

Polarization studies for Super-B Contributions from: I. Koop (BINP) S. Nikitin (BINP) M. Preger (INFN Frascati) P. Raimondi (INFN Frascati) J. Seeman (SLAC) U. Wienands (SLAC)

Why not let the beam self-polarize? Polarization time: SBF beam lifetime =~ 5 minutes  Inject polarized electrons from the linac

Ring Layout (from F. Forti) SuperB Ring (about 1800m) SPARX SuperB Injector (about 400m) Roman Villa 100m SuperB Main Building

Polarization Components from the SLC at SLAC Example of Injected Polarized Electrons Polarization Components from the SLC at SLAC Polarized Photo-Gun 120 Hz, 87% 2 x 5x10^10/pulse Spin manipulators SLC IP Located at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Polarization equipment ready for reuse!

IP Spin Rotation

Spin Transport Issues Spin rotation x-y coupling Spin chromaticity Depolarizing resonances IP symmetry Beam-beam forces

“Foot print” shape preferred

Alternative #1of IP Spin Rotator

Alternative #2 of IP Spin Rotator Derbenev, Kondratenko, Skrinsky, 1977 Snake rotates spin by 1800 around z-axis Snake In arcs spin lies in the horizontal plane At IP the spin is directed longitudinally (exactly!) IP

Polarization times LER: HER: Best energies: 3.83 GeV, 4.10 GeV to avoid resonances Polarization times: 10800 sec with antisymmetric IP horiz. bends 3300 sec with symmetrical IP horiz. bends HER: Best energies: 6.92 GeV, 7.18 GeV to avoid resonances Polarization time: 2800 sec with antisymmetric IP horiz. bends

Polarization Conclusions Polarization of one beam is included in Super-B. Either energy beam could be the polarized one. The LER would be less expensive. Long polarization times and short beam lifetimes indicates a need to inject polarized electrons in the vertical plane. There are several possible IP spin rotators. Solenoids look better at present. Expected longitudinal polarization at the IP of about 87%(inj) x 97%(ring)=85%(effective).