Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NOVEL BRCA2-INTERACTING PROTEIN BJ-HCC-20A INHIBITS THE INDUCTION OF APOPTOSIS IN RESPONSE TO DNA DAMAGE Go Tomiyoshi, Akira Nakanishi, Katsuya Takenaka,
Advertisements

Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (November 2011)
Yu-Hsin Chiu, Jennifer Y. Lee, Lewis C. Cantley  Molecular Cell 
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
UV-Induced RPA1 Acetylation Promotes Nucleotide Excision Repair
Phosphorylation of PML by mitogen-activated protein kinases plays a key role in arsenic trioxide-mediated apoptosis  Fumihiko Hayakawa, Martin L Privalsky 
p53 Stabilization and Transactivation by a von Hippel-Lindau Protein
Oliver I. Fregoso, Shipra Das, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Eun-Joo Kim, Jeong-Hoon Kho, Moo-Rim Kang, Soo-Jong Um  Molecular Cell 
Volume 130, Issue 4, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (February 2008)
An Acetylation Switch in p53 Mediates Holo-TFIID Recruitment
Direct Interactions of OCA-B and TFII-I Regulate Immunoglobulin Heavy-Chain Gene Transcription by Facilitating Enhancer-Promoter Communication  Xiaodi.
Esther B.E. Becker, Azad Bonni  Neuron 
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Xiaolong Wei, Hai Xu, Donald Kufe  Cancer Cell 
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
p53DINP1, a p53-Inducible Gene, Regulates p53-Dependent Apoptosis
C-Jun Downregulation by HDAC3-Dependent Transcriptional Repression Promotes Osmotic Stress-Induced Cell Apoptosis  Yan Xia, Ji Wang, Ta-Jen Liu, W.K.
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 16, Issue 24, Pages (December 2006)
Oncogenic Ras-Induced Expression of Noxa and Beclin-1 Promotes Autophagic Cell Death and Limits Clonogenic Survival  Mohamed Elgendy, Clare Sheridan,
Julien Colombani, Cédric Polesello, Filipe Josué, Nicolas Tapon 
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Septins Regulate Actin Organization and Cell-Cycle Arrest through Nuclear Accumulation of NCK Mediated by SOCS7  Brandon E. Kremer, Laura A. Adang, Ian.
Lizhong Xu, Veronica Lubkov, Laura J. Taylor, Dafna Bar-Sagi 
Phosphorylation on Thr-55 by TAF1 Mediates Degradation of p53
Volume 115, Issue 2, Pages (October 2003)
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (January 2015)
SOCS1 Links Cytokine Signaling to p53 and Senescence
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Amanda O'Donnell, Shen-Hsi Yang, Andrew D. Sharrocks  Molecular Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Lindsey A. Allan, Paul R. Clarke  Molecular Cell 
Yap1 Phosphorylation by c-Abl Is a Critical Step in Selective Activation of Proapoptotic Genes in Response to DNA Damage  Dan Levy, Yaarit Adamovich,
Hua Gao, Yue Sun, Yalan Wu, Bing Luan, Yaya Wang, Bin Qu, Gang Pei 
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
NF-κB Is Required for UV-Induced JNK Activation via Induction of PKCδ
Dong Zhang, Kathrin Zaugg, Tak W. Mak, Stephen J. Elledge  Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (June 2004)
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
A Direct HDAC4-MAP Kinase Crosstalk Activates Muscle Atrophy Program
Volume 129, Issue 5, Pages (June 2007)
c-IAP1 Cooperates with Myc by Acting as a Ubiquitin Ligase for Mad1
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Wip1 Phosphatase Modulates ATM-Dependent Signaling Pathways
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (February 2006)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 725-738 (March 2007) DYRK2 Is Targeted to the Nucleus and Controls p53 via Ser46 Phosphorylation in the Apoptotic Response to DNA Damage  Naoe Taira, Keishi Nihira, Tomoko Yamaguchi, Yoshio Miki, Kiyotsugu Yoshida  Molecular Cell  Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 725-738 (March 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.02.007 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Identification of Ser46 Kinases (A) Schematic diagram of the Ser46 kinase screening (see Experimental Procedures section for detail). (B) In the first screening step, candidates for Ser46 kinases were screened from phage expression libraries derived from cDNAs of human fetal brain (2 × 107 pfu), placenta (2 × 107 pfu), or HeLa cells (4 × 107 pfu) (upper left panel). Phosphorylated p53 was detected by rabbit anti-phospho-p53(Ser46). Positive phages were replated for the second screening (upper right panel). Following the second screening, selected positive clones were infected with a bacterium that either expressed GST-p53(1–92) wild-type (WT) or S46A (lower panels). The arrow indicates a positive plaque. (C) DYRK2 phosphorylates p53 on Ser46 in vitro. Recombinant His-DYRK2 was incubated with purified GST-p53(1–92)WT or GST-p53(1–92)S46A and ATP. Reaction products were analyzed by immunoblotting (IB) with rabbit anti-phospho-p53(Ser46) (top panel), mouse anti-phospho-p53(Ser46) (second panel), anti-GST (third panel), or anti-His (bottom panel). (D) Lysates from COS-7 cells transfected with Flag vector, Flag-DYRK2, or the Flag-DYRK2(K178R) mutant were immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag agarose. The immunoprecipitates were incubated with purified GST-tagged p53 and ATP. Reaction products were analyzed by immunoblotting with rabbit anti-phospho-p53(Ser46) (upper panel), anti-GST (middle panel), or anti-Flag (lower panel). Molecular Cell 2007 25, 725-738DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.02.007) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 DYRK2 Phosphorylates p53 at Ser46 in Response to Genotoxic Stress (A) Lysates from 293T cells cotransfected with Flag-p53 and GFP vector, GFP-DYRK2, or the GFP-DYRK2(K178R) mutant were immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag agarose. Immunoprecipitates were then subjected to immunoblot analysis with rabbit anti-phospho-p53(Ser46) (top panel), mouse anti-phospho-p53(Ser46) (second panel), anti-Flag (third panel), or anti-GFP (bottom panel). (B) U2OS cells were transfected with GFP vector or the GFP-DYRK2(K178R) mutant and then treated with 2 μg/ml adriamycin (ADR) for 24 hr. Lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with mouse anti-phospho-p53(Ser46) (top panel), anti-p53 (second panel), anti-PCNA (third panel), or anti-GFP (bottom panel). (C) U2OS cells were transfected with the scramble siRNA or DYRK2 siRNA to reduce endogenous DYRK2 expression. At 48 hr posttransfection, cells were left untreated or treated with ADR for 24 hr. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblot analysis with mouse anti-phospho-p53(Ser46) (top panel), anti-p53 (second panel), anti-DYRK2 (third panel), or anti-PCNA (fourth panel). Total RNAs were analyzed by RT-PCR using DYRK2-specific (fifth panel), GAPDH-specific (sixth panel), or p53AIP1-specific (bottom panel) primers. Molecular Cell 2007 25, 725-738DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.02.007) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 DYRK2 Translocates into the Nucleus in Response to DNA Damage (A) Localization of p53 and DYRK2 in U2OS cells. U2OS cells were transfected with GFP vector, GFP-DYRK2, or GFP-DYRK2(K178R) and then treated with 20 μM etoposide for 24 hr. Cells were stained with anti-GFP (FITC) and anti-p53 (rhodamine) antibodies. The nuclei were stained with DAPI. (B) U2OS cells were transiently transfected as in (A). The localization of DYRK2 was scored according to whether it was higher in the nucleus (closed bars), evenly distributed between the nucleus and the cytoplasm (dotted bars), or higher in the cytoplasm (open bars). Results are the mean ± SD of values obtained from five fields of 30–100 cells in each of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed with the Student's t test, and p < 0.05 (asterisk) was defined as significant. (C) U2OS cells were transfected with the scramble siRNA or p53 siRNA followed by treatment with ADR. Nuclear and cytoplasmic lysates were subjected to immunoblot analysis with indicated antibodies. Molecular Cell 2007 25, 725-738DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.02.007) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 ATM Regulates DYRK2-Mediated Phosphorylation of p53 at Ser46 (A) HCT116 cells were transfected with the scramble siRNA or ATM siRNA1 and then left untreated or treated with ADR for 24 hr. Cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblot analysis with mouse anti-phospho-p53(Ser46) (top panel), anti-p53 (second panel), anti-ATM (third panel), or anti-PCNA (bottom panel). The signals were scanned to compare the amount of phosphorylation induced by ADR treatment in ATM siRNA1-transfected cells with that of scramble-transfected cells. The amount of phosphorylation was normalized by dividing its value by the value for the amount of total p53. We found that 0.38 was the ratio of the amount for phosphorylation with ATM siRNA1:phosphorylation with scramble siRNA. (B) 293T cells were cotransfected with Flag-DYRK2 or the Flag-DYRK2(K178R) mutant and the scramble siRNA or ATM siRNA1; the transfected cells were treated with ADR for 24 hr. Lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag agarose, then immunoprecipitates were incubated with purified GST-tagged p53 and ATP. Reaction products were analyzed by immunoblotting with rabbit anti-phospho-p53(Ser46) (top panel), anti-GST (second panel), anti-ATM (third panel), anti-Flag (fourth panel), or anti-PCNA (bottom panel). (C) HCT116 cells cotransfected with Flag vector or Flag-DYRK2 and scramble siRNA or ATM siRNA1 were left untreated or treated with ADR for 24 hr. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblot analysis with mouse anti-phospho-p53(Ser46) (top panel), anti-p53 (second panel), anti-ATM (third panel), anti-Flag (fourth panel), or anti-PCNA (bottom panel). Molecular Cell 2007 25, 725-738DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.02.007) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 DYRK2 Induces p53-Dependent Apoptosis in Response to DNA Damage (A and B) U2OS cells were transfected with the scramble siRNA, DYRK2 siRNA, or p53 siRNA followed by treatment with ADR. Apoptotic cells were quantified by TUNEL assays (A). The results are represented as the percentage of TUNEL-positive cells. The data indicate the mean ± SD from three independent experiments each performed in triplicate (B). Control cells, open bars; ADR-treated cells, closed bars. Total RNAs were subjected to RT-PCR analysis using DYRK2-specific (upper panel), p53-specific (middle panel), or GAPDH-specific (lower panel) primers. (C and D) SaOS-2 cells, which are p53 null lines, were cotransfected as indicated and treated with ADR for 24 hr. Apoptotic cells were analyzed by TUNEL assays as described above. Control cells, open bars; ADR-treated cells, closed bars. Cell lysates and total RNA were analyzed by immunoblotting and RT-PCR, respectively. Molecular Cell 2007 25, 725-738DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.02.007) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Involvement of DYRK2 on p53 Phosphorylation at Ser46 and Induction of Apoptosis in Response to Various Genotoxic Stress (A) U2OS cells were left untreated or treated with UV for the indicated dose for 24 hr. Apoptotic cells were quantitated by TUNEL assays. The results are represented as the percentage of TUNEL-positive cells. The data indicate the mean ± SD from two independent experiments each performed in triplicate. Cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with mouse anti-phospho-p53(Ser46) (upper panel), anti-p53 (middle panel), or anti-tubulin (lower panel). (B) U2OS cells were transfected with the scramble siRNA, DYRK2 siRNA, or HIPK2 siRNA followed by treatment with ADR or 2.5 J/m2 UV for 24 hr. Apoptotic cells were quantitated by TUNEL assays as described above. Control cells, open bars; ADR-treated cells, dotted bars; UV-treated cells, closed bars. Cell lysates and total RNA were analyzed by immunoblotting and RT-PCR, respectively. C, control cells; A, ADR-treated cells; U, UV-treated cells. (C) A proposed model for DYRK2-mediated apoptosis in the cellular response to DNA damage. Upon exposure to genotoxic stress, p53 is stabilized and activated by phosphorylation at Ser15 and Ser20. Cytoplasmic DYRK2 is activated and targeted to the nucleus and then phosphorylates p53 at Ser46. Ser46 phosphorylation of p53 triggers induction of apoptosis by upregulation of apoptosis-related gene expression, such as p53AIP1. Molecular Cell 2007 25, 725-738DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.02.007) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions