Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Smita Srivastava, Patricia S. Grace, Joel D. Ernst  Cell Host & Microbe 
Advertisements

Cheng-Ming Sun, Edith Deriaud, Claude Leclerc, Richard Lo-Man  Immunity 
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 141, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Cellular DDX21 RNA Helicase Inhibits Influenza A Virus Replication but Is Counteracted by the Viral NS1 Protein  Guifang Chen, Chien-Hung Liu, Ligang.
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
The UPEC Pore-Forming Toxin α-Hemolysin Triggers Proteolysis of Host Proteins to Disrupt Cell Adhesion, Inflammatory, and Survival Pathways  Bijaya K.
Activation of the Innate Signaling Molecule MAVS by Bunyavirus Infection Upregulates the Adaptor Protein SARM1, Leading to Neuronal Death  Piyali Mukherjee,
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages e5 (September 2017)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Brian Yordy, Norifumi Iijima, Anita Huttner, David Leib, Akiko Iwasaki 
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Incorporation of the B18R Gene of Vaccinia Virus Into an Oncolytic Herpes Simplex Virus Improves Antitumor Activity  Xinping Fu, Armando Rivera, Lihua.
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
Nucleocapsid Phosphorylation and RNA Helicase DDX1 Recruitment Enables Coronavirus Transition from Discontinuous to Continuous Transcription  Chia-Hsin.
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Modular Three-component Delivery System Facilitates HLA Class I Antigen Presentation and CD8+ T-cell Activation Against Tumors  Benjamin J Umlauf, Chin-Ying.
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (September 2014)
Urtzi Garaigorta, Francis V. Chisari  Cell Host & Microbe 
Poxviral B1 Kinase Overcomes Barrier to Autointegration Factor, a Host Defense against Virus Replication  Matthew S. Wiebe, Paula Traktman  Cell Host.
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Cellular 5′-3′ mRNA Exonuclease Xrn1 Controls Double-Stranded RNA Accumulation and Anti-Viral Responses  Hannah M. Burgess, Ian Mohr  Cell Host & Microbe 
Vaccinia Virus F11 Promotes Viral Spread by Acting as a PDZ-Containing Scaffolding Protein to Bind Myosin-9A and Inhibit RhoA Signaling  Yutaka Handa,
Targeted Cleavage of Signaling Proteins by Caspase 3 Inhibits T Cell Receptor Signaling in Anergic T Cells  Irene Puga, Anjana Rao, Fernando Macian  Immunity 
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
PU.1 Expression Delineates Heterogeneity in Primary Th2 Cells
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Dengue Virus-Induced Autophagy Regulates Lipid Metabolism
Translocation of a Vibrio cholerae Type VI Secretion Effector Requires Bacterial Endocytosis by Host Cells  Amy T. Ma, Steven McAuley, Stefan Pukatzki,
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 558-570 (October 2012) Short-Range Exosomal Transfer of Viral RNA from Infected Cells to Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells Triggers Innate Immunity  Marlène Dreux, Urtzi Garaigorta, Bryan Boyd, Elodie Décembre, Josan Chung, Christina Whitten-Bauer, Stefan Wieland, Francis V. Chisari  Cell Host & Microbe  Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 558-570 (October 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.08.010 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Inhibition of pDC Activation Triggered by HCV-Infected and SGR Cells by Exosome Release Inhibitors (A–C) Quantification of IFN-α in supernatants of pDCs cocultured with HCV-infected Huh-7.5.1c2 cells (moi of 1 for 48 hr) that were treated or not with exosome-release inhibitors GW4869 or spiroepoxide (10 and 5 μM, respectively) throughout the course of the coculture (A). Uninfected Huh-7.5.1c2 cells are referred to as control (cont) cells. The hatch marks (#) indicate results below the limit of detection of the IFN-α ELISA (i.e., 12.5 pg/ml). In parallel, the intracellular HCV-RNA levels (B) and extracellular infectious virus production (C) of HCV-infected cells treated with exosome release inhibitors were analyzed. Results are representative of two independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. Error bars represent the mean ± SD. (D) Quantification of IFN-α in supernatants of pDCs cocultured with HCV-SGR Huh-7.5.1c2 cells after treatment with exosome-release inhibitors GW4869 or spiroepoxide (treatment with 10 and 5 μM, respectively) throughout the course of the coculture. HCV-negative Huh-7.5.1c2 cells served as controls (cont cells). (E) Intracellular HCV-RNA levels in HCV-SGR cells treated for 24 hr with exosome release inhibitors. (F) Parallel pDC/control cell cocultures were incubated with the TLR-7 ligand agonist R848 and supernatants were analyzed for IFN-α. Results in (D)–(F) are representative of three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. Bar graphs depict the mean ± SD. The treatment conditions (i.e., incubation time and concentration) were exactly the same for the analysis of IFN-α production, HCV-RNA replication, and extracellular infectious virus production. See also Figure S1. Cell Host & Microbe 2012 12, 558-570DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2012.08.010) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 HCV RNA Is Transferred from HCV-SGR Cells to pDCs (A) Specificity of HCV-RNA detection (green) by FISH in HCV-infected Huh-7.5.1c2 cells that expressed high levels of HCV RNA (left panel), that were treated with the HCV polymerase inhibitor 2′-C-methyladenosine (5 μM for 24 hr; middle panel) and in uninfected Huh-7.5.1c2 cells (no HCV; right panel). Nuclei are stained with Hoechst dye (blue). (B and C) Projection (B) and consecutive Z-axis sections (C) of pDC cocultured with HCV-SGR Huh-7.5.1c2 cells (3.5-fold magnification of the white box in [B]). Green: HCV RNA; red: IFN-α protein; blue: nuclei. HCV RNAs inside pDC are indicated by white arrows. Of note, FISH HCV-RNA signals are lower in HCV-SGR cells because they contain ∼10-fold less HCV RNA than infected cells, and in addition, FISH signals are reduced when combined with immunofluorescent staining (data not shown). Similar results were obtained in five independent experiments. (D) Summary table showing the fraction of total cocultured pDCs that contain HCV RNA. Cell Host & Microbe 2012 12, 558-570DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2012.08.010) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Colocalization of HCV RNA, Exosome Markers in HCV-SGR Cells (A–C) Detection of HCV RNA (red); CD63 (A, green), eGFP-CD81 (B, green), and FLAG-CHMP4B proteins (C, green); and nuclei (blue) in HCV-SGR Huh-7.5.1c2 cells. Panels 2–4 correspond to a 3.6-fold magnification of the white box in #1 in each row. The arrows indicate HCV RNA in CD63-, CD81-, or CHMP4B-positive compartments. The frequencies of HCV-SGR cells in which HCV RNA colocalized with CHMP4B, CD81, and CD63 were 25/29, 38/56, and 17/24, respectively. Results are representative of three independent experiments. Cell Host & Microbe 2012 12, 558-570DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2012.08.010) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 RNase-Resistant HCV RNA Is Secreted from HCV-SGR Cells (A–C) HCV-RNA levels in precleared supernatants from HCV-SGR Huh-7.5.1c2 cells (A: n = 4, mean ± SD; C: n = 2, mean ± SD), and in vitro transcribed HCV RNA (B: n = 3, mean ± SD) were treated with RNase, NP40, and/or RNase inhibitor, as indicated. The hatch marks (#) indicate results below the detection limit of the assay (i.e., 500 HCV GE/ml). GE, genome equivalents. (D) HCV and GADPH RNA levels in precleared supernatants from HCV-SGR Huh-7.5.1c2 cells (extracell) either untreated or treated with RNase, NP40, and untreated SGR cell RNA (intracell) as indicated. Error bars represent the mean ± SD (n = 3); paired Student’s t test, ∗∗p < 0.005. Cell Host & Microbe 2012 12, 558-570DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2012.08.010) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Exosomes Prepared from HCV-SGR Cell Supernatants Trigger IFN-α Production by pDCs (A) Comparison of exosome (CD63 and CD81) and nonexosome (EEA-1, calnexin, and COX IV) markers in exosomes prepared from HCV-SGR Huh-7.5.1c2 cell supernatants and from the corresponding whole-cell lysates (intracell) by immunoblotting. The molecular weight markers (MW, in kDa) are indicated to the right. (B) Exosome preparations were treated with NP40 and/or RNase and qRT-PCR results are expressed as HCV GE or GAPDH mRNA copies per μg of total protein. Error bars represent the mean ± SD (n = 3). (C) Northern blot analysis. The input copy number of HCV and GADPH RNA determined by qRT-PCR is indicated below each blot. Huh-7.5.1c2 cells served as negative control (cont cells). NA, not applicable. (D) pDCs (4 × 105 cells) were incubated with concentrated exosomes at varying HCV GE/pDC ratios or with R848, a TLR7 agonist. The hatch marks (#) indicate results below the limit of detection of the IFN-α ELISA (12.5 pg/ml). Results are representative of two independent experiments. Error bars represent the mean ± SD. See also Figure S2. Cell Host & Microbe 2012 12, 558-570DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2012.08.010) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 ESCRT Proteins Are Required for Production of the pDC-Activating Signal by HCV-SGR and HCV-Infected Cells (A and B) The impact of shRNA-mediated CHMP4B downregulation, using two different shRNAs (#30 and #69, described in Table S1) (A) and shRNA-mediated TSG101 downregulation (B) on expression of the corresponding proteins (upper panels), levels of IFN-α in HCV-SGR Huh-7.5.1c2 cell-pDC coculture supernatants (middle panels), and intracellular HCV RNA in Huh-7.5.1c2 SGR cells (lower panels) was compared with HCV-SGR cells transduced with shRNA against GFP and an shRNA against an unrelated cellular protein (Atg4B) or nontransduced HCV-SGR cells (−). HCV-negative Huh-7.5.1c2 cells served as controls (cont cells). The hatch marks (#) indicate results below the limit of detection of the IFN-α ELISA (12.5 pg/ml). Results are representative of two independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. Error bars represent the mean ± SD. NS, nonspecific band; PR, Ponceau red staining; MW, molecular weight marker. (C–E) CHMP4B and TSG101 downregulated Huh7.5.1c2 cells, infected by HCV (moi of 5 for 48 hr) were cocultured with pDCs for 20 hr. The levels of CHMP4B and TSG101 expression (C), IFN-α in coculture supernatants (D, upper panel), intracellular HCV RNA (D, lower panel), and titration of HCV infectious particles in supernatants of the infected cells (E) were compared with control HCV-infected cells transduced with shRNA against GFP. Uninfected Huh-7.5.1c2 cells served as controls (cont cells). Results are representative of two independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. Error bars represent the mean ± SD. See also Figure S3. Cell Host & Microbe 2012 12, 558-570DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2012.08.010) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 ANXA2 Is Required for HCV-Infected and SGR Cells to Trigger IFN-α Production by pDCs (A–C) shRNA-mediated downregulation of ANXA2 protein in HCV-SGR Huh-7.5.1c2 cells (A) strongly reduced IFN-α production by cocultured pDCs (B), but had no impact on HCV replication (C). All results were compared with ANXA2 shRNA-transduced HCV-SGR Huh-7.5.1c2 cells that ectopically express an shRNA-resistant variant of ANXA2 (Rescue). Results are representative of two independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. NS, nonspecific band; MW, molecular weight markers. (D–G) Levels of downregulation of ANXA2 expression in HCV-infected Huh-7.5.1c2 cells (moi of 5 for 48 hr) (D), IFN-α in HCV-infected cell-pDC coculture supernatants (E), intracellular HCV RNA in HCV-infected cells (F), and HCV infectious particles in supernatants of the infected cells (G) were compared with HCV-infected cells transduced with an shRNA against GFP. HCV-negative Huh-7.5.1c2 cells served as controls (cont cells). The hatch marks (#) indicate results below the limit of detection of the IFN-α ELISA (12.5 pg/ml). Error bars represent the mean ± SD. See also Figure S4. Cell Host & Microbe 2012 12, 558-570DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2012.08.010) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions