Study of MDC tuning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ORFEOv6r3 10. GeV muons This data MC comparison was made with the last version of ORFEO. Here a new version of the smearing tool is implemented, this is.
Advertisements

Neutrinos from kaon decay in MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn Columbia University MiniBooNE beamline overview Kaon flux predictions Kaon measurements in MiniBooNE.
Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
1 ttbar events with Atlantis   A lot of jets in this event !   Bjets (1 and 2) close in phi   Muon from semilep decay of b-jet1   Tau jet   Pb.
Secondary beam analysis – PS and SPS Started May 22, 2012.
PVDIS baffle,trigger and rate Zhiwen Zhao 2013/09/ /11/04.
DIS 2008, London Transverse Spin Physics at PHENIX Douglas Fields (University of New Mexico) For the PHENIX Collaboration 4/9/20081 Douglas Fields for.
24-Apr-15S.Movchan Straw prototype beam test into the NA48 infrastructure 1 Goals: test of straw prototype wires positioning straw bending check grounding.
% eff = (Wout / W in) *100 eff = (80 J / 100 J) * 100 = 80% W in = 75 N * 5 m = 375 J W out = 100 N * 3 m = 300 J eff = (300 J / 375 J) *100 = 80% W in.
Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Collaboration Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February
22/5/2011 Particle-ID and Tracking performance in CLIC_ILD1/27 CLIC_ILD particle identification and tracking performance J. Nardulli This talk in 2 parts:
Exclusive D s Semileptonic decays using kinematic fitting.
Single Particle Energy Resolution Vishnu V. Zutshi.
First CMS Results with LHC BeamToyoko Orimoto, Caltech 1 First CMS Results with LHC Beam Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology On behalf of.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Feb 7, 2007.
Status of Particle ID in TRD reconstruction Prashant Shukla Institute of Physics University of Heidelberg Presentation at TRD Software Meet 21 st April,
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Feb 14, 2007.
 Track-First E-flow Algorithm  Analog vs. Digital Energy Resolution for Neutral Hadrons  Towards Track/Cal hit matching  Photon Finding  Plans E-flow.
W’  tb  lnubb efficiency VS. electron/muon P T cut muon channel electron channel.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Jan 31, 2007.
1 N. Davidson E/p minimum bias update with Athena Analysis Meeting 12 th June 2007.
Exclusive D s Semileptonic decays using kinematic fitting.
3/31/2005 KEK, Japan 1 G4Beamline for KEK test K. Yonehara Illinois Institute of Tech.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
PION STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND MORE. Pion signature in experiment: Forward neutrons in DIS Gottfried Sum rule.
TJR 7/30/031 Geant4 Simulations of the MICE Beamline Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology 7/30/03.
More on Testbeam Analysis FLZ. Stability Checks for TCMT Pedestal stability already shown by Kurt MIP calibration stability Response stability.
L3 Muon Trigger at D0 Status Report Thomas Hebbeker for Martin Wegner, RWTH Aachen, April 2002 The D0 muon system Functionality of the L3 muon trigger.
Status of Fast Tracking Algorithm MdcHough Guowei YU 8 th March 2006.
Introduction Miha Zgubič, summer student Scintillating fibre tracker software Analysis of performance of momentum reconstruction 1.
MdcPatRec Tracking Status Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao Shandong University.
Large Magnetic Calorimeters Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) in a Nufact Nufact04 (Osaka, 1/8/2004)
BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO CNS workshop, Tokyo Univ. Identified Charged Single Particle Spectra at RHIC-PHENIX Tatsuya Chujo (BNL) for the PHENIX.
N. Saoulidou Fermilab 1 Status & Update of track reconstruction in the Near Detector N. Saoulidou, Fermilab
Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector
K  group activities K + K - retracking features New vs Old : resolution future planning. Conclusion and outlook K + K - retracking features New vs Old.
1 Pion production in np collisions at 1.25AGeV A.Kurilkin, P.Kurilkin, V.Ladygin, A.Ierusalimov, T.Vasiliev, LHEP-JINR, Dubna, Russia For the HADES collaboration.
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System Zepu Mao IHEP BESIII Col. Meeting 2006/01/12.
PID simulations Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting RAL.
Muon absolute flux measurement in anti-neutrino mode A.Ariga 1, C. Pistillo 1, S. Aoki 2 1 University of Bern, 2 Kobe University.
2012/7/231 Cosmic Ray at STAR Shuai Yang Center of Particle Physics and Technology University of Science and Technology of China STAR Regional Meeting.
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
Emulsion Simulation Y. Caffari (IPN Lyon) F. Juget (IPH Neuchatel) A. Marotta (CNRS-IN2P3 Lyon) CERN 3-5/05/2006.
A preliminary Muon Identification result You Zhengyun School of Physics, PKU
Update on pion and muon showers Erik van der Kraaij & Przemyslaw Majewski CERN LCD May 17, 2010.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
Heavy stable-particle production in NC DIS with the ZEUS detector Takahiro Matsumoto, KEK For the ZEUS collaboration.
Meeting V0 Daughter PID by TPC dEdx:pp real data By AliTPCIDResponse (aleph parameterization), 4 sigma Daughter PID cuts With this K0s candidates,
1 MDC Track Finding at BESIII Zang Shilei BES Annual Meeting (Jun 1, 2005) ______________________________________ -Outline- 
1 GLD DOD Akiya Miyamoto KEK 2 nd GLD DOD meeting All figures shown here are preliminary.
TOF detector in PHENIX experiment PHENIX time-of-flight counter The PHENIX time-of-flight (TOF) counter serves as a particle identification device for.
SHIP calorimeters at test beam I. KorolkoFebruary 2016.
2nd lepton veto, in the one-lepton SUSY analysis
Analysis Frame for MC data
The Beam Test at Fermilab:
Introduction The aim of this talk is to try to get a feeling on the expected degradation of performance of a calibration once we move from MonteCarlo.
Individual Particle Reconstruction
Trigger efficiency study
Status of LHETRACK Tracking with STT+MVD Stefano Spataro
for the PHENIX collaboration
Some basics about Cosmic CMS
longitudinal shower profile
LHCb Particle Identification and Performance
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
100MeV learning.
Directed Flow from Au+Au Collisions at 200 GeV
Rare and Forbidden Decays in the Standard Model
BesMUC Reconstruction Algorithm
Hit and Tracking Data set used: From loose to tight cuts Pythia p+p
Presentation transcript:

Study of MDC tuning

Tracking eff v.s. Transverse Momentum (proton)

Tracking eff v.s. Transverse Momentum (antiproton)

Tracking eff v.s. Transverse Momentum (positive pion)

Tracking eff v.s. Transverse Momentum (negative pion)

Tracking eff v.s. cos[theta] (proton) WRONG!!!

Tracking eff v.s. cos[theta] (antiproton) WRONG!!!

Tracking eff v.s. cos[theta] (positive pion)

Tracking eff v.s. cos[theta] (negative pion)

Muon momentum resolution Previous /GeV New / GeV σ data 1.61873× 10 −2 ±5.38342× 10 −6 σ MC 1.57002× 10 −2 ±4.72154× 10 −6 1.62509× 10 −2 ±4.03548× 10 −6 σ MC/σ data – 1 (%) −3.00915±0.0434885 0.462708±0.0416868

Tracking eff v.s. cos[theta] (proton)

Hit eff (new MC)

Tracking eff v.s. cos[theta] (proton)

Tracking eff v.s. cos[theta] (antiproton)