Structure of a Voltage-Dependent K+ Channel β Subunit

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elena Conti, Nick P Franks, Peter Brick  Structure 
Advertisements

High-Resolution Model of the Microtubule
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
Volume 3, Issue 7, Pages (July 1995)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (December 2003)
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Crystal Structure of the Soluble Form of Equinatoxin II, a Pore-Forming Toxin from the Sea Anemone Actinia equina  Alekos Athanasiadis, Gregor Anderluh,
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages (June 1996)
Glycerol Dehydrogenase
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
Chi-Hon Lee, Kalle Saksela, Urooj A Mirza, Brian T Chait, John Kuriyan 
A biosynthetic thiolase in complex with a reaction intermediate: the crystal structure provides new insights into the catalytic mechanism  Yorgo Modis,
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
Volume 6, Issue 11, Pages (November 1998)
The 1.9 Å Structure of α-N-Acetylgalactosaminidase
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages (December 1997)
Jonathan Goldberg, Angus C Nairn, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Masaru Goto, Rie Omi, Noriko Nakagawa, Ikuko Miyahara, Ken Hirotsu 
Silvia Onesti, Andrew D Miller, Peter Brick  Structure 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Structure of a water soluble fragment of the ‘Rieske’ iron–sulfur protein of the bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex determined by MAD phasing.
Tzanko Doukov, Javier Seravalli, John J Stezowski, Stephen W Ragsdale 
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2000)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Structure of the InlB Leucine-Rich Repeats, a Domain that Triggers Host Cell Invasion by the Bacterial Pathogen L. monocytogenes  Michael Marino, Laurence.
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Rachelle Gaudet, Andrew Bohm, Paul B Sigler  Cell 
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 1997)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Sabine Pokutta, William I. Weis  Molecular Cell 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Presentation transcript:

Structure of a Voltage-Dependent K+ Channel β Subunit Jacqueline M Gulbis, Sabine Mann, Roderick MacKinnon  Cell  Volume 97, Issue 7, Pages 943-952 (June 1999) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80805-3

Figure 1 A Tetramer of Kvβ2 Forms the Asymmetric Unit (A) Stereoview of a ribbon diagram of the β tetramer viewed along the molecular tetrad. The TIM barrels of individual subunits are distinctively shaded to emphasize the four-fold symmetry of the complex, and the hinged α-helical subdomain of each is colored blue. This figure and other ribbon diagrams were prepared using the programs MOLSCRIPT (Kraulis 1991), Raster-3D (Bacon and Anderson 1988), or POVRAY (http://www.povray.org). (B) A side view of Kvβ2 shows two topologically distinct faces. Two diagonally opposite monomers are removed for clarity. (C) Schematic representation of the molecular tetramer indicating the position of the active site (red asterisks) relative to the subdomain structure. Cell 1999 97, 943-952DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80805-3)

Figure 2 Structure of Kvβ2 (A) Ribbon representation of the Kvβ2 TIM barrel in a similar orientation to Figure 1, with secondary structural elements colored as defined in sequence alignments (Figure 4). Helices and strands of the TIM barrel are shaded green and orange, respectively, and a subdomain comprising C-terminal residues 243–360 (with the exception of strand βJ) is shown in blue. In white is the amino-terminal hairpin presented at the tetramer interface. A bound NADP+ molecule present in our crystals is depicted in yellow. (B) The molecule is shown rotated approximately 90° about a vertical axis such that the central axis of the barrel is perpendicular to the viewer. Cell 1999 97, 943-952DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80805-3)

Figure 4 Sequence Alignment of Kvβ2 and Related Proteins Secondary structural elements and residue numbering (Kvβ2) are indicated above the sequences. To produce this alignment, the amino acid sequence of Kvβ2 was aligned with 3α-HSD and aldose reductase based on the tertiary fold. The remaining sequences were automatically aligned with Kvβ2 or 3α-HSD using the program CLUSTALW (Thompson et al. 1994) and minor adjustments made upon inspection. The conserved catalytic residues are shown in red, and regions of significant homology between all amino acid sequences are yellow (algorithm of Livingston and Barton 1993). Boxed regions I, II, and III reflect major differences between β subunits and members of the aldo-keto reductase superfamily and are discussed in the text. This figure was prepared using ALSCRIPT (Barton 1993). Amino acid sequences are, respectively, Kvβ2 from Rattus norvegicus (Rettig et al. 1994, GenBank accession number X76724), Kvβ1 from Homo sapiens (McCormack et al. 1995, GenBank accession number S66503), β subunit from Arabidopsis thaliana (GenBank accession number AC002376, 1997), Hyperkinetic from Drosophila melanogaster (Chouinard et al. 1995, GenBank accession number U23545), recombinant 3α-HSD from Rattus norvegicus (Bennett et al. 1997), aldose reductase from Homo sapiens (Harrison et al. 1994), aflatoxin aldehyde reductase (AFAR) from Homo sapiens (Ireland et al. 1998, GenBank accession number AAC52104), and ORF o346 from Escherischia coli (GenBank accession number U28377). Cell 1999 97, 943-952DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80805-3)

Figure 3 Structural Alignment of Kvβ2 with a Member of the Aldo-Keto Reductase Superfamily Stereoview of a Cα trace of Kvβ2 (beta, black) superimposed onto that of 3α-hydroxysteroid dihydrodiol dehydrogenase (3α-HSD, red). This figure was generated using the programs O (Jones et al. 1991) and GRASP (Nicholls et al. 1991). Cell 1999 97, 943-952DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80805-3)

Figure 5 Comparative Anatomy of the Active Site Stereo diagrams of (A) Kvβ2 and (B) 3α-HSD, viewed along the central axis of the β barrel from the C-terminal end of the β strands. In each case, a transparent representation of the molecular surface enveloping the Cα trace (tube) illustrates the structural features of the protein. The Cα tube is colored green in regions with conserved secondary structure, while significant differences between Kvβ2 and 3α-HSD are highlighted in orange or red. Residues of 3α-HSD involved in substrate binding are white, and nominally equivalent residues in Kvβ2 are similarly depicted. These residues are (Kvβ2) Trp-57, Val-89, Trp-121, Asn-158, Trp-272; (3α-HSD) Leu-54, Trp-86, His-117, Phe-118, Phe-128, Phe-129, Trp-227, Tyr-310, Phe-311. The cofactor is included here as a yellow stick model. This figure was generated using the program GRASP (Nicholls et al. 1991). Cell 1999 97, 943-952DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80805-3)

Figure 6 Evidence for Bound Cofactor (A) Strong electron density for NADP+ is evident in a 3|Fo| − 2|Fc| (40.0–2.8 Å; contour level 1.5 σ) map calculated from an incomplete early model of the Kvβ2 protein prior to building in the cofactor. It is consistent with comparable density centered at an equivalent location in the experimental MIR maps. The refined NADP+ molecule is colored yellow, and amino acids of Kvβ2 are in cyan. (B) Close-up of the NADP-binding pocket viewed in stereo, displaying an extensive array of intramolecular hydrogen-bonding and van der Waals contacts contributed by the two subdomains of Kvβ2. Selected residues of the protein are drawn in white, and oxygen and nitrogen atoms are colored red and cyan, respectively. Four well-ordered intermediary water molecules (pale green) are included, as is the NADP+ molecule itself (yellow). Three catalytic residues from the TIM barrel (green ribbon) are also shown: Asp-85, Tyr-90, and Lys-118. (C) Schematic representation detailing selected interactions between cofactor and enzyme. Residues of Kvβ2 surrounding NADP+ are colored as in (B) (green, TIM barrel; blue, α-helical subdomain). Contacts made solely with main chain atoms of the protein are denoted by amino acid numbering only, whereas those made with side chains are given full residue nomenclature. Water molecules are shown as gray circles. Cell 1999 97, 943-952DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80805-3)

Figure 7 Relative Dimensions of the α and β K+ Channel Subunits The Kvβ2 tetramer is displayed as a gray ribbon and bound NADP+ modeled in black. The KcsA potassium channel (blue) is depicted above with inner, outer, and pore helices represented as cylinders. The chosen orientation of the β subunit with respect to the K+ channel pore is arbitrary. Cell 1999 97, 943-952DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80805-3)