Status of data from EMEP intensive period 2008/2009

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary of relevant information in the CAFE Position paper on PM Martin Meadows UNECE PMEG Berlin, 23 & 24 May 2005.
Advertisements

The ELSA for Children Legal Research Group. ELSA for Children LRG ELSA for Children.
S Larssen: PM-PP-Stockholm-Oct-2003.ppt slide 1 PM in Europe - State and past trends Emissions and concentration levels Steinar Larssen Norwegian Institute.
Model used in « Source Apportionment of Airborne Particulate Matter in the UK » [Stedman et al., Receptor modelling of PM 10 concentrations at a UK national.
Using field campaigns results to reduce uncertainties in inventories Wenche Aas, Knut Breivik and Karl Espen Yttri And material from: Eiko Nemitz (CEH,
Section highlights Organic Aerosol and Field Studies.
Organic Carbon and Elemental Carbon in Atlanta Area Chao Wu.
Title PM2.5: Comparison of modelling and measurements Presented by Hilde Fagerli SB, Geneva, September 7-9, 2009.
PM in Sweden HC Hansson and Christer Johansson ITM, Stockholm University.
1 Laxenburg, 16 Nov TFIAM-TFMM joint workshop(1) Similarities and Differences in Particle Characteristics across Europe Jean-Philippe Putaud EC –
Source apportionment of the carbonaceous aerosol – Quantitative estimates based on 14 C- and organic tracer analysis 1.Norwegian Institute for Air Research.
AREHNA Workshop-Mobility and Health, 3-6 May 2003, Kos, Greece EARLINET The European Aerosol Research Lidar Network A. PAPAYANNIS Lasers and Applications.
Intensive measurements and modelling of size segregated chemical composition of aerosols in June 2006 and Jan 2007 Wenche Aas, Rami Alfarra, Elke Bieber,
Developments in EMEP monitoring strategy and recommendations from AirMonTech Kjetil Tørseth, NILU/EMEP-CCC.
Cooperation of EMEP/CCC and EEA on near real-time air quality data. Presented by Wenche Aas Though most of the work is done by: Tim Haigh, Bernt Rondell,
/tfmm3 EMEP Chemical Coordinating Centre Measurements of particulate matter in EMEP Current implementation Kjetil Tørseth, Wenche Aas, Michael.
EARLINET-ASOS Symposium 20 September 2010, Geneva, Switzerland EARLINET: Future plans Gelsomina Pappalardo Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche-Istituto.
Revisions to NAAQS –Data Handling and Interpretation NO 2 /SO 2 Update AQS Conference Colorado Springs June 2010 Rhonda Thompson US EPA, Office of Air.
EMEP INTENSIVE MEASUREMENT PERIODS IN CLOSE PARTNERSSHIP WITH EU PROJECTS Wenche Aas, Andres Alastuey, Francesco Canonaco, Fabrizia Cavalli, Franco Lucarelli,
Aerosol Microphysics: Plans for GEOS-CHEM
Proposal for a Research Infrastructure for Advanced Aerosol Observations and Capacity Building in China Alfred WIEDENSOHLER Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric.
” Particulates „ Characterisation of Exhaust Particulate Emissions from Road Vehicles Key Action KA2:Sustainable Mobility and Intermodality Task 2.2:Infrastructures.
25/05/20071 About comparability of measured and modeled metrics Jean-Philippe Putaud Fabrizia Cavalli DG JRC Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
St Andrew’s Junior College
The Use of Source Apportionment for Air Quality Management and Health Assessments Philip K. Hopke Clarkson University Center for Air Resources Engineering.
Synergies between EMEP and EUSAAR Wenche Aas and Kjetil Tørseth EMEP/CCC (NILU)
EMEP Monitoring programme Wenche Aas EMEP/CCC (NILU)
EMEP Monitoring Strategy Status and challenges, with main focus on the EECCA region Wenche Aas and Kjetil Tørseth EMEP/CCC (NILU)
ENEON first workshop Observing Europe: Networking the Earth Observation Networks in Europe September, Paris [EMEP,ACTRIS,HELCOM,CAMP and more/NILU]
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
Kick off meeting, 2008, Cavtat Guidance on the use of models for the European air quality directive An activity of WG1 FAIRMODE Bruce Denby 1*, Steinar.
Air Quality in EEA and EECCA Europe’s Environment assessment report, th Europe’s Environment assessment report, 2007 (‘the Belgrade report’) Hans.
Aerosols, Clouds and Trace gases Research Infrastructure
Extended Bureaux EMEP & WGE, Geneva March 21th 2017
Sources of the PM10 aerosol in Flanders, Belgium, and re-evaluation of the contribution from wood burning Willy Maenhaut1,2, Reinhilde Vermeylen2, Magda.
EU Water Framework Directive
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Measurements of PM10 a contribution from EIONET
Progress in the implementation of D11
Bruce Rolstad Denby FAIRMODE 4th Plenary, Norrkjoping Sweden June 2011
EMEP intensive measurements, June 2006 and Jan 2007
EMEP intensive measurements
Wenche Aas and Karl Espen Yttri (EMEP/CCC)
ACTRIS Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) Network and new filter off-line techniques to measure PM chemical composition and determine organic aerosol.
Streamlining of monitoring and reporting under WFD, Nitrates Directive and EEA's SoE –concept paper DG Environment.
EMEP Monitoring Strategy
Monitoring strategy, technical issues
HELCOM and the Baltic Sea
About comparability of measured and modeled metrics
TFMM PM Assessment Report
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
EMEP intensive measurements, June 2006
EMEP/ACTRIS/COLOSSAL intensive measurement period Des 2017 – March 2018 Wenche Aas, EMEP/CCC.
TFMM Work plan for 2010 Build-up the appropriate framework for the implementation of the revised monitoring strategy Technical support to the Parties.
M. Schaap + TNO and RIVM teams
An Overview of the EUSAAR I3 Project
Longer Term Aerosol Chemical speciation monitoring data during ACTRIS/EMEP activities ACSM Teams across Europe Many slides from Michael Bressi, JRC Italy.
EUSAAR contribution to the EMEP intensive field campaigns
DETERMINATION OF CARBONATE CARBON
Wenche Aas, Kjetil Tørseth, Cathrine Lund Myhre
Future intensive field periods Recommendations
Introduction – workshop on EBAS and Data Quality
Lessons learnt from the EMEP intensive measurements
Summary: TFMM trends analysis
RECEPTOR MODELLING OF AIRBORNE PARTICULATE MATTER
Welcome TFMM workshop on the implementation of the EMEP monitoring strategy Introduction to the monitoring strategy QA/QC activities of EMEP organisation.
EC/OC – monitoring within EMEP
EMEP intensive measurement periods
TFMM Workplan & Mandate Augustin Colette & Oksana Tarasova
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Presentation transcript:

Status of data from EMEP intensive period 2008/2009 Wenche Aas and Karl Espen Yttri

Objectives of the 2nd intensive measurement periods 17 Sep. – 15 Oct Objectives of the 2nd intensive measurement periods 17 Sep. – 15 Oct. 2008 and 25 Feb. – 26 Mar. 2009 These intensive measurements are part of the EMEP monitoring program, should be repeated every 3-5 years on different topics. The 2008/2009 one aimed to: Obtain a comprehensive dataset on chemical speciation of particulate matter with respect to its inorganic, mineral and carbonaceous content with daily/weekly (EMEP) or hourly (EUCAARI) time resolution Gas/particle phase distribution of inorganic nitrogen constituents Aerosol size distribution (EUCAARI/EUSAAR) Separation of the carbonaceous aerosol into primary vs. secondary biogenic vs. anthropogenic Attempts to quantify the aerosol water content (EUCAARI) Attempts to quantify the OC/OM ratio (EUCAARI) Vertical profiles (coordinate with EARLINET)

Measurement programme for the 18 sites:

Sites and programme 05.10.09

EMEP Intensive – The Carbonaceous Aerosol Aim: Source apportionment of the carbonaceous aerosol for Air-Quality, Climate, and Model Validation issues How: By the combined effort of thermal-optical analysis, 14C-analysis and analysis of organic tracers Why: numerous reasons including e.g.: constitutes a substantial part of the ambient aerosol affects radiative forcing contributes to adverse health effects poorly resolved sources

EMEP Intensive – cont. Lower Current knowledge about the carbonaceous aerosol in the European rural background environment mainly stems from: Lower Higher EMEP EC/OC campaign in 2002/2003 (EMEP intensive 2006/2007) CARBOSOL 2002 - 2004 Few EMEP sites with continuous monitoring Carbonaceous aerosol level in the European rural background environment - EMEP sites (Annual mean concentrations) (Yttri et al., 2007, ACP).

9 participating sites, situated in C, E, S, NW Europe. EMEP Intensives – cont. 9 participating sites, situated in C, E, S, NW Europe. 14C–analysis delayed due to unforseen issues (lab. renovation and AMS ”issues”) Status Best guess on receiving remaining results from 14C-analysis: June Paper in progress; to be submitted to ACP Special Issue

EMEP Intensives – cont. 4 sites in Norhtern Europe subject to extended sampling and chemical analysis Status: All chemical analysis finished Statistical analysis for source apportionment in progress Paper in progress; to be submitted to ACP Special Issue

Status of data reporting

Remaining reporting Hourly AMS/MARGA/SJAC for 2008 and 2009. EUCAARI reporting 14C analysis. Reanalysis of some filters. Expected finished in June Carbonaceous matter and levoglucosan (and 14C) not centrally analyzed To be reported. Also a need to assess comparability Mineral dust. Not clear who has actually done any analysis Need some updated information on plans from i.e. IT, ES,DK,IE,GR, CH Inorganic (main components) 2009 data to be submitted with regular EMEP reporting Absorption, scattering and size distribution Part of EUSAAR reporting (similar deadlines as EMEP)

Publication plan Carbonaceous matter 2007/2008 intensive Overview paper from 2006/2007. Incl measurements and model Draft was circulated among a few and revised version will be distributed in June. Submission in august/sept AMS papers from 2006/2007 and 2008/2009 ref Eiko’s talk Carbonaceous matter 2007/2008 intensive EMEP data, to be finalized. Nordic study, to be finalized Size distribution, aerosol water etc Not aware of any publication plans, however this is in the hands of EUCAARI and EUSAAR 05.10.09

Summary Successful cooperation between EUSAAR/EUCAARI/EMEP I.e. Established reporting guidelines and QA/QC procedures for a range of new components for the EMEP Community EARLINET has however been little involved (yet) A range of papers from all the intensive periods are in the steps to be published Data availability through ebas.nilu.no or contact CCC password protected for some of the non-regular EMEP data and newer data than 2008 Still not clear what the theme of next intensive periods should be, and when 05.10.09