Integrin Molecular Tension within Motile Focal Adhesions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Yvonne Aratyn-Schaus, Margaret L. Gardel  Current Biology 
Advertisements

Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Motor Regulation Results in Distal Forces that Bend Partially Disintegrated Chlamydomonas Axonemes into Circular Arcs  V. Mukundan, P. Sartori, V.F. Geyer,
Matan Goldshtein, David B. Lukatsky  Biophysical Journal 
High-Density 3D Single Molecular Analysis Based on Compressed Sensing
M. Maraldi, C. Valero, K. Garikipati  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 109, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
Shijie He, Chenglin Liu, Xiaojun Li, Shaopeng Ma, Bo Huo, Baohua Ji 
Volume 92, Issue 8, Pages (April 2007)
Physical Properties of Escherichia coli Spheroplast Membranes
Dynamics of the Serine Chemoreceptor in the Escherichia coli Inner Membrane: A High- Speed Single-Molecule Tracking Study  Dongmyung Oh, Yang Yu, Hochan.
Metastatic State of Cancer Cells May Be Indicated by Adhesion Strength
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
Self-Organization of Myosin II in Reconstituted Actomyosin Bundles
Quantifying Cell Adhesion through Impingement of a Controlled Microjet
He Meng, Johan Bosman, Thijn van der Heijden, John van Noort 
Effects of Cytosine Hydroxymethylation on DNA Strand Separation
Volume 103, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Serapion Pyrpassopoulos, Henry Shuman, E. Michael Ostap 
Viscoplasticity Enables Mechanical Remodeling of Matrix by Cells
Anil K. Dasanna, Christine Lansche, Michael Lanzer, Ulrich S. Schwarz 
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Cellular Contraction Can Drive Rapid Epithelial Flows
Markita P. Landry, Patrick M. McCall, Zhi Qi, Yann R. Chemla 
Yong Wang, Paul Penkul, Joshua N. Milstein  Biophysical Journal 
Qiaochu Li, Stephen J. King, Ajay Gopinathan, Jing Xu 
Traction Forces of Neutrophils Migrating on Compliant Substrates
Cell Traction Forces Direct Fibronectin Matrix Assembly
Predicting the Rupture Probabilities of Molecular Bonds in Series
Volume 94, Issue 12, Pages (June 2008)
Taeyoon Kim, Margaret L. Gardel, Ed Munro  Biophysical Journal 
Stefan Nehls, Andreas Janshoff  Biophysical Journal 
Fiber-Dependent and -Independent Toxicity of Islet Amyloid Polypeptide
Emergent Global Contractile Force in Cardiac Tissues
Volume 103, Issue 10, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 111, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Guidance of Cell Migration by Substrate Dimension
Volume 107, Issue 8, Pages (October 2014)
Juan Guan, Harrison Liu, Xiaoyu Shi, Siyu Feng, Bo Huang 
Focal Adhesion Kinase Stabilizes the Cytoskeleton
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Felix Ruhnow, David Zwicker, Stefan Diez  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 114, Issue 2, Pages (January 2018)
Venkat Maruthamuthu, Margaret L. Gardel  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 112, Issue 4, Pages (February 2017)
Measuring Actin Flow in 3D Cell Protrusions
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Christina Bergonzo, Thomas E. Cheatham  Biophysical Journal 
Brownian Dynamics of Subunit Addition-Loss Kinetics and Thermodynamics in Linear Polymer Self-Assembly  Brian T. Castle, David J. Odde  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (April 2015)
Anisotropic Membrane Curvature Sensing by Amphipathic Peptides
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Christina Ketchum, Heather Miller, Wenxia Song, Arpita Upadhyaya 
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 106, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Modeling Endoplasmic Reticulum Network Maintenance in a Plant Cell
Volume 97, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Yongli Zhang, Junyi Jiao, Aleksander A. Rebane  Biophysical Journal 
Enrique M. De La Cruz, Jean-Louis Martiel, Laurent Blanchoin 
Mechanotransduction Dynamics at the Cell-Matrix Interface
Volume 104, Issue 4, Pages (February 2013)
Anil K. Dasanna, Christine Lansche, Michael Lanzer, Ulrich S. Schwarz 
Zackary N. Scholl, Weitao Yang, Piotr E. Marszalek  Biophysical Journal 
Takako Nakata, Chika Okimura, Takafumi Mizuno, Yoshiaki Iwadate 
Jocelyn Étienne, Alain Duperray  Biophysical Journal 
Sandeep Kumar, Alakesh Das, Amlan Barai, Shamik Sen 
Presentation transcript:

Integrin Molecular Tension within Motile Focal Adhesions Xuefeng Wang, Jie Sun, Qian Xu, Farhan Chowdhury, Mehdi Roein-Peikar, Yingxiao Wang, Taekjip Ha  Biophysical Journal  Volume 109, Issue 11, Pages 2259-2267 (December 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.10.029 Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Surface-immobilized RGDfK-TGTs ruptured by integrin tensions in live CHO-K1 cells. (A) The dsDNA geometries and tension tolerances of five TGT constructs with Ttol = 12∼54 pN used in this article. The top DNA strand was labeled with Cy3 to report TGT rupture by integrins. (B) DIC images of cells and the rupture patterns of TGTs with Ttol = 12∼54 pN reported by Cy3 fluorescence loss. Scale bar: 10 μm. Data were acquired after 2 h of cell incubation on a TGT surface. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 2259-2267DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.10.029) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Surface-immobilized RGDfK-TGT with Ttol = 54 pN is ruptured by motile FAs. (A) Schematics of cell engagement with RGDfK-TGT immobilized on a surface. FA structure is based on (31). (B) DIC image of a CHO-K1 cell plated on a 54 pN TGT surface for 2 h in serum-free medium. (C) Fluorescence of Cy3-labeled TGT under the cell shown in (B). Loss of fluorescence in dark streaks represents TGT rupture. (D) Localization of FAs (red dots, marked by immune-stained vinculin) on the lines of ruptured TGT (green lines, inverted from Fig. 2 C). (E) Stress fibers formed by actin (blue lines) and cell contour added to (D). Scale bar: 10 μm. (F) RGDfK-TGT density was estimated to be ∼1100/μm2. Cy3-labeled TGT surface has 4.83 × 104 grayscale value under Cy3 imaging. By comparison, with the same imaging setting, a surface with 385/μm2 Cy3 precalibrated by the method in (22) has 1.72 × 104 grayscale value. Thus, TGT density was estimated to be ∼1100/μm2 (385/μm2 × 4.83/1.72). (G) Line profile analysis of TGT rupture pattern (red line in Fig. 2 F) shows ∼40% fluorescence loss in TGT rupture track. Data were acquired after 2 h of cell incubation on TGT surface. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 2259-2267DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.10.029) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 TGT rupture pattern with blebbistatin or Y27632. (A) 5 μM blebbistatin abolished Ttol = 54 pN TGT rupture. (B) 10 μM ROCK inhibitor Y-27632 abolished 54 pN TGT rupture. Scale bar: 10 μm. (C) 5 μM blebbistatin did not abolish Ttol = 12, 23, and 33 pN TGT rupture. Scale bar: 20 μm. (D) TGT rupture ratio on 12∼54 pN TGT surfaces in 5 μM blebbistatin. Each data point was acquired based on 18 cells. The error bar represents standard error. Rupture ratio = (I0 − Icell)/I0, where I0 is the averaged fluorescence intensity in the background and Icell is the averaged intensity in the area under the cell. Data were acquired after 2 h of cell incubation on TGT surface. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 2259-2267DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.10.029) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 TGT rupture site analysis and internalization of ruptured TGT. (A) 54 pN TGT labeled with Cy5 and Cy3 on the top and bottom strands, respectively. Selective loss of Cy5 signal reports dsDNA melting and simultaneous loss of Cy3 and Cy5 signals reports biotin-NeutrAvidin rupture. Cy5 loss under a typical cell (the cell at center of picture) is 13.8%, whereas Cy3 loss is 0.68%, confirming that TGT rupture majorly occurred on the dsDNA site, the force gauging part of TGT. (B) Fluorescent dots were found inside cells, suggesting that the ruptured TGT were internalized by cells. Image plane 1 is 1.8 μm above image plane 2. Data were acquired after 2 h of cell incubation on TGT surface. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 2259-2267DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.10.029) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Analysis of integrin tension distribution in FAs. (A) Sample images for FA (red for vinculin) and 54 pN TGT rupture pattern (green) analysis. White lines indicate the analyzed line profiles. (B) Averaged line profiles (n = 16 lines) of the FA and TGT rupture pattern. The blue curve is the simulated TGT rupture curve based on the assumption that >54 pN integrin tension is evenly distributed within FAs. The magenta curve is simulated based on the assumption that >54 pN integrin tension is uniformly distributed only in the left lobe of the FA site. The black curve is simulated based on the assumption that >54 pN integrin tension is uniformly distributed only in the right lobe of the FA site (distal site). Correlations coefficients of blue and green curves, blue and magenta curve, and blue and black curves are 0.99, 0.91, and 0.86, respectively. Correlations were calculated based on curve parts on the location of 0∼2.5 μm. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 2259-2267DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.10.029) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Symmetry analysis of FA pair motion. (A) Two FAs connected by one stress fiber form a FA pair. The paired FA (magenta dots) travel distances reported by TGT rupture tracks (green lines) show different symmetry levels, depending on the FA locations in cells. (B) FA pair motion is highly symmetrical if two paired FAs are both in the inner region of cell-substratum interface. FA pair motion becomes asymmetrical if two FAs in pair are located on the periphery of cells. Symmetry is calculated as 1-|L1 − L2|/(L1 + L2), where L1 and L2 are the travel distances of two FAs in a pair. Scale bar: 10 μm. Sample number for each data point: 20. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 2259-2267DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.10.029) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions