Christopher T. Nguyen et al. BTS 2018;3:97-109

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Quartiles of complete blood count components Jeffrey L. Anderson, et al. Am J Cardiol 2007;99:

Advertisements

The Clinical Significance of Uric Acid and Complement Activation in the Progression of IgA Nephropathy Kidney Blood Press Res 2016;41: DOI: /

Figure Legend: From: Fixations on low-resolution images

From: Combined Thoracic Ultrasound Assessment during a Successful Weaning Trial Predicts Postextubation Distress Anesthes. 2017;127(4): doi: /ALN

Duc T.M. Nguyen, Edward A. Graviss

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) of model D: the total score of ‘the presence of six optical coherence tomography.

Daniel J. Lenihan et al. BTS 2016;1:

Zhi-hui Hou et al. JIMG 2012;5:

Comparison of the model incorporating daily dose to that incorporating Cmax. Comparison of the model incorporating daily dose to that incorporating Cmax.

Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves comparing the ability of different expiratory breathing parameters and perinatal variables (birthweight z-score.

Ectopic pregnancy diagnosis and the pseudo-sac

Daniel J. Lenihan et al. BTS 2016;1:

Steven E. Williams et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep

Patients with Kawasaki disease but not those with mimicking conditions have significantly elevated serum and urine levels of meprin A and filamin C, which.

Hui-Fang Song et al. BTS 2017;2:

A Risk Prediction Model for Invasive Fungal Disease in Critically Ill Patients in the Intensive Care Unit Fangyi Li, Minggen Zhou, Zijun Zou, Weichao.

Receiver operating curves (ROC) of the Framingham and QRISK2 risk factor models for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease with and without.

Heiko Lehrmann et al. JACEP 2018;j.jacep

Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the plasma biomarker panels for differentiating ARDS (cases) from controls in patients with severe.

EQUATION 4.1 Relationship Between One Dependent and One Independent Variable: Simple Regression Analysis.

Ashraf Hamdan et al. JCIN 2015;8:

Discriminatory performance (receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis) of lung clearance index (LCI) analysed with the different methods. a) ROC.

Figure 1 ROC curve of ASFMR1-TV2

Figure 2. ROC curves for different group comparisons

ROC for predicted combined death or neurodevelopmental impairment compared with actual death or neurodevelopmental impairment as stratified by gestational.

(A) Illustration of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (discrimination) of the recalibrated model on the external validation set data. (A)

Cardiac Fibrosis at 18 Weeks Post TAC (A) Representative images (original magnification ×20) of Picrosirius red-stained cardiac tissue sections from HF +

Masanobu Ishii et al. BTS 2017;2:

Krzysztof Narkiewicz et al. BTS 2016;1:

ROC curve for separating advanced stages (advanced BE and EA) versus early stages (BE or BE instability) using total genome-wide LOH [area under the curve.

Diagnostic Performance of Four-dimensional CT and Sestamibi SPECT/CT in Localizing Parathyroid Adenomas in Primary Hyperparathyroidism Combined four-dimensional.

Figure 3 Analysis of the prognostic value of IL-10–producing B cells or IL-6/IL-10–B-cell ratio measurements in patients with RIS/CIS MS Analysis of the.

Sven Y. Surikow et al. BTS 2018;3:

Sven Y. Surikow et al. BTS 2018;3:

Baseline Characteristics

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the diagnostic accuracy of different pH cut-offs for the fresh gastric sample versus the non-gastric.

Thirty-day survival curves for the rapid versus slow correction rate groups are not significantly different. Thirty-day survival curves for the rapid versus.

Lauren Brash et al. BTS 2018;3:

Accuracy of sputum colour in predicting NB

Comparison of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for predicting oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 1 h postload glucose ≥155 mg/dL in (A) patients.

Comparative receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) in association with 30-day mortality for severity scores.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the AIMS65 score and Glasgow–Blatchford score (GBS) as predictors of requirement for blood transfusion.

Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) for the metabolites between the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (n=15) and sepsis (n=35) groups.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the AIMS65 score and Glasgow–Blatchford score (GBS) as predictors of requirement for high dependency.

Aortic Vasorelaxation at 18 Weeks Post TAC Freshly isolated thoracic aortic rings were allowed to equilibrate, and pre-contracted with 1 μM phenylephrine.

(A) ROC for the prediction of 5-year mortality in unoperated significant MR. AUCs and corresponding p values are shown for lateral annulus E/E′ (AUC=0.69,

ROC curves. ROC curves. The four plots represent the ROC curves from the following four prediction models for day 3 AKI: RAI (A), NGAL and RAI (B), MMP-8.

Nikole J. Byrne et al. BTS 2017;j.jacbts

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (area under the curve (AUC) (95% CI)) for FACED (forced expiratory volume in 1 s, age, chronic colonisation.

Receiver operating characteristic curves of prediction models.

Scoring of Coronary Artery Disease Characteristics on Coronary CT Angiograms by Using Machine Learning For prediction of all-cause mortality on the basis.

Receiver operator curve plots for prognostication of 5-year and 12-year all-cause (A and C, respectively) and cardiovascular mortality (B and D, respectively)

—ROC curves for each simple test compared with NCS (gold standard) plotting the sensitivity versus 1-specificity (the false-positive rate) for different.

Receiver-operating characteristic curves showing the performance of the diabetes risk score in predicting diabetes in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) citizens.

Receiver operating characteristic ROC curve of Lung Clearance Index (LCI)1/40, LCI1/30, LCI1/20, LCI1/10 and inverse forced expiratory volume in 1 s %

ROC curves showing additive value of DHE in diagnosing ongoing episode of recurrence among all patients with established history of recurrent pericarditis.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) of model B: the total score of ‘the presence of six optical coherence tomography (OCT)

Cytokine profiles can predict severe CRS

Comparison of MGM-FCI-MAX-derived with retrained lung cancer prediction models on the training cohort. Comparison of MGM-FCI-MAX-derived with retrained.

Treadmill Exercise Capacity at 18 Weeks Post TAC Exercise capacity was evaluated in all study groups at 18 weeks following TAC surgery. (A) Duration (min)

Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for both the training and testing data sets based on a number of hidden-layer perceptrons.

Accuracy of sputum colour in predicting neutrophilic inflammation.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves assessing pre-trilostane, three-hour post-trilostane and post-adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) cortisol.

Fig. 6 Immunological clonal prediction status improves significantly after MAF error and bias correction. Immunological clonal prediction status improves.

Figure 3 A receiver operating characteristic curve of days to IVMP as a predictor of failure to regain 0.2 logMAR (20/30) vision (AUC 0.84, p < 0.001)‏

ROC analysis of MIC-1 and CA19-9.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for discriminating diabetic subjects without retinopathy from control subjects using a logistic regression.

Significantly enriched OTUs at 0 vs. 72 hours.

Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve for fasting blood glucose (FBG) predicting posttransplantation diabetes (PTD) using time 0 FBG (a) and screening.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for Saint George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) category scores predicting chronic obstructive pulmonary.

Presentation transcript:

Christopher T. Nguyen et al. BTS 2018;3:97-109 ROC Curves of ΔSS, ΔHAT, and Combined ΔSS and ΔHAT to Predict ΔEF ΔHAT and ΔSS had comparable predictive values that did not significantly differ (AUC = 0.66 and 0.68, respectively). Combining ΔSS and ΔHAT with the best fit multilinear regression model resulted in significantly (p = 0.04) better predictive value (AUC = 0.87). AUC = area under the curve; ROC = receiver operator characteristic; other abbreviations as in Figure 6. Christopher T. Nguyen et al. BTS 2018;3:97-109 2018 The Authors