Two-Photon Thermal Bleaching of Single Fluorescent Molecules

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Klas H. Pettersen, Gaute T. Einevoll  Biophysical Journal 
Advertisements

Jean-Yves Chatton, Yumei Cao, Jörg W. Stucki  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
3-D Particle Tracking in a Two-Photon Microscope: Application to the Study of Molecular Dynamics in Cells  Valeria Levi, QiaoQiao Ruan, Enrico Gratton 
Probing Membrane Order and Topography in Supported Lipid Bilayers by Combined Polarized Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence-Atomic Force Microscopy 
Volume 103, Issue 9, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 91, Issue 8, Pages (October 2006)
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (October 2008)
Etienne Roux, Marko Marhl  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Ariel Lubelski, Joseph Klafter  Biophysical Journal 
Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy Close to a Fluctuating Membrane
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
Apparent Subdiffusion Inherent to Single Particle Tracking
A. Delon, Y. Usson, J. Derouard, T. Biben, C. Souchier 
Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 91, Issue 10, Pages (November 2006)
Serapion Pyrpassopoulos, Henry Shuman, E. Michael Ostap 
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Tracking Phospholipid Populations in Polymorphism by Sideband Analyses of 31P Magic Angle Spinning NMR  Liam Moran, Nathan Janes  Biophysical Journal 
Protein Free Energy Landscapes Remodeled by Ligand Binding
Jefferson D. Knight, Joseph J. Falke  Biophysical Journal 
Actin Cytoskeleton-Dependent Dynamics of the Human Serotonin1A Receptor Correlates with Receptor Signaling  Sourav Ganguly, Thomas J. Pucadyil, Amitabha.
Enthalpy Changes during Photosynthetic Water Oxidation Tracked by Time-Resolved Calorimetry Using a Photothermal Beam Deflection Technique  Roland Krivanek,
Mechanics and Buckling of Biopolymeric Shells and Cell Nuclei
Agata Witkowska, Reinhard Jahn  Biophysical Journal 
Electronic Transport in DNA
Gustav Persson, Per Thyberg, Jerker Widengren  Biophysical Journal 
Giant Unilamellar Vesicles Formed by Hybrid Films of Agarose and Lipids Display Altered Mechanical Properties  Rafael B. Lira, Rumiana Dimova, Karin A.
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Kinesin Moving through the Spotlight: Single-Motor Fluorescence Microscopy with Submillisecond Time Resolution  Sander Verbrugge, Lukas C. Kapitein, Erwin.
Role of Cholesterol in the Formation and Nature of Lipid Rafts in Planar and Spherical Model Membranes  Jonathan M. Crane, Lukas K. Tamm  Biophysical.
Cell Surface Topography Is a Regulator of Molecular Interactions during Chemokine- Induced Neutrophil Spreading  Elena. B. Lomakina, Graham Marsh, Richard E.
Volume 99, Issue 9, Pages (November 2010)
Yusuke Nakasone, Kazunori Zikihara, Satoru Tokutomi, Masahide Terazima 
Volume 93, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 111, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Samuel T. Hess, Watt W. Webb  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Drift and Behavior of E. coli Cells
Validating Solution Ensembles from Molecular Dynamics Simulation by Wide-Angle X- ray Scattering Data  Po-chia Chen, Jochen S. Hub  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 96, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Carlos Mattea, Johan Qvist, Bertil Halle  Biophysical Journal 
The Effect of Dye-Dye Interactions on the Spatial Resolution of Single-Molecule FRET Measurements in Nucleic Acids  Nicolas Di Fiori, Amit Meller  Biophysical.
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Effects of Temperature on Heteromeric Kv11.1a/1b and Kv11.3 Channels
Kinetic Analysis of the Thermal Stability of the Photosynthetic Reaction Center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides  Arwel V. Hughes, Paul Rees, Peter Heathcote,
Satomi Matsuoka, Tatsuo Shibata, Masahiro Ueda  Biophysical Journal 
Aligning Paramecium caudatum with Static Magnetic Fields
Application of Singular Value Decomposition to the Analysis of Time-Resolved Macromolecular X-Ray Data  Marius Schmidt, Sudarshan Rajagopal, Zhong Ren,
Chien-Jung Lo, Mark C. Leake, Richard M. Berry  Biophysical Journal 
R. Stehle, M. Krüger, G. Pfitzer  Biophysical Journal 
High-Pressure Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy
Jess V. Nauman, Phil G. Campbell, Frederick Lanni, John L. Anderson 
Kinetics of P2X7 Receptor-Operated Single Channels Currents
Volume 98, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Interaction of Oxazole Yellow Dyes with DNA Studied with Hybrid Optical Tweezers and Fluorescence Microscopy  C.U. Murade, V. Subramaniam, C. Otto, Martin.
Volume 75, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Eric D. Siggia, Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz, Stefan Bekiranov 
Scott M. Blackman, Eric J. Hustedt, Charles E. Cobb, Albert H. Beth 
John E. Pickard, Klaus Ley  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 113, Issue 10, Pages (November 2017)
R.P. Schuhmeier, B. Dietze, D. Ursu, F. Lehmann-Horn, W. Melzer 
Yufang Wang, Ling Guo, Ido Golding, Edward C. Cox, N.P. Ong 
Frequency-Dependent Shear Impedance of the Tectorial Membrane
S. Rüdiger, Ch. Nagaiah, G. Warnecke, J.W. Shuai  Biophysical Journal 
Orientation of the Myosin Light Chain Region by Single Molecule Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Polarization Microscopy  Margot E. Quinlan, Joseph.
George D. Dickinson, Ian Parker  Biophysical Journal 
Presentation transcript:

Two-Photon Thermal Bleaching of Single Fluorescent Molecules Giuseppe Chirico, Fabio Cannone, Giancarlo Baldini, Alberto Diaspro  Biophysical Journal  Volume 84, Issue 1, Pages 588-598 (January 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74879-6 Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Distribution of the intensity of the spots of an image of a glass slide prepared by spin coating a C=11.8μM Indo-1 solution. The image was acquired with residence time ≅3μ, 97×97μm field of view and excitation power ≅10.5mW. The numbers on top of the peaks of the distribution indicate the approximate fluorescence level. Upper inset: Fluorescence of the peaks in the distribution in order of increasing intensity. The background level acquired on the same image far from any visible spot ≅ 900±130 arbitrary units, has been subtracted from the data. Lower inset: typical fluorescence image of the spin coated glasses. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 588-598DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74879-6) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Fluorescence signal (arbitrary units) per single molecule versus the excitation power. The average has been computed on at least 80 molecules. The symbols indicate Fluorescein (▾), Rhodamine 6G (●), Pyrene (▴), and Indo-1 (□). The data are fit to a law of the type AEXC×P2. The parameter AEXC is reported in Table 1. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 588-598DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74879-6) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Typical fluorescence signal versus time for single molecules of Fluorescein (▾top panel), Rhodamine 6G (●, second panel from top), Indo-1 (□, third panel from top) and Pyrene (▴, bottom panel) at 6.7mW of excitation power. Inset right top: typical distribution of the bleaching time for Fluorescein. Inset right bottom: percentage, RF%, of the single molecules that show fluorescence recovery after bleaching versus the excitation power for fluorescein, rhodamine 6G and indo-1. Symbols are the same as in the main panels. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 588-598DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74879-6) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Average Bleaching rate, ΓB, of Rhodamine6G (●), Fluorescein (▾), Indo-1 (□) and Pyrene (▴), versus the excitation power. The solid lines are fits to a power law, B×PC; the best fit values of B and C are reported in Table 1. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 588-598DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74879-6) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Typical fluorescence kinetics for aggregates of rhodamine 6G molecules: a fourth order aggregate (▾) and a second order aggregate (□). Solid and dashed lines are the best fit to an exponential decay for the fourth and the second order aggregate kinetics, respectively. Inset: average decay time obtained by fitting the aggregate kinetics to a single exponential decay, ξN, versus the order of aggregation for Fluorescein (▾), Rhodamine 6G (●), Pyrene (▴), and Indo-1 (□). The solid lines are the linear fits, ξN=N ξ0. The values of ξ0 for the four dyes are reported in Table 1. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 588-598DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74879-6) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Left panels: scheme of the intermittent excitation experiments. These data refer to a single rhodamine 6G molecule with excitation ≅10.7mW. Upper left panel: Excitation power versus time: the excitation power is null for a time τD. Middle left panel: Fluorescence signal as recovered from the analysis of all images. In the panel, the TB∗ (TB∗=41.7s for this case) is indicated with an arrow. Lower left panel: Fluorescence signal reconstructed by dropping the intervals when the sample was not illuminated. In the panel the TBR (TBR=8.9s for this case) is indicated with an arrow. Right panel: Bleaching time with intermittent excitation versus the delay time τD for rhodamine 6G (●) fluorescein (▾), indo-1 (□), and pyrene ▴. The solid lines are linear fit to the data: TBR=AR+BRτD. The best fit parameter BR is reported in Table 1. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 588-598DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74879-6) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Bleaching times versus the substrate temperature for: indo-1 (top panel, excitation powers 10, 8.4, 7.8mW from the bottom to the top curve); fluorescein (middle panel, excitation powers 11.7, 10, 8.4, 5.7mW from the bottom to the top curve); rhodamine 6G (bottom panel, excitation powers 13.4, 10.7, 9.7, 7.8mW from the bottom to the top curve). Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 588-598DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74879-6) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Temperature increase as simulated for the two-photon absorption by means of Eq. 10 in the text for the case δ2=50GM, ϕ=0.5, 〈P〉ave=10mW, w0=0.22⁡mm and z0=0.66⁡mm and for the values of the heat conductivity: χ=4×10−6Kcal/sm°K (□), χ=4×10−6Kcal/sm°K (dashed line), χ=10−5Kcal/sm°K (dotted line) and χ=4×10−4Kcal/sm°K (dot-dashed line). The solid line is an exponential growth fit to the case χ=4×10−6Kcal/sm°K for t>1s. Inset: Simulations for the case of single photon absorption by water, δ1=10−24cm2, χ=χwater=4×10−4Kcal/sm°K and 〈P〉ave=10 (solid line) and 50mW (dashed line). Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 588-598DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74879-6) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 Correlation plot of the best fit parameters with the amount of excitation power not reradiated, Σ=AEXC(1−ϕ/ϕ. Upper panel: Left axis, % of the fluorescence recovery at 10mW; right axis, slope BR of the bleaching time upon intermittent illumination, TBR, versus the dark time τD (see Fig. 6); middle panel: left axis, slope of the bleaching times of small aggregates versus the aggregation order (see text), ξ0; right axis, temperature T0 at which no fluorescence can be detected (see Fig. 7); lower panel: left axis, bleaching rate amplitude, B; right axis, bleaching rate exponent, C. The bleaching rate was fit to the law B×〈P〉aveC. In all the panels, the lines are exponential fits intended only to guide the eye. The chemical structures and the values of Σ for the four dyes are reported on the side and below the graphs. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 588-598DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74879-6) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions