EUPAN Troika Secretariat 26 March 2007, Berlin MidTermProgramme (MTP)

How do you assess the significance of HRWG contributions to Questionnaire on EUPAN WG – members’ assessment on the implementation of the Mid Term Programme 2006 – 2007 How do you assess the significance of HRWG contributions to the priority areas or “common coordinated action plans” listed in the MTP under these headings: The way EU member states work towards the Lisbon objectives: 7 x very important 20 x substantial 4 x marginal The reduction of administrative burdens….. 9 x very important 7 x substantial 15 x marginal Efficiency of public administration 10 x very important 17 x substantial 4 x marginal Working towards European User Satisfaction Indices (only IPSG and eGov) 7 x very important 8 x substantial 5 x marginal

How do you assess the significance of HRWG activities with Questionnaire on EUPAN WG – members’ assessment on the implementation of the Mid Term Programme 2006 – 2007 How do you assess the significance of HRWG activities with regard to HRWG topics listed in the MTP under these headings: 1) Strategic Human Resources Management in the Public Administration 7 x very important 5 x substantial 0 x marginal 2) Leadership Development and Succession Planning in the Public Administration 6 x very important 6 x substantial 0 x marginal 3) Modernization of Public Administration 6 x very important 6 x substantial 1 x marginal

How do you assess the significance of HRWG activities with Questionnaire on EUPAN WG – members’ assessment on the implementation of the Mid Term Programme 2006 – 2007 How do you assess the significance of HRWG activities with regard to HRWG topics listed in the MTP under these headings: 4) Ethics and Integrity 6 x very important 5 x substantial 1 x marginal 5) Pensions in the public sector 0 x very important 8 x substantial 3 x marginal 6) Training of civil servants 2 x very important 6 x substantial 4 x marginal

How do you assess the significance of IPSG activities with Questionnaire on EUPAN WG – members’ assessment on the implementation of the Mid Term Programme 2006 – 2007 How do you assess the significance of IPSG activities with regard to IPSG topics listed in the MTP under these headings: 1) Benchmarking and Best Practice 9 x very important 5 x substantial 1 x marginal 2) CAF (Common Assessment Framework) 12 x very important 1 x substantial 2 x marginal 3) Communication/Knowledge Sharing and Management 7 x very important 4 x substantial 3 x marginal 4) Quality Conferences 12 x very important 3 x substantial 0 x marginal

How do you assess the significance of EGOVWG activities with Questionnaire on EUPAN WG – members’ assessment on the implementation of the Mid Term Programme 2006 – 2007 How do you assess the significance of EGOVWG activities with regard to EGOVWG topics listed in the MTP under these headings: 1) Interoperability, inter & intra governmental collaboration and pan- European services 1 x very important 2 x substantial 2 x marginal 2) A focus on users needs with attention to benefits for citizens and the impact of e-government 2 x very important 1 x substantial 2 x marginal 3) Organisational changes, skills and the role of leadership required in achieving the benefits that effective use of ICT can bring to public administrations 1 x very important 1 x substantial 3 x marginal