Figure 1. Concept of poly(A) tail labeling for translation and localization analyses of reporter mRNAs. Azido-modified ... Figure 1. Concept of poly(A)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure 1. drb7.2 mutant plants display altered accumulation of endoIR-siRNA. Wild-type (Col-0) and drb7.2 mutant plants were subjected to high throughput.
Advertisements

Figure 1. Stabilization of the hairpin structure by non-nucleotide linkers (-L-) following enzymatic circularization. Structures of the stilbene diether.
Figure 1. The flow chart illustrates the construction process of anti-CRISPRdb, and the information that users can obtain from anti-CRISPRdb. From: Anti-CRISPRdb:
From: Dynamic protein–RNA interactions in mediating splicing catalysis
Figure 1: Necrobiosis lipoidica: Yellow-brown skin lesions with indurated borders located on both lower legs. Figure 1: Necrobiosis lipoidica: Yellow-brown.
Figure 1. (A) The VEGF promoter PQS and scheme of G oxidation to OG, as well as (B) the proposed APE1-dependent pathway ... Figure 1. (A) The VEGF promoter.
Figure 1. Circular taxonomy tree based on the species that were sequenced in our study. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.
Figure 1. A novel image analysis tool to monitor epigenetic changes in spatiotemporal distribution of chromatin in live ... Figure 1. A novel image analysis.
Figure 1. (A) Diagram of artificial microDNA creation by LAMA
Figure 1. DYRK1A and DCAF7 form a nuclear complex that promotes stability of both proteins. (A) Analysis by mass ... Figure 1. DYRK1A and DCAF7 form a.
Figure 7. Primary cells from prostate tumours are more sensitive to ML than adjacent non-cancerous cells from the ... Figure 7. Primary cells from.
Figure 2. Status of rRNA methylations upon SAM depletion
Figure 1: Axial T2 W images of penis showed a well-defined septated area of 2 cm in the posterior aspect of ... Figure 1: Axial T2 W images.
Figure 1. Aminoacylation of 3′-NH2-tRNA catalyzed by flexizymes
Figure 1. Effect of random T/A→dU/A substitutions on transcription by T7 RNAP using a 321 bp DNA transcription template ... Figure 1. Effect of random.
FIGURE 1 Histological diagnoses divided into 8-year time frames (n = 1208). Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.
Figure 1. Position and number of NLS improves genome editing by AsCas12a, LbCas12a and FnoCas12a. (A) General schematic ... Figure 1. Position and number.
FIGURE 1 The effect of daprodustat on hemoglobin (Hgb) levels
Figure 1. Zebrafish Sas10 and Mpp10 are nucleolar proteins and display dynamic expression patterns during early ... Figure 1. Zebrafish Sas10 and Mpp10.
Figure 1. BRCA1-associated R-Loop accumulation at a non-coding region upstream of ESR1 locus. (A) Alignment of DRIP-seq ... Figure 1. BRCA1-associated.
FIGURE 2 Responses to the question: regarding vasoactive drugs, does your centre use the following frequently, rarely ... FIGURE 2 Responses to the question:
Figure 1. Designing a cell-specific Cas-ON switch based on miRNA-regulated anti-CRISPR genes. (A) Schematic of the ... Figure 1. Designing a cell-specific.
FIGURE 1 Maternal (A) urinary aldosterone; (B) plasma active renin; (C) urinary AGT concentrations; and (D) plasma AGT ... FIGURE 1 Maternal (A) urinary.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of CSN and NDM construction and our statistic model. (A) CSN and NDM construction. (i) ... Figure 1. Schematic illustration.
Figure 1. Ratios of observed to expected numbers of exon boundaries aligning to boundaries of domain and disorder ... Figure 1. Ratios of observed to expected.
Figure 1. autoMLST workflow depicting placement and de novo mode
Figure 1. Chemical structures of DNA and tc-DNA
Fig. 1 Mean change from baseline in ANC ± s. e
Point estimates with ... Point estimates with 95% CI. HR: hip replacement; KR: knee replacement. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright.
FIGURE 1 Participant flow diagram. Exercise Counseling Clinic (ECC).
Graph 1. The number of homicide cases per year discussing neuro-evidence. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.
Figure 6. The DNA lyase activity of hNTHL1 contributes to the processing of lesions in nucleosomes, even in the ... Figure 6. The DNA lyase activity of.
Figure 1. Analysis of human TRIM5α protein with Blast-Search and PhyML+SMS ‘One click’ workflow. (A) NGPhylogeny.fr ... Figure 1. Analysis of human TRIM5α.
Figure 2. Natural history of chlamydia transmission, with arrows showing the transitions between health states. Figure 2. Natural history of chlamydia.
Figure 1 Nelson-Aalen estimates of the cumulative incidence rates for patients on versus off IST. ON = optic neuritis; ... Figure 1 Nelson-Aalen estimates.
FIGURE 1 Study consort diagram
Fig. 2 Case 2. Levels of serum creatinine and anti-GBM antibodies before and during treatment with cyclophosphamide, ... Fig. 2 Case 2. Levels of serum.
Figure 1. Illustration of DGR systems and their prediction using myDGR
Figure 1. The pipeline of Aggrescan3D 2.0 server.
FIGURE 1 Food groups consumed (mean, g/d) among US infants and young children by age group and tertile of mean ... FIGURE 1 Food groups consumed (mean,
Figure 1. EBOV VP35 has NTP-binding and NTPase activities
Figure 1. Prediction result for birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 (PDB: 1bv1), as obtained by comparison to the cherry ... Figure 1. Prediction result for.
Figure 1. Analysis of the AP lyase activity of BsuLigD
Figure 4. RLS spectra of (A) TMPipEOPP and (B) OMHEPzEOPP in the presence of different concentrations of KRAS. The RLS ... Figure 4. RLS spectra of (A)
Figure 1. PaintOmics 3 workflow diagram
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of solar energy and coal-fired power generation system. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.
Figure 1. Uncertainty reduction, value creation, and appropriation in two case studies. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.
Figure 1 Ratio of the geometric mean concentration of hsTnT (A) and sST2 (B) at baseline (BL) and each subsequent ... Figure 1 Ratio of the geometric mean.
Figure 1. MERMAID web server interface (Start page, Parameter page): MERMAID provides two ways to submit a protein ... Figure 1. MERMAID web server interface.
Figure 1. Yvis platform overview
Figure 1. The framework of NetGO with seven steps
Figure 1 Patient disposition
Figure 1. Accumulation kinetics of TC-NER factors reveal a CSA independent UVSSA recruitment. (A) Representative images ... Figure 1. Accumulation kinetics.
Figure 1. Workflow of the analysis to estimate the number of true human miRNAs. Samples containing NGS data were ... Figure 1. Workflow of the analysis.
Figure 4. MTase JHP1050 inactivation causes phenotypic effects that vary between strains: growth, viability and ... Figure 4. MTase JHP1050 inactivation.
Figure 1. Scheme of a phosphorothioated-terminal hairpin formation and self-priming extension (PS-THSP) for selection ... Figure 1. Scheme of a phosphorothioated-terminal.
Figure 1. 3C analysis of HEM3, BLM10, and SEN1 genes in rpb4Δ and isogenic wild type cells. (A) Schematic ... Figure 1. 3C analysis of HEM3, BLM10, and.
Figure 1 Genetic results. No case had more than one diagnostic result
Figure 1. CSB does not affect the recruitment of OGG1 to oxidative DNA damage. (A) Representative stills of time-lapse ... Figure 1. CSB does not affect.
Figure 1. (A) Baseline contrast-enhanced CT scan of melanoma patient presenting with metastases in the liver and lymph ... Figure 1. (A) Baseline contrast-enhanced.
Figure 1. Prevalence of parasitic infection and anemia among the children. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.
Figure 1. DNA-guided RNA cleavage activity
Figure 6. Protein-protein interactions
Figure 1. GWAS Catalog associations for coronary artery disease plotted across all chromosomes. Associations added ... Figure 1. GWAS Catalog associations.
Figure 1 The workflow of CAR development from a hybridoma
Figure 1. Crystal structures of Rim1
Source:Zimnisky (2014). Source:Zimnisky (2014).
Figure 1 Mechanisms of mitral regurgitation.
Figure 5. The endonucleolytic product from PfuPCNA/MR activity is displaced from dsDNA. Results from real-time ... Figure 5. The endonucleolytic product.
Figure 1. (A) Overview of ENPD including data source, data processing and features. Transcriptomes from TSA, genomes ... Figure 1. (A) Overview of ENPD.
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1. Concept of poly(A) tail labeling for translation and localization analyses of reporter mRNAs. Azido-modified ... Figure 1. Concept of poly(A) tail labeling for translation and localization analyses of reporter mRNAs. Azido-modified adenosine nucleotides are enzymatically attached at the poly(A) tail of in vitro transcribed reporter mRNAs (luciferase or eGFP) using yeast poly(A) polymerase. (A) Translation analysis. (B) Intracellular labeling. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com Nucleic Acids Res, Volume 47, Issue 7, 06 February 2019, Page e42, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz084 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 2. Enzymatic addition of modified adenosines to the 3′-end of short test RNA. (A) Scheme illustrating 3′-end ... Figure 2. Enzymatic addition of modified adenosines to the 3′-end of short test RNA. (A) Scheme illustrating 3′-end modification of test RNA with 2′-N<sub>3</sub>-2′-dATP or 3′-N<sub>3</sub>-2′,3′-ddATP using yeast PAP followed by click reaction with DBCO-biotin. Using 2′-N<sub>3</sub>-2′-dATP, multiple 2′-N<sub>3</sub>-2′-deoxyadenosine nucleotides were added at the poly(A) tail and then reacted quantitatively to the corresponding click product. Using 3′-N<sub>3</sub>-2′,3′-ddATP, a single 3′-N<sub>3</sub>′-2′,3′-dideoxyadenosine nucleotide is added and reacted during click reaction. (B, C) MS analysis of adenylated and clicked RNA after digestion and dephosphorylation to ribonucleosides: 2′-click-2′-dA 2 (calculated mass of [C<sub>49</sub>H<sub>64</sub>N<sub>13</sub>O<sub>11</sub>S]<sup>+</sup> = 1042.4563, found: 1042.4565) or 3′-click-2′,3′-ddA 4 (calculated mass of [C<sub>49</sub>H<sub>64</sub>N<sub>13</sub>O<sub>10</sub>S]<sup>+</sup> = 1026.4614, found: 1026.4616), respectively. (D) HPLC analysis of adenylated test RNA before and after click reaction. Samples were prepared as in B, C. (E) PAGE analysis of intact modified test RNAs (15% PAA gel, 12 W, 3 h, rt). SYBR™ Gold staining (Invitrogen) is shown. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com Nucleic Acids Res, Volume 47, Issue 7, 06 February 2019, Page e42, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz084 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 3. In vitro fluorescence labeling of poly(A) tail-modified reporter mRNAs. (A) Concept for poly(A) tail ... Figure 3. In vitro fluorescence labeling of poly(A) tail-modified reporter mRNAs. (A) Concept for poly(A) tail modification of mRNAs with 2′-N<sub>3</sub>-2′-dATP using yeast PAP followed by click reaction using DBCO-SRB. (B, C) Luciferase (GLuc, CLuc) and eGFP mRNAs were analyzed by PAGE (7.5% PAA gel, 10 W, 1 h, rt) and visualized using SRB fluorescence (λ<sub>ex</sub> = 532 nm) and SYBR™ Gold (Invitrogen) staining. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com Nucleic Acids Res, Volume 47, Issue 7, 06 February 2019, Page e42, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz084 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 4. Stability and translational efficiency of poly(A) tail-modified luciferase mRNAs. (A) Scheme illustrating ... Figure 4. Stability and translational efficiency of poly(A) tail-modified luciferase mRNAs. (A) Scheme illustrating translation assay in mammalian cells of poly(A)-modified luciferase mRNAs followed by luminescence analysis of secreted luciferases. (B) Western blot analysis of GLuc protein in the supernatant of cells transfected with indicated GLuc-mRNA constructs. With the cell lysate of corresponding samples, GAPDH protein level from the respective cell lysate is shown as control. (C) Translational efficiency of differently modified GLuc-mRNAs relative to co-transfected CLuc-mRNA. The GLuc luminescence was referenced to the luminescence from ARCA-capped CLuc-mRNA and then normalized to ARCA-GLuc mRNA after 24 h (≙ 100%). Data and error bars show average and standard deviation of three independent experiments measured in duplicate. Statistical comparisons performed by two-tailed t-test with P < 0.01 (**) and P < 0.001 (***), statistical comparisons to ApppG and untransfected cells are not shown). (D) Comparison of GLuc- and CLuc-mRNA levels by qPCR at 24 h after transfection for different combinations of modified poly(A) tails, as indicated in the legend. The GLuc or CLuc mRNA level was quantified by qPCR and compared to the ß-actin-mRNA level by generating ΔCt = Ct<sub>(target)</sub>-Ct<sub>(reference)</sub>. Data and error bars show averages and standard deviations of two independent experiments with two technical replicates measured in duplicate. Abbreviations: Ct: cycle threshold, target: GLuc- or CLuc-mRNA, reference: ß-actin-mRNA, ApppG / ARCA: capped 5′-end, N<sub>3</sub>: azido-modified poly(A) tail, click: clicked poly(A) tail). Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com Nucleic Acids Res, Volume 47, Issue 7, 06 February 2019, Page e42, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz084 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 5. Poly(A) tail-modified eGFP-mRNA is a translationally active mRNA. (A) Scheme illustrating transfection of ... Figure 5. Poly(A) tail-modified eGFP-mRNA is a translationally active mRNA. (A) Scheme illustrating transfection of HeLa cells with poly(A) tail-modified mRNAs (ARCA-N<sub>3</sub>, ARCA-click) or with unmodified control (ARCA, ApppG) and following translation into protein. (B) The eGFP and GAPDH protein level of different cell samples was analyzed on western blots. (C) Confocal microscopy shows eGFP fluorescence after transfection with indicated modified mRNAs. 24 h after transfection, cells were fixed for imaging. Scale bars are 20 μm. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com Nucleic Acids Res, Volume 47, Issue 7, 06 February 2019, Page e42, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz084 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 6. eGFP-mRNA with azido-modified poly(A) tail can be labeled in living cells. (A) Scheme illustrating in-cell ... Figure 6. eGFP-mRNA with azido-modified poly(A) tail can be labeled in living cells. (A) Scheme illustrating in-cell click reaction in mammalian cells transfected with ARCA-N<sub>3</sub>-eGFP-mRNA. (B) Confocal microscopy of HeLa cells transfected with eGFP-mRNA with azido modifications at the poly(A) tail (ARCA-N<sub>3</sub>) or with in vitro clicked poly(A) tail (ARCA-click). Sample with ARCA-N<sub>3</sub>-eGFP-mRNA was then subjected to DBCO-SRB treatment to achieve bioorthogonal fluorescence labeling in living cells, followed by washing steps. After incubation overnight, all cell samples were fixed and hybridized using Stellaris eGFP probe with Quasar 670 dye. SRB and Q670 fluorescence show mRNA labeling. Same cell samples were used as for translational analysis (Figure 5). Scale bars are 20 μm. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com Nucleic Acids Res, Volume 47, Issue 7, 06 February 2019, Page e42, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz084 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.