Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Advertisements

Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 6, Issue 7, Pages (July 1998)
Herpes Simplex Virus Glycoprotein D Bound to the Human Receptor HveA
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1995)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 83, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
R. Elliot Murphy, Alexandra B. Samal, Jiri Vlach, Jamil S. Saad 
Modular Recognition of RNA by a Human Pumilio-Homology Domain
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Intramolecular interactions of the regulatory domains of the Bcr–Abl kinase reveal a novel control mechanism  Hyun-Joo Nam, Wayne G Haser, Thomas M Roberts,
Chi-Hon Lee, Kalle Saksela, Urooj A Mirza, Brian T Chait, John Kuriyan 
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
James J Chou, Honglin Li, Guy S Salvesen, Junying Yuan, Gerhard Wagner 
Crystal Structure of an Inactive Akt2 Kinase Domain
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Solution Structure of the Core NFATC1/DNA Complex
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Solution Structure of a Telomeric DNA Complex of Human TRF1
Structure of Bax  Motoshi Suzuki, Richard J. Youle, Nico Tjandra  Cell 
Structure of the UBA Domain of Dsk2p in Complex with Ubiquitin
Crystal Structure of Recombinant Human Interleukin-22
Danny N.P Doan, Terje Dokland  Structure 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Solution Structure of the RAIDD CARD and Model for CARD/CARD Interaction in Caspase-2 and Caspase-9 Recruitment  James J Chou, Hiroshi Matsuo, Hanjun.
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (July 2004)
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (May 2000)
A Putative Mechanism for Downregulation of the Catalytic Activity of the EGF Receptor via Direct Contact between Its Kinase and C-Terminal Domains  Meytal.
Structural Basis for FGF Receptor Dimerization and Activation
Activation Mechanism of the MAP Kinase ERK2 by Dual Phosphorylation
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Tertiary Structure of Destrin and Structural Similarity between Two Actin-Regulating Protein Families  H Hatanaka, K Ogura, K Moriyama, S Ichikawa, I.
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Crystal Structure of the Human Myeloid Cell Activating Receptor TREM-1
E.Radzio Andzelm, J Lew, S Taylor  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Structure of a water soluble fragment of the ‘Rieske’ iron–sulfur protein of the bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex determined by MAD phasing.
Volume 100, Issue 4, Pages (February 2000)
Solution Structure of the Interacting Domains of the Mad–Sin3 Complex
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
Volume 97, Issue 3, Pages (April 1999)
Jia-Wei Wu, Amy E. Cocina, Jijie Chai, Bruce A. Hay, Yigong Shi 
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Structure of the InlB Leucine-Rich Repeats, a Domain that Triggers Host Cell Invasion by the Bacterial Pathogen L. monocytogenes  Michael Marino, Laurence.
Structure of a HoxB1–Pbx1 Heterodimer Bound to DNA
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Sequence-Specific RNA Binding by a Nova KH Domain
Sabine Pokutta, William I. Weis  Molecular Cell 
Morgan Huse, Ye-Guang Chen, Joan Massagué, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex Dingjiang Liu, Rieko Ishima, Kit I Tong, Stefan Bagby, Tetsuro Kokubo, D.R Muhandiram, Lewis E Kay, Yoshihiro Nakatani, Mitsuhiko Ikura  Cell  Volume 94, Issue 5, Pages 573-583 (September 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81599-8

Figure 1 Features and Sequence Alignment of TAFII230 (A) Schematic depiction of full-length Drosophila TAFII230. Proposed domain locations and functions are shown. (B) Sequence alignment of the N-terminal TBP-binding domain (residues 11–77) of Drosophila TAFII230 with the corresponding region of human TAFII250. Secondary structure elements determined in the present study are indicated with yellow boxes for α helices and orange arrows for β strands of the β hairpin. Residues conserved between the human and Drosophila proteins are connected by two dots, and residues involved in the TBP interaction are marked with an asterisk. Cell 1998 94, 573-583DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81599-8)

Figure 2 Backbone Fingerprint NMR Spectra of the TBP–dTAFII23011–77 Complex (A) 1H-15N HSQC spectrum of 15N-labeled TBP in complex with unlabeled dTAFII23011–77. (B)1H-15N HSQC spectrum of 15N-labeled dTAFII23011–77 in complex with unlabeled TBP. (C) 1H-15N HSQC spectrum of 15N-labeled dTAFII23011–77 alone. In (A) and (B), peaks are labeled (where peak separation allows) using the one-letter amino acid code and sequence position of the corresponding residue. Cell 1998 94, 573-583DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81599-8)

Figure 3 Best-Fit Superposition of the Family of NMR-Derived Structures and Polypeptide Fold of the TBP–dTAFII23011–77 Complex (A) Best-fit superposition of 34 NMR-derived structures. Only backbone N, Cα, and C′ atoms are displayed. TBP is shown in green and dTAFII23011–77 in yellow. Residues 11–16 have been omitted. (B) A different view of the family of NMR-derived structures generated from the view in (A) by rotating through 90° along the horizontal axis. These figures were produced using Insight II. (C and D) Ribbon representation of the energy-minimized average structure of the TBP–dTAFII23011–77 complex. The color schemes and orientations of the complex are the same as in (A) and (B). These figures were generated using Ribbons (Carson 1991). Cell 1998 94, 573-583DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81599-8)

Figure 4 dTAFII23011–77 Hydrophobic Core Stereoview of the dTAFII23011–77 fold in the TBP–dTAFII23011–77 complex, showing residues involved in hydrophobic core formation. The backbone is shown as a yellow ribbon. Secondary structure elements are labeled. This figure was generated using MOLSCRIPT (Kraulis 1991) and rendered using Raster3D (Merritt and Bacon 1997). Cell 1998 94, 573-583DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81599-8)

Figure 5 Molecular Interface between TBP and dTAFII23011–77 (A) Summary of residue pairs for which intermolecular NOEs between TBP and dTAFII23011–77 are observed. The dTAFII230 residues that interact with the TBP direct repeat α/β motifs (top, N-terminal TBP motif, and bottom, C-terminal TBP motif) are listed inside yellow boxes. Secondary structure elements of the TBP motifs are represented by arrows (β strands) and boxes (α helices). (B) Stereoview showing hydrophobic interactions between TBP and dTAFII23011–77. TBP and TAFII23011–77 side chains are shown in magenta and cyan. The dTAFII23011–77 backbone is shown as a yellow ribbon. The TBP backbone is omitted for clarity. (C) Schematic diagram representing the interactions that confer asymmetry on dTAFII23011–77 binding to TBP. Acidic residues are highlighted with a red box, basic residues with a blue box, and hydrophobic regions are yellow. Whereas Thr-112 is involved in a putative side chain–side chain hydrogen bond with Asp-29, the corresponding C-terminal TBP motif residue, Val-203, is involved in hydrophobic interactions with Phe-25, Leu-64, and Met-67. Cell 1998 94, 573-583DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81599-8)

Figure 6 dTAFII230 Mimics the Partially Unwound Minor Groove Surface of the TATA Box in the TBP–TATA Complex Structure (A and C) The molecular surface of the TBP-binding domain of dTAFII23011–77 in the TBP–dTAFII23011–77 complex. The loop between helix α2 and the β hairpin has been omitted. In (A), acidic residues in dTAFII23011–77 that are close to TBP are labeled. The negatively charged side chains of Asp-29, Glu-31, Glu-51, Glu-70, and Asp-73 mimic the positions of negatively charged phosphate groups in the unwound minor groove of the TATA element that interact with Arg-105, Arg-98, Lys-211, Lys-218, and Lys-120 of TBP (Kim et al. 1993b; Kim and Burley 1994). (B and D) The molecular surface of the TBP-binding surface of the TATA element in the TBP–TATA complex (Kim et al. 1993a). Molecular surfaces are colored according to electrostatic potential. Blue corresponds to positive potential, red to negative potential. TBP is shown as a green ribbon. The TBP orientation is the same in (A) and (B) and in (C) and (D). The views in (C) and (D) are generated by an approximately 90° rotation of the views in (A) and (B). These figures were generated using GRASP (Nicholls 1993). Cell 1998 94, 573-583DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81599-8)