Outcomes and Satisfaction: Adult Seating and Mobility Clinic Penny J. Powers, PT,MS,ATP Level IV PT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chiari Surgical Outcomes Trial PI: Bermans J. Iskandar and Timothy George with collaboration from John Kestle ASAP-funded pilot study ASAP-funded pilot.
Advertisements

Co-Teaching as a Methodology in Teacher Preparation
Student Wellness Functional Plan. Student Wellness Functional Plan Key Features Expansion of the USDA school nutrition programs A more robust commitment.
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
IRB Insights UTHSC IRB Categories Review Process – Exempt – Expedited – Full Board Forms – Initial Application – Form 2 – Change.
Chiaki Gonda, B.A. Glen W. White, Ph.D. University of Kansas Craig Ravesloot, Ph.D. University of Montana MICL Advisory Panel Meeting November 2009 New.
Updates on APR Reporting for Early Childhood Transition (Indicators C-8 and B-12)
Hubbard County, Minn. Classification and Compensation Study Update GREG MANGOLD| AUGUST 5, 2014.
Manufacturer and Vendor Relationships Sept 16, 2009.
The Periodic Review Report at the Community College: Opportunities for Collaborative Institutional Renewal Valarie Avalone, Director of Planning Dr. Michael.
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
WELCOME COLBY SCHOOL DISTRICT Stakeholder Driven Strategic Planning January 8, 2014.
Chapter 15 Voice of the Customer. Objectives Project impact for internal customers Project impact for external customers Better understand customer needs.
Institutional Review Board And how it affects you.
CADTH Therapeutic Reviews
SPS Round Table The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance (ORIA) April 17, 2007.
Computer Science ABET Visit Update November 8, 2003.
1 Dissertation Process 4 process overview 4 specifics –dates, policies, etc.
 Please sign in.  You must register for the course to receive PAC.  PAC is valuable for advancing on the salary schedule.
Monitoring Accommodations in South Dakota Linda Turner Special Education Programs.
Educational Research and the VCOM Institutional Review Board
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Nursing Care Makes A Difference The Application of Omaha Documentation System on Clients with Mental Illness.
Graduation Conversation Doug Kosty Assistant Superintendent, Office of Learning Derek Brown Manager, Assessment of Essential Skills Cristen McLean Operations.
Team Member(s) Your name. 25 January SOLD: BUY: Copy of stock pdf.
Finding Support For Your Research Where will your curiosity take you?
Primary Care and Community Outreach Research VCOM Institutional Review Board Jim Mahaney, PhD Associate Dean for Biomedical Affairs, Virginia Campus Past.
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
HIPAA and Research Basics for IRB Tim Atkinson Director, Research and Sponsored Programs Director, Institutional Review Board Research Privacy Officer.
The Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) Robert Nordstrom, Ph.D. Larry Clarke, Ph.D.
Engaging Student Affairs Professionals in Division-Wide Assessment Lisa Garcia-Hanson,University of Washington Tacoma Charlotte Tullos, Central Washington.
Time Management From Proposal to Dissertation Defense.
Background Management Council (MC) was briefed on approach in early Feb 2003 and approved it Agreed that every Service Group (SG) will participate in.
Jamestown Community College The Path to NACEP Accreditation.
Measuring Consumer Perception of Care Challenges & Opportunities John Bartlett, M.D.,M.P.H. March Meeting with California’s Division of Alcohol and.
Developing your Research Plan for FemNorthNet Community Case Studies 1.
1 Geospatial Line of Business Update FGDC Coordination Group April 14, 2009.
Copyright FDA Inspections: Where Do Things Go Wrong? Diana Naser RN, MS, CCRP Executive Director Clinical Research Administration Clinical Research.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Institutional Review Board Brown Bag Series February 7, 2007 CITI – What is It & Why Do I have to Do It?
Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART). January 2006 Report to President and Congress Section 724(i) REPORT- Not later than 4 years after the date.
Evaluation Plan Steven Clauser, PhD Chief, Outcomes Research Branch Applied Research Program Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences NCCCP Launch.
Report of Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE) Goals, Timelines and Requirements Catherine F. Andersen Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
All College Day Friday, January 25, 2013 West Valley College Integrated Planning.
INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FAIR Rules and Guidelines 2016.
AAC&U VALUE Project: Minnesota Collaborative Demonstration Year 2 ( ) Demonstration Year 3 ( ) 1.
Professional Growth & Effectiveness System. DECISION REQUIRED BY MARCH 2013 Current Evaluation and PD Models The current evaluation plan was last revised.
Student Perspectives of Service Learning with Older Adults Carol Bashford ABD, RN, ACNS,BC Karen Brown MSN, RN
Action Research Proposal Presentation Jamie Burkley EDU 671 Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Newton Miller Date: March 22, 2015.
Michele Winship, Ph.D.  Compliance with HB 153/SB 316 requirements?  Seek out and get rid of “bad” teachers? OR  Improve teaching.
Special Needs Plans (SNP) Overview of SNP Assessment and S&P Measures June 2010.
Introduction Review and proper registration of Human Gene Transfer protocols is very complex. A protocol goes through rigorous review by multiple Committees.
Baltimore Summer Funding Collaborative
District Research Review
IRB BASICS Ethics and Human Subject Protections Summer 2016
Managing Study Expirations
Daniela B. Friedman, University of South Carolina
Division of General Internal Medicine
Overview of Important Changes to the Final Rule
Anca Miron, PhD IRB Chair, UW Oshkosh Kelly Schill, BS, CIP
Institutional Review Board
Streamlining IRB Procedures for Expanded Access
Human Subject Research
Overview of Important Changes to the Final Rule
Ethics in Evaluation Research & IRB
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Evergreen Valley College Accreditation Update October 20, 2014
The Center for Nursing Research Ochsner Health System December 2015
Begin With the End in Mind
Presentation transcript:

Outcomes and Satisfaction: Adult Seating and Mobility Clinic Penny J. Powers, PT,MS,ATP Level IV PT

Problem/question What are the outcomes (success and areas for improvement) of the Adult Seating and Positioning Clinic? What are the outcomes (success and areas for improvement) of the Adult Seating and Positioning Clinic? What level of satisfaction do the consumers of the Adult Seating and Mobility Clinic have with the services that they receive? What level of satisfaction do the consumers of the Adult Seating and Mobility Clinic have with the services that they receive?

Why is this a problem? Assistive technology( seating and mobility) is most likely to be a life long need and expense (RESNA 1998b) Assistive technology( seating and mobility) is most likely to be a life long need and expense (RESNA 1998b) No outcome measures or satisfaction data are being collected at this time. No outcome measures or satisfaction data are being collected at this time. Consumers of this clinic should have the opportunity to give satisfaction/dissatisfaction data. Consumers of this clinic should have the opportunity to give satisfaction/dissatisfaction data.

Study Parameters It was decided that this study falls into a research category that requires IRB approval at Vanderbilt. Given the formality of research design and demands of external review, this project will require 2 years to complete. This was approved at all levels. It was decided that this study falls into a research category that requires IRB approval at Vanderbilt. Given the formality of research design and demands of external review, this project will require 2 years to complete. This was approved at all levels.

Study: Two Part Satisfaction data is collected at Pi Beta Phi from participants in our comprehensive treatment program. The survey has been developed in-house and data is analyzed by our outcomes committee Satisfaction data is collected at Pi Beta Phi from participants in our comprehensive treatment program. The survey has been developed in-house and data is analyzed by our outcomes committee –Satisfaction survey will be developed similar to present instruments for the consumers of the Adult Seating and Mobility Clinic

Study: contd Survey questions will be submitted to committee for approval. Survey questions will be submitted to committee for approval. Survey data will be collected in conjunction with survey instrument - FEW Survey data will be collected in conjunction with survey instrument - FEW

Study contd Very little evidence exists regarding satisfaction with seating and mobility devices in the community. Very little evidence exists regarding satisfaction with seating and mobility devices in the community. The FEW – Functioning Everyday with a Wheelchair is one tool that is available that has both reliability and validity data The FEW – Functioning Everyday with a Wheelchair is one tool that is available that has both reliability and validity data Collaboration with Belmont University School of Physical Therapy is desired Collaboration with Belmont University School of Physical Therapy is desired

Timeline and progress to date Research Team: Research Team: Penny J. Powers, PT,MS,ATP - PI Penny J. Powers, PT,MS,ATP - PI Renee Brown, PhD, PT – Faculty Belmont University Renee Brown, PhD, PT – Faculty Belmont University –Students: Elizabeth Codington –Sarah Lyons –Larry Pemberton –Daniel Rogers

Progression of project Forms, informed consent and procedures developed Forms, informed consent and procedures developed IRB completed and submitted – January 2009 – multiple revisions. Final approval received 3/30/09. IRB completed and submitted – January 2009 – multiple revisions. Final approval received 3/30/09. IRB submitted to Belmont for secondary approval – obtained -April 2009 IRB submitted to Belmont for secondary approval – obtained -April 2009

Data Collection Data collection has been initiated May 2009 – 22 subjects have provided informed consent. Data collection has been initiated May 2009 – 22 subjects have provided informed consent. Project completion expected by March 29,2010 prior to expiration of IRB Project completion expected by March 29,2010 prior to expiration of IRB