Undulator Tuning Status

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Insertion Device Toshi Tanabe, ID group leader 8 th ASAC meeting for NSLS-II Project May 10-11, 2011.
Advertisements

Simona Bettoni and Remo Maccaferri, CERN Wiggler modeling Double-helix like option.
SLAC, 5-Dec-2006 Magnets and Magnetic Measurements for Prototype Energy Spectrometer T-474.
Zachary Wolf Undulator Tuning November 12, Undulator Tuning Status Z. Wolf, S. Anderson, R. Colon, S. Jansson, D. Jensen,
Magnets for the ESRF upgrade phase II
XFEL Undulator Efforts at DESY and Thoughts on LCLS-II H.-D. Nuhn June 30, 2010.
Zachary Wolf Undulator Tuning June 17, 2008 Undulator Tuning Status Z. Wolf, S. Anderson, R. Colon, S. Jansson, S.Kaplunenko,
LCLS Undulators October 14, 2004 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL MMF Review Introduction to the LCLS Undulators Heinz-Dieter Nuhn,
Yurii Levashov Undula t or fiducialization test Oct. 14, 2004 Undulator Fiducialization Test Results Fiducialization Tolerances.
Zack Wolf Quadrupole Fiducialization October 20, A Vibrating Wire System For Quadrupole Fiducialization Zack Wolf,
Isaac Vasserman Magnetic Measurements and Tuning 10/14/ I. Vasserman LCLS Magnetic Measurements and Tuning.
Yurii Levashov LCLS Undulator Fiducialization October 20, 2005 *Work supported in part by DOE Contract DE-AC02-76SF LCLS.
1 Zachary Wolf 1 Undulator Tuning Status June 9, 2009 Undulator Tuning Status Z. Wolf, S. Anderson, R. Colon, S. Jansson, D. Jensen,
Robert Ruland Installation Alignment -Magnetic Measurements – Fiducialization April 7-8, 2005 FAC Meeting 1 Installation Alignment,
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Robert Ruland MMF Introduction, Schedule, Budget October 14, 2004 MMF Review 1 MMF Introduction, Schedule, Budget Robert Ruland.
Stephen Milton Undulator System 20 April, 2006 LCLS Undulator System Update S. Milton, ANL FAC, April 20 th, 2006.
Robert Ruland MMF Layout, Workflow October 14, 2004 MMF Review 1 MMF Layout, Workflow Robert Ruland Magnetic Measurements Facility.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
J. Welch Talk MMF 10/14/04 LCLS Magnetic Measurement Facility Requirements Functional Temperature Vibration Earth's.
Zachary Wolf LCLS Undulator October 30, LCLS Undulator Tuning And Fiducialization Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim.
Zack Wolf Undulator Magnetic April 11, 2006 LCLS Undulator Magnetic Measurements Zack Wolf, Scott Anderson, Ralph Colon,
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnetic Specifications and Tolerances Weiming Guo, NSLS-II Project In this presentation I briefly introduced the.
Zachary Wolf Undulator Oct 12, LCLS Undulator Tuning Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim Weidemann, Seva Kaplounenko,
DELTA Quadrant Tuning Y. Levashov, E. Reese. 2 Tolerances for prototype quadrant tuning Magnet center deviations from a nominal center line < ± 50  m.
1 / 19 M. Gateau CERN – Geneva – CH 14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland.
Radiation Monitoring at the Undulator System Heinz-Dieter Nuhn – LCLS Undulator Group Leader Presented at Wednesday, March 7, 2012.
Permanent Magnet Quadrupoles for the CLIC Drive Beam Jim Clarke, Norbert Collomb, Neil Marks, James Richmond, and Ben Shepherd STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
< BackNext >PreviewMain Chapter 2 Data in Science Preview Section 1 Tools and Models in ScienceTools and Models in Science Section 2 Organizing Your DataOrganizing.
ERHIC: an Efficient Multi-Pass ERL based on FFAG Return Arcs June 9, 2015Stephen Brooks, ERL On behalf of the eRHIC design team.
COBRA Magnet Status W. Ootani June 27th, 2006 MEG Review W. Ootani June 27th, 2006 MEG Review.
Magnet Design & Construction for EMMA
ATF2 Magnets Results of the Field Measurements of three ATF2 DEA Dipoles by Single Stretched Wire and Hall Probe at IHEP over past 2 months: updated report.
Status of Target Design Chris Booth Sheffield 28 th October 2004.
SR NSLS prototype magnets. Dipoles 90 mm aperture dipole Pole Ends will be matched to achieve the magnetic field quality ( )
SCU1 Vertical Test Results Matt Kasa 9/16/2014. Vertical Cryostat Assembly Coil Training Record the current decay and the terminal voltage across the.
Helical Undulator Status Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
Low Energy RHIC e - Cooling 1 IP2 64 m LEReC-I (1.6-2MeV): Gun to dump SRF gun used as a booster cavity.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
X LCLS SCU NbTi Prototype Schedule Version: February 12, 2015 Update 23JUN2015 X X System complete and ready for test X System complete & tested w/Hall.
Catherine LeCocq, SLAC Alignment Plan for the LCLS Undulator IWAA 2006,1 Alignment Plan for the LCLS Undulator Catherine.
Physics Requirements Sensitivity to Manufacturing Imperfections Strategy  where to map field  measure deviation from ideal model  fit to error tables.
CERN –GSI/CEA MM preparation meeting, Magnetic Measurements WP.
201 MHz Cavity Plans Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory February 11, 2011 MAP Friday Video Conference Meeting.
SSRL EPU Magnetic Measurements Zachary Wolf March 15, 2013.
CEA - Irfu – Mois 2011 – 1 Cavity-string alignment experience in the EXFEL prototype cryomodule assembly Michel Fontaine CEA – SACLAY DSM/IRFU/SIS TTC.
Alignment and stability session
Magnetic Field optimization of EPU at TPS
Magnetic Measurements At SLAC
Tutorial On Fiducialization Of Accelerator Magnets And Undulators
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Brief Status SPS Prototype PSB Prototype Installed in LS1
Magnetic Measurements For The LCLS Undulator System
Renovation of the 45-year old PS magnets
Magnets for the ESRF upgrade phase II
LCLS Undulator Fiducialization
Status of Target Design
Phase Adjustments: K vs
PERMANENT MAGNET QUADRUPOLE FOR THE LINAC 4 CCDTL
Beam-Based Alignment Results
Undulator Tuning Status Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS for Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim Weidemann, Seva Kaplounenko, Scott Jansson, Ralph Colon, Dave.
LCLS Undulator System Status and Schedule
Motivation Technique Simulations LCLS LCLS DOE Review, April 24, 2002
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn – LCLS Undulator Group Leader May 14, 2009
LCLS Undulator System Status and Schedule
LCLS Undulator Tuning And Fiducialization
Undulators Subgroup Summary April FAC Review K. Robinson, J
Physics Requirements for Conventional Facilities
LCLS Undulator Magnetic Measurements
Presentation transcript:

Undulator Tuning Status Z. Wolf, S. Anderson, R. Colon, S. Jansson, D. Jensen, S. Kaplunenko, Y. Levashov, Ed. Reese, A. Weidemann

Undulator Tuning Status Overview Status/Schedule Reference Undulator Undulator Repairs Radiation Damage

Re-Tuning We are re-tuning all the undulators because of damage from temperature excursions beam pipe interferences

Re-Tuning Schedule 25 undulators are in the tunnel 8 undulators are still required 2 undulators need repair 6 spares need to be tuned K vs Temperature studies still need to be done

Reference Undulator X-Trajectory, Y-Trajectory, Phase vs Z, measured many times X-Trajectory, Y-Trajectory, Phase vs Z, Phase In Cell, all stable

Field integrals stable, Reference Undulator I1XvsX I1YvsX Field Integral Measurements, Long Coil Reference Undulator never tuned for ±6 mm good field region I2XvsX I2YvsX Field integrals stable, but some systematic changes

Reference Undulator Started straightening coil routinely, improved I1X vs Time I1Y vs Time Field integral changes possibly due to coil straightness Field integrals at X=0 at different times I2X vs Time I2Y vs Time Started straightening coil routinely, improved repeatability

Reference Undulator Beam Axis Position The beam axis position relative to the tooling balls is affected by many errors. The repeatability of the reference undulator beam axis position is a measure of the rms error on K for the undulators in the tunnel.

Undulator Tooling Balls Relative To Beam Axis Reference Undulator Undulator Tooling Balls Relative To Beam Axis

Change In Beam X Position Relative To X Tooling Balls Reference Undulator Change In Beam X Position Relative To X Tooling Balls Average change doesn’t affect performance. RMS change is important.

Change In Beam Y Position Relative To Y Tooling Balls Reference Undulator Change In Beam Y Position Relative To Y Tooling Balls

MMF Temperature History Reference Undulator MMF Temperature History Aside: The 9 degree temperature excursion in December 2008 caused a one month delay while we recalibrated, straightened the bench, and checked all the undulators in the MMF. The smaller temperature excursions caused a one week delay each while we checked our calibrations.

MMF Temperature Excursions T > 22 C Reference Undulator MMF Temperature Excursions T > 22 C The large temperature excursions are not responsible for the slope in the beam axis x-position plot. deg C

Hall Probe Calibrations Reference Undulator Hall Probe Calibrations The hall probe was calibrated several times during the tuning. The changes in x-position remained. Hall probe calibration errors do not appear to be responsible for the change in beam axis x-position.

MMF Temperature Accuracy Reference Undulator MMF Temperature Accuracy T# Read Refere Differ 1 19.96 19.958 0.002 2 19.97 19.966 0.004 3 19.96 19.956 0.004 4 19.94 19.943 -0.003 5 19.93 19.931 -0.001 6 19.88 19.875 0.005 Yurii compared our temperature measurement system output to a reference thermometer on 4/16/09. The temperature difference is shown. We have done similar tests in the past, with similar results. There does not appear to be any significant error in our temperature measurements. deg C

Kugler Bench Reference Dipole Reference Undulator Kugler Bench Reference Dipole Reference Dipole, uniform field, NMR measurements (Bhall – Bnmr) / Bnmr is stable to better than 10-4 over the past year.

Hall Probe Calibration History Reference Undulator Hall Probe Calibration History a) c) Bcalib – Bnom vs Vhall Bnom is linear in V. (Take out linear part of calibration.) See some changes in probe. At V = 5 V (1 T), change in calibration over time. See an ageing of probe. Calibration takes this out. Residuals Bmeas – Bfit Residuals less than 0.2 G. b)

SN16 Radiation Damage Test Heinz-Dieter will comment on the dose and the number of equivalent years of usage.

Straightness Repairs Are Complete Undulator Repairs Straightness Repairs Are Complete 6 Undulators Before After

Undulator Repairs SN6 needs the end pole assemblies re-installed. SN4 needs a pole repaired. We are setting up a lab to do this work. In addition, we will install a block magnetizer and a helmholtz coil in this lab to repair undulators and allow prototype development.

Conclusion 25 undulators are in the tunnel 33 undulators will be installed in June Reference undulator trajectories and phases are stable Reference undulator axis position indicates rms ∆K/K errors of 3×10-5 for production 2 MMF temperature measurements appear accurate by comparing to a reference thermometer Reference dipole measurements are stable to 10-4 determined by comparing the hall probe to an NMR. Hall probe calibration fits have residuals less than 0.2 G. The hall probe shows some ageing with time. (The calibrations correct this.) A radiation damage test was done and no damage was detected. The final undulator repairs are in progress. Studies of K vs temperature will start as soon as the production work is done. We need to tune 6 spare undulators and then we are ready for routine radiation damage checks. We will be able to fix undulators and build small prototypes with our fixturing and block magnetizer.