BESIII TOF Digitization

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 STAR TOF Calibration. 2 Detectors TPC(TPX) - tracking MRPC TOF (TOFr) – stop time measurement pVPD/upVPD - start time measurement Particle momentum;
Advertisements

30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
Review of PID simulation & reconstruction in G4MICE Yordan Karadzhov Sofia university “St. Kliment Ohridski” Content : 1 TOF 2 Cerenkov.
ECAL Digitization Rick Wilkinson May 25, ECAL Digitization CaloHitResponse CaloSamples (analog signal) EcalElectronicsSim EBDataFrame EEDataFrame.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Timing Properties of T0 Detectors At PHOBOS Saba Zuberi, Erik Johnson, Nazim Khan, Frank Wolfs, Wojtek Skulski University of Rochester.
Progress and plans on PID simulation and reconstruction Yordan Karadzhov Sofia university St. Kliment Ohridski.
27 Jun 2005S. Kahn -- Tof/Ckov Status1 Status of TOF and Ckov Sub- packages in G4Mice Steve Kahn 27 June 2005.
Scintillation Detectors
The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,
RF background, analysis of MTA data & implications for MICE Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Collaboration Meeting – Analysis session, October.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
EXL/crystal simulations B. Genolini Simulation of NUSTAR crystals with Litrani Presentation of Litrani: simulation of.
Report on SiPM Tests SiPM as a alternative photo detector to replace PMT. Qauntify basic characteristics Measure Energy, Timing resolution Develop simulation.
Status of MC Simulation Huaimin Liu BESIII Collaboration meeting IHEP, Beijing, Jan. 12, 2006.
R 3 B Gamma Calorimeter Agenda. ● Introduction ● Short presentation on the first ● Task definition for R&D period ( )
GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Detector Review, October 2004.
1 Alessandra Casale Università degli Studi di Genova INFN Sezione Genova FT-Cal Prototype Simulations.
Implementing a dual readout calorimeter in SLIC and testing Geant4 Physics Hans Wenzel Fermilab Friday, 2 nd October 2009 ALCPG 2009.
Time of Flight Counter BESIII International Review Sep. 16, 2002 Heng Yuekun
Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.
15-16 Oct 2005 Alice-USA meetingAleksei Pavlinov GEANT EMCAL geometry for ALICE current status Aleksei Pavlinov WSU.
Start Counter Collaboration Meeting September 2004 W. Boeglin FIU.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
Hongyu Fu, Trigger group The Monte Carlo for Trigger Design of BES3 Scintillating Fibre BEMC Outline: Introduction to BES3 Scin-fibre BEMC Trigger.
BESIII Simulation Status Z.Y. Deng M. He H.M. Liu Y.J. Mao Z.Y. You Y.Yuan BES Annual Meeting June 1, 2005.
BigCal Reconstruction and Elastic Event Selection for GEp-III Andrew Puckett, MIT on behalf of the GEp-III Collaboration.
1 Geant4 Simulation :MCP PET 4’’(102mm) Scintillator ( LSO) 4’’(102mm) 10mm Glass( Borosilicate) PhotocathodeI(Carbon) Space(Vacuum) MCP(Alumina) Space(Vacumm)
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
G4 Validation meeting (5/11/2003) S.VIRET LPSC Grenoble Photon testbeam Data/G4 comparison  Motivation  Testbeam setup & simulation  Analysis & results.
Test beam preliminary results D. Di Filippo, P. Massarotti, T. Spadaro.
Start and Vertex Detector W. Boeglin, A.Klein Current Design: 3300 scintillating fibers 1mm diameter 3 double layers (1 axial, 2 stereo) cylindrical geometry.
KEK Test Beam Phase I (May 2005) Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE-FT Daresbury Aug 30th, 2005.
Beam test of low index sillica aerogel Yukiyoshi Kon RCNP, Osaka University Collaboration 2008/5/2.
Digitization in EMC simulation Dmytro Melnychuk, Soltan Institute for Nuclear Studies, Warsaw, Poland.
BESIII EMC Simulation & Reconstruction He Miao
1 Hadronic calorimeter simulation S.Itoh, T.Takeshita ( Shinshu Univ.) GLC calorimeter group Contents - Comparison between Scintillator and Gas - Digital.
Collection of Photoelectrons from a CsI Photocathode in Triple GEM Detectors C. Woody B.Azmuon 1, A Caccavano 1, Z.Citron 2, M.Durham 2, T.Hemmick 2, J.Kamin.
TOF Reconstruction, Calibration & Test-beam Simulation Jiang Linli 2005/6/1 (13th BES Annual Meeting )
A Brand new neutrino detector 「 SciBar 」 (2) Y. Takubo (Osaka) - Readout Electronics - Introduction Readout electronics Cosmic ray trigger modules Conclusion.
Photon Transport Monte Carlo September 27, 2004 Matthew Jones/Riei IshizikiPurdue University Overview Physical processes PMT and electronics response Some.
Rita Carbone, RICAP 11, Roma 3 26/05/2011 Stand-alone low energy measurements of light nuclei from PAMELA Time-of-Flight system. Rita Carbone INFN Napoli.
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
Simulation and reconstruction of CLAS12 Electromagnetic Calorimeter in GSIM12 S. Stepanyan (JLAB), N. Dashyan (YerPhI) CLAS12 Detector workshop, February.
1 The Scintillation Tile Hodoscope (SciTil) ● Motivation ● Event timing/ event building/ software trigger ● Conversion detection ● Charged particle TOF.
 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.
Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration
Fabio, Francesco, Francesco and Nicola INFN and University Bari
Status of BESIII and upgrade of BESIII
Particle Identification (PID) at HIEPA Experiment
Ultra fast SF57 based SAC M. Raggi Sapienza Università di Roma
Simulation & Reconstruction
Scintillation Detectors
Huagen Xu IKP: T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns
Central detector for CLAS12: CTOF and Neutron detector
LAV simulation with Geant4
PCAL Cosmic Ray Tests Progress Report C. Smith μ U V W MODULE 2
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
The time-of-flight reconstruction & calibration
Deng Ziyan Jan 10-12, 2006 BESIII Collaboration Meeting
Particle ID Diagnostics in the MICE Beamline
Backgrounds using v7 Mask in 9 Si Layers at a Muon Higgs Factory
Photomultiplier (PMT) Tubes
PID detector on BESIII Nov 27th, 2007 Yuekun Heng IHEP
CLAS 12 Status of the test bench Calculation of the time resolution
Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #17 Wednesday ,April 4, 2012 Dr. Brandt
Performance test of a RICH with time-of-flight information
Presentation transcript:

BESIII TOF Digitization Deng ziyan 2005.10.26

Outline TOF Geometry TOF Digitization version 1 Something about running BOOST

TOF Geometry Wrapping Al + PVF layer1 layer2 88 barrel

TOF Geometry end-cap

Digitization from hits edep digi time Hit position event digi Hit Hit digi Hit Hit forwADC forwTDC forward: east backward: west backADC No backward output for endcap tof backTDC

Digitization Version 1 Geant Tof digitization ADC Select Arrival Time edep to ADC edep, arrivalTime 1 edep, arrivalTime 2 edep, arrivalTime n edep (1) edep (2) edep (n) Select first Arrival time Apply dE/dx threshold cut Geant arrivalTime (initial) ADC edep :-dE/dx in scintillator arrivalTime : time of flight + dz/vel Tof digitization PMT resolution tdc smeared by Gaussian with s(f(ADC)) tdc ADC TDC Time walk added TDC = tdc + c(ADC)-0.5 ADC

Digitization Version 1 1GeV e- Theta=90 Phi: 0-360 Sigma = 84 ps

More to do about version 1 Correction on ADC and TDC ADC vs z-hit TDC Resolution vs ADC Time-walk correction TDC vs ADC Parameters will be taken from data fitting

Digitization Version 2 Full simulation Scintillation light emission in each step Light propagation in scintillator upto PMT PMT response Photoelectron production Signal pulse production Discrimation of PMT signal at two levels If pulse height>HL, then make T,Q output

Parameters Scintillator PMT Emit time parameters Light attenuation length Refractive index Light output PMT Gain Rise time Effective area Transit time(and spread) Collection factor Quantum efficiency HL, LL

Scintillation light emission Number of photons is proportional to edep 10000/MeV Uniform distribution Emission time: a time profile assumed temit

Light propagation Lpro = d / cosθ Propagation time: tpro= Lpro/ vel PMT θ d Lpro = d / cosθ Propagation time: tpro= Lpro/ vel Attenuation in TOF counter is simulated Part Lights escape or lost

PMT response Photoelectron production Photoelectrons are produced with quantum efficiency Number of photoelectrons is reduced due to the dynode structure Transit time is added PMT response for single photon electron

PMT response Hit 1 direction Path length Pro time Photon 1 reach PMT Transit time end time endTime = flightTime+emitTime+ProTime+TransitTime ……….. Photon N ….. Hit N Integration of arrival photon times with PMT response function

PMT response endTime PMT response for single pe PMT pulse output Rise time = 2.5 ns PMT pulse output

Time distribution flight time delta T in one step 1GeV/c e- vertical incidence

Time distribution emitting time propagation time 1GeV/c e- vertical incidence

Time distribution PMT transit time end time 1GeV/c e- vertical incidence

Simulation of readout electronics Each PMT signal is examined using double threshold (LL,HL) A signal larger than HL threshold provides a gate to measure TDC TDC is given at the moment when PMT pulse crosses LL threshold HL LL TDC

TOF Front_End Electronics

Energy deposit total energy loss in one scintillator (5cm width) 1GeV/c e- vertical incidence total energy loss in one scintillator (5cm width)

e- 1GeV/c Z=0 : forward TDC resolution = 121 e- 1GeV/c Z=0 : forward TDC resolution = 121.6ps backward TDC resolution = 121.4ps

TDC vs z-hit forward Veff=17.16 cm/ns backward Veff=17.19 cm/ns

β vs P particles: random P: 0-1.6GeV random

ADC vs z-hit log(forwADC/backADC) vs z-hit

TDC sigma vs z-hit

Running environment besfarm Genbes BOOST lxplus koala BesGenModule BesSim besfarm: old, no maintenance koala: overwhelmed lxplus: the last choice! even problems exist Using BesGenModule and BesSim can avoid changing environment

Running environment lxplus04, 05 more document /ihepbatch/bes/dengzy /afs/ihep.ac.cn/users/d/dengzy (2G) /ihepbatch/besdata/public/dengzy (5G) more document G4ParticleList GenbesParticleId PDGscheme http://boss.ihep.ac.cn/SofPro/simulation.html

The end Thanks!