2011 CEPP Retreat Data Report Field Experience and Student Teaching

Content INTASC Averages for Secondary and Elementary Programs Combined INTASC Averages for Elementary Programs INTASC Averages for Secondary Programs Elementary vs. Secondary Scores Field Experience Diversity Data: Disabilities Social Diversity Cultural Diversity Print-outs

INTASC Standards 1: Knowledge of Subject 2: Learning and Human Development 3: Adapting Instruction 4: Instructional Strategies 5: Motivation and Learning Environment 6: Communication Skills 7: Planning 8: Assessment 9: Reflection and Professional Growth 10: Relationship with the School and Community

Unit Field Experience and Student Teaching INTASC Averages 2010-2011 2009-2010 2008-2009 FE ST 1: Knowledge of Subject 3.47 3.71 3.43 3.56 3.61 2: Learning and Human Development 3.45 3.62 3.4 3.46 3.57 3: Adapting Instruction 3.31 3.29 3.44 3.39 4: Instructional Strategies 3.66 3.34 3.54 5: Motivation and Learning Environment 3.53 3.67 3.48 3.58 3.5 6: Communication Skills 3.37 3.65 3.35 3.51 7: Planning 3.7 3.49 8: Assessment 3.64 3.3 9: Reflection and Professional Growth 3.76 3.32 10: Relationship with the School and Community 3.02 3.73 3.03 3.33 Number of Evaluations 306 324 346 368 226 375

Combined Field Experiences Evaluations vs Combined Field Experiences Evaluations vs. Final Student Teaching Evaluations Combined Field Experience Scores tend to be lower than final Student Teaching Evaluations All standard consistently improve from Field Experience to Student Teaching Standard 10 is the most improved score Standard 5: is the least improved Score

Elementary Field Experience and Student Teaching 2010-2011 2009-2010 2008-2009 TM1 TM2 ST TM 1: Knowledge of Subject 3.46 3.47 3.78 3.42 3.64 3.58 3.48 3.61 3.7 2: Learning and Human Development 3.5 3.53 3.51 3.63 3: Adapting Instruction 3.36 3.67 3.45 3.41 3.55 3.49 4: Instructional Strategies 3.37 3.52 3.74 3.38 3.57 3.65 3.62 5: Motivation and Learning Environment 3.54 3.69 6: Communication Skills 3.29 3.25 3.72 3.34 3.56 7: Planning 3.33 3.44 3.66 8: Assessment 3.71 9: Reflection and Professional Growth 3.4 10: Relationship with the School and Community 3.09 3.28 3.35 3.43 Number of Evaluations 65 85 184 93 81 200 64 67 201

Secondary Field Experience and Student Teaching 2010-2011 2009-2010 2008-2009 P250 P253 M ST 1: Knowledge of Subject 3.52 3.41 3.49 3.61 3.33 3.44 3.32 3.54 3.59 3.5 3.56 3.51 2: Learning and Human Development 3.45 3.34 3.38 3.26 3.28 3.2 3.42 3.43 3.25 3: Adapting Instruction 3.35 3.21 3.17 3.09 3.4 3.31 3.27 4: Instructional Strategies 3.57 3.18 3.53 3.46 5: Motivation and Learning Environment 3.3 3.24 3.48 6: Communication Skills 3.47 3.22 3.29 3.55 7: Planning 3.14 3.63 3.19 8: Assessment 9: Reflection and Professional Growth 3.36 3.72 3.37 10: Relationship with the School and Community 2.86 2.99 2.75 3.65 2.71 2.72 2.77 3.58 Number of Evaluations 75 47 58 142 71 65 70 170 35 43 36 174

Elementary vs. Secondary INTASC Scores Compared 2010-2011 2009-2010 2008-2009 Formula: Difference=Elementary - Secondary Elementary Field Experiences tend to be scored higher than Secondary Elementary Student Teaching always scores higher than Secondary

Percentage of Field Experiences in a classroom that included student(s) with disabilities Secondary Field Experience Programs consistently rank higher in this category Scores remained constant for last 2 years Averages for 2011: 79%; 2010: 77%; 2009: 81%

Percentage of Elementary Field Experiences in a classroom that included students of certain Social Diversity: Values Remain Relatively Constant

Percentage of Secondary Field Experiences in a classroom that included students of certain Social Diversity: Urban is trending down Suburban is trending up

Percentage of Secondary Field Experiences in a classroom that included students of certain Cultural Diversity:

Percentage of Elementary Field Experiences in a classroom that included students of certain Cultural Diversity:

Secondary vs. Elementary Cultural Diversity Formula: Difference = Secondary-Elementary Over Last 3 years, Secondary Field Experiences provided more Diverse Field Experiences than Elementary

END