BPaaS Evaluation Research Prototype

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Requirements. UC&R: Phase Compliance model –RIF must define a compliance model that will identify required/optional features Default.
Advertisements

From Ontology Design to Deployment Semantic Application Development with TopBraid Holger Knublauch
BI Web Intelligence 4.0. Business Challenges Incorrect decisions based on inadequate data Lack of Ad hoc reporting and analysis Delayed decisions.
Connecting Knowledge Silos using Federated Text Mining Guy Singh Senior Manager, Product & Strategic Alliances ©2014 Linguamatics Ltd.
WIMS 2014, June 2-4Thessaloniki, Greece1 Optimized Backward Chaining Reasoning System for a Semantic Web Hui Shi, Kurt Maly, and Steven Zeil Contact:
The Semantic Web. The Web Today Designed for Human to read Cannot express meaning Architecture: URL –Decentralized: Link structure Language: html.
Guoqian Jiang, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic
Of 17 course outline. of 17 marek reformat ecerf building, w ece 627, winter'13.
Reconciling Schemas of Disparate Data Sources: A Machine-Learning Approach AnHai Doan Pedro Domingos Alon Halevy.
Network Enabled Capability Through Innovative Systems Engineering Service Oriented Integration of Systems for Military Capability Duncan Russell, Nik Looker,
Cloud based linked data platform for Structural Engineering Experiment Xiaohui Zhang
Framework for Model Creation and Generation of Representations DDI Lifecycle Moving Forward.
LÊ QU Ố C HUY ID: QLU OUTLINE  What is data mining ?  Major issues in data mining 2.
© 2006 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice Publishing data on the Web (with.
Information Integration Intelligence with TopBraid Suite SemTech, San Jose, Holger Knublauch
1 Foundations V: Infrastructure and Architecture, Middleware Deborah McGuinness and Peter Fox CSCI Week 9, October 27, 2008.
Configurable User Interface Framework for Cross-Disciplinary and Citizen Science Presented by: Peter Fox Authors: Eric Rozell, Han Wang, Patrick West,
An Integrated Approach to Extracting Ontological Structures from Folksonomies Huairen Lin, Joseph Davis, Ying Zhou ESWC 2009 Hyewon Lim October 9 th, 2009.
Representing, Querying and Mining Knowledge about Autism Phenotypes
1 Carlos Rueda, Paul Alexander, John Graybeal Marine Metadata Interoperability Project (MMI) Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI) The MMI Registry.
Peer-to-Peer Data Integration Using Distributed Bridges Neal Arthorne B. Eng. Computer Systems (2002) Supervisor: Babak Esfandiari April 12, 2005 Candidate.
Templates. The Problem Supplier X A range on the data sheet.
Ontology Views An Update A BISTI Collaborative RO1 with the National Center for Biomedical Ontology James F. Brinkley, PI Structural Informatics Group.
1 Foundations V: Infrastructure and Architecture, Middleware Deborah McGuinness TA Weijing Chen Semantic eScience Week 10, November 7, 2011.
Value Set Resolution: Build generalizable data normalization pipeline using LexEVS infrastructure resources Explore UIMA framework for implementing semantic.
SEMANTIC WEB FOR A HOSPITAL
Semantic Web, Web Services and Museums: Mapping the Road to Implementation John Perkins “MESMUSES Workshop” Florence, June 16-17, 2003.
Developing “Geo” Ontology Layers for Web Query Faculty of Design & Technology Conference David George, Department of Computing.
Knowledge Representation of Statistic Domain For CBR Application Supervisor : Dr. Aslina Saad Dr. Mashitoh Hashim PM Dr. Nor Hasbiah Ubaidullah.
Oracle Database 11g Semantics Overview Xavier Lopez, Ph.D., Dir. Of Product Mgt., Spatial & Semantic Technologies Souripriya Das, Ph.D., Consultant Member.
Workpackage 2: Implementation Infrastructure. WP2: Objectives Main Objective of WP2: Integrated Optique Platform Main Objective of WP2: Integrated Optique.
ONECAT & ONESAC Cataloguing & Authority control KB Seminar Poul Henrik Jørgensen, ONE Association
Semantic Computing Research Group 1 UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY OntoViews – A Tool for.
Integration of Domain & Application Knowledge in MPEG-7/21 in the DS-MIRF Framework Laboratory of Distributed Multimedia Information Systems & Applications.
Semantic Enhancement: Key to Massive and Heterogeneous Data Pools Violeta Damjanovic, Thomas Kurz, Rupert Westenthaler, Wernher Behrendt, Andreas Gruber,
Trustworthy Semantic Webs Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham The University of Texas at Dallas Lecture #4 Vision for Semantic Web.
ESIP Semantic Web Products and Services ‘triples’ “tutorial” aka sausage making ESIP SW Cluster, Jan ed.
International Workshop Jan 21– 24, 2012 Jacksonville, Fl USA Model-based Systems Engineering (MBSE) Initiative Slides by Henson Graves Presented by Matthew.
Aim Ability to automate the detection of financial inconsistency and irregularity Problem Need to create a unified and logically rigorous terminology.
Semantic Web Final Exam Review. Topics for Final Exam First exam material (~30%) Design Patterns and Map/Reduce (~20%) Inference / Restrictions (~10%)
What is Enterprise Architecture March Enterprise Architecture Architecture –the fundamental organization of a system, embodied in its components,
1 Class exercise II: Use Case Implementation Deborah McGuinness and Peter Fox CSCI Week 8, October 20, 2008.
Conclusions Presenter: Manolis Koubarakis Extended Semantic Web Conference 2012.
Toward a framework for statistical data integration Ba-Lam Do, Peb Ruswono Aryan, Tuan-Dat Trinh, Peter Wetz, Elmar Kiesling, A Min Tjoa Linked Data Lab,
Parastoo Mohagheghi 1 A Multi-dimensional Framework for Characterizing Domain Specific Languages Øystein Haugen Parastoo Mohagheghi SINTEF, UiO 21 October.
Télé-université Synthesis From Research to Practice Montreal, November 7, 2007 EFPC/CSPS.
WonderWeb. Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web. IST Project Review Meeting, 11 th March, WP2: Tools Raphael Volz Universität.
SALUS Semantic Middleware SALUS Advisory Board Meeting - January 17, 2013.
Selected Semantic Web UMBC CoBrA – Context Broker Architecture  Using OWL to define ontologies for context modeling and reasoning  Taking.
Distributed Instance Retrieval over Heterogeneous Ontologies Andrei Tamilin (1,2) & Luciano Serafini (1) (1) ITC-IRST (2) DIT - University of Trento Trento,
Semantic metadata in the Catalogue Frédéric Houbie.
LUMEN WinGIS The manageable GIS plus worldwide Microsoft BING maps and Sentinel images incl. NDVI-growth-index-maps + services (download all sensors, storage,
MEKON & HOBO Java Frameworks for building Ontology-Driven Applications Current use cases:  Almost (!) products:  Knowledge-driven clinical documentation.
Dmitry Mouromtsev, Aleksei Romanov, Dmitry Volchek and Fedor Kozlov Laboratory ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russia “Metadata Extraction from.
Enabling the Vision of Bench-to-Bedside with Semantic Web Technologies
Harnessing the Semantic Web to Answer Scientific Questions:
ece 720 intelligent web: ontology and beyond
Daniel Amyot and Jun Biao Yan
Zachary Cleaver Semantic Web.
RDF Presentation and Correct Content Conveyance for Legacy
LOD reference architecture
CSE591: Data Mining by H. Liu
BPaaS Evaluation Environment Research Prototype
Smart Service Discovery & Composition Tool
Cross-layer monitoring and adaptation
BPaaS Allocation Environment Research Prototype
A Cross-Layer BPaaS Adaptation Framework
Engineering Design Process
Toward an Ontology-Driven Architectural Framework for B2B E. Kajan, L
RDF Presentation and Correct Content Conveyance for Legacy
Presentation transcript:

BPaaS Evaluation Research Prototype Evaluate BPaaS to Check BPaaS performance Find root-causes of problems (KPI violations) Discover best BPaaS deployments Identify adaptation rules for addressing KPI violations Draw additional knowledge via process mining Issues Disparate information in different formats from different services / components Current frameworks for KPI analysis & drill-down: Cover 1or 2 layers at most Adopt a non flexible & sometimes db-dependent approach for KPI evaluation Limited set of fixed KPI metrics considered Solution Adopt a semantic approach Suitable for information integration KPI Measurements linked to dependency information Dependency modelling via Evaluation ontology KPI modelling via OWL-Q KPI extension Information harvested from different components at different levels, semantically lifted and linked KPIs evaluated via SPARQL queries Flexible exploration of possible KPI metric space Transformation from OWL-Q KPI to SPARQL KPI drill-down based on KPI metric hierarchies More precise root-cause analysis KPI evaluation in bottom-up approach to form the KPI drill-down results