RNA Helicase A Mediates Association of CBP with RNA Polymerase II

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Advertisements

CREB Binding Protein Recruitment to the Transcription Complex Requires Growth Factor–Dependent Phosphorylation of Its GF Box  Kerstin Zanger, Sally Radovick,
A Novel Cofactor for p300 that Regulates the p53 Response
Large Hepatitis Delta Antigen Modulates Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling Cascades: Implication of Hepatitis Delta Virus–Induced Liver Fibrosis 
by Chong-Shan Shi, Joseph Tuscano, and John H. Kehrl
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Phosphorylation of NF-κB p65 by PKA Stimulates Transcriptional Activity by Promoting a Novel Bivalent Interaction with the Coactivator CBP/p300  Haihong.
Histone deacetylase 3 associates with and represses the transcription factor GATA-2 by Yukiyasu Ozawa, Masayuki Towatari, Shinobu Tsuzuki, Fumihiko Hayakawa,
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
E6 Oncoprotein Represses p53-Dependent Gene Activation via Inhibition of Protein Acetylation Independently of Inducing p53 Degradation  Mary C. Thomas,
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1997)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Tat Competes with CIITA for the Binding to P-TEFb and Blocks the Expression of MHC Class II Genes in HIV Infection  Satoshi Kanazawa, Takashi Okamoto,
NRF2 Is a Major Target of ARF in p53-Independent Tumor Suppression
ASK1 Is Essential for JNK/SAPK Activation by TRAF2
Yingqun Huang, Renata Gattoni, James Stévenin, Joan A. Steitz 
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 1996)
Yongli Bai, Chun Yang, Kathrin Hu, Chris Elly, Yun-Cai Liu 
Transcriptional Control of the Mouse Col7a1 Gene in Keratinocytes: Basal and Transforming Growth Factor-β Regulated Expression  Michael Naso, Jouni Uitto,
HDAC Activity Is Required for p65/RelA-Dependent Repression of PPARδ-Mediated Transactivation in Human Keratinocytes  Lene Aarenstrup, Esben Noerregaard.
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Ras Induces Mediator Complex Exchange on C/EBPβ
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
MyD88: An Adapter That Recruits IRAK to the IL-1 Receptor Complex
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Yuming Wang, Jennifer A. Fairley, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Current Biology 
Vanessa Brès, Tomonori Yoshida, Loni Pickle, Katherine A. Jones 
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 98, Issue 6, Pages (September 1999)
Volume 92, Issue 4, Pages (February 1998)
Volume 136, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Ligand-Independent Recruitment of SRC-1 to Estrogen Receptor β through Phosphorylation of Activation Function AF-1  André Tremblay, Gilles B Tremblay,
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Effect of AP1 Transcription Factors on the Regulation of Transcription in Normal Human Epidermal Keratinocytes  Antonello Rossi, Shyh-Ing Jang, Roberta.
The Mammalian RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Interacts with RNA to Suppress Transcription-Coupled 3′ End Formation  Syuzo Kaneko, James L. Manley 
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (January 1998)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Andrei Kuzmichev, Thomas Jenuwein, Paul Tempst, Danny Reinberg 
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
SUMO-1 Modification Represses Sp3 Transcriptional Activation and Modulates Its Subnuclear Localization  Sarah Ross, Jennifer L Best, Leonard I Zon, Grace.
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages (November 1996)
The PHD Finger/Bromodomain of NoRC Interacts with Acetylated Histone H4K16 and Is Sufficient for rDNA Silencing  Yonggang Zhou, Ingrid Grummt  Current.
In Vitro Analysis of Huntingtin-Mediated Transcriptional Repression Reveals Multiple Transcription Factor Targets  Weiguo Zhai, Hyunkyung Jeong, Libin.
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
VP16 and Ubiquitin Current Biology
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
A Smad Transcriptional Corepressor
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Stéphane Karlen, Lasse R. Braathen 
The LIN-2/LIN-7/LIN-10 Complex Mediates Basolateral Membrane Localization of the C. elegans EGF Receptor LET-23 in Vulval Epithelial Cells  Susan M Kaech,
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

RNA Helicase A Mediates Association of CBP with RNA Polymerase II Toshihiro Nakajima, Chiharu Uchida, Stephen F. Anderson, Chee-Gun Lee, Jerard Hurwitz, Jeffrey D. Parvin, Marc Montminy  Cell  Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages 1107-1112 (September 1997) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80376-1

Figure 1 RHA Binds to CBP In Vitro (Top) GST pull-down assay of 35S-labeled CBP C/H3 peptide (aa 1805–1890) using GST (GST) or GST-RHA resins. Amino acid endpoints for each RHA construct are indicated over each lane. INPUT, 20% of input CBP fragment shown. Above, schematic showing relative position of individual domains of RHA, including N-terminal basic region, central core helicase domain with DEAH consensus, and C-terminal RGG motif. Amino acid number shown below schematic. (Bottom) GST pull-down assay of full-length (aa 1–1279) 35S-labeled RHA using GST-CBP polypeptide resins. Amino acid endpoints for each GST-CBP construct shown over the corresponding lane. GST, control assay with GST resin alone. INPUT, 50% of total 35S-labeled RHA added to each resin. Arrow points to full-length RHA protein. Above, schematic of CBP with individual domains indicated: NR, nuclear receptor binding region (aa 1–120); CREB, CREB binding domain (aa 591–680); HAT, histone acetyl transferase (HAT) catalytic domain; pol II, RNA polymerase II binding region (aa 1805–1890). Cell 1997 90, 1107-1112DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80376-1)

Figure 2 RHA Binds to RNA Polymerase II In Vitro Western blot (right) assay of RNA polymerase II using anti-CTD antiserum against the 200 kDa subunit of pol II. Figure shows pol II recovered from GST-RHA resins following coincubation with purified calf thymus–core RNA polymerase II. Amino acid endpoints for RHA fragments used in individual reactions indicated over each lane. Cell 1997 90, 1107-1112DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80376-1)

Figure 3 RHA Mediates Association of CBP with RNA Polymerase II (Top) Western blot assay of RNA polymerase II recovered from GST-CBP1805–1890 resin following interaction assay with full-length baculovirus expressed RHA (RHA), purified calf thymus–RNA polymerase II (Pol II ), and N-terminal CBP-binding domain of RHA (N-RHA) as indicated. Western blot assay was performed with anti-CTD antiserum. Input levels of RNA polymerase II from calf thymus RNA polymerase II fraction shown. Purified RHA contained no detectable RNA polymerase II protein by Western blot assay. (Bottom) In vitro transcription assay of GST-CBP1805–1890 beads following interaction assays with RHA and RNA polymerase II. Transcription assays were performed using all purified general transcription factors except RNA polymerase II, which was supplied by the GST resin. Activity derived from MLP template shown. Cell 1997 90, 1107-1112DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80376-1)

Figure 4 RHA Associates with CBP and RNA Polymerase II In Vivo Western blot analysis of CBP (top) RHA (middle), or RNA polymerase II (bottom) recovered from immunoprecipitates of 293T whole cell extracts using preimmune (PI), anti-CBP (αCBP), anti-CTD (αCTD), or anti-RHA antisera (αRHA). In each case, 20% of input extract (INPUT) shown. Cell 1997 90, 1107-1112DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80376-1)

Figure 5 RHA Promotes Activation of cAMP Responsive Genes via phospho(Ser-133) CREB and CBP Transient assays of 293T cells using CRE-CAT reporter (left), GAL4-CREB plus G5B CAT reporter containing 5 GAL4 recognition sites (center), or Ser/Ala 133 phosphorylation-defective mutant GAL4-CREBM1 plus G5B CAT reporter (right). Activity shown as percent 14C-chloramphenicol converted to acetylated forms after normalizing for transfection efficiency via cotransfected RSV-βGAL plasmid. Reporter activity was induced by cotransfection of wild-type (PK-A) or catalytically inactive (CON) PK-A expression vector, which contains a Lys/Met72 substitution in the ATP-binding site. Cells cotransfected with various expression vectors indicated below each set of bars. CMV, control CMV expression plasmid minus insert. Wild-type CBP and RHA constructs indicated. mtRHA, mutant RHA expression vector containing K/R 417 substitution in the ATP-binding domain that abolishes RHA helicase activity in vitro; N-RHA, expression vector containing N-terminal CBP-binding domain of RHA (1–250). Equivalent expression of RHA, N-RHA, mtRHA, CBP, and GAL4 CREB constructs under all conditions was confirmed by Western blotting (not shown). Cell 1997 90, 1107-1112DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80376-1)