Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Costimulatory Molecule CD27 Maintains Clonally Diverse CD8+ T Cell Responses of Low Antigen Affinity to Protect against Viral Variants Klaas P.J.M.
Advertisements

Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Sustained Interactions between T Cell Receptors and Antigens Promote the Differentiation of CD4+ Memory T Cells  Chulwoo Kim, Theodore Wilson, Kael F.
Local Inflammatory Cues Regulate Differentiation and Persistence of CD8+ Tissue- Resident Memory T Cells  Tessa Bergsbaken, Michael J. Bevan, Pamela J.
Initial T Cell Receptor Transgenic Cell Precursor Frequency Dictates Critical Aspects of the CD8+ T Cell Response to Infection  Vladimir P. Badovinac,
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Hans-Peter Raué, Carol Beadling, Jennifer Haun, Mark K. Slifka 
Pascal Chappert, Nicolas Bouladoux, Shruti Naik, Ronald H. Schwartz 
miR-150-Mediated Foxo1 Regulation Programs CD8+ T Cell Differentiation
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Lung Airway-Surveilling CXCR3hi Memory CD8+ T Cells Are Critical for Protection against Influenza A Virus  Bram Slütter, Lecia L. Pewe, Susan M. Kaech,
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Protective Capacity of Memory CD8+ T Cells Is Dictated by Antigen Exposure History and Nature of the Infection  Jeffrey C. Nolz, John T. Harty  Immunity 
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)
Amotosalen-treated donor T cells have polyclonal antigen-specific long-term function without graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation 
Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Dynamics of Blood-Borne CD8 Memory T Cell Migration In Vivo
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Immunopathology in RSV Infection Is Mediated by a Discrete Oligoclonal Subset of Antigen-Specific CD4+ T Cells  Steven M Varga, Xiaoting Wang, Raymond.
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Blimp-1 Transcription Factor Is Required for the Differentiation of Effector CD8+ T Cells and Memory Responses  Axel Kallies, Annie Xin, Gabrielle T.
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
An Interleukin-21- Interleukin-10-STAT3 Pathway Is Critical for Functional Maturation of Memory CD8+ T Cells  Weiguo Cui, Ying Liu, Jason S. Weinstein,
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Opposing Effects of TGF-β and IL-15 Cytokines Control the Number of Short-Lived Effector CD8+ T Cells  Shomyseh Sanjabi, Munir M. Mosaheb, Richard A.
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
T Cells with Low Avidity for a Tissue-Restricted Antigen Routinely Evade Central and Peripheral Tolerance and Cause Autoimmunity  Dietmar Zehn, Michael.
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
E3 Ubiquitin Ligase VHL Regulates Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α to Maintain Regulatory T Cell Stability and Suppressive Capacity  Jee H. Lee, Chris Elly,
Cell-Intrinsic IL-27 and gp130 Cytokine Receptor Signaling Regulates Virus-Specific CD4+ T Cell Responses and Viral Control during Chronic Infection 
Matthew A. Williams, Eugene V. Ravkov, Michael J. Bevan  Immunity 
CD44 Regulates Survival and Memory Development in Th1 Cells
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Courtney R. Plumlee, Brian S. Sheridan, Basak B. Cicek, Leo Lefrançois 
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 97-108 (July 2011) The Costimulatory Molecule CD27 Maintains Clonally Diverse CD8+ T Cell Responses of Low Antigen Affinity to Protect against Viral Variants  Klaas P.J.M. van Gisbergen, Paul L. Klarenbeek, Natasja A.M. Kragten, Peter-Paul A. Unger, Marieke B.B. Nieuwenhuis, Felix M. Wensveen, Anja ten Brinke, Paul P. Tak, Eric Eldering, Martijn A. Nolte, Rene A.W. van Lier  Immunity  Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 97-108 (July 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.04.020 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Immunity 2011 35, 97-108DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2011.04.020) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Antigen Density and Avidity Determine the Outcome of CD27-Driven Costimulation (A and B) WT and Cd27−/− OTI cells were stimulated with peptide for 3 days in the presence of irradiated splenocytes of (A) Cd27−/− mice (control APCs) or (B) Cd27−/− × CD70 Tg mice (CD70 Tg APCs). Proliferation and survival was quantified by determining the percentage of CFSElo and PIlo cells of total OTI cells after stimulation with the peptides SIINFEKL (top panels), SAINFEKL (center panels), and SIIQFEKL (bottom panels). (C) IL-2 production was measured using ELISA in supernatants of WT and Cd27−/− OTI cells that had been stimulated for 3 days with 10 pg/ml of the indicated peptides in the presence of control APCs or CD70 Tg APCs. Representative data is shown of three separate experiments. Error bars denote standard error of the mean (SEM). See also Figure S1. Immunity 2011 35, 97-108DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2011.04.020) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 CD27 Lowers the Affinity of the Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cell Population (A and B) WT and Cd27−/− mice were infected with (A) A/PR8/34 or (B) HK2/68 and after 10 days influenza-specific CD8+ T cells were enumerated in mLN, spleen and lungs with (A) A/PR8/34 or (B) HK2/68 specific tetramers. (C–H) WT and Cd27−/− mice were infected with A/PR8/34 and sacrificed 10 days later for analysis. (C) Representative dot plots display CD8+ T cells of WT and Cd27−/− spleen that are labeled for CD8 and tetramer. Insets denote the mean ± SEM of the geo MFI of the tetramer+ CD8+ T cells of WT (left) and Cd27−/− mice (right). The difference in geo MFI is significant between WT and Cd27−/− mice (p < 0.005). Arbitrary gates indicate low and high tetramer binding CD8+ T cells. (D) Quantification of the geo MFI of tetramer binding of tetramer+ CD8+ T cells of mLN, spleen and lungs of WT and Cd27−/− mice. (E) Geo MFI of CD3 and TCR-β expression of influenza-specific CD8+ T cells of WT and Cd27−/− spleen. (F) Splenocytes of WT and Cd27−/− mice were labeled with tetramers in the presence of increasing concentrations of blocking tetramer antibodies. The block in tetramer binding, compared to tetramer binding in the absence of blocking antibodies, is displayed. (G) Splenocytes of WT and Cd27−/− mice were briefly cultured with or without peptide and the absolute number of CD8+ T cells that produced IFN-γ was determined. (H) The relative percentage of IFN-γ producing CD8+ T cells in spleen of WT and Cd27−/− mice is shown upon restimulation of increasing concentrations of peptide. The percentage of IFN-γ producing CD8+ T cells in the presence of 10 ng/ml peptide was set at 100%. Error bars denote standard error of the mean (SEM). See also Figure S2. Immunity 2011 35, 97-108DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2011.04.020) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 CD27 Restricts Effector Differentiation of Low- but Not High-Affinity CD8+ T Cells (A–C) The phenotype of influenza-specific CD8+ T cells was analyzed in the mLN and spleen of A/PR8/34-infected mice using CD127 and CD62L. (A) Representative dot plots display tetramer+ CD8+ T cells labeled for CD62L and CD127 in the mLN of 5 day-, 8 day-, and 10 day-infected WT (top) and Cd27−/− mice (bottom). Insets denote the percentage of influenza-specific CD8+ T cells within the respective quadrants. (B) The absolute number of EM-type MPEC CD8+ T cells was quantified at day 5, 8, and 10 in the mLN (left panel) and spleen (right panel). (C) Influenza-specific CD8+ T cell effector subsets in spleen of WT and Cd27−/− mice were quantified at day 10. (D) The geo MFI of tetramer binding was determined in the indicated influenza-specific CD8+ T cell effector subsets of spleen of WT and Cd27−/− mice. (E) The absolute numbers of total, CM-type MPEC, EM-type MPEC and SLEC phenotype CD8+ T cells with high and low tetramer binding were determined within the spleen of WT and Cd27−/− mice. See also Figure S3. Immunity 2011 35, 97-108DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2011.04.020) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 CD27 Regulates CD8+ T Cells in a Cell-Intrinsic Manner (A–C) Mixed BM chimeras that contained WT and Cd27−/− donor BM were infected with A/PR8/34 and sacrificed 10 days later. (A) Total numbers and numbers of the indicated subsets of tetramer+ CD8+ T cells of WT and Cd27−/− donors were determined in spleen. (B) Representative dotplot displays tetramer binding of splenic Ly5.1+ WT and Ly5.1− Cd27−/− donor CD8+ T cells. (C) The mean of tetramer binding to influenza-specific CD8+ T cells of WT and Cd27−/− donor origin was determined in spleen. (D–F) Splenocytes of WT, Cd27−/−, and mixed BM chimeric mice that had been infected with A/PR8/34 10 days previously were re-stimulated with peptide. (D) Representative dotplots display intracellular staining of CD8+ T cells of WT (left) and Cd27−/− mice (right) for IFN-γ and IL-2. Insets denote the percentage of CD8+ T cells within the respective quadrants. (E and F) The percentage of IL-2 coproducing CD8+ T cells within the IFN-γ-producing population was determined in (E) WT and Cd27−/− mice and (F) BM chimeric mice containing WT and CD27 donor BM. Error bars denote standard error of the mean (SEM). See also Figure S4. Immunity 2011 35, 97-108DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2011.04.020) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 CD27 Ensures the Presence of Low-Affinity Clones in the Memory CD8+ T Cell Pool WT and Cd27−/− mice were infected with A/PR8/34 and 28 days later influenza-specific CD8+ T cells were analyzed. (A) Absolute numbers of influenza-specific CD8+ T cells were determined in the mLN, the spleen, and lungs of WT and Cd27−/− mice. (B) Representative dot plots are shown that display tetramer binding of CD8+ T cells of spleen of WT and Cd27−/− mice. Insets denote geo MFI +/- SEM of tetramer binding to influenza-specific CD8+ T cells. The difference in geo MFI is significant between WT and Cd27−/− mice (p < 0.005). Arbitrary gates indicate low and high tetramer binding CD8+ T cells. (C) The geo MFI of tetramer binding was determined in influenza-specific CD8+ T cells of the mLN, the spleen, and lungs of WT and Cd27−/− mice. (D) Similarly, the geo MFI of tetramer binding was determined in the indicated memory subsets of influenza-specific CD8+ T cells of WT and Cd27−/− spleen. (E) The absolute numbers of CM and EM CD8+ T cells with high and low tetramer binding were determined within the spleen of WT and Cd27−/− mice. Error bars denote standard error of the mean (SEM). See also Figure S5. Immunity 2011 35, 97-108DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2011.04.020) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 CD27 Favors Subdominant Clones within the Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cell Pool WT and Cd27−/− mice were infected with A/PR8/34. (A) The amount of tetramer binding was determined in Vβ8.3− and Vβ8.3+ influenza-specific CD8+ T cells of WT spleen at day 10 after infection. (B) Representative dot plots display tetramer and Vβ8.3 expression of influenza-specific CD8+ T cells in spleen of WT and Cd27−/− mice. Insets represent percentage of cells within quadrant. (C) The usage of Vβ8.3 was followed over time in the influenza-specific CD8+ T cell population of WT and Cd27−/− spleen. (D) The usage of Vβ8.3 was determined in mLN and lungs of WT and Cd27−/− mice at day 10 after infection. (E and F) Influenza-specific CD8+ T cells were isolated 28 days after infection and analyzed with deep sequencing for TCR repertoire within the Vβ8.3 segment. (E) The total number of different clones within this CD8+ T cell population was determined for WT and Cd27−/− mice. (F) The relative frequency of influenza-specific CD8+ T cell clones with a frequency of higher than 1% of the total pool was analyzed within individual WT and Cd27−/− mice. Error bars denote standard error of the mean (SEM). See also Figure S6 and Table S1. Immunity 2011 35, 97-108DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2011.04.020) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 CD8+ T Cell Responses upon Rechallenge with Heterologous but Not Homologous Virus Require CD27 (A) WT and Cd27−/− mice were sequentially infected with the heterologous viruses HK2/68 and 41 days later A/PR8/34. The absolute numbers of influenza-specific CD8+ T cells were determined in mLN, spleen and lungs of WT and Cd27−/− mice 8 days after re-challenge using A/PR8/34 specific tetramers. (B) WT and Cd27−/− mice were infected with HKx31 and after 41 days the mice were rechallenged with the homologous virus A/PR8/34. The influenza-specific CD8+ T cell population was quantified in the mLN, the spleen, and lungs of WT and Cd27−/− mice 8 days after rechallenge with A/PR8/34 specific tetramers. (C) Mice were infected as described under (A). Representative dotplots are shown of CD8+ T cells of WT (left) and Cd27−/− spleen (right) displaying costaining for A/PR8/34 and HK2/68 specific tetramers. Insets represent the mean ± SEM of the percentages of cells within the respective quadrants. The percentage of cells in upper right quadrant is significantly different between WT and Cd27−/− mice (p < 0.05). (D and E) The frequency of CD8+ T cells recognizing HK2/68 specific tetramers (D) and those cross-reactive with A/PR8/34 specific tetramers (E) was followed in time upon HK2/68 infection (at day 0) and A/PR8/34 reinfection (at day 41) in the blood of WT and Cd27−/− mice. Arrowheads indicate time of influenza infection. (F) Mice were infected with HK2/68 and analyzed 10 days later. Representative dot plots are shown of CD8+ T cells of WT (left) and Cd27−/− blood (right) displaying costaining for tetramers specific for HK2/68 and A/PR8/34. Insets represent the mean ± SEM of the percentages of cells within the respective quadrants. The percentage of cells in upper-right quadrant is significantly different between WT and Cd27−/− mice (p < 0.05). Error bars denote standard error of the mean (SEM). See also Figure S7. Immunity 2011 35, 97-108DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2011.04.020) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions